Survey
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Glass-Forming Ability and Competitive Crystalline Phases for Lightweight Ti-Be–Based Alloys Y. ZHANG, W.G. ZHANG, J.P. LIN, G.J. HAO, G.L. CHEN, and P.K. LIAW The glass-forming ability (GFA) for the Ti-Be–based alloys in the Ti-Be-Zr ternary system is systematically studied. It was found that the best GFA obtained at a composition of Ti41Be34Zr25 (at. pct) in the Ti-Be-Zr ternary system, and the bulk-metallic-glass (BMG) rod samples with a diameter of 5 mm were fabricated by Cu-mold casting. The competitive crystalline phases around the composition of the best GFA materials were determined by scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and X-ray diffractometry (XRD). The GFA of the ternary alloys was further improved by an addition of 4 at. pct vanadium (V). The largest supercooled liquid region, DTx (DTx = Tx Tg, Tg is the glass-transition temperature, and Tx the crystallization temperature), in the ternary alloy system reaches about 110 K (110 C) for the Ti35Be32Zr33 alloy. DOI: 10.1007/s11661-009-0122-9 The Minerals, Metals & Materials Society and ASM International 2010 I. INTRODUCTION BULK-METALLIC GLASSES (BMGs) have attracted extensive interest due to their unique physical, chemical, and mechanical properties attributed to the randomatomic configurations. Owing to their high glassforming ability (GFA), good processing ability, and exceptional stability with respect to the crystallization, along with many promising properties, such as high strengths, elastic strain limits, wear resistance, fatigue resistance, and corrosion resistant, BMGs have been the focus of the scientific research over the past 20 years.[1–19] Much more attention was paid to Ti-based amorphous alloys because of their high specific strength and relatively low cost. However, most currently available Ti-based BMGs with high GFA contain a high portion of late transition metals (LTMs) (e.g., Ni, Cu, and Sn), which are necessary for glass formation, and the specific strength of these BMGs is compromised of the high density of these LTMs. In this article, we attempted to exclude the LTMs in Ti-based BMGs to further improve their specific strength. The reported scheme based on the binary eutectic clusters is applied to predict a base alloy in the Ti-Zr-Be system. As a result, there is a class of Ti-based bulk amorphous alloys excluding LTMs with Y. ZHANG, J.P. LIN, and G.L. CHEN, Professors, and G.J. HAO, Research Associate, are with the State Key Laboratory for Advanced Metals and Materials, University of Science and Technology Beijing, Beijing 100083, China. Contact e-mail: [email protected] W.G. ZHANG, formerly Graduate Student, State Key Laboratory for Advanced Metals and Materials, University of Science and Technology Beijing, is with the Chinese Academy of Space Technology, Beijing 100083, China. P.K. LIAW, Professor, is with the Department of Materials Science and Engineering, The University of Tennessee, Knoxville TN 37996-2200. This article is based on a presentation given in the symposium ‘‘Bulk Metallic Glasses VI,’’ which occurred during the TMS Annual Meeting, February 15–19, 2009, in San Francisco, CA, under the auspices of TMS, the TMS Structural Materials Division, TMS/ASM: Mechanical Behavior of Materials Committee. METALLURGICAL AND MATERIALS TRANSACTIONS A high GFA, exceptional thermal stability, very high specific strength, and large compressive plasticity. Tanner[20–23] reported that amorphous ribbons (typically 30-lm thick) in the Ti-Be, Zr-Be, and Ti-Zr-Be systems could be prepared by splat-quenching or meltspinning techniques at high cooling rates of ~106 K s1. Recently, Wiest et al.[24,25] reported a series of ZrBeTi ternary BMGs with high GFA. By tailoring the primary dendrite phase, a tensile ductility was achieved in the Ti-based BMG composite.[26] In the present work, the binary eutectic-cluster-rule[27] and eutectic-coupled-zone methods[3,4] were applied to optimize the GFA in the Ti-Be-Zr alloy system. The article intends to clarify the glass-formation zone and its crystal phases. II. EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES Alloys were prepared using elements with purity better than 99.9 wt pct. The elements were weighed to be within ±0.1 pct of the calculated mass to ensure accurate compositions and were ultrasonically cleaned in acetone and ethanol before melting. Typically, 10-g ingots were arc melted on a Cu hearth in a Ti-gettered argon atmosphere and flipped at least 3 times to ensure the chemical homogeneity. The mass deviation after melting was maintained to be within ±0.1 pct from the originally weighed alloy before melting. Alloy rods with diameters of 3, 5, and 8 mm were prepared by means of copper-mold-suction castings. The phase structural identification of these alloys was carried out by means of the X-ray diffractometry (XRD) on the sections of the rods using Cu Ka radiation (k = 0.154 nm). The thermal properties associated with the glass transition and crystallization of the amorphous phase were measured using differential scanning calorimetry (DSC). The DSC traces were monitored during continuous heating from 373 to 1273 K (100 to 1000 C) using a constant heating rate of 0.33 K/s (0.33 C/s). The melting process of the alloys was studied by Perkin Elmer differential temperature analysis (DTA), DTA-7, with a heating rate of 0.33 K/s (0.33 C/s); the experimental detail can be seen in Reference 28. Specimens with a diameter of 2 mm and an aspect ratio of 2 were compressed between two SiC platens at an engineering strain rate of 10-4s-1. The density of bulk glassy alloys was measured by the Archimedean principle. As for exploring the glass formation of Ti-Be–based alloys, 20 Ti-Be-Cu ternary alloys, 10 Ti-Be-Si ternary alloys, and 10 Ti-Be-Y ternary alloys were cast into 3-mm-diameter-rod samples. However, no glass phase formed after being detected by the XRD analysis. After that, the study focused on the ternary Ti-Be-Zr alloys. Totally, more than 50 alloys along 8 composition lines in the Ti-Be-Zr ternary alloy system were studied by arc melting and suction casting into 3-mm-diameter-rod samples, in which 17 alloys can form BMGs in 3-mm rods. The glass-formation compositions were shown in Figure 1. The alloy marked by red circles was found to have the best GFA, which can form BMG with at least 5-mm-diameter-rod samples. The typical alloys studied in this work were also listed in Table I. Figure 2 shows the glass-formation zones of 3 and 5 mm in the partial ternary-phase diagram. It is obvious that there are two glass-formation zones in the Ti-rich Ti-Be-Zr ternary phase diagram. The first one with higher Be and Ti contents can form BMGs in a 5-mm diameter, while the other one with the more Zr content can only form 3-mm BMGs. Figure 3 presents the scanning electron microscopy (SEM) pictures of the casting 3-mm-diameter-rod samples of the alloys of (a) and (b) Ti55Be30Zr15, (c) Ti39Be30Zr31, (d) Ti52Be32Zr16, (e) Ti54Be34Zr12, and (f) Ti55Be35Zr10. Figures 3(a) and (b) indicate that the casting 3-mm rod of the alloy of Ti55Be30Zr15 is mainly of the eutectic of a-Ti + BeTi. Figure 3(c) shows that the alloys of Ti39Be30Zr31 are mainly composed of the b-Ti solid-solution dendrite + amorphous phase. Figure 3(d) demonstrates that the alloy of Ti52Be32Zr16 consists of the phases of a-Ti + BeTi + Be2Zr. Figure 3(e) shows that the alloy of Ti54Be34Zr12 is mainly composed of a-Ti + BeTi + amorphous phases. Figure 3(f) shows that the alloy of Ti55Be35Zr10 mainly consists of the a-Ti + BeTi phases. The amorphous phase formation with the competitive crystalline phases can be presented in Figure 4. Figure 4(a) presents the amorphous phase and its competitive primary phases of a-Ti, BeTi, and Be2Zr, while Figure 4(b) shows the amorphous phase and its competitive crystalline phases of a-Ti, Be2Zr, and b-Zr. The first glass-formation zone contains two intermetallic compounds and one solid solution. The second one includes only one intermetallic compound and two solid solutions. The GFA of the first one is better than that of the second one. This trend will be further discussed later.[27,29] Fig. 1—Alloys studied exhibiting GFA of forming 3-mm-diameterrod BMGs, and the two lines were the connections of the binary glass-formation region in the Ti-Be and Zr-Be binary alloys. Fig. 2—Glass-formation zones of 3-mm and 5-mm rods in the TiBe-Zr ternary alloy system. III. RESULTS Table I. Composition Ti45Be30Zr25 Ti43Be32Zr25 Ti47Be34Zr19 Ti41Be34Zr25 Ti35Be32Zr33 Ti41Be30Zr25V4 Phase Amorphous Amorphous Amorphous Amorphous Amorphous Amorphous Amorphous Parameters for the Typical Ti-Be–Based Alloys Tg (K) 566.1 585.7 590.1 573.9 588 572.3 (293.1 C) (312.7 C) (317.1 C) (300.9 C) (315 C) (299.3 C) TX1 (K) 616.0 (343 C) 658.8 (385.8 C) 645.5 (372.5 C) 627.9 (354.9 C) 702 (429 C) 645.2 (372.2 C) DTX (K) 50 73.1 55.4 54.0 113 72.9 (50 C) (73.1 C) (55.4 C) (54.0 C) (113 C) (72.9 C) Size (mm) 3 5 5 5 3 8 METALLURGICAL AND MATERIALS TRANSACTIONS A Fig. 3—SEM pictures of the casting alloys of (a) and (b) Ti55Be30Zr15, (c) Ti39Be30Zr31, (d) Ti52Be32Zr16, (e) Ti54Be34Zr12, and (f) Ti55Be35Zr10. Figure 5 exhibits the typical DSC heating curves of (a) the Ti68–xBe32Zrx alloys and (b) the Ti66–xBe34Zrx alloys. All the curves present glass-transition and crystallization events. The glass-transition temperature (Tg) and first crystallization temperature (Tx1) are 573.9 (300.9 C) and 627.9 K (354.9 C), respectively, for the Ti41Be34Zr25 alloy. The data about the other glass formers are listed in Table I. The largest supercooled liquid region DTx (DTx = Tx1 Tg) is obtained at the composition of Ti35Be32Zr33, and the DTx is about 113.5 K (113.5 C). It is interesting that after adding a small amount of vanadium (V), the GFA of the ternary alloys was METALLURGICAL AND MATERIALS TRANSACTIONS A further improved. Figure 6(a) presents the XRD patterns of Ti41Be34–xZr25Vx alloys. It can be seen that the alloy of Ti41Be30Zr25V4 can form BMGs in an 8-mm-diameter-rod sample. Thus, a small amount of the V addition enhanced the GFA of Ti-Be-Zr ternary alloys. Figure 6(b) presents the DSC heating curves of the crystallization process. It can be seen that the best glass former, Ti41Be30Zr25V4, has the largest DTx value among the other V-containing alloys, which is about 73 K (73 C). Figure 6(c) exhibits the melting process of the Ti41Be34–xZr25Vx alloys. It can be seen that the best glass former, the Ti41Be30Zr25V4 alloy, has the Fig. 4—Schematic pictures of the two glass-formation zones with its competitive crystalline phases: (a) a-Ti, BeTi and Be2Zr; and (b) a-Ti, b-Zr, and Be2Zr. lowest liquidus temperature as well as the lowest solidus temperature. Figure 7 shows the typical compressive stress-strain curves of the TiBeZr ternary BMGs. It is clear that some of the TiBeZr ternary alloys can have compressive plasticity and high fracture strength (rb). The highest specific strength can be 448 MPa/g/cm3 for the alloy of Ti45Be35Zr20. Figure 8 exhibits the typical shear bands on the side surface of the BMG samples. It can be found that the primary shear bands are along a direction, 45 deg, to the compressive stress, while the secondary shear bands are normal to the compressive stress. IV. DISCUSSION A. GFA of the Ti-Be–Based Alloys Inoue[30] has proposed that the BMG-forming alloys should be composed of the LTM and early-transition metal (ETM) and simple metal (SM), namely, ETM + LTM + SM. A typical example should be TiCuBe. However, our experiments showed that the TiBeCualloy system has a lower GFA than that of the TiBeZralloy system. It has been reported that the elements of Y and Si are good for the GFA improvement in the Zr- and Cu-based alloys,[31–36] but the GFA of the TiBeY and TiBeSi is not so high to form the 3-mm BMGs. As for the ternary system of Ti-Be-Zr, it was found to have a much better GFA than the other three. The ternary Ti-Be-Zr can be written as a pseudo-binary Fig. 5—DSC heating curves of (a) Ti68–xBe32Zrx and (b) Ti66–xBe34Zrx BMG alloys. of (Ti, Zr)-Be, because Ti and Zr are of the same group in the element Periodic table. The TiBeZr alloys without containing the LTM would make the BMG lightweighted, because the LTM usually has a high density. For example, Cu, Fe, or Ni has a density greater than 7 g/cm3. It is interesting that a small amount of V can improve the GFA of the TiBeZr greatly. Wiest et al. also reported that Cr has similar effects.[24,25] B. Compositions of the Ti-Be-Zr–Based BMGs Tanner[20–23] has found the glass-formation regions for the binary of Ti-Be and Zr-Be alloys and, thus, linked them to the binary glass-formation terminal points, as shown in Figure 2. Tanner reported a ternary glassy alloy with a composition of Ti50Be40Zr10, which has a trademark of METGLAS 2204 (Allied Chemical Corp., Morristown, NJ). Wiest et al.[24,25] observed the glass-formation composition of Ti45Be35Zr20, which can form 6-mm-diameter-rod samples. The binary-eutectic METALLURGICAL AND MATERIALS TRANSACTIONS A Fig. 7—Compressive stress-strain curves of the Ti41Be32Zr27 and Ti37Be32Zr31 alloys. Fig. 6—(a) XRD patterns, (b) DSC heating curves showing the glass transition and crystallization, and (c) DTA curves showing the melting process of Ti41Be34–xZr25Vx alloys. METALLURGICAL AND MATERIALS TRANSACTIONS A Fig. 8—Typical shear bands on the side surface of the Ti41Be30Zr25V4 BMGs. rule[27] was used to predict the glass-formation composition, CA, in the ternary eutectic of A-B-C: CA ¼ a½EuðA-BÞ þ b½EuðB-CÞ þ c½EuðC-AÞ The (Ti, Zr)-Be pseudo-binary system can be regarded as an ideal glass-forming liquid, and its composition CA can be obtained as follows: CA ¼ a½EuðBe-TiÞ þ b½EuðBe-ZrÞ ½1 where a and b are constants, a + b = 1, and Eu denotes the eutectic composition (e.g., Eu(Be-Ti) denotes the eutectic composition of the Be-Ti binary system). As suggested in Reference 27, a and b values can be determined in a way that clusters with a large negative heat of mixing should have a relatively low concentration. Thus, aDHTi-Be ¼ bDHZr-Be ½2 where DHTi-Be and DHZr-Be are heats of mixing for the atomic pairs Ti-Be and Zr-Be, respectively. From the binary-phase diagrams of Be-Ti and Be-Zr, Eu(Be-Ti) = Ti70Be30 and [Eu(Be-Zr)] = Zr65Be35. Then a and b can be calculated by substituting the heat of mixing of these atomic pairs into Eq. [2], and the predicted glass former is Ti41Be32Zr27. The best ternary BMG alloy was found by experiments with a composition of Ti41Be34Zr25, which is very close to the predicted composition. C. Competition with Crystalline Phases In this work, two glass-formation zones, glass-zone A (GA) and glass-zone B (GB), were found. Each one corresponds to a ternary-eutectic reaction (EA and EB). The EA is L fi a-Ti + BeTi + Be2Zr, and the EB is L fi a-Ti + b-Zr + Be2Zr. In the glass-formation zone of GA, the largest glass-casting size is 5 mm, while the GB is 3 mm. This trend may be due to the fact that the EA is composed of two intermetallic compounds and one solid solution, while the EB contains only one intermetallic compound with two solid solutions. Previous work has shown that the intermetallic compounds are easier to be suppressed, as they are usually the ordered phases,[17,20] which need a longer time to order. The interface between the liquid and the compounds usually faceted, and the interface undercooling of the faceted interface was deeper than that of the unfaceted one. All of the preceding factors are beneficial for suppressing the crystallization, thus improving the GFA of the alloys. D. GFA Indicators for the Ti-Be–Based Alloys There have been many indicators for predicting the GFA of the alloys. For example, Inoue[7–9] proposed that the larger the DTx, the higher the GFA of the alloy would be. However, in this work, the largest DTx is reached at a composition of Ti35Be32Zr33, which is about 113 K (113 C). While the best GFA is at a composition of Ti41Be34Zr25, its DTx is about 54 K (54 C). Moreover, after adding 4 at. pct V, the GFA of the alloy increases from 5-mm to 8-mm-diameter rod of BMG samples, but the DTx is about 73 K (73 C). From the preceding facts, it is concluded that the GFA does not have a direct relationship with the DTx, which has also been reported in the La-based BMGs.[6] V. CONCLUSIONS The Ti-Be-Zr ternary alloy system exhibits higher GFA than those of the Ti-Be-Cu, Ti-Be-Y, and Ti-Be-Si ternary alloy systems. The BMG composition predicted by the binary-eutectic rule is very close to the experimental results. The ternary eutectic consisting of two solid solution phases and one intermetallics exhibits lower GFA than that of the one solid solution and two intermetallics. The DTx has no direct relation with the GFA of the alloys. The quaternary alloys of Ti41Be30Zr25V4 can form BMGs with a diameter of 8 mm. The specific strength of the Ti45Be35Zr20 BMG is 448 MPa/g/cm3. ACKNOWLEDGMENTS The research is supported by the Program for New Century Excellent Talents in University (Grant No. NCET-05-0105) of China, and the ‘‘973 program’’ (Contract No. 2007CB613903), and in part by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 50571018). One of the authors (PKL) is supported by the National Science Foundation International Materials Insititutes (IMI) Program, Dr. C. Huher, Dr. U. VenkEteswEren, and Dr. D. Finotello, as program directors. REFERENCES 1. A. Peker and W.L. Johnson: Appl. Phys. Lett., 1993, vol. 63, pp. 2342–44. 2. F.Q. Guo, H.J. Wang, S.J. Poon, and G.J. Shiflet: Appl. Phys. Lett., 2005, vol. 86, p. 091907(1–3). 3. H. Tan, Y. Zhang, D. Ma, Y.P. Feng, and Y. Li: Acta Mater., 2003, vol. 51, pp. 4551–61. 4. Y. Zhang, W. Xu, H. Tan, and Y. Li: Acta Mater., 2005, vol. 53, pp. 2607–16. 5. G.J. Hao, Y. Zhang, J.P. Lin, Y.L. Wang, Z. Lin, and G.L. Chen: Mater. Lett., 2006, vol. 60, pp. 1256–60. 6. Y. Zhang, Y. Li, H. Tan, G.L. Chen, and H.A. Davies: J. NonCryst. Solids, 2006, vol. 352, pp. 5482–86. 7. C.L. Ma, S. Ishihara, H. Soejima, N. Nishiyama, and A. Inoue: Mater. Trans., 2004, vol. 45, pp. 1802–06. 8. H. Men, S.J. Pang, A. Inoue, and T. Zhang: Mater. Trans., 2005, vol. 46, pp. 2218–20. 9. J.J. Oak, D.V. Louzguine-Luzgin, and A. Inoue: J. Mater. Res., 2007, vol. 22, pp. 1346–53. 10. W.H. Peter, P.K. Liaw, R.A. Buchanan, C.T. Liu, C.R. Brooks, I.A. Horton, C.A. Carmichael, and I.L. Wright: Intermetallics, 2002, vol. 10 (11–12), pp. 1125–29. 11. G.Y. Wang, P.K. Liaw, W.H. Peter, B. Yang, Y. Yokoyama, M.L. Benson, B.A. Green, M.J. Kirkham, S.A. White, T.A. Saleh, R.L. McDaniels, R.V. Steward, C.T. Liu, and C.R. Brooks: Intermetallics, 2004, vol. 12 (7–9), pp. 885–92. 12. W.H. Peter, R.A. Buchanan, C.T. Liu, P.K. Liaw, M.L. Morrison, I.A. Horton, C.A. Carmichael, and J.L. Wright: Intermetallics, 2002, vol. 10 (11–12), pp. 1157–62. METALLURGICAL AND MATERIALS TRANSACTIONS A 13. B. Yang, P.K. Liaw, G. Wang, M. Morrison, C.T. Liu R.A. Buchanan, and Y. Yokoyama: Intermetallics, 2004, vol. 12 (10–11), pp. 1265–74. 14. H.Q. Li, C. Fan, K.X. Tao, H. Choo, and P.K. Liaw: Adv. Mater, 2006, vol. 18 (6), pp. 752–54. 15. W.H. Jiang, G.J. Fan, F.X. Liu, G.Y Wang, H. Choo, and P.K. Liaw: J. Mater. Res, 2006, vol. 21 (9), pp. 2164–67. 16. C. Fan, H.Q. Li, L.I. Kecskes, K.X. Tao, H. Choo, P.K. Liaw, and C.T. Liu: Phys. Rev. Lett, 2006, vol. 96 (14), pp. 145506–09. 17. B. Yang, C.T. Liu, T.G. Nieh, M.L. Morrison, P.K. Liaw, and R.A. Buchanan: J. Mater. Res, 2006, vol. 21 (4), pp. 915–22. 18. G. Chen, H. Bei, Y. Cao, A. Gali, C.T. Liu, and E.P. George: Appl. Phys. Lett., 2009, vol. 95, p. 081908(1–3). 19. G.Y. Sun, G. Chen, and G.L. Chen: Intermetallics, 2007, vol. 15 (5–6), pp. 632–34. 20. L.E. Tanner and R. Ray: Scripta Metall., 1977, vol. 11, pp. 783– 89. 21. R. Hasegawa and L.E. Tanner: Phys. Rev. B, 1977, vol. 16, pp. 3925–28. 22. L.E. Tanner and R. Ray: Acta Metall., 1979, vol. 27, pp. 1727–47. 23. L.E. Tanner and R. Ray: Scripta Metall., 1977, vol. 11 (9), pp. 783–89. 24. A. Wiest, G. Duan, M.D. Demetriou, L.A. Wiest, A. Peck, G. Kaltenboeck, B. Wiest, and W.L. Johnson: Acta Mater., 2008, vol. 56, pp. 2625–30. METALLURGICAL AND MATERIALS TRANSACTIONS A 25. G. Duan, A. Wiest, M.L. Lind, A. Kahl, and W.L. Johnson: Scripta Mater., 2008, vol. 58, pp. 465–68. 26. D.C. Hoffmann, J. Suh, A. Wiest, M. Lind, M.D. Demetriou, and W.L. Johnson: PNAS, 2008, vol. 105 (51), pp. 20136–40. 27. Z.P. Lu, J. Shen, D.W. Xing, J.F. Sun, and C.T. Liu: Appl. Phys. Lett., 2006, vol. 89, p. 071910(1–3). 28. Y. Zhang, Y.F. Ji, D.Q. Zhao, Y.X. Zhuang, R.J. Wang, M.X. Pan, Y.D. Dong, and W.H. Wang: Scripta Mater., 2001, vol. 44, pp. 1107–12. 29. Y. Zhang, Y.J. Zhou, J.P. Lin, G.L. Chen, and P.K. Liaw: Adv. Eng. Mater, 2008, vol. 10 (6), pp. 534–38. 30. A. Inoue and A. Takeuchi: Mater. Trans., 2002, vol. 43, pp. 1892– 1906. 31. Y. Zhang, Y.J. Zhou, X.D. Hui, M.L. Wang, and G.L. Chen: Sci. China, Ser. G, 2008, vol. 51 (4), pp. 427–37. 32. Y. Zhang, J. Chen, G.L. Chen, and X.J. Liu: Appl. Phys. Lett., 2006, vol. 89, p. 131904(1–3). 33. Y. Zhang, M.X. Pan, D.Q. Zhao, R.J. Wang, and W.H. Wang: Mater. Trans. JIM, 2000, vol. 41 (11), pp. 1410–14. 34. W.Z. Liang, J. Shen, and J.F. Sun: J. Alloys Compd., 2006, vol. 420 (1–2), pp. 94–97. 35. X.D. Hui, W. Dong, G.L. Chen, and K.F. Yao: Acta Mater., 2007, vol. 55, pp. 907–20. 36. Y.K. Xu, H. Ma, J. Xu, and E. Ma: Acta Mater., 2005, vol. 53, pp. 1857–66.