Survey
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Travel Time Tomographic Imaging of Shallow Fore-arc Basin Structure at the Cascadia Subduction Zone Offshore Washington INSTITUT DE PHYSIQUE DU GLOBE DE PARIS R. Azarm, H. Carton. Institut de Physique du Globe de Paris (IPGP) [email protected] Below: Travel time misfit plots (the difference between the observed (picked) travel times and the predicted travel times), and histogram of the distribution of residuals before (left image) and after (right image) inversion. Introduction The Cascadia subduction zone (CSZ) where the very young (late Miocene, ~10 Ma old) oceanic crust of Juan de Fuca (JdF) plate is being subducted beneath the overlying North American continental plate, extends 1100 km from the Mendocino Escarpment off northern California to northern Vancouver Island. 4500 3.5 3500 2.5 Misfit counts 3000 2500 2000 2 1.5 1500 1 1000 0.5 500 0 0 The probability of occurrence of a giant earthquake in the future not only poses major seismic and societal hazards to populations of the Pacific Northwest but would cause tsunami damages across the Pacific Ocean. It is therefore of particular interest to gain insight into the structure and asses the seismo-tectonic behaviour along this margin. The knowledge about the geometry and properties of the plate boundary, the hydration state of the descending oceanic plate and the amount of subducting sediment are thus of fundamental importance. Focused geophysical studies continue to advance our understanding of Cascadia margin. 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0 300 600 900 1200 1500 1800 2100 2400 2700 0 300 600 900 1200 1500 1800 2100 2400 2700 Depth [km] Depth [m] Residuals [s] 0 4 8 12 16 20 24 28 32 36 40 44 48 52 56 60 Distance[km] 1.6 1.8 2 0 4 8 12 16 20 24 28 32 36 40 44 48 52 56 0.5 0.6 0.7 0 -0.08 -0.06 -0.04 -0.02 0 0.02 0.04 0.06 0.08 Residuals [s] 60 Distance [km] 2.2 2.4 2.6 Velocity [km/s] 2.8 3 3.2 3.4 1.4 Above: Laterally homogeneous starting velocity model and tomographic inversion result (Final model). Depth [m] 1.4 Right: Final model restricted to the ray covered area. 0 300 600 900 1200 1500 1800 2100 2400 2700 0 1.6 4 8 1.8 12 2 16 2.2 2.4 2.6 Velocity [km/s] 20 24 28 32 36 2.8 40 44 3 48 3.2 52 56 3.4 60 Distance[km] 1.4 1.6 1.8 2 2.2 2.4 2.6 Velocity [km/s] 2.8 3 3.2 Above: The derivative weight sum (DWS) for the best-fit model. The colour-bar represents the number of rays per inversion cell. Note a good coverage in central and shallow parts (reliable regions for interpretation). Regions associated with lighter colour (toward the edges and deeper parts) are not well resolved. 3.4 Results 0 300 600 900 1200 1500 1800 2100 2400 2700 Depth [m] Depth [m] Below left: Resolvability of the final model is assessed using checkerboard pattern tests with different anomaly sizes. We then compare our tomographically-derived velocity models to coincident seismic reflection images post-stack time migrated and converted to depth using our results (below right). On the Washington shelf, where the fore-arc basin is segmented into three sub-basins, ray coverage mostly extends to ∼1.2–1.5 km below seafloor. Velocities in the shallowmost sediments show, at the large scale, a gradual decrease towards the shelf edge (from 2.1 to 1.8 km/s). At depth, regions devoid of clear reflections such as an ∼5 km large anticline core are associated with lower velocities than that obtained within mildly deformed sedimentary layers on either side (2.3 vs 2.7 km/s, measured at 1.2 km depth), suggesting the presence of localized fluid-rich regions within the basin. Methods 0 4 8 12 16 20 24 28 32 36 40 44 48 52 56 60 0 300 600 900 1200 1500 1800 2100 2400 2700 0 4 8 12 16 20 24 0 300 600 900 1200 1500 1800 2100 2400 2700 0 4 8 12 16 20 24 28 32 36 40 44 48 52 56 60 0 300 600 900 1200 1500 1800 2100 2400 2700 0 4 8 12 16 20 24 0 4 8 12 16 20 24 28 32 36 40 44 48 52 56 60 0 300 600 900 1200 1500 1800 2100 2400 2700 0 4 8 12 16 20 Distance [km] -0.1 -0.08 -0.06 -0.04 32 36 40 44 48 52 56 60 28 32 36 40 44 48 52 56 60 36 40 44 48 52 56 60 Distance [km] Depth [m] Distance [km] 0 300 600 900 1200 1500 1800 2100 2400 2700 28 Distance [km] Depth [m] Depth [m] Distance [km] Depth [m] We conduct a P-wave tomography study of shallow fore-arc basin structure at the Cascadia subduction zone using first-arrival travel times from two multichannel seismic (MCS) profiles acquired with an 8-km long streamer in the frame of the 2012 Cascadia Ridge to trench program. The first profile extends offshore Gray’s Harbor in Washington and the second extends offshore Oregon at the latitude of Hydrate ridge, with the fore-arc basin imaged below ∼60 and ∼70-km long shallow water (< 500 m) portions of these profiles, respectively. We use the travel time tomography method of VanAvendonk et al. [2004], which is based on the shortest path method for ray tracing, and iterative inversions driven by gradual reduction of the chi-square misfit (root mean square value of the difference between predicted and observed travel times normalized by pick uncertainty). We construct our starting model by hanging to the seafloor a 1D velocity profile based on interval velocities derived from semblance analysis of MCS data. 4 3 The convergence rate varies from 30 mm/y at the southern end of the plate boundary to 45 mm/y at its northern end. Even though the relatively short documentary history (late eighteenth century) dose not provide any written record to estimate the size and recurrence interval of earthquakes at Cascadia, geological evidences suggest the potential capability of generating Magnitude ~ 9.0 earthquakes. The Cascadia Ridge to Trench study was designed to characterise the structure and evolution of the JdF plate and to test the hypothesis that the JdF plate is significantly hydrated prior to subduction, transporting water into the subduction zone, and contributing to along-strike variations in structure and seismicity along the Cascadia margin. The experiment included two East-West transects extending from the JdF ridge to the accretionary wedge and shelf of the Cascadia margin and a long trench-parallel line outboard of the Cascadia accretionary wedge. ×10 4000 Misfit counts IPGP [email protected] -0.02 0 0.02 Velocity [km/s] 24 28 32 Distance [km] 0.04 0.06 0.08 0.1 -0.1 -0.08 -0.06 -0.04 -0.02 0 0.02 Velocity [km/s] 0.04 0.06 0.08 0.1 Refrences AH. J. Van Avendonk, D. J. Shillington, W. S. Holbrook, and M. J. Hornbach. Inferring crustal structure in the Aleutian island arc from a sparse wide-angle seismic data set. Geochemistry, Geophysics, Geosystems, 5(8), 2004. T. J. Crone, M. Tolstoy, and H. Carton. Estimating shallow water sound power levels and mitigation radii for the R/V Marcus G. Langseth using an 8 km long MCS streamer. Journal of Geochemistry, Geophysics, Geosystems, 15(10):15252027, 2014. S. Han, (2015) Accretion and subduction of oceanic lithosphere: 2D and 3D seismic studies of off-axis magma lenses at East Pacific Rise 9 3740N area and downgoing Juan de Fuca Plate at Cascadia Subduction Zone, PhD thesis, Columbia Univ. T. Parsons, R. E. Wells, M. A. Fisher. Three-dimensional velocity structure of Siletzia and other accreted terranes in the Cascade forearm of Washington, J. of Geophysical research 104(B8), 1999