* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Download Left Bundle-Branch Block
Survey
Document related concepts
Remote ischemic conditioning wikipedia , lookup
Cardiac contractility modulation wikipedia , lookup
Myocardial infarction wikipedia , lookup
Jatene procedure wikipedia , lookup
Arrhythmogenic right ventricular dysplasia wikipedia , lookup
Coronary artery disease wikipedia , lookup
Transcript
Tech Tips E D U C AT I O N A L TO P I C S F O R N U C L E A R L A B P R O F E S S I O N A L S Left Bundle-Branch Block Left bundle-branch block (LBBB) is a condition that occurs when the electrical impulses traveling through the left bundle branch become slowed or blocked. The right ventricle (RV) receives the electrical impulse first, causing the left ventricle (LV) to contract slightly after the RV contracts. LBBB often is a marker for coronary heart disease, cardiomyopathy, long-standing hypertension, and severe aortic valve disease.1 On electrocardiogram (ECG), the peak of the QRS complex is notched in patients with LBBB2 (Figure 1). The R wave represents septal and right ventricular activation The Q wave represents septal depolarization r P T Q The r wave represents right ventricular depolarization R S Left Bundle-Branch Block—Lead V1 ` Figure 2a. P The S wave represents left ventricular depolarization R` The R’ wave represents left ventricular depolarization T Left Bundle-Branch Block—Lead V6 Figure 1. Detailed representation of surface ECG in patients with LBBB.3 LBBB AND FALSE-POSITIVE DEFECTS WITH EXERCISE Rate of False Positives, % Patients with LBBB have asynchronous ventricular contraction that worsens with exercise.4,5 During exercise myocardial perfusion imaging (MPI), images from patients with LBBB often display false-positive defects similar to those caused by coronary artery disease (CAD)4 (see Figures 2a and 2b). Because reversible septal perfusion defects, mimicking septal ischemia, are common in non-CAD patients with LBBB who are stressed with exercise (Figure 3), pharmacologic stress testing has become the preferred method of MPI in patients with LBBB and a moderate to high risk of CAD.4,6 Figure 3. False-positive rates for septal defects with exercise and pharmacologic stress testing.4 50 40 46% 30 P<.001 20 10 0 10% Exercise (n=57) Pharmacologic Stress (n=48) Images courtesy of Cesar A. Santana, MD, PhD and Ernest V. Garcia, PhD Figure 2b. Figure 2a. Treadmill images for a 63-year-old male with no history of CAD who had been diagnosed as having an LBBB. These images show a reversible perfusion defect in the anteroseptal wall, accounting for 30% of the total LV myocardium. This exercise SPECT study was technically suboptimal. Figure 2b. Pharmacologic stress images in the same patient, showing a mild fixed perfusion defect in the septal wall, accounting for 7% of total LV myocardium. These results were interpreted as probably normal. Pharmacologic stress demonstrated benefit over exercise stress in this patient with LBBB. Based on the exercise stress test results alone, this patient may have been incorrectly diagnosed as having CAD because a large reversible septal defect was noted on imaging. UTILITY OF PHARMACOLOGIC STRESS FOR LBBB In patients with LBBB, pharmacologic stress imaging has been associated with fewer false-positive defects. Several studies have indicated the clinical value of pharmacologic stress MPI in patients with pre-existing LBBB.7-9 Wagdy et al7 evaluated 245 patients with LBBB who underwent thallium or sestamibi SPECT with a vasodilator pharmacologic stress test. In this study, high-risk was defined as having a large severe perfusion defect on the resting study (<46), at least two segments with a segmental score of ≤2 on resting images, and a global reversibility score of ≤5. The low-risk group included all other patients. As shown by pharmacologic stress imaging, death rates were lower in low-risk patients versus high-risk patients (Figure 4). The authors concluded that MPI with pharmacologic stress provides important prognostic information in patients with LBBB. The clinical utility of pharmacologic stress in LBBB patients with hypertension has also been shown.8 Total deaths, (%) 50 40 45% 30 20 19% 10 0 High risk Low risk Figure 4. Prognostic value of vasodilator SPECT in LBBB.7 (n=84) (n=161) Conclusion LBBB usually causes a perfusion defect that is restricted to the septum. Because the decrease in septal blood flow in patients with LBBB seems to be dependent on heart rate, it is suggested that pharmacologic stress may result in fewer false-positive defects in patients with LBBB who are referred for a myocardial perfusion study. “Our findings clearly indicate that pharmacologic stress imaging is associated with fewer falsepositive septal perfusion defects in patients with left bundle branch block, thereby improving the specificity of perfusion scintigraphy for left anterior descending coronary artery stenosis.” —Vaduganathan P, et al. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1996;28:543-550. References 1. Goldberger AL. Electrocardiography. in: Kasper DL, Braunwald E, Fauci AS, et al, eds. Harrison’s Principles of Internal Medicine. 16th ed. The McGraw-Hill Companies; 2007. Available at: www.accessmedicine.com. Accessed March 19, 2012. 2. Crawford ES, Husain SS. Fundamentals of electrocardiography. In: Nuclear Cardiac Imaging. Terminology and Technical Aspects. Reston, VA: Society of Nuclear Medicine; 2003. 3. Kakavand B, Berger S. Pediatric left bundle branch block. Available at: http://emedicine.medscape.com/ article/895064-overview; 2010. Accessed March 20, 2012. 4. Vaduganathan P, He Z-X, Raghavan C, Mahmarian JJ, Verani MS. Detection of left anterior descending coronary artery stenosis in patients with left bundle branch block: exercise, adenosine or dobutamine imaging? J Am Coll Cardiol. 1996;28:543-550. 5. Bramlet DA, Morris KG, Coleman RE, Albert D, Cobb FR. Effects of rate-dependent left bundle branch block on global and regional left ventricular function. Circulation. 1983;67:1059-1065. 6. Klocke FJ, Baird MG, Bateman TM, et al. ACC/AHA/ASNC guidelines for the clinical use of cardiac radionuclide imaging. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2003;42:1318-1333. 7. Wagdy HM, Hodge D, Christian TF, Miller TD, Gibbons RJ. Prognostic value of vasodilator myocardial perfusion imaging in patients with left bundle-branch block. Circulation. 1998;97:1563-1570. 8. Feola M, Biggi A, Ribichini F, Camuzzini G, Uslenghi E. The diagnosis of coronary artery disease in hypertensive patients with chest pain and complete left bundle branch block: utility of adenosine Tc-99m tetrofosmin SPECT. Clin Nucl Med. 2002;27:510-515. 9. Lebtahi NE, Stauffer JC, Delaloye AB. Left bundle branch block and coronary artery disease: accuracy of dipyridamole thallium-201 singlephoton emission computed tomography in patients with exercise anteroseptal perfusion defects. J Nucl Cardiol. 1997;4:266-273. Visit pharmstresstech.com for Tech Tips podcasts and interactive modules, which include an educational question-and-answer section. Provided as an educational service by Committed to Cardiology® ©2013 Astellas Pharma US, Inc All rights reserved. 013B-012-7197 6/13