Survey
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Giant magnetoresistance wikipedia , lookup
Impact of nanotechnology wikipedia , lookup
Condensed matter physics wikipedia , lookup
Multiferroics wikipedia , lookup
Ferromagnetism wikipedia , lookup
Energy applications of nanotechnology wikipedia , lookup
Magnetic skyrmion wikipedia , lookup
Nanotoxicology wikipedia , lookup
CARBON 5 0 ( 2 0 1 2 ) 4 2 0 9 –4 2 1 9 Available at www.sciencedirect.com journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/carbon Structural, magnetic, and textural properties of iron oxide-reduced graphene oxide hybrids and their use for the electrochemical detection of chromium Anand Prakash, Sudeshna Chandra, D. Bahadur * Department of Metallurgical Engineering and Materials Science, Indian Institute of Technology Bombay, Mumbai-400 076, India A R T I C L E I N F O A B S T R A C T Article history: Superparamagnetic Fe3O4 nanoparticles were anchored on reduced graphene oxide (RGO) Received 5 March 2012 nanosheets by co-precipitation of iron salts in the presence of different amounts of graph- Accepted 2 May 2012 ene oxide (GO). A pH dependent zeta potential and good aqueous dispersions were Available online 16 May 2012 observed for the three hybrids of Fe3O4 and RGO. The structure, morphology and microstructure of the hybrids were examined by X-ray diffraction, transmission electron microscopy (TEM), Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy, Raman and X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy. TEM images reveal lattice fringes (d311 = 0.26 nm) of Fe3O4 nanoparticles with clear stacked layers of RGO nanosheets. The textural properties including the pore size distribution and loading of Fe3O4 nanoparticles to form Fe3O4–RGO hybrids have been controlled by changing the concentration of GO. An observed maximum (10 nm) in pore size distribution for the sample with 0.25 mg ml1 of GO is different from that prepared using 1.0 mg ml1 GO. The superparamagnetic behavior is also lost in the latter and it exhibits a ferrimagnetic nature. The electrochemical behavior of the hybrids towards chromium ion was assessed and a novel electrode system using cyclic voltammetry for the preparation of an electrochemical sensor platform is proposed. The textural properties seem to influence the electrochemical and magnetic behavior of the hybrids. 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved. 1. Introduction Graphene, a two-dimensional sheet of sp2-hybridized carbon atoms arranged in a honeycomb lattice, exhibits remarkable surface, electronic and mechanical properties [1,2]. Owing to these fascinating properties, graphene has a range of applications in nano-electronics, catalysis and waste water treatments [3–5]. On the other hand, superparamagnetic Fe3O4 nanoparticles (NPs) have been brought into sharp focus due to their potential biomedical applications such as hyperthermia treatment of cancer [6], contrast agent for magnetic resonance imaging [7], magnetic separation [8], targeted drug delivery [9] and waste water treatments [10]. The NPs are required to be chemically stable, uniform in size with high spe- cific surface area and well dispersed in liquid media for all applications. But due to anisotropic dipolar attraction, pristine NPs of Fe3O4 tend to aggregate into large clusters thereby losing the specific properties associated with single-domain magnetic nanostructures [11]. This can be effectively overcome by loading the magnetic nanoparticles (MNPs) in carbon-based matrix [12]. Carbon nanotubes (CNTs) loaded with MNPs using different chemical approaches and their applications in electrochemical sensing [13], solid phase extraction [14], catalytic properties [15], etc. have been well explored. Due to similarities between CNTs and graphene, it is anticipated that graphene sheets if loaded with Fe3O4 NPs might give an extra feature of magnetic moiety with enhanced properties of the hybrids. * Corresponding author: Fax: +91 22 2572 3480. E-mail address: [email protected] (D. Bahadur). 0008-6223/$ - see front matter 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.carbon.2012.05.002 4210 CARBON 5 0 ( 2 0 1 2 ) 4 2 0 9 –4 2 1 9 Recently, Yang et al. [5] have reported the preparation of graphene oxide (GO)–Fe3O4 hybrids containing 13.4 wt.% Fe3O4 by a chemical precipitation method which showed a very high loading efficiency of a cancer drug. Yu et al. [16] decorated reduced graphene oxide (RGO) nanosheets with Fe3O4 NPs by high temperature decomposition of the precursor iron(III) acetylacetonate and proposed their use as a magnetic resonance contrast agent. He et al. [17] reported the attachment of surface-modified Fe3O4 NPs to GO by covalent bonding. Chen et al. [18] have developed an electromechanical actuator based on graphene and graphene/Fe3O4 hybrid paper by separately mixing aqueous suspension of Fe3O4 NPs and GO and reducing it with hydrazine hydrate (80%) at 90 C. Wang et al. [19] prepared Fe3O4 graphene composites by a gas/liquid interface reaction at 180 C with enhanced cycling performance for lithium-ion batteries. Zhang et al. [20] have developed 3D hierarchical porous Fe3O4/graphene composites with high lithium storage capacity and for controlled drug delivery. Hu et al. [21] and Cheng et al. [22] synthesized graphene–Fe3O4 composites at high temperatures with improved reversible capacity and cyclic stability for lithium-ion batteries. Since the above reaction was carried out at a very high temperature, it was difficult to control pore size distribution for desired applications. Despite significant efforts, multifunctional hybrid materials that take an advantage of the superior properties of graphene and Fe3O4 have been largely unexplored. Also, there is a need to address the existing challenges and problems in the field of graphene–Fe3O4 hybrids, some of which are (1) relatively complex synthesis method (2) control on size, surface properties and coverage density of MNPs on graphene and (3) effect of GO concentration on their microstructural, magnetic and electrochemical properties of the hybrids. To resolve such issues, in the present work we provide an easy one-step co-precipitation route for synthesizing Fe3O4–RGO hybrids at relatively lower temperature (90 C). During the reaction, reduction of GO takes place simultaneously with nucleation and growth of Fe3O4 NPs on RGO nanosheets. We have also investigated the pore size distribution, superparamagnetic behavior and loading amount of MNPs on RGO by controlling the amount of GO. The electrochemical detection of metal ions was carried out using the synthesized hybrids as electrode material. 2. Experimental 2.1. Materials Graphite powder with a particle size of 45 lm (product No. 496596, 99.99 %), Ferric chloride hexahydrate (FeCl3Æ6H2O23648-9) and Ferrous chloride tetrahydrate (FeCl2Æ4H2O22029-9) were obtained from Sigma–Aldrich. Hydrazine hydrate (N2H4, 80%), H2SO4 (98%), HCl (35%), H2O2 (30%), KMnO4 and other chemical reagents were purchased from Thomas Baker, India and used without further purification. A dialysis tubing cellulose membrane used in the purification of GO, was purchased from Sigma–Aldrich (D 9402-100 FT). 2.2. Synthesis of Fe3O4–RGO hybrids Aqueous suspension of GO was prepared by Hummer’s method [23–25] from natural graphite involving graphite oxidation, followed by ultrasonication (see Supplementary information). In a typical procedure, graphite oxide (125 mg) was dispersed in 500 mL of milliQ water (0.25 mg/mL) and ultrasonicated for 4–5 h. It was then centrifuged at 5000 rpm for 20 min and the supernatant was collected for further synthesis of Fe3O4–RGO hybrids. The aqueous suspension of GO was purged with N2 gas and was vigorously stirred for 30 min. FeCl3Æ6H2O (1.838 g, 0.0216 mol) and FeCl2Æ4H2O (0.703 g, 0.0108 mol) were dispersed separately in 20 mL milliQ water and were added to the suspension of GO. Stirring of the mixture was continued at 80 C for 30 min and then, 10 mL of ammonia solution (NH4OH) was quickly injected into the reaction mixture and was stirred for another 30 min. To this, 10 mL of hydrazine hydrate was added and the mixture was again stirred for 4–5 h at 90 C to ensure complete reduction of GO. The above reaction mixture was cooled and washed several times with milliQ and the unreacted precursors were removed using a magnet. We refer the above synthesized Fe3O4–RGO hybrid as Fe3O4–RGO-1 in the text (Fig. 14). By adopting same experimental procedure and fixing all other parameters including weight of reagents, we prepared Fe3O4–RGO-2 (0.5 mg/mL– 500 mL of aqueous suspension of GO) and Fe3O4–RGO-3 (1.0 mg/mL–500 mL of aqueous suspension of GO). 2.3. Instruments and measurements The crystallographic structures of the Fe3O4–RGO hybrids were analyzed by X-ray diffraction (XRD, Philips powder diffractometer PW3040/60 with CuKa radiation). The NPs distribution, morphologies and selected area electron diffraction (SAED) patterns of the Fe3O4–RGO hybrids were characterized by transmission electron microscopy (TEM) using a JEOL JEM2100 facility. Raman measurements were performed on Lab RAM HR 800 micro-Raman spectroscopy using the 514.5 nm line of an Argon (Ar+) laser. The magnetic properties of the hybrids were measured with vibrating sample magnetometer (Lake Shore, VSM-7410). XPS measurements were performed using an ESCA Probe (MULTILAB from Thermo VG Scientific) with a monochromatic Al Ka radiation (Energy = 1486.6 eV). Fourier transform infrared spectra (FTIR) were taken on a JASCO spectrometer (6100 type-A) instrument. The specific surface area, pore volume and pore size distribution of the hybrids were measured by ASAP 2020 Micromeritics instrument. Specific surface areas were determined by the multipoint Brunauer–Emmet–Teller (BET) method. The corresponding pore size distribution and total pore volume were determined by the Brunauer Joyner–Hallenda (BJH) method applied to the desorption branch. Prior to measurements, the samples were outgassed at 40 C with a heating rate of 10 C/min for 1 h and then the temperature was raised up to 50 C and maintained overnight. Zeta potentials of hybrids were measured by zeta potential analyzer, (DelsaNano C, Beckman coulter Inc.). The content of Fe in hybrids was measured by inductively coupled plasma–atomic emission spectrometer (ICP–AES, ARCOS, Germany). The electrochemical measurements (Cyclic Voltammetry) were conducted in a 3-electrode single-cell system in Fe2+/Fe3+ couple electrolyte with 0.1 M PBS as supporting electrolyte. Glassy carbon electrode (GCE, diameter u = 2 mm), Pt-wire and Ag/AgCl electrodes were used as working, counter and reference CARBON 5 0 ( 20 1 2 ) 4 2 0 9–42 1 9 electrodes, respectively with CHI1140A electrochemical workstation (CHI110, Austin, TX). All electrochemical measurements were carried out at room temperature. To eliminate the effect of dissolved oxygen, the electrolyte was purged with nitrogen gas for half an hour. 3. Results and discussion Fig. 1 shows the XRD patterns of the magnetic hybrids Fe3O4– RGO-1, Fe3O4–RGO-2 and Fe3O4–RGO-3 to elucidate the phase and structural parameters. The observed diffraction peaks of the hybrids are in good agreement with those reported in the literature for pure face-centered cubic structured Fe3O4 [20,21]. The absence of (0 0 1) diffraction peak corresponding to graphite oxide (see Supplementary information, Fig. S1) indicates complete exfoliation of RGO nanosheets in the hybrids. Moreover, the full width at half maximum (FWHM) of (3 1 1) diffraction peak of hybrids (inset of Fig. 1) is dependent on concentration of GO and the average crystallite size of Fe3O4 NPs in Fe3O4–RGO-3 as estimated from FWHM of (3 1 1) is larger than Fe3O4–RGO-1 and Fe3O4–RGO-2. FEG-TEM images of the obtained hybrids (Fe3O4–RGO-1, Fe3O4–RGO-2 and Fe3O4–RGO-3) are shown in Fig. 2a–f. It is observed that Fe3O4 NPs are anchored on RGO nanosheets in all three samples. The aggregation of Fe3O4 NPs is maximum for Fe3O4–RGO-1 (Fig. 2a). With an increase in the concentration of RGO in Fe3O4–RGO-2 and Fe3O4–RGO-3, aggregation decreases (Fig. 2b) and a good distribution of Fe3O4 NPs is observed for Fe3O4–RGO-3 (Fig. 2c). The SAED pattern of Fe3O4–RGO-1 (inset Fig. 2a) shows well-defined rings, which are characteristic of the cubic structure of nanocrystalline Fe3O4. As can be seen in TEM micrographs (Fig. 2a–c), after strong sonication (200 W, 2 h) of hybrids during the preparation of the TEM specimen, Fe3O4 NPs were observed only on RGO nanosheets. This implies strong interaction between Fe3O4 NPs and RGO nanosheets. The TEM micrograph of Fe3O4–RGO-1 (Fig. 2d) on a selected site demonstrates good crystallinity and clear lattice fringes Fig. 1 – Powder XRD patterns of as prepared hybrids Fe3O4– RGO-1, Fe3O4–RGO-2 and Fe3O4–RGO-3 respectively. The top left inset shows in large view of (3 1 1) peak. 4211 of the Fe3O4 NPs along with a cross section view of stacked RGO nanosheets (square across the regions with fringes). The crystal lattice fringes with d-spacing of 0.26 nm (inset Fig. 2d) can be assigned to the (3 1 1) plane of the cubic Fe3O4, which is consistent with the d-spacing of (3 1 1) XRD peak, while the interlayer distance of stacked RGO nanosheets was found to be 4.3 Å, corresponding to the spacing of the (0 0 2) planes of graphite. The observed basal spacing is higher than that of well-ordered graphite (3.35 Å). The higher basal spacing may be due to the presence of residual oxygen-containing functional groups, indicating incomplete reduction of GO in RGO nanosheets [26]. The lattice fringes of the Fe3O4 NPs were clearly observed in Fe3O4–RGO-1, but not so well for Fe3O4–RGO-2 and Fe3O4–RGO-3 probably due to increased content of RGO nanosheets (Fig. 2e and f). As expected, during the synthesis of hybrids, restacking process among RGO nanosheets is hampered as the Fe3O4 NPs get anchored randomly on RGO layers which may be responsible for the porous structure in the hybrids. The FTIR spectra of the Fe3O4–RGO hybrids along with GO and RGO are shown in Fig. 3. The observed representative peaks in GO confirm the presence of the oxygen-containing functional moieties in carbon frameworks, which include bands at 1066 cm1 (C–O stretching vibration of epoxide) and 1732 cm1 (C=O stretching of carbonyl and carboxyl groups at edges of the GO networks) [27]. The band at 1620 cm1 is attributed to the skeletal vibration of graphitic domains [28]. All the absorption bands related to oxygen-containing functional groups of GO disappear in the spectrum of RGO nanosheets thereby, confirming the reduction of abovementioned functional groups by hydrazine hydrate. The band at 1532 cm1 could be ascribed to formation of –COO after coating with Fe3O4 NPs [5]. Raman spectra of Fe3O4–RGO hybrids (Fig. 4) reflect two prominent bands at 1344 (D band) and 1596 cm1 (G-bands), which are characteristic of sp2 bonded, honeycomb-structured carbon allotropes [20]. The D band is either absent or very weak in perfect graphite and only becomes active in the presence of defects whereas the prominent G peak observed at 1575 cm1, corresponds to the first-order scattering of the E2g mode (in-plane bond-stretching motion of pairs of C sp2 atoms) [29]. During synthesis of Fe3O4–RGO hybrids, significant structural changes occur in carbon framework of GO which is reflected in terms of shift and intensity ratio (ID/IG) of D and G band [30]. The intensity ratio of the two bands, ID/IG for these hybrids has increased as compared to GO (ID/IG 1.01, (see Supplementary information Table S2) and are in range of 1.4–1.5. This indicates the presence of localized sp3 defects within the sp2 carbon network upon reduction of the exfoliated GO and are in agreement with previous results reported for RGO nanosheets obtained from exfoliated GO [31]. The significant increase in ID/IG intensity ratios were observed due to reduction of exfoliated GO in hybrids. This leads to decrease in the average size of the sp2 domains and can be explained if new graphitic domains are created during reduction and that are smaller in size to the ones present in GO [32]. A small peak appeared at 680 cm1 which indicates the presence of Fe3O4 NPs in the hybrids [33]. 4212 CARBON 5 0 ( 2 0 1 2 ) 4 2 0 9 –4 2 1 9 Fig. 2 – TEM micrographs of Fe3O4–RGO hybrids with different concentration of GO: (a) 0.25 mg/mL, Fe3O4–RGO-1 (b) 0.5 mg/ mL, Fe3O4–RGO-2 and (c) 1.0 mg/mL, Fe3O4–RGO-3. Corresponding HR-TEM images of hybrids show lattice images of Fe3O4 NPs and stacked layers of RGO (d–f). A typical SAED pattern of Fe3O4–RGO-1 is shown in inset of (a). Fig. 3 – FTIR spectra of (a) GO, (b) RGO, and Fe3O4–RGO hybrids with different concentration of GO: (c) Fe3O4–RGO-1, (d) Fe3O4–RGO-2 and (e) Fe3O4–RGO-3. Since we have adopted the same synthesis protocol for all hybrids, XPS was recorded only for Fe3O4–RGO-2 as a representative and compared with that of RGO nanosheets. The bands observed in wide scan XPS spectrum of the Fe3O4– RGO-2 confirm the presence of C1s, O1s, and Fe2p (Fig. 5a). Deconvolution of the C1s peak (Fig. 5b) of RGO shows that relative contribution of the components associated with Fig. 4 – Raman spectra of hybrids Fe3O4–RGO-1, Fe3O4–RGO2, and Fe3O4–RGO-3. oxygenated functional groups decreased markedly, indicating the deoxygenation of GO as reported in literature [21]. The C1s spectra of Fe3O4–RGO-2 (Fig. 5c) shows nonoxygenated carbon (284.8 eV) and the carbon in C–O (286.2 eV) which confirms the presence of RGO. The observed O1s peak in RGO at 531.4 eV is shifted to lower binding energy (530.1 eV) due to attachment of Fe3O4 NPs in Fe3O4–RGO hybrids (Fig. 5d) [31]. The Fe2p XPS spectrum (Fig. 5e) exhibits two peaks at 711.2 and 724.8 eV, corresponding to the Fe2p3/2 and Fe 2p1/2 spin CARBON 5 0 ( 20 1 2 ) 4 2 0 9–42 1 9 4213 Fig. 5 – X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) spectra: (a) wide scan, (b) C1s spectra of RGO, (c) C1s spectra of Fe3O4–RGO-2, (d) O1s spectra of RGO and Fe3O4–RGO-2, and (e) Fe2p spectra of Fe3O4–RGO-2. orbit peaks of Fe3O4 [21,34]. Further, the M–T data is recorded for these hybrids, discussed in next section, which is another indication for formation of the Fe3O4 phase in the RGO matrix. The room-temperature magnetic properties of the Fe3O4– RGO hybrids were measured by VSM. The magnetization of the Fe3O4–RGO hybrids is strongly dependent on Fe3O4 content and loading of these NPs on RGO nanosheets provide crucial information on the magnetic properties. After performing a series of controlled experiments, it has been observed that the concentration of GO plays a crucial role in engineering the loading capacity of the NPs. To get a quantitative information about loading capacity of iron content of NPs in Fe3O4– RGO hybrids, ICP–AES measurements were carried out and the loading amount of iron content (wt.%) in RGO nanosheets was calculated to be 50.8, 45.1 and 38.4% for Fe3O4–RGO-1, Fe3O4–RGO-2, and Fe3O4–RGO-3, respectively. The decrease in the loading amount of Fe content is due to an increase in the concentration of GO. Based on the ICP–AES results, it may be anticipated that magnetization of Fe3O4–RGO-1 should be higher than Fe3O4–RGO-2 and Fe3O4–RGO-3 hybrids. The magnetization of Fe3O4–RGO-1 (57.4 emu g1) at an applied field of 2T, is higher than that of Fe3O4–RGO-2 and Fe3O4–RGO-3 as the amount of RGO increases and that of Fe3O4 decreases [21,35]. Contrary to the above, inspite of higher loading wt.% of Fe content in Fe3O4–RGO-2, the magnetization at an applied field of 2T was found to be slightly lower than the Fe3O4–RGO-3 (37.9 emu g1). Thus, it may be assumed that the magnetization is not only attributed to the loading percentage of Fe content in Fe3O4–RGO hybrids but also to the crystallite size of Fe3O4 NPs (Supplementary information, Table S1) and surface properties discussed later. Further, typical superparamagnetic behavior (zero coercivity and zero remanence) was observed for Fe3O4–RGO-1 and Fe3O4–RGO-2 whereas in Fe3O4–RGO-3 hybrid having larger crystallite size, finite value of coercivity (45.5 Oe) was obtained (inset Fig. 6). This indicates that a precise control of size of the magnetic NPs over GO is also very important to engineer a complete superparamagnetic Fe3O4–RGO hybrid. Since the XRD patterns of Fe3O4 (JCPDS card 19-629) and c-Fe2O3 (JCPDS card 39-1346) are quite similar, it is essential that the temperature dependent magnetization (M–T) measurement is considered to unambiguously assign the crystal phase of the hybrids because TC is very sensitive to crystal phase. The M–T measurements for hybrids at an applied field of 100 Oe (inset of Fig. 6) were recorded, which reveal that values of magnetization in temperature scan 30–600 C depends on RGO content but TC was found to be 853 K, which agrees well with that reported for Fe3O4 whereas the TC of c-Fe2O3 is around 918 K [9]. These results further confirmed that the phase formed in present investigation is Fe3O4 rather than c-Fe2O3 and is supported by the XPS spectra for Fe2p (Fig. 5e). By measuring the zeta potential of Fe3O4–RGO hybrids as a function of pH, the acidity or basicity of surfaces and isoelectric point (IEP) have been determined. It has been observed 4214 CARBON 5 0 ( 2 0 1 2 ) 4 2 0 9 –4 2 1 9 Fig. 6 – The room temperature magnetization hysteresis curves of Fe3O4–RGO hybrids with different concentration of GO: Fe3O4–RGO-1, Fe3O4–RGO-2 and Fe3O4–RGO-3. The bottom right inset shows the magnetization vs. temperature along with TC for these hybrids. The top left inset shows in large view of M–H curve. that IEP of all the hybrids is nearly independent of GO concentration and is found to be in range of 3.5–3.8 (Fig. 7). This indicates that at pH < IEP, the Fe3O4–RGO hybrids exhibit positive surface charge and can act as anion exchanger, while at pH > IEP, the surface charge is negative, which is beneficial for adsorbing cations. In order to examine the porous structure and surface area of the hybrids, N2 adsorption/desorption isotherms were carried out, as shown in Fig. 8a–c. There is a need to control the random and wide distribution of pores to utilize the properties of Fe3O4–RGO hybrids. In the present case, the narrow distribution of pores in Fe3O4–RGO hybrids has been achieved by varying the concentration of GO at relatively lower temperature. The effect of GO on textural properties of hybrids could be well understood by analyzing the shape of hysteresis loops along with the pore size distributions. The increase in the nitrogen uptake at higher relative pressure (P/Po > 0.3) for Fig. 7 – pH dependent zeta-potential plots of GO, RGO, Fe3O4– RGO-1, Fe3O4–RGO-2 and Fe3O4–RGO-3 hybrids at room temperature. the hybrids was due to adsorption in mesopores and the generated N2 isotherms are close to Type IV with an evident hysteresis loop in the 0.4–0.99 range of relative pressure (Fig. 8a–c). This indicates that the mesoporous structure of the Fe3O4–RGO hybrids are according to the IUPAC classification. The hysteresis loop for Fe3O4–RGO-1 is not saturated at very high relative pressure (P/Po), and can be ascribed to H-3 type, suggesting aggregates of Fe3O4 NPs on RGO nanosheets giving rise to slit-shape pores and hence expected to have distribution of pores along with hump as shown in inset of Fig. 8a [36]. The hysteresis loops for Fe3O4–RGO-2 and Fe3O4– RGO-3 are also H-3 type with differences in their desorption branch of isotherms (Fig. 8 b, c) that depend on the concentration of GO. As the concentration of GO increases, the hump in pore size distribution starts decreasing and finally disappears (Fig. 8c). This gives a uniform narrow distribution of pores without hump in Fe3O4–RGO-3. The details of textural parameters of the hybrids are listed in Table 1. We observe that with an increase in the concentration of GO in hybrids, the total pore volume and average pore diameter decrease continuously. However, the BET specific surface area of the hybrids followed a different behavior. The concentration of GO in Fe3O4–RGO-3 is higher than Fe3O4–RGO-2, but the observed specific surface area of Fe3O4–RGO-3 is marginally lower than Fe3O4–RGO-2. The sample Fe3O4–RGO-3 exhibits larger particle size as seen TEM and X-ray data. Also, it is reflected in magnetization measurements with nearly similar value of magnetization as for Fe3O4–RGO-2. While the sample Fe3O4–RGO-2 is essentially superparamagnetic, the sample Fe3O4–RGO-3 is more like ferrimagnetic. It appears that the specific surface area, pore size distribution and total pore volume may be ascribed to the interaction between Fe3O4 NPs aggregates and RGO nanosheets and folded RGO nanosheets. Therefore, the porous structure of Fe3O4–RGO-1 may be due to the Fe3O4 NPs aggregates and their attachment on RGO nanosheets whereas folded RGO nanosheets and well distributed Fe3O4 NPs intercalated in RGO are responsible for porous structure in Fe3O4–RGO-2 and Fe3O4–RGO-3. The pores generated in Fe3O4–RGO hybrids, are anticipated to be beneficial for certain applications such as removing heavy metal cations from water and targeted drug deliveries [10]. With a view to understand the electrochemical properties of the hybrids and their use in electrochemical sensing, cyclic voltammetry was performed. Fig. 9 shows cyclic voltammograms (CVs) of bare GCE, Fe3O4–RGO-1, Fe3O4–RGO-2 and Fe3O4–RGO-3 modified glassy carbon electrodes (GCEs) in 4 0.1 M PBS in presence of 0.1 M FeðCNÞ3 6 =FeðCNÞ6 and the potential was scanned between 0.5 and 1.0 V. The observed redox peaks and their peak-to-peak potential separation (DEp = EpaEpc) are related to the electron transfer (ET) coefficient, and a low DE value indicates a fast ET for a singleelectron electrochemical reaction. The redox peak current responses were much larger on the modified electrodes than the bare electrode, which indicates the electroactive nature of the hybrid material. To ascertain the electroactivity of the hybrid materials, the modified electrodes were tested for selective determination of chromium. Cyclic voltammetry was carried out in presence of 1 nM Cr3+ in the electrolyte at a scan rate of 50 mV/s. As can be seen from the Fig. 10, CVs of Fe3O4–RGO-2 indicated CARBON 4215 5 0 ( 20 1 2 ) 4 2 0 9–42 1 9 Fig. 8 – Nitrogen adsorption/desorption isotherm and pore size distribution (inset) of the as prepared hybrids (a) Fe3O4–RGO-1, (b) Fe3O4–RGO-2 and (c) Fe3O4–RGO-3. The filled and open symbols indicate adsorption and desorption branches. presence of two well-resolved anodic and cathodic peaks which were not seen in Fe3O4–RGO-1 and Fe3O4–RGO-3 modified electrodes. However, a small redox hump was observed in the CV of Fe3O4–RGO-3 modified electrodes. From the above observation, it can be said that the Fe3O4–RGO-2 hybrid with 0.5 mg/mL graphene oxide gives optimum detection limit for the chromium ions. The anodic peaks appeared at 0.248 and 0.864 V while the cathodic peaks were seen at 0.006 and 0.696 V; DEp were calculated to be 240 and 168 mV. The ratio of anodic to cathodic peak current (Ipa/Ipc) were calculated to be 1.04 indicating a reversible reaction on the electrodes. On the forward anodic scan, the oxidation wave is attributed to the oxidation of Cr(III) to Cr(IV) species while the peak in reverse scan is attributed to the reduction of the Cr(IV) to the parent Cr(III) ions. The diffusion coefficients of the electrode system were measured using Randles–Sevcik equation [37] as described below: ip ¼ ð2:69 105 Þ n3=2 C D0:5 m0:5 where ip is the peak current density (A/cm2), n is the number of electrons, C is the concentration (mol/cm3), D is the diffusion constant (cm2/s) and m is the sweep rate (V/s). The determination of the diffusion coefficient is important to determine the rate at which the electroactive species moves onto the electrode surface. The values of D was calculated using the above Table 1 – Textural analysis of Fe3O4–RGO hybrids with different GO concentration. Hybrids Fe3O4–RGO-1 (0.25 mg/mL) Fe3O4–RGO-2 (0.5 mg/mL) Fe3O4–RGO-3 (1.0 mg/mL) BET (m2/g) 137.12 207.99 204.89 Single point adsorption total pore volume of pores (cm3/g) 0.33 0.25 0.22 BJH desorption average pore diameter (4 V/A) (Å) 82.5 46.1 43.1 4216 CARBON 5 0 ( 2 0 1 2 ) 4 2 0 9 –4 2 1 9 Fig. 9 – Cyclic voltammograms of bare GCE, Fe3O4–RGO-1, Fe3O4–RGO-2 and Fe3O4–RGO-3 modified GCE in 0.1 M PBS in 4 presence of 0.1 M FeðCNÞ3 6 =FeðCNÞ6 . Fig. 12 – CV of Fe3O4–RGO-2 modified electrode in 0.1 M 4 3+ at different scan rates. FeðCNÞ3 6 =FeðCNÞ6 with 30 nM Cr Linear relation of the anodic and cathodic peak currents vs. the square root of the scan rate is shown in the inset. Fig. 10 – Electrochemical response of the modified electrodes towards chromium. Fig. 13 – Electrochemical response of Fe3O4–RGO-2 modified electrode towards successive addition of chromium (III) ions in the electrolyte. Insets show enlarged plot of cathodic peak currents vs. potentials at different concentrations of Cr3+ ions (top left) and plot of cathodic peak currents vs. different concentrations of Cr3+ ions (bottom right). 8 6 Fe3O4-RGO-2 with 30 nM of Cr+3 > 2 0 > Current/10-5A 4 -2 -4 -6 -8 1.0 0.8 0.6 0.4 0.2 0.0 -0.2 -0.4 -0.6 Potential/V vs. Ag/AgCl Fig. 11 – Cyclic voltammograms of the Fe3O4–RGO-2 modified electrode depicting stability towards chromium ion. equation and was found to be 2.38 · 1010, 19.38 · 1010 and 10.16 · 1010 cm2/s for Fe3O4–RGO-1, Fe3O4–RGO-2 and Fe3O4– RGO-3, respectively. As can be seen that the Fe3O4–RGO-2 gives the highest diffusion coefficient which credence the observation that it is more selective towards chromium. Henceforth, all the electrochemical studies were performed with Fe3O4–RGO-2 modified GCE. CV measurements was recorded for Fe3O4–RGO-2 in presence of 30 nM Cr3+ for 10 cycles at a scan rate of 50 mV/s (Fig. 11) and it shows no change in the oxidation/reduction current peak indicating the stability of the electrode material. CVs of Fe3O4–RGO-2 modified electrodes were carried out in 4 3+ ions at var0.1 M FeðCNÞ3 6 =FeðCNÞ6 in presence of 30 nM Cr ious scan rates and are shown in Fig. 12. The anodic and the cathodic peak current increased with increase in the scan rate. Both anodic (Ipa) and cathodic (Ipc) peak currents showed linearity with the square root of the scan rate (m) over the entire range of 10–400 mV/s., which suggest that the redox processes on Fe3O4–RGO-2 modified GCE electrodes are predominantly CARBON 5 0 ( 20 1 2 ) 4 2 0 9–42 1 9 4217 Fig. 14 – Schematic representation of RGO loaded with Fe3O4 NPs. diffusion controlled mass transfer reactions. The plot of Ip against m1/2 gave straight lines for both anodic and cathodic peak with r2 of 0.99898 and 0.9999, respectively. The difference between the anodic and the cathodic peak potential (DEp) was found to increase with increase in scan rate. Under the same condition, CVs were again measured using Fe3O4–RGO-2 modified GCE electrode with varying Cr(III) concentrations ranging from 0.2 to 2 nM (Fig. 13). As can be seen that the intensity of cathodic peak current increased with an increase of Cr(III) ion concentration. On further addition of chromium, the anodic peak potential shifted to a higher potential and the cathodic peak potential shifted to more negative side along with rise in peak currents. This behavior shows the analytical importance of the modified electrode in the determination of chromium. Based on all the above results, it is corroborated that surface area plays an important role in electrochemical performance of a system. The interaction of Fe3O4 NPs with RGO membranes is well-documented [38] and it can be seen that both the components contribute to the surface area of the hybrid material. Further, the magnetic properties of magnetic NPs show strong dependence on the average crystallite size, and magnetization decreases with decreasing crystallite size due to increasing surface disorder and spin canting effect [39]. In the present study, the crystallite size of Fe3O4 NPs in Fe3O4–RGO-3 hybrid is larger than Fe3O4–RGO-2, which results in reduced surface spin canting effect or surface spin disorder, and possibly cation site distribution in Fe3O4–RGO-3 hybrids. This in turn, is responsible for higher magnetic moment, finite coercivity (45.5 Oe) (Fig. 6) and lower specific surface area for Fe3O4–RGO-3 hybrid. The highest surface area of Fe3O4–RGO-2 hybrid results in optimum electrochemical detection of chromium. The onset of a new redox peak in the cyclic voltammograms of Fe3O4–RGO-2 hybrid modified electrode indicates enhanced electron transfer resulting in an improved electrochemical response towards chromium ions. This is further supported by the highest diffusion coefficient of the Fe3O4–RGO-2 hybrids modified electrodes as calculated by the Randles–Sevcik equation. 4. Conclusions A simple method for in situ conversion of iron salts to magnetic NPs and simultaneous reduction of GO into RGO nanosheets in aqueous solution has been proposed for the preparation of Fe3O4–RGO hybrids. The distribution and loading of Fe3O4 NPs on RGO nanosheets, along with distribution of pores is controlled by altering the GO concentration at relatively lower temperature. The zeta potentials of the hybrids are pH dependent and can flip on both sides of IEP as compared to GO. More 4218 CARBON 5 0 ( 2 0 1 2 ) 4 2 0 9 –4 2 1 9 importantly, the IEP of Fe3O4–RGO hybrids are nearly independent of GO concentrations. The CVs response suggests that Fe3O4–RGO-2 is electroactive towards chromium ion and can be used for its electrochemical sensing. The proposed Fe3O4– RGO modified electrodes might be useful for a simple and effective way to develop electrochemical sensors for other trivalent cations in biological systems and waste water. Acknowledgments Financial supports from Department of Science and Technology (DST) and Department of Information Technology (DIT), Government of India are gratefully acknowledged. The authors are thankful to the Centre for Research in Nanotechnology & Science (CRNTS) for TEM and Raman facilities. Appendix A. Supplementary data Supplementary data associated with this article can be found, in the online version, at http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.carbon. 2012.05.002. R E F E R E N C E S [1] Li D, Kaner RB. Graphene-based materials. Science 2008;320:1170–1. [2] Geim AK, Novoselov KS. The rise of graphene. Nat Mater 2007;6. 183-1. [3] Eda G, Fanchini G, Chhowalla M. Large-area ultrathin films of reduced graphene oxide as a transparent and flexible electronic material. Nat Nanotechnol 2008;3:270–4. [4] Gao W, Majumder M, Alemany LB, Narayanan TN, Ibarra MA, Pradhan BK, et al. Engineered graphite oxide materials for application in water purification. Appl Mater Interfaces 2011;3:1821–6. [5] Yang X, Zhang X, Ma Y, Huang Y, Wang Y, Chen Y. Superparamagnetic graphene oxide–Fe3O4 nanoparticles hybrid for controlled targeted drug carriers. J Mater Chem 2009;19:2710–4. [6] Chandra S, Barick KC, Bahadur D. Oxide and hybrid nanaostructures for therapeutic applications. Adv Drug Deliver Rev 2011;63:1267–81. [7] Barick KC, Aslam M, Lin YP, Bahadur D, Prasad PV, Dravid VP. Novel and efficient MR active aqueous colloidal Fe3O4 nanoassemblies. J Mater Chem 2009;19:7023–9. [8] Gu HW, Xu KM, Xu CJ, Xu B. Biofunctional magnetic nanoparticles for protein separation and pathogen detection. Chem Commun 2006:941–9. [9] Nigam S, Barick KC, Bahadur D. Development of citratestabilized Fe3O4 nanoparticles: conjugation and release of doxorubicin for therapeutic applications. J Magn Magn Mater 2011;323:237–43. [10] Singh S, Barick KC, Bahadur D. Surface engineered magnetic nanoparticles for removal of toxic metal ions and bacterial pathogens. J Hazard Mater 2011;192:1539–47. [11] Cao H, He J, Deng L, Gao X. Fabrication of cyclodextrinfunctionalized superparamagnetic Fe3O4/amino-silane core– shell nanoparticles via layer-by-layer method. Appl Surf Sci 2009;255:7974–80. [12] Zhang WM, Wu XL, Hu JS, Guo YG, Wan LJ. Carbon coated Fe3O4 nanospindles as a superior anode material for lithiumion batteries. Adv Funct Mater 2008;18:3941–6. [13] Qu S, Wang J, Kong J, Yang P, Chen G. Magnetic loading of carbon nanotube/nano Fe3O4 composite for electrochemical sensing. Talanta 2007;71:1096–102. [14] Correa-Duarte MA, Grzelczak M, Salgueirino-Maceira V, Giersig M, Liz-Marzan LM, Farle M, et al. Alignment of carbon nanotubes under low magnetic fields through attachment of magnetic nanoparticles. J Phys Chem B 2005;109:19060–3. [15] Musameh M, Wang J. Magnetically induced carbon nanotubemediated control of electrochemical reactivity. Langmuir 2005;21:8565–8. [16] Cong HP, He JJ, Lu Y, Yu SH. Water-soluble magneticfunctionalized reduced graphene oxide sheets: in situ synthesis and magnetic resonance imaging applications. Small 2010;6:169–73. [17] He F, Fan J, Ma D, Zhang L, Leung C, Chan HL. The attachment of Fe3O4 nanoparticles to graphene oxide by covalent bonding. Carbon 2010;48:3139–44. [18] Liang J, Huang Y, Oh J, Kozlov M, Sui D, Fang S, et al. Electromechanical actuators based on graphene and graphene/Fe3O4 hybrid paper. Adv Funct Mater 2011;21:3778–84. [19] Lian P, Zhu X, Xiang H, Li Z, Yang W, Wang H. Enhanced cycling performance of Fe3O4–graphene nanocomposite as an anode material for lithium-ion batteries. Electrochim Acta 2010;56:834–40. [20] Li X, Huang X, Liu D, Wang X, Song S, Zhou L, et al. Facile synthesis of 3D hierarchical Fe3O4/graphene composites with high lithium storage capacity and for controlled drug delivery. J Phys Chem C 2011;115:21567–73. [21] Su J, Cao M, Ren L, Hu C. Fe3O4–graphene nanocomposites with improved lithium storage and magnetism properties. J Phys Chem C 2011;115:14469–77. [22] Zhou G, Wang DW, Li F, Zhang L, Wu ZS, Wen L, et al. Graphene-wrapped Fe3O4 anode material with improved reversible capacity and cyclic stability for lithium ion batteries. Chem Mater 2010;22:5306–13. [23] Becerril HA, Mao J, Liu Z, Stoltenberg R, Bao Z, Chen YS. Evaluation of solution processed functionalized graphene films as transparent conductors. ACS Nano 2008;2:463–70. [24] Hummers WS, Offeman RE. Preparation of graphitic oxide. J Am Chem Soc 1958;80:1339. [25] Hirata M, Gotou T, Horiuchi S, Fujiwara M, Ohba M. Thin-film particles of graphite oxide 1: high-yield synthesis and flexibility of the particles. Carbon 2004;42:2929–37. [26] Nethravathi C, Rajamathi M. Chemically modified graphene sheets produced by the solvothermal reduction of colloidal dispersions of graphite oxide. Carbon 2008;46:1994–8. [27] Liang Y, Wu D, Feng X, Mullen K. Dispersion of graphene sheets in organic solvent supported by ionic interactions. Adv Mater 2009;21:1679–83. [28] Si Y, Samulski ET. Synthesis of water soluble graphene. Nano Lett 2008;8:1679–82. [29] Tuinstra F, Koenig JL. Raman spectrum of graphite. J Chem Phys 1970;53:1126–30. [30] Stankovich S, Dikin DA, Piner RD, Kohlhaas KA, Kleinhammes A, Jia Y, et al. Synthesis of graphene-based nanosheets via chemical reduction of exfoliated graphite oxide. Carbon 2007;45:1558–65. [31] Chandra V, Park J, Chun Y, Lee JW, Hwang IC, Kim KS. Waterdispersible magnetite reduced graphene oxide composites for arsenic removal. ACS Nano 2010;4:3979–86. [32] Poizot P, Lauruelle S, Grugeon S, Dupont L, Tarascon JM. Nano-sized transition-metal oxides as negativeelectrode materials for lithium-ion batteries. Nature 2000;407:496–9. [33] Sousa MH, Tourinho FA, Rubim JC. Use of Raman microspectroscopy in the characterization of MIIFe2O4 (M=Fe, Zn) CARBON 5 0 ( 20 1 2 ) 4 2 0 9–42 1 9 electric double layer ferrofluids. J. Raman Spectrosc 2000;31:185–91. [34] Teng X, Black D, Watkins NJ, Gao Y, Yang H. Platinum– maghemite core–shell nanoparticles using a sequential synthesis. Nano Lett 2003;3:261–4. [35] Berkowitz AE, Schuele WJ, Flanders PJ. Influence of crystallite size on the magnetic properties of acicular c-Fe2O3 Particles. J Appl Phys 1968;39:1261–3. [36] Valente JS, Cantu MS, Cortez JGH, Montiel R, Bokhimi X, Salinas EL. Preparation and characterization of sol–gel MgAl hydrotalcites with nanocapsular morphology. J Phys Chem C 2007;111:642–51. 4219 [37] Yan J, Sun W, Wei T, Zhang Q, Fan Z, Wei F. Fabrication and electrochemical performances of hierarchical porous Ni(OH)2 nanoflakes anchored on graphene sheets. J Mater Chem 2012. http://dx.doi.org/10.1039/C2JM30221G. [38] Narayanan TN, Liu Z, Lakshmy PR, Gao W, Nagaoka Y, Ajayan PM, et al. Synthesis of reduced graphene oxide–Fe3O4 multifunctional freestanding membranes and their temperature dependent electronic transport properties. Carbon 2012;50:1338–45. [39] Morales MP, Verdaguer SV, Montero MI, Serna CJ. Surface and internal spin canting in c-Fe2O3 nanoparticles. Chem Mater 1999;11:3058–64.