Survey
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
COHESION POLICY DELIVERING ADDED VALUE TO THE EU AND ITS CITIZENS Mariana HRISTCHEVA Evaluation & European Semester DG REGIO 1 Regional Policy The ex post evaluation • 14 work packages, independent experts • 63 programme, 20 project case studies • Interviewed: • 3 000 beneficiaries; • 1 000 Managing authority employees; • 530 stakeholders participating in 10 seminars to discuss the results • State of the art evaluation methods 2 Regional Policy Macroeconomic impact 3 Regional Policy Net positive impact for all MS (GDP, % deviation from baseline) 6 5 4 3 2 1 2015 EU-12 EU-15 PL LV HU LT EE RO CZ SK BG GR PT SI MT ES AT CY IT DE FI IE FR BE SE UK NL DK LU 0 2023 4 Regional Policy Regional Policy Headline figures 6 Regional Policy Context: Cohesion Policy as % of public investment ERDF & CF AS A % OF GOVERNMENT CAPITAL INVESTMENT 2007-2013 EU27 = 6.5% AVERAGE 7 Regional Policy Selected achievements • About 400 000 SMEs supported • Over 5 000 km of new roads (2 400 km TEN-T) • About 4 000 km of railway upgraded (2 600 km TEN-T built) • About 6 million more people connected to drinking water • About 7 million people connected to wastewater treatment In Poland, the share of municipal waste going to landfills was reduced from 90% to 53% Reduced energy use in public buildings in Lithuania (=3% of national energy consumption) 8 Regional Policy Key lessons learned 9 Regional Policy Results & performance Issue Addressed in 2014-20 by… ~90% of FIs in just 1 field (enterprise support) Regulations allow FIs in all themes and volumes are expanding Broad focus programmes, lacking clear goals Thematic concentration, result indicators Project contribution to programme objectives unclear Project selection criteria must take account of result indicators, better monitoring indicators Making it difficult to track programme progress (other than spending) Regular reporting of results and outputs, performance framework linked to a performance reserve Evaluations often focused on delivery and monitoring Impact evaluation for each of the specific objectives, assessing contribution to results 10 Regional Policy Performance, transparency and accountability • Thematic concentration of resources • Clear objectives, measurable results including performance framework and reserve • Ex-ante conditionalities • Expanded use of financial instruments • Smart specialization strategies; • Strengthened monitoring; • Impact evaluations 11 Regional Policy Transparency and Accountability 2014-20 • Open Data Platform: i • Detailed data on planned and achieved investments (Dec 2016) 12 Regional Policy Thank you! • Cohesion Policy at work - 2007-2013: http://ec.europa.eu/regional_policy/en/newsroom/news/2 016/10/10-07-2016-cohesion-policy-at-work-keyoutcomes-of-eu-investments-in-2007-2013 • ESIF Open Data Platform: https://cohesiondata.ec.europa.eu/ • Evaluation: http://ec.europa.eu/regional_policy/en/policy/evaluations/ 13 Regional Policy