Download Restriction Endonuclease Analysis of Bovine Herpesvirus 1 DNA

Survey
yes no Was this document useful for you?
   Thank you for your participation!

* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project

Document related concepts

Ebola virus disease wikipedia , lookup

Taura syndrome wikipedia , lookup

Influenza A virus wikipedia , lookup

Marburg virus disease wikipedia , lookup

West Nile fever wikipedia , lookup

Canine distemper wikipedia , lookup

Lymphocytic choriomeningitis wikipedia , lookup

Canine parvovirus wikipedia , lookup

Henipavirus wikipedia , lookup

Transcript
J. gen. Virol. (1985), 66, 2787-2792.
Printed in Great Britain
2787
Key words: BHV-l[field isolates/laboratory isolates/restriction enzyme analysis
Restriction Endonuclease Analysis of Bovine Herpesvirus 1 DNA and
Nucleic Acid Homology between Isolates
By B R U C E S. S E A L , 1 S T E P H E N C. ST. J E O R 1. AND
R O B E R T E. L E E T A Y L O R 2
1Departments of Microbiology and Biochemistry, University of Nevada School of Medicine, Reno,
Nevada 89557 and 2Agriculture Experiment Station, University of Nevada School of Veterinary
Medicine, Reno, Nevada 89502, U.S.A.
(Accepted 20 August 1985)
SUMMARY
Isolates of bovine herpesvirus 1 (BHV-1) are associated with a variety of clinical
manifestations. To determine if a single form of BHV-I was responsible for the
different virus-associated diseases or whether subpopulations of various isolates
produced different clinical symptoms, studies were initiated to examine the D N A
restriction enzyme patterns and nucleic acid homology between virus isolates from
respiratory infections and other clinical syndromes. Differences between the genomes
of several virus isolates were detected using D N A restriction enzyme analyses.
However, nucleic acid hybridization studies of the virus DNAs using filter and liquid
hybridization indicated at least a 9 5 ~ genetic homology between the virus isolates
from different types of infections. Additionally, these studies demonstrated that the
D N A of BHV-1 had an average molecular weight of 84 x 106.
Bovine herpesvirus 1 (BHV-1) has been associated with a variety of clinical syndromes. These
are primarily respiratory, but may also inclfide genital infections, encephalitis, ocular carcinoma
and abortion. The virus associated with respiratory diseases has been referred to as infectious
bovine rhinotracheitis (IBR) virus, whereas the virus isolate associated with genital infections
has been termed infectious pustular vulvovaginitis (IPV) virus (Kahrs, 1977; Pastoret et al.,
1982). Misra et al. (1983) reported that isolates of BHV-I could be divided into three distinct
groups based upon the virus D N A restriction enzyme patterns. As in the situation of herpes
simplex virus types 1 and 2 in humans, the possibility exists that respiratory and genital
infections may be caused by partially related viruses that appear serologically similar, but by
analysis of the virus D N A represent different virus types. Consequently, the investigations
reported here were initiated to determine the amount of genetic homology between a respiratory
isolate of BHV-1 and other clinical isolates using restriction enzyme analysis and nucleic acid
hybridization of virus DNA.
Since reports indicated that D N A from BHV-1 isolates associated with respiratory infections
(IBR virus) had different restriction patterns from the D N A isolated from viruses associated
with genital infections (IPV virus) (Engels et al., 1981), we initially differentiated virus isolates
using restriction enzyme analysis and nucleic acid hybridization. The BHV-1 isolates used in
these studies were IBR virus Los Angeles (LA), a respiratory disease isolate, obtained from the
American Type Culture Collection and an IPV virus isolate obtained from the Department of
Microbiology, School of Veterinary Medicine, University of California, Davis. A variety of
isolates from various clinical disease states were also obtained from the School of Veterinary
Medicine at Washington State University, Pullman, Washington and from the Agriculture
Experiment Station at the University of Nevada. Bovine embryonic lung cells were used for all
experiments and cultured in Dulbecco's MEM with 5 ~ foetal calf serum. Virus D N A for use in
restriction enzyme analysis was isolated and purified essentially as described by Huang et al.
0000-6706 © 1985 SGM
Downloaded from www.microbiologyresearch.org by
IP: 88.99.165.207
On: Thu, 04 May 2017 09:34:03
t~
Qo
Q~
Downloaded from www.microbiologyresearch.org by
IP: 88.99.165.207
On: Thu, 04 May 2017 09:34:03
Short communication
2789
(1973). For hybridization analyses virus D N A was isolated from caesium chloride density
gradient fractions corresponding to a density of 1-730 g/ml (Graham et al., 1972).
Various isolates of BHV-1 representing a variety of clinical syndromes were compared by
restriction enzyme analysis and Southern blot hybridization as illustrated in Fig. 1 (a, b). Even
though there were differences in virus D N A restriction enzyme patterns there appeared to be no
correlation between the type of pattern obtained and the corresponding clinical manifestation.
The D N A restriction enzyme patterns depicted in Fig. 1 lanes 3, 9, 10, 11 and 13 are from
'respiratory' isolates and conform to patterns obtained from vaginal isolates (lanes 2, 4, 5 and 6),
an isolate from an aborted foetus (lane 8) or from bovine ocular carcinoma (lane 7). It is of
interest to note that the IPV virus isolate illustrated (lane 2) has a pattern exactly like that of a
respiratory isolate (lane 13). Additionally, genital isolates (lanes 5 and 6) may have identical
patterns to IBR virus LA isolate (lane 3). Another difference is that of a restriction enzyme
pattern obtained from the D N A of an encephalitis isolate of BHV-1 (Fig. 1, lane 12). Although
very faint in the illustration of the gel it demonstrated a pattern conforming to that of the
'Cooper' isolate of BHV-1 (Mayfield et al., 1983).
To initially determine the nucleic acid homology between isolates, the BHV-1 D N A
fragments in Fig. 1 (a) were transferred to nitrocellulose paper (Southern, 1975) and hybridized
(Maniatis et al., 1982) with a nick-translated (Rigby et al., 1977) IBR virus LA isolate 32p_
labelled D N A probe (Fig. 1 b). In every case the probe D N A hybridized to all the fragments
present for each BHV-1 isolate while not hybridizing to the lambda phage D N A used as a
control. This demonstrates the extensive homology between D N A sequences present in all the
BHV-1 isolates examined. When the IPV virus isolate D N A (lane 2) was used as a probe of an
identical gel blotted and hybridized, duplicate results were obtained (data not shown).
It was apparent from the initial restriction enzyme analysis and hybridization data (Fig. 1 a, b)
that a high percentage of homology existed between isolates of BHV-1 regardless of the clinical
manifestation. Therefore, more extensive studies were conducted using the LA isolate (Fig. 1,
lane 3) and an IPV isolate (Fig. 1, lane 2), two isolates from different clinical syndromes which
show the greatest variation in restriction enzyme pattern. One ~tg of D N A isolated from the I B R
LA and IPV virus was digested with 5 units of the restriction enzymes HindlII, E c o R I or B a m H I
(Bethesda Research Laboratories), end-labelled with [~-32p]dATP, using the Klenow fragment
of D N A polymerase I in the presence of unlabelled dGTP, d C T P and d T T P (Maniatis et al.,
1982) and electrophoresed (Fig. 2). Molecular weights of the resultant fragments were
determined by comparison with phage lambda D N A standards (Bearden, 1979). Molar amounts
of the virus D N A restriction fragments were calculated from D N A obtained from an in vitro
infection using 32p-labelled H3PO 4 to label the virus D N A uniformly. Following electrophoresis
and extraction of the virus D N A fragments from agarose gel slices, molarities were determined
as described by Wharton et al. (1981) and the data are presented in Table 1. The sum of the
molecular weights of individual restriction fragments indicated average molecular weights for
IBR virus and IPV virus D N A to be 84 × 106. Genome molecular weights for both BHV-1
isolates obtained by summation of the molecular weights of virus D N A fragments were lower
than that reported by Engels et al. (1981), but concurred with that of Mayfield et al. (1983) and
Misra et al. (1983).
Although the results of blot hybridizations indicated homology between all D N A fragments
Fig. 1. Comparison of HindIII restriction enzyme cleavage patterns and Southern blot hybridization of
clinical isolates of BHV-I. Following digestion with HindIII 10 ~tl of tracking dye (50~ Ficoll, 0.75~
bromophenol blue, 0.1 ~ EDTA) was added to the reaction mixture and electrophoresed in a horizontal
0-7~ agarose slab gel for 14 h at 75 mA in Tris-acetate buffer (40 mM-Tris, 20 mM-sodiumacetate, 18
mM-NaCI, 2 mM-EDTA, pH 8.4). The gel was stained with ethidium bromide and photographed with
Polaroid type 667 film during u.v. transillumination (a). The DNA fragments were transferred to
nitrocellulose and hybridized with a nick-translated 32pqabelled IBR LA virus DNA probe (b). Lane 1,
lambda phage DNA restricted with HindllI; lane 2, IPV; lane 3, IBR LA isolate; lane 4, vaginal isolate
following vaccination; lanes 5 and 6, vaginal isolates from genital infections; lane 7, isolate from bovine
ocular carcinoma; lane 8, isolate from an aborted foetus; lane 9, Colorado isolate obtained from
U.S.D.A., National Veterinary Service, Ames, Iowa; lanes 10 and 11, respiratory disease isolates; lane
12, isolate from an encephalitis infection; lane 13, respiratory disease isolate.
Downloaded from www.microbiologyresearch.org by
IP: 88.99.165.207
On: Thu, 04 May 2017 09:34:03
Short communication
2790
1
3
2
5
4
6
:~!!i~!~i!i:L• • ~i~<• ,
~ilL:i:ii!il/
~
A
D
~F
GH-
• •
,i ~7 ;i "
Fig. 2. Comparative restriction endonuclease cleavage patterns of IBR virus a n d IPV virus D N A . IBR
virus D N A (lanes 1, 3 and 5) and IPV virus D N A (lanes, 2, 4 and 6) were digested with HindllI (lanes 1
and 2), EcoRl (lanes 3 and 4) and BamHI (lanes 5 and 6). Following digestion, fragments were endlabelled and then electrophoresed as described in Fig. 1. The gel was dried on to W h a t m a n 3MM filter
paper with a Bio-Rad slab gel dryer and exposed to Kodak XAR-5 autoradiography film. L a m b d a
phage D N A digested with H/ndlll and EcoRI was co-electrophoresed with restricted BHV-1 virus
D N A and used as a reference to determine fragment sizes by regression analysis (Bearden, 1979).
Table
l. Sizes* oJ" bovine herpesvirus
1 virus isolate DNA fragments produced by restriction
endonuclease cleavage
HindI II
EcoR I
A
.k
IBR
A
B
C
D
E,F
G,H
I
J
K
L
M
14.3
12.9
11.37
10.4?
8.6++
8.0:~
6,1
5.8
5-5
2.8
1.8
IPV
A
B
C
D
E,F
G,H
I
J
K
L
M
N
O
P
14-3
12,9
11.37
10.4?
8.65
8.0:~
6.8
6.1
5.5
4.6
2.8
1.7
1.1
1.0
IBR
A
B
C
D
E
F
G
H
28.4
15.0
12.4
10-9
8.9
5.8
2.1
1.2
BamHI
~,
IPV
A
B
C
D
E
F
G
28-4
15.0
12.4
11.8
8.9
5.8
1.0
IBR
A
B
C
D
E
F,G
H
18-8
14-3
12,4
11.8
10.9
8-35
1.0
IPV
A
B
C
D
E
F
G,H
I
18,8
14-3
12.4
10.9
8.3
8.2
3.7§
1.0
* Molecular weights ( x 10 -6) were determined by regression analysis of fragments electrophoresed with
bacteriophage | a m b d a D N A fragments.
? 0.5 M a m o u n t approximately. All other values are approximately 1-0 M. The molar abundance of each fragment
was determined by the formula M = (Fragment c.p.m./total c.p.m.)/(Fragment tool. wt./mol, wt. of intact
molecule).
++Present in 1.5 M amount.
§ Present in 2.0 M amount.
Downloaded from www.microbiologyresearch.org by
IP: 88.99.165.207
On: Thu, 04 May 2017 09:34:03
2791
Short communication
0
0.5
1
2
o
,~
0.2
5
Reaction time (h)
8 16
0.5 1
2
5
8 16
a)
0.4
t~
= 0.6
G
-~.
go.8
1.0
0.01
I
0.1
0.01
0.1
Cot (mol. s/l)
Fig. 3. Comparison of IBR and IPV virus DNA by DNA DNA reassociation. (a) Hybridization of32Plabelled IBR virus DNA in the presence of unlabelled DNA from IBR virus (O), IPV virus (O) and
lambda phage ( . ) . (b) Hybridization of 32p-labelled IPV virus DNA in the presence of unlabelled
DNA from IPV virus (O), IBR virus ((3) and tambda phage ( I ) . Followingnick translation (Rigby et
al., 1977)and heat denaturation, single-stranded probe DNA was collected by hydroxylapatite column
chromatography (Martinson, 1973). The labelled probe, 4 ~tg unlabelled virus DNA and 20 btg salmon
sperm DNA were sonically disrupted to approximately 5S in size (Cedar, 1976), heat-denatured at
100 °C for 15 min and then brought to 1 ml in 1 x PIPES buffer (0.72 M-NaCI, 0.01 M-PIPES, 0.001 MEDTA, pH 7.0). The DNA was allowed to reassociate at 61 °C (Tm - 25 °C) and followinginitiationof
the reaction, samples were taken at 0.5, 1, 2, 5, 8, 16 and 24 h. The fraction of reassociated 32P-labelled
DNA was analysed by $1 enzyme differential digestion (Vogt, 1973). Cot (tool. s/1 deoxynucleotide)was
calculated on the basis of the total amount of virus DNA present in each assay. Background values were
subtracted and the data normalized followingfive separate hybridizations with three samples taken per
time point.
of the isolates examined, partial homology between a specific fragment and the probe D N A
could produce a similar pattern by autoradiography, as would complete hybridization to the
same fragment. To quantify differences in genetic composition between the isolates of BHV-1,
which exhibited the greatest variation in restriction pattern, liquid hybridization between the
D N A of the IBR LA and IPV virus isolates was conducted and the results plotted as the percent
D N A reassociated versus Cot and incubation time (Britten & Kohne, 1968). In both sets of
hybridizations, the 32p-labelled virus probes did not reassociate significantly in the presence of
lambda phage D N A used as a control. As illustrated in Fig. 3 (a) there were no differences in the
rates of reassociation of 32p_labelled IBR LA virus D N A with unlabelled IBR LA virus D N A or
with unlabelled IPV virus D N A . Conversely, 32p-labelled IPV virus D N A reannealed at the
same rate with unlabelled IPV virus D N A as it did with unlabelled IBR LA virus D N A (Fig.
3b). The C0tl/2 value of 4 x 10-2 was the same in both sets of reactions. Consequently, there is
very little detectable quantitative difference in sequence homology between these isolates of
BHV-1.
The results of the liquid hybridization studies indicate a high degree of homology between the
D N A of IBR and IPV virus isolates examined. Although a 5 ~ mismatch during D N A
hybridizations may occur (Sugino & Kingsbury, 1976), the conditions used for both the Southern
blot hybridizations and the liquid hybridizations were relatively stringent. Southern blots were
hybridized at 15 °C below the Tm of BHV-1 D N A in 5 0 ~ formamide followed by extensive
washing at 60 °C in 0-1 x SSC, while the liquid hybridizations were conducted at 25 °C below
the T~ of BHV-1 D N A in 0.72 M-NaCl.
The results presented indicate that, although the D N A from the IBR LA virus isolate, IPV
and other BHV-1 virus isolates may vary in their restriction pattern, the D N A sequences of
these isolates are at least 95 ~ homologous. Differences in restriction enzyme patterns are
probably due to specific point mutations resulting in the loss or gain of certain restriction
endonuclease sites. Considering the high degree of D N A homology between various isolates, the
reason for differences in clinical syndromes is still not well understood. In agreement with Misra
et al. (1983), it may be that routes of infection and/or other environmental factors determine
whether a particular isolate causes a typical respiratory tract infection or some other type of
disease such as an encephalitis or genital infection. Also, the relationship between
Downloaded from www.microbiologyresearch.org by
IP: 88.99.165.207
On: Thu, 04 May 2017 09:34:03
2792
Short communication
BHV-1 isolates d o e s n o t a p p e a r a n a l o g o u s to t h a t o f h u m a n h e r p e s s i m p l e x virus t y p e s 1 a n d 2
w h e r e t h e r e is a 5 0 ~ nucleic acid h o m o l o g y d i f f e r e n c e ( K i e f f et al., 1972; L u d w i g et al.,
1972).
The authors thank James Evermann, D.V.M. (W.S.U.) and D. G. McKercher, D.V.M. (U.C.D.) for clinical
isolates of bovine herpesvirus 1 and Jan Amesbury for typing the manuscript. Appreciation is extended to Mark
R. Hall, Jesse Martinez, Berch E. Henry and Elizabeth Griffith for their critical review of the manuscript. These
investigations were partially supported by Public Health service grant R01 CA28029, the Research Advisory
Board of the University of Nevada, Reno (S.S.J.) and the Agriculture Experiment Station, University of Nevada,
Reno (R.E.L.T.). In partial fulfilment for the Ph.D. in biochemistry (B.S.S.).
REFERENCES
BEARDEN,J. C. (1979). Electrophoretic mobility of high-molecular weight, double-stranded DNA on agarose gels.
Gene 6, 221 234.
BRITTEN, R. J. & KOHNE, D. E. (1968). Repeated sequences in DNA. Science 161, 529 540.
CEDAR,n. (1976). Annealing and hybridization properties of herpes simplex virus type 1 DNA. Journal of General
Virology 32, 337-347.
ENGELS, M., STECK, F. & WYLER, R. (1981). Comparison of the genomes of infectious bovine rhinotracheitis and
infectious pustular vulvovaginitis virus strains by restriction endonuclease analysis. Archives of Virology 67,
169 174.
GRAHAM, B. J., LUDWIG, H., BRONSON, D. L., BENYESH-MELNICK, M. & B1SWAL, N. (1972). Physicochemical properties
of the DNA of herpesviruses. Bioehimica et biophysica acta 259, 13-23.
HUANG, E., CHEN,S. & PAGANO,J. S. (1973). Human cytomegalovirus. I. Purification and characterization of viral
DNA. Journal of Virology 12, 1473-1481.
KAHRS, R. F. (1977). Infectious bovine rhinotracheitis: a review and update. Journal of the American Veterinary
Medical Association 171, 1055-1064.
KIEFF, E., HAYER, B., BACHENHEIMER,S. & ROIZMAN, B. (1972). Genetic relatedness of type 1 and type 2 herpes
simplex viruses. Journal of Virology 9, 738 745.
LUDW[G, H. O., BISWAL, N. & BENYESH-MELNICK, M. (1972). Studies on the relatedness of herpesviruses through
DNA-DNA hybridization. Virology 49, 95 101.
MANtATIS,T., FRITSCH, E. r. & SAMBROOK,J. (1982). Molecular Cloning: A Laboratory Manual, pp. 382 389. New
York: Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory.
MARTINSON, H. G. (1973). The basis of fractionation of single-stranded nucleic acids on hydroxylapatite.
Biochemistry 12, 2731 2736.
MAYFIELD, J. E., GOOD, P. J., VAN OORT, H. J., CAMPBELL, A. R. & REED, D. E. (1983). Cloning and cleavage site
mapping of DNA from bovine herpesvirus 1 (Cooper strain). Journal of Virology 47, 259 264.
MISRA, V., BABIUK,T. A. & LE Q. DARCEL,C. (1983). Analysis of bovine herpes virus type l isolates by restriction
endonuclease fingerprinting. Archives of Virology 76, 341-354.
PASTORET, P. P., THIRY, E., BROCHIER, B. & DERBOVEN, G. (1982). Bovid herpesvirus 1 infection of cattle:
pathogenesis, latency, consequences of latency. Annales de Recherches V~t&inaires 13, 221-235.
RIGBY, P. W. J., DIECKMANN, M., RHODES, C. & BERG, P. (1977). Labelling deoxyribonucleic acid to high specific
activity in vitro by nick translation with DNA polymerase I. Journal of Molecular Biology 114, 237 251.
SOUTHERN,E. M. (1975). Detection of specific sequences among DNA fragments separated by gel electrophoresis.
Journal oJ Molecular Biology 98, 503 517.
SUGINO, W. M. & KINGSBURY,D, L. (1976). DNA homologies between strains of herpes simplex virus. Virology 71,
605-608.
VOGT,v. M. (1973). Purification and further properties of single-stranded specific nuclease from Aspergillus oryzae.
European Journal of Biochemistry 33, 192-200.
WHARTON, J. H., HENRY, B. E. & O'CALLAGHAN, D. J. (1981). Equine cytomegalovirus : cultural characteristics and
properties of viral DNA. Virology 109, 106-119.
(Received 22 M a y 1985)
Downloaded from www.microbiologyresearch.org by
IP: 88.99.165.207
On: Thu, 04 May 2017 09:34:03