Download J-STD-005A Solder paste

Survey
yes no Was this document useful for you?
   Thank you for your participation!

* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project

Document related concepts
no text concepts found
Transcript
J-STD-005A Dec 2011
JOINT
INDUSTRY
STANDARD
Requirements for Soldering Pastes
J Standard 005A
December 2011
J-STD-005A Dec 2011
Requirements for Soldering Pastes
1.0 SCOPE
This standard prescribes general requirements for the characterization and testing of solder pastes used to make high
quality electronic interconnections. This specification is a quality control document and is not intended to relate directly to the
material’s performance in the manufacturing process. Solder paste buyers are referred to 6.3 for a listing of requirements
information and options which should be addressed when preparing an order for J-STD-005 solder pastes.
1.1 Scope
This standard defines the characteristics of solder paste through the definitions of properties and specification of
test methods and inspection criteria. The materials include solder powder and solder paste flux blended to produce solder
paste. Solder powders are classified as to shape of the particles and size distribution of the particles. It is not the intent of this
standard to exclude particle sizes or distributions not specifically listed. The flux properties of the solder paste, including
classification and testing, shall be based on J-STD-004B. The requirements for solder paste are defined in general terms. In
practice, where more stringent requirements are necessary, additional requirements shall be defined by mutual agreement between
the user and supplier. Users are cautioned to perform tests (beyond the scope of this specification) to determine the acceptability of
the solder paste for specific processes.
1.1.1 Purpose
2.0 APPLICABLE DOCUMENTS
The following documents of the issue currently in effect, form a part of this specification to the extent specified herein.
2.1 Joint Standards 1
J-STD-001 Soldering requirements for Electronic Interconnections (Supersedes
J-STD-004 Requirements for Soldering Fluxes (Supersedes IPC-SF-818)
J-STD-006 Requirements for Alloys and Solder Products
IPC-S-815)
2.2 International Standards Organization 3
Quality Systems − Model for Quality Assurance in Design, Development, Production, Installation and Servicing.
ISO 9001
2 . 3 IP C 1
IPC-A-20
Fine pitch stencil pattern for Slump.
IPC-A-21
Standard pitch stencil pattern for Slump.
IPC-T-50
Terms and Definitions for Interconnecting and Packaging Electronic Circuits
IPC-TM-650
Test Methods Manual
2.2.14.3 Determination of Maximum Solder Powder Particle Size
2.2.20 Solder Paste Metal Content by Weight
2.4.34 Solder Paste Viscosity—T-Bar Spin Spindle Method (Applicable for 300,000 to 1,600,000 centipoise)
2.4.34.1 Solder Paste Viscosity—T-Bar Spindle Method (Applicable at less than 300,000 centipoise)
2.4.34.2 Solder Paste Viscosity—Spiral Pump Method (Applicable for 300,000 to 1,600,000 centipoise)
2.4.34.3 Solder Paste Viscosity—Spiral Pump Method (Applicable at less than 300,000 centipoise)
2.4.35 Solder Paste—Slump Test
2.4.43 Solder Paste—Solder Ball Test
2.4.44 Solder Paste—Tack Test
2.4.45 Solder Paste—Wetting Test
2.4 American Society for Testing Materials 4
ASTM D-1210
Fineness of Dispersion of Pigment Vehicle Systems
__________________________________________________________________________________________
1. Application for copies should be addressed to the IPC, 3000 Lakeside Drive, Suite 309S, Bannockburn, Illinois 60015-1219
2. Publications are available from Standardization Documents Order Dept., Building 4D, 700 Robbins Avenue, Philadelphia, PA 19111-5090
3. Publications are available from the International Standards Organization 1 Rue de Varembe, Case 56, CH-1211 Geneve 20 Switzerland
4. American Society forTesting Materials, 1916 Race Street, Philadelphia, PA 19103-1187
3.0 REQUIREMENTS
3.1 General Requirements
3.1 .1 Conflict
In the event of conflict between the requirements of this specification and other requirements of the applicable
J-STD-005A Dec 2011
acquisition documents, the precedence in which documents shall govern in descending order is as follows:
1.
2.
3.
4.
The applicable acquisition document
The applicable specification sheet/drawing
This standard
Applicable referenced documents (see paragraph 2.0)
Definitions applicable to this specification shall conform to IPC-T-50, J-STD-001D, J-STD004B, and as follows. The terms and definitions are in accordance with IPC-T-50.
3.1 .2 Terms and Definitions
3.1.2.1 Centipoise  CGS unit of the dynamic measurement of viscosity equal to 1/100 poise.
3.1.2.2 Drying  Ambient
See viscosity.
or heating process to evaporate volatile components from solder paste which may, or may not, result in
melting of rosin/resin.
3.1.2.3 Micron 
Equal to 1 x 10 -6 meters or 39.4 x 10 -6 inches.
3.1.2.4 Rheology
The study of the change in form and the flow of matter, generally characterized by elasticity, viscosity,
and plasticity.
A solvent or paste system with, or without, activator which is added to solder paste to replace
evaporated solvents, adjust viscosity, or reduce solids content.
3.1.2.5 Thinner (Paste)
3.1.2.6 Viscosity
The internal friction of a fluid, caused by molecular attraction, which makes it resist a tendency to flow.
Expressed in dyne-seconds per cm2 (poise) or centipoises.
The description of a solder paste product should identify all applicable characteristics, such as:
alloy, flux, powder, metal content, viscosity, unit package size, etc. The description system in Table 1 may be used to concisely
describe standard solder paste products and to partially describe non-standard solder paste products. Complete description of
non-standard solder paste products usually requires the use of tabular or narrative format, because the number of possible variations
in characteristics cannot be easily coded into a concise format.
3.2 Description of Product
Table 1 System to Describe Solder Paste Products Description
Solder Paste Product Characteristic
Alloy Short name from Appendix A of J-STD006
Solder Form 1 - P for all solder paste products
Flux designator from Table 1 of J-STD-004
Powder type designation from Table 2
Metal content in percent by mass (e.g., 91, 92)
Viscosity (Reference Manufacturer’s Product Data
Sheet)
Package unit mass in kilogram (e.g., 0.5, 0.001,
0.010)
Note: 1 The Solder Form code is used to distinguish between various solder forms which use similar description formats.
3.2.1 Alloy Composition
The percentage of each element in an alloy shall be determined by any standard analytical procedure
with sufficient resolution.. Wet chemistry shall be used as the reference procedure. The tolerance & impurity levels of the alloy must
conform with the current version of J-STD-006. All manufacturer’s designed alloy additions AABUS shall be identified as a fraction of the
weight of the alloy.3.2.2 Flux Characterization and Inspection The fluxes in solder pastes shall be characterized by the
manufacturer in accordance with the flux characterization requirements specified in J-STD-004 and shall be inspected in accordance with the flux inspection requirements of J-STD-004. The results of these inspections should be recorded on the report form
included in J-STD-004B and the flux type shall be recorded on the solder paste report form.
3.3 Solder Powder Particle Size

See IPC-T-50
J-STD-005A Dec 2011
Powder size determination using laser diffraction or alternate test procedures shall be agreed
upon by user and supplier (AABUS). Powder size shall be by weight %, not population
3.3.1 Powder Size Determination
When tested in accordance with paragraph 3.3.2.1, the powder size shall be classified by type as per a standard
sieve size or nearest sieve size shown which matches Table 2 dimensions. Powder used for testing should be from virgin powder,
not extracted from solder paste.
3.3.2 Powder Size
The maximum powder size shall be determined with a fineness of grind
gauge (Hegmann) type CMA 185, or equivalent, in accordance with ASTM D-1210 or IPC-TM-650, method 2.2.14.3.
3.3.2.1 Maximum Powder Size (Fineness of Grind)
Powder particle size distribution shall be determined by IPC-TM-650, Test Method 2.2.14, Test Method
2.2.14.1, or Test Method 2.2.14.2.
3.3.2.2 Solder Powder
3.3.3 Solder Powder Particle Shape
Solder powder shape shall be spherical with maximum length-to-width ratio of 1.25 when tested in
accordance with paragraphs 3.3.3.1.1 and 3.3.3.1.2. Other shapes shall be acceptable if agreed upon by user and supplier
(AABUS).
3.3.3.1 Powder Shape
Solder powder particle shape should be spherical and shall be
determined by AABUS. (Table 2 subgroup will present an alternative)
3.3.3.1 .1 Determination of Solder Powder Particle Shape
Table 2 % of Sample by Weight—Nominal Size
Type
Less than 0.5% larger
than
1
160
2
80
3
60
4
50
5
40
6
25
7
15
10% max between
80% Minimum Between
10% Maximum Less Than
75 – 150
75
45 – 75
45
25 - 45
25
20 - 38
20
15 - 25
15
5 - 15
5
2-11
2
150-160
75-80
45-60
38-50
25-40
15-25
11-15
The metal content should be between 65-96% as specified in weight percent when tested in accordance
with IPC-TM-650, method 2.2.20. The metal percent shall be within +/-1% of the nominal value specified on the user’s purchase
order.
3.4 Metal Percent
3.5 Viscosity The
measured viscosity shall be within +/- 15 of the value specified by the user. The measurement and test
conditions shall be in accordance with paragraph 3.5.1.
The methods for determining the viscosity of solder paste in the range of 300,000 to
1,600,000 centipoise shall be in accordance with IPC-TM-650, method 2.4.34 or method 2.4.34.2. The method for determining
viscosity of solder paste in the range of 50,000 to 300,000 centipoise shall be in accordance with IPC-TM-650, method
2.4.34.1 or method 2.4.34.3.
3.5.1 Methods of Determining Viscosity
3.6 Slump Test
Unless otherwise specified in the contract or purchase order, slump is assessed using two stencil thicknesses
J-STD-005A Dec 2011
and three pad (deposit) sizes in accordance with paragraphs 3.6.1 and 3.6.2. Unless agreed on by supplier and user, ceramic
coupons, as specified in TM-650, 2.4.35, shall be used as the test substrates for slump. For purposes of this test a bridge is
defined as any location where there are 2 or more solder spheres or particles touching each other and the solder bricks to either
side.
The 0.63 x 2.03mm pads of IPC-A-21 (see Figure 1) when tested in accordance with
paragraph 5.2.1 in IPC-TM-650, method 2.4.35 shall show no evidence of bridging between pads when spacing is 0.56 mm or
greater. When tested in accordance with paragraph 5.2.2 in IPC-TM-650, method 2.4.35 the specimen shall show no evidence of
bridging between pads when the spacing is 0.63mm or greater. (For higher melting solders than eutectic tin-lead, e.g. lead
free alloys, the sample will be tested at a temperature of 35° C below the melting point when tested as per 5.2.2.) The 0.33
x 2.03 mm pads (Figure 1) of the IPC-A-21 pattern when tested as per paragraph 5.2.1 in IPC-TM-650, method 2.4.35, shall show
no evidence of bridging at spacing of 0.25 mm or greater and when tested as per paragraph 5.2.2 of IPC-TM650, method 2.4.3 5,
shall show no evidence of bridging at spacing of 0.30 mm or greater.
3.6.1 Test with 0.2 mm Thick Stencil
The 0.33 mm x 2.03 mm pads of IPC-A-20 (see Figure 2) when tested in accordance with
paragraph 5.2.1 in IPC-TM-650, method 2.4.3 5 shall show no evidence of bridging at spacing of 0.25 mm or greater and when
tested as per paragraph 5.2.2 of IPC-TM-650, method 2.4.35, shall show no evidence of bridging at spacing at 0.30 mm or greater.
(For higher melting solders than eutectic tin-lead, e.g. lead free alloys, the sample will be tested at a temperature of 35° C
below the melting point when tested as per 5.2.2.)
3.6.2 Test with 0.1 mm Thick Stencil
The 0.2 mm x 2.03 mm pads (Figure 2) of the IPC-A-20 pattern when tested in accordance with paragraph 5.2.1 in IPC-TM-650,
method 2.4.35 shall show no bridging at spacing of 0.175 mm or greater and when tested in accordance with paragraph 5.2.2
of IPC-TM-650, method 2.4.35, shall show no evidence of bridging at spacing of 0.20 mm or greater.
The solder paste when tested in accordance with the applicable method listed below shall meet the
requirements specified.
3.7 Solder Ball Test
The solder paste with Type 1 through 4 type powders defined in IPC-TM-650, method 2.4.43, shall
meet the acceptance criteria presented in Figure 3.
3.7.1 Type 1-4 Powder
The solder paste with Type 5 through 6 type powder as defined in IPC-TM-650, method 2.4.43, shall
meet the acceptance criteria presented in Figure 3.
3.7.2 Type 5-6 Powder
3.7.3 Type 7 Powder
The solder paste with type 7 powders does not require testing.
The solder paste shall be tested in accordance with IPC-TM-650, method 2.4.44. Minimum holding force and time
shall be agreed upon by user and supplier (AABUS).
3.8 Tack Test
When tested in accordance with IPC -TM-650, method 2.4.45, the solder paste shall uniformly wet the
copper coupon without evidence of dewetting or non-wetting.
3.9 W etting
The manufacturer shall label each container of solder paste with the following:
a. The manufacturer’s name and address.
b. The solder paste classification (type designation), and the manufacturer’s designation of the solder paste, if different. (See
3.2, Table 1)
c. The net mass of solder paste.
d. The batch number.
e. The date of manufacture.
f. All required health and safety warnings.
g. Additional information shall comply with J-STD-609.
h. Expiration date at recommended storage temperatures
3.10 Labeling
J-STD-005A Dec 2011
Figure 1 Slump Test Stencil Thickness – 0.20 mm
4.0 QUALITY ASSURANCE PROVISIONS
4.1 Responsibility for Inspection The solder paste manufacturer is responsible for the performance of all inspection
specified herein except the performance inspections which are the responsibility of the user. The solder paste manufacturer
may use its own or any other facilities suitable for the performance of the inspections specified herein, unless disapproved
by the user. It is the responsibility of the supplier to ascertain that all solder products or supplies delivered to the user or
submitted for user acceptance conform to the requirements of the contract or purchase order and Section 3, herein. The
absence of any inspection requirements shall not relieve the supplier of this responsibility. The user reserves the right to
perform any of the inspections set forth in the specification where such inspections are deemed necessary to ensure that
supplies and services conform to prescribed requirements.
4.1.1 Responsibility for Compliance Materials covered by this specification shall meet all requirements of Section 3. The
inspection(s), excluding the performance inspections defined in this specification, shall become a part of the contractor's
overall inspection system or quality program. The supplier has responsibility of ensuring that all products or supplies
submitted to the user for acceptance comply with all requirements of the purchase order contract.
4.1.1.1 Quality Assurance Program When required by the user, a quality assurance program for material furnished under
this specification shall be established and maintained in accordance with ISO 9001 or as otherwise agreed on between user
and supplier (AABUS), and shall be monitored by the qualifying activity.
4.1.2 Test Equipment and Inspection Facilities Test/measuring equipment and inspection facilities, of sufficient accuracy,
quality, and quantity to permit performance of the required inspection(s), shall be established and maintained or
designated by the supplier. Establishment and maintenance of a calibration system to control the accuracy of the
measuring and test equipment shall be in accordance with ISO 10012 Part 1.
J-STD-005A Dec 2011
4.1.3 Inspection Conditions Unless otherwise specified herein, all inspections shall be performed in accordance with the
test conditions specified in Section 3 and in test methods listed herein.
Figure 2 Slump Test Stencil Thickness 0.10 mm
4.2 Classification of Inspections The inspections specified herein are classified as follows:
1. Qualification Inspection (4.4)
2. Quality Conformance (4.5)
4.3 Inspection Report Form Figure 4 is a report form suitable, and recommended, for recording the results of solder paste
inspections. Where definitive test results are not required or appropriate, successful completion of inspections should be
indicated by checkmarks on the solder paste report form.
4.4 Qualification Inspection Qualification inspections shall be performed at a laboratory acceptable to the user and
inspections shall consist of examinations and tests of materials, processes, and products needed to ascertain that a
manufacturing facility has the necessary facilities and expertise to make acceptable solder paste. In determining the
acceptability of a manufacturing facility as a source for solder paste, users are encouraged to utilize the documented results
of product inspections previously performed by the manufacturing facility to the maximum extent possible in lieu of
requiring new qualification inspections. Solder paste samples, which have been produced using the materials equipment,
processes, and procedures used in production, shall be subjected to the qualification inspections specified. The standard
qualification inspections for solder paste covered by this standard are listed in Table 3. Unless otherwise specified, the
qualification inspections shall be conducted using the procedures specified herein.
J-STD-005A Dec 2011
4.4.1 Sample Size A minimum of two 300 to 500 g containers of solder paste shall be submitted for qualification
inspection.
4.4.2 lnspection Routine The samples shall be subjected to the inspections specified in Table 3 and shall be performed to
verify the ability of a solder paste manufacturer to meet the qualification and/or quality conformance requirements of this
standard.
4.5 Quality Conformance The material manufacturer shall perform those inspections necessary to ensure that the process is
in control and the product is within specification limits.
4.5.1 Sampling Plan Statistical sampling and inspection shall be in accordance with an approved quality program. (See
4.1.1.1).
4.5.2 Rejected Lots If an inspection lot is rejected, the supplier may rework it to correct the defects, or screen out the
defective units and resubmit for reinspection. Resubmitted lots shall be inspected using tightened inspection. Such lots
shall be separated from new lots, and shall be clearly identified as reinspected lots.
J-STD-005A Dec 2011
Figure 3 Solder ball test standards
J-STD-005A Dec 2011
Table 3: Qualification, Quality Conformance and Performance Testing for Solder Paste
Name
Test Method
IPC-TM-650 or
Other Method
Visual
Material
Metal Content
Viscosity
Solder Ball
Slump
Alloy Composition
Flux Designation
Powder Class
Maximum Powder Size
Powder Shape
Tack
Wetting
2.2.20
2.4.34, 2.4.31.1,
2.4.34.2, 2.4.34.3
2.4.43
2.4.35
Reference
Paragraph
2.4.44
2.4.45
Quality
Conformance
User
Performance
Inspection
R
3.4
R
R
R
R
3.5
R
R
R
3.7
3.6
R
R
R
R
R
O
R*
R*
R
R
3.3
R
R*
3.3.2.1
3.3.3.1
3.8
3.9
R
R
R
R
J-STD-006
J-STD-004
2.2.14, 2.2.14.2,
2.2.14.1, 2.2.14.3
2.2.14.3
Qualification
R
R
*Quality conformance testing on the powder and flux which are used in the batch of paste being tested .
Preservation packaging, packing and marking for shipment, and identification shall be as
specified in the contract or purchase order. (See 6.0)
5.0 PREPARATION FOR DELIVERY
6.0 NOTES
This document is intended to be applicable to all types of solder paste as used for soldering in general and to soldering
in electronics in particular. The solder pastes involved relate to all application types.
6.1
6.2 Shelf Life Any use of the material beyond the stated shelf life on the product should be AABUS.
Acquisition documents should specify the following:
a. Number, revision, title, and date of this standard
b. Alloy designation (see 3.2)
c. Flux type (see 3.2.2)
d. Standard powder size number (see 3.3.2, Tables 2), or size characteristics of non-standard powder
e. Powder shape, if different (see 3.3.3)
f. Metal percent
g. Viscosity (see 3.5)
h. Slump test, if required (see 3.6)
i. Solder ball test, if required (see 3.7)
j. Tack test, if required (see 3.8)
k. Wetting test, if required (see 3.9)
l. Labeling requirements, if different (see 3.10)
m. Qualification and quality conformance inspections (see 4.1)
n. Preservation, packing, packaging, and exterior marking requirements (see 5.0)
6.3 Acquisition Requirements
J-STD-005A Dec 2011
Test Report on Solder Paste
(Enter appropriate information in top portion of report and complete report by entering the test results or checkmarks in the
appropriate spaces.)
Inspection Purpose:
___ Qualification
Manufacturer’s Identification_____________________________
___ Shelf-Life Extension
Manufacturer’s Batch Number____________________________
___ Performance
Date of
Manufacture____________________________________
Original USE-By Date:__________________________________
Revised USE-By
Date:__________________________________
Date Inspection Completed:______________________________________
Overall Results: ___ Pass ___ Fail
Inspection performed by: _________________________________________ Witnessed by: ___________________________________
Requirement
Paragraph
Test
Method
Metal Content
3.4
2.2.20
Viscosity
3.5
Solder Ball
3.7
2.4.43
Slump
3.6
2.4.35
Inspections
Material
Visual
2.4.34, 2.4.34.1,
2.4.34.2, 2.4.34.3
Alloy
Flux
Powder Size
2.2.14, 2.2.14.2,
2.2.14.1, 2.2.14.3
3.3
%in Top Screen
% in Next Screen
% in Bottom Screen
% in Receiver Bottom
Max. Powder Size
3.3.2.1
Powder Shape
3.3.3.1
2.2.14.3
Tack
3.8
2.4.44
Wetting
3.9
2.4.45
*P/F = Pass/Fail; enter P if test results are within tolerance of actual requirement; otherwise, enter F.
Figure 4 Solder Paste Inspection Report Form
User’s Actual
Requirement
Test
Result
P/F (*)
Tested by & Date