Download Left Bundle-Branch Block

Survey
yes no Was this document useful for you?
   Thank you for your participation!

* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project

Document related concepts

Remote ischemic conditioning wikipedia , lookup

Cardiac contractility modulation wikipedia , lookup

Myocardial infarction wikipedia , lookup

Jatene procedure wikipedia , lookup

Arrhythmogenic right ventricular dysplasia wikipedia , lookup

Coronary artery disease wikipedia , lookup

Quantium Medical Cardiac Output wikipedia , lookup

Management of acute coronary syndrome wikipedia , lookup

Transcript
Tech Tips
E D U C AT I O N A L TO P I C S F O R N U C L E A R L A B P R O F E S S I O N A L S
Left Bundle-Branch Block
Left bundle-branch block (LBBB) is a condition that occurs when the electrical
impulses traveling through the left bundle branch become slowed or blocked. The
right ventricle (RV) receives the electrical impulse first, causing the left ventricle
(LV) to contract slightly after the RV contracts. LBBB often is a marker for coronary
heart disease, cardiomyopathy, long-standing hypertension, and severe aortic valve
disease.1 On electrocardiogram (ECG), the peak of the QRS complex is notched in
patients with LBBB2 (Figure 1).
The R wave represents septal and
right ventricular activation
The Q wave represents
septal depolarization
r
P
T
Q
The r wave represents
right ventricular
depolarization
R
S
Left Bundle-Branch Block—Lead V1
`
Figure 2a.
P
The S wave represents
left ventricular
depolarization
R`
The R’ wave represents
left ventricular
depolarization
T
Left Bundle-Branch Block—Lead V6
Figure 1. Detailed representation of surface ECG in patients with LBBB.3
LBBB AND FALSE-POSITIVE DEFECTS WITH EXERCISE
Rate of False Positives, %
Patients with LBBB have asynchronous ventricular contraction that worsens with
exercise.4,5 During exercise myocardial perfusion imaging (MPI), images from patients
with LBBB often display false-positive defects similar to those caused by coronary
artery disease (CAD)4 (see Figures 2a and 2b). Because reversible septal perfusion
defects, mimicking septal ischemia, are common in non-CAD patients with LBBB
who are stressed with exercise (Figure 3), pharmacologic stress testing has become
the preferred method of MPI in patients with LBBB and a moderate to high risk
of CAD.4,6
Figure 3. False-positive
rates for septal defects with
exercise and pharmacologic
stress testing.4
50
40
46%
30
P<.001
20
10
0
10%
Exercise
(n=57)
Pharmacologic Stress
(n=48)
Images courtesy of Cesar A. Santana, MD, PhD and
Ernest V. Garcia, PhD
Figure 2b.
Figure 2a. Treadmill images for a 63-year-old male with no history of CAD
who had been diagnosed as having an LBBB. These images show a reversible
perfusion defect in the anteroseptal wall, accounting for 30% of the total LV
myocardium. This exercise SPECT study was technically suboptimal.
Figure 2b. Pharmacologic stress images in the same patient, showing a
mild fixed perfusion defect in the septal wall, accounting for 7% of total LV
myocardium. These results were interpreted as probably normal. Pharmacologic
stress demonstrated benefit over exercise stress in this patient with LBBB. Based
on the exercise stress test results alone, this patient may have been incorrectly
diagnosed as having CAD because a large reversible septal defect was noted
on imaging.
UTILITY OF PHARMACOLOGIC STRESS FOR LBBB
In patients with LBBB, pharmacologic stress imaging has been associated
with fewer false-positive defects. Several studies have indicated the
clinical value of pharmacologic stress MPI in patients with pre-existing
LBBB.7-9 Wagdy et al7 evaluated 245 patients with LBBB who underwent
thallium or sestamibi SPECT with a vasodilator pharmacologic stress test.
In this study, high-risk was defined as having a large severe perfusion
defect on the resting study (<46), at least two segments with a segmental
score of ≤2 on resting images, and a global reversibility score of ≤5. The
low-risk group included all other patients. As shown by pharmacologic
stress imaging, death rates were lower in low-risk patients versus high-risk
patients (Figure 4). The authors concluded that MPI with pharmacologic
stress provides important prognostic information in patients with LBBB.
The clinical utility of pharmacologic stress in LBBB patients with
hypertension has also been shown.8
Total deaths, (%)
50
40
45%
30
20
19%
10
0
High risk
Low risk
Figure 4. Prognostic
value of vasodilator
SPECT in LBBB.7
(n=84)
(n=161)
Conclusion
LBBB usually causes a perfusion defect that is restricted to the septum.
Because the decrease in septal blood flow in patients with LBBB seems to
be dependent on heart rate, it is suggested that pharmacologic stress
may result in fewer false-positive defects in patients with LBBB who are
referred for a myocardial perfusion study.
“Our findings clearly indicate that pharmacologic
stress imaging is associated with fewer falsepositive septal perfusion defects in patients with
left bundle branch block, thereby improving
the specificity of perfusion scintigraphy for left
anterior descending coronary artery stenosis.”
—Vaduganathan P, et al.
J Am Coll Cardiol. 1996;28:543-550.
References
1. Goldberger AL. Electrocardiography. in: Kasper DL, Braunwald E, Fauci AS, et al, eds. Harrison’s Principles
of Internal Medicine. 16th ed. The McGraw-Hill Companies; 2007. Available at: www.accessmedicine.com.
Accessed March 19, 2012. 2. Crawford ES, Husain SS. Fundamentals of electrocardiography. In: Nuclear
Cardiac Imaging. Terminology and Technical Aspects. Reston, VA: Society of Nuclear Medicine; 2003.
3. Kakavand B, Berger S. Pediatric left bundle branch block. Available at: http://emedicine.medscape.com/
article/895064-overview; 2010. Accessed March 20, 2012. 4. Vaduganathan P, He Z-X, Raghavan C,
Mahmarian JJ, Verani MS. Detection of left anterior descending coronary artery stenosis in patients with left
bundle branch block: exercise, adenosine or dobutamine imaging? J Am Coll Cardiol. 1996;28:543-550.
5. Bramlet DA, Morris KG, Coleman RE, Albert D, Cobb FR. Effects of rate-dependent left bundle branch
block on global and regional left ventricular function. Circulation. 1983;67:1059-1065. 6. Klocke FJ, Baird
MG, Bateman TM, et al. ACC/AHA/ASNC guidelines for the clinical use of cardiac radionuclide imaging. J Am
Coll Cardiol. 2003;42:1318-1333. 7. Wagdy HM, Hodge D, Christian TF, Miller TD, Gibbons RJ. Prognostic
value of vasodilator myocardial perfusion imaging in patients with left bundle-branch block. Circulation.
1998;97:1563-1570. 8. Feola M, Biggi A, Ribichini F, Camuzzini G, Uslenghi E. The diagnosis of coronary
artery disease in hypertensive patients with chest pain and complete left bundle branch block: utility of
adenosine Tc-99m tetrofosmin SPECT. Clin Nucl Med. 2002;27:510-515. 9. Lebtahi NE, Stauffer JC, Delaloye
AB. Left bundle branch block and coronary artery disease: accuracy of dipyridamole thallium-201 singlephoton emission computed tomography in patients with exercise anteroseptal perfusion defects. J Nucl
Cardiol. 1997;4:266-273.
Visit pharmstresstech.com for Tech Tips podcasts and interactive
modules, which include an educational question-and-answer section.
Provided as an educational service by
Committed to Cardiology®
©2013 Astellas Pharma US, Inc All rights reserved. 013B-012-7197 6/13