Survey
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Marina B. Nebro December 1, 2013 Henry VIII and the Field of the Cloth of Gold The period of the sixteenth century in Europe proved to be one of internal and external tensions. Christendom was being threatened both by the likes of Martin Luther and his ninety-five theses in 1517, and the expanding Islamic power of the Ottoman Empire. Though still a Renaissance era, and not yet the Baroque or Counter-Reformation epoch, the Church sought to exhibit its power within the realm of Europe, maintaining internal piece between feuding kingdoms, and focusing negativities outwards. The 1518 Treaty of London did just that, though this essay will focus primarily on the peace agreement between Henry VIII of England and Francis I of France. The Field of the Cloth of Gold, taking place on continental English soil in the year 1520, proved not to be of actual political importance or necessity, as terms were agreed upon two years prior during the treaty. The spectacle, instead, was a move towards increasing the public image of both monarchs, though this paper is mainly interested in Henry VIII, exhibiting their power and majesty not only to their own people, or the opposing faction, but also to the rest of Europe. Henry VIII, son of the first Tudor on the throne, still experienced difficulty with many of the nobles and aristocrats scattered around his realm. Though the fifteenth century War of the Roses placated the threat of much of the nobility by removing many of their standing armies, there were still several powers that attempted to usurp the king’s power.1 Edward Stafford, Duke of Buckingham, was one such noble that seemed to drop out of royal favor due to traitor-like tendencies. 1 Charles L. Mee Jr. Playing God, (New York: Simon & Schuster, 1993), 56. It was said he was a very popular aristocrat and that he “might easily obtain the Crown if the King died without heirs.”2 He was later executed in 1521 at the Tower of London, the first of many future executions. From the above-mentioned example, it can be extrapolated that Henry had a desire to keep the rest of his nobility in check. Everybody who was anybody made his or her way across the English Channel with the king to support his peace-making mission with France. “It was said that England, that June, was stripped of its nobility, its courtiers… and its high-born women,” says author Charles L. Mee Jr.3 Not only was it necessary to keep an eye on his inferiors, but Henry desired to display their inferiority as well. Each class was assigned specified rules when it came to vestments and adornments. In this way, Henry was able to clearly delineate the status of each and every one of his subjects, as well as convey to Francis and his subjects that he had tight control on the people of his realm. Shakespeare was correct when claiming, “all the world’s a stage.” Every aspect of the meeting between the monarchs at the Field of the Cloth of Gold was highly planned and choreographed to evoke the greatest emotion and effect from the on looking subjects. Originally quoted from Frances A. Yates, “the Renaissance had at its disposal a repertory of images, systematized by learned experts, which formed a language used by art and literature in all European countries to which the Joycelyne G. Russell, The Field of the Cloth of Gold: Men and manners in 1520, (New York: Barnes & Noble, Inc., 1969), 7. 3 Mee Jr., Playing God, 50. 2 learning of the humanists had penetrated.”4 Every aspect of the princely meeting was documented an analyzed as is proven in Edward Hall’s Chronicles of the event. If one could imagine the entire occasion taking place on a stage, it would not be far fetched to assume a man on a higher platform is more powerful than a man standing on low ground. Before the first encounter between monarchs, land was leveled and evened so that the first eye contact between Henry and Francis would be from equal footing across the field.5 Their initial contact is described as a dance, introduced by music and fanfare interspersed with bone chilling silence, climaxing with the charging of horses, and concluding with twenty embraces. The people on both the French and English side exhibited anxiety towards each other and towards the alliance. Russell describes this latent animosity as a permeating Francophobia, as the tensions between the kingdoms can be traced back to as early as the Norman Conquest. The encircling dance steps and embracing movements of the kings lessened and eased this fear among their subjects. Tournaments in jousting and wrestling were also highly choreographed, as the practice of true knightly fighting practice was a vestment of the Middle Ages. It is important to note that Henry’s losses were conveniently left out of publication by the likes of historians such as Edward Hall, showing the highly censored nature of the time, and the desire for this occasion to show his majesty and power. Just as clothing was meant to convey class and societal status among the lesser nobles and Henry’s inferiors, it was also used to convey political messages. 4 5 Russell, The Field of the Cloth of Gold, 11. Mee Jr., Playing God, 60. Edward Hall spent much of his time “decoding” the embroidered imagery on the clothes of both kings and the drapery on their horses. One of Henry’s messages appeared on “his horse’s bard… decorated with waves… obviously [signifying] ‘the Lordeshippe of the narowe sea.’”6 The narrow sea being the English Channel, Henry used this imagery to show the power of England, as this small strait of water was a natural barrier for many attacks. The spectacle of the Field of the Cloth of Gold, as mentioned before, also let other kingdoms know of Henry’s power and majesty over his realm. At this time, Charles V of Spain was the newly appointed Holy Roman Emperor, and also held power over the Low Lands in Northern Europe. His landholdings and economic power threatened England’s wool trade, and “if England and France entered an alliance against [him], the two of them could close off the English Channel against [his] ships and cause the empire extreme hardship.”7 This impending opportunity gave England the upper hand, enabling Henry to wield deals between both France and Spain. Ultimately, the Field of the Cloth of Gold was merely an elaborate performance. Within a year, peace in Europe began to crumble once again between England, France, Spain, and the entire Holy Roman Empire. The event created an “atmosphere of total unreality”8 amongst the people in attendance, and proved to be unrealistic in its end goals. The terms of the Treaty of 1518 between France and England were unmet, as Princess Mary never ended up marrying Francis’s son, but Ibid, 67. Ibid, 74. 8 Ibid, 73. 6 7 rather Philip of Spain. Considering the purpose of the tents clad in golden cloth was not for purely political agreement but for political ostentatiousness and the displaying of monarchical power, Henry VIII was successful. From this point onwards, he became a well-known figure in Europe.