Survey
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Unit 5 Adulteration; Food Standards The Prevention of Food Adulteration Act; Poisonous and deleterious substances; Standards of Identity, Quality, Fill of Container, and Infant Formulas; tampering, aesthetic and economic adulteration The Prevention of Food Adulteration Act •The Prevention of Food Adulteration Act of 1954 aims at making provisions for the prevention of adulteration of food. It went into effect on June 1,1955. •The conditions that render a food adulterated are described in FDCA Section 402 (21 U.S.C. Section 342). • Eggs are an example for reviewing adulteration regulations Adulteration defined • Adulteration is the act of intentionally debasing the quality of food offered for sale either by the admixture or substitution of inferior substances or by the removal of some valuable ingredient. • Examples: Color added to wine; dilution of liquid food with water; manipulation of weight; substitution with low quality ingredients. Added Poisonous Substances that are required for processing • Food additives are allowed only if considered safe by the FDA or, if unsafe, must be used in the manner that is allowed in the regulations. Any food with unsafe or illegally used additives is adulterated • New animal drugs must be approved by the FDA before use, and properly labeled. Use of an unapproved new animal drug renders the food adulterated (FDCA S,ec. 512). Adulteration and Misbranding in Interstate Commerce • The F,DCA prohibits adulteration and misbranding randing of foods in interstate commerce (FDCA Sec. 301), while state laws go govern foods sold within one State • Interstate commerce r,efers to commerce between any state or territory and any place outside it or commerce within the District of Columbia or within any other territory not organized with a legislative body. • The Prohibited Acts section of the FDCA regullates adulteration and misbranding of foods in all stages(21 U.S.C. Section 342; FDCA Section 402) • Adulteration and misbranding of foods in all stages of in terstate commerce are prohibited. Investigation of Adulterated Foods The FDCA prohibits actions that may trigger the FDA's investigation of adulterated or misbranded foods, e.g., refusal to permit access to records, refusal to permit for inspection, remove any official tag or mark authorized by the FDCA, altering, mutilating, or removing labels of foods that passed through interstate commerce if they are for sale. Additional Value of Food Standards • Food standards are important in international trade as they provide basis for negotiations • In general, they are acceptable to the American consumers and to the food industry. Food Standards • There were no formal food standards prior to ,tlhe passage of the FDCA of 1938. • Food standards today include - Standards of identity - Standa rds of quality - Standards of fill-of-container - Standards for InfantFormulas • Standardized foods that do not meet their standard are considered misbranded. • In absence of food standards, states may enact their own standards Standards of Identity • These ensure that products have the characteristic,s expected by the consumer. • They prescribe the minimum amounts of certain ingredients; maximum fat, water; methods of processing, cooking and preparation. • They permit certain optional safe ingredients. • Foods th,at do not conform to these standards may be sold under another non-standardized names. FDA Standards of Identity are at: CFR title 21, 107, 130-189 USDA Standards of Identity are at: CFR title 9, 319 (meat and poultry) Standards of Identity Initially, Standards of Identity defined: 1. The food product 2. Its name 3. The ingredients that must (mandatory) or may (optional) be used in the manufacturing of the food These standards ensured that ,consumers knew what they were getting and had control over addition of food additi ves. FSMA Final Rule for Mitigation Strategies to Protect Food Against Intentional Adulteration 1. Rather than targeting specific foods or hazards, this rule requires mitigation (risk-reducing) strategies for processes in certain registered food facilities. 2. The proposed rule was issued in December 2013. 3. This rule is designed to primarily cover large companies whose products reach many people, exempting smaller companies. 4. Compliance date: 1. 2. 3. Very Small Businesses: within five years after the publication of the final rule. Small Businesses: have to comply four years after the publication of the final rule Other Businesses: three years after the publication of the final rule.