Survey
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Effective Actions in Monitoring Hospital School Amalia Neide COVICa , Eduardo KANEMOTOa Andre Covic BASTOS b a Institute of Pediatric Oncology – GRAACC - UNIFESP b Intitute of Computing - UNICAMP Abstract. Introduction: To study the impact of hospital care for school mathematics literacy in cancer patients during treatment. The 54 patients subjects are: Bone Tumors (n = 39), Hodgkin's lymphoma (n = 08) and non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (n = 07), all with 15 years of age, and one year of starting treatment. Method: Qualitative, descriptive and interpretative, with exploratory analysis of formative assessments carried out in the process, from 2001 to 2008. The refinement of the analysis was carried out with grouping of categories according to levels of the Programme for International Student Assessment (PISA). Justifications: (1) PISA meant by literacy in mathematics an individual's ability to identify, understand and reflect mathematical constructions in various sectors of life. Building this capacity is in line with the objectives of the School Hospital. (2) neoplasms studied have pronounced effect on the studied age. Results: 17%, 26% , 24% , 24%, 3, 6%, 0% and 3% by the levels 0,1,2,3,4,5 and 6 respectively. Discussion: Prior to treatment, these students belong to the universe of the 4,452 surveyed by PISA and feature the following indexes: 53%, 22%, 14%, 7%, 3%, 1% and 0% on the levels 0,1,2,3,4,5 and 6 respectively. In literature the rate is 14% of students who, at age 15 with less than 4 years of schooling. The methodological approach of the School Hospital, which discusses the contents of the significant from school for each student, causes a change beyond the withdrawal of explicit information from the text (level 1 and bellow) and tends to criticism and the resolution of problems (level 2 and above). Conclusion: The construction of mathematical knowledge takes place in working with the historically established cultural awareness, with the disciplinary aspects contemplated without prejudice or bias. It is taken mainly on the possibility of expression that each child perceives as the holder - that is the value. Source: Data from EMAE(“Escola Movel – Aluno Especifico“) in GRAACC-IOP-UNIFESP (“Grupo de Apoio ao Adolescente e a Crianca com Cancer – Instituto de Oncologia Pediatrica – Universidade Federal de Sao Paulo”), São Paulo – SP – Brazil, 2001 to 2008. Keywords. School Hospital, Specific Education, PISA Introduction While attending school hospital, in addition to issues related to the mathematical knowledge, there are issues that concern the role of education during the treatment period. As for relations with the knowledge, we refer to the epistemological mathematical knowledge and the applicability in daily life. As for the significance of education in the hospital we can refer to the links with the development of skills proper to the age of the students, and the links relevant to the social group prior to treatment [1] and [2]. Listed above the elements of the curriculum in the hospital, such information is consolidated into the school attendance service hospital, "Mobile School - Student Specific (EMAE, in portuguese “Escola Móvel – Aluno Específico”), which caters to patients of the Institute GRAACC (IOP-UNIFESP) in your educational needs both in the intensive phase of treatment and in monitoring patients out of treatment. The service is independent and follows on average 430 students per year [3], [4] and [5]. GRAACC is a hospital that is born of the association between an NGO and an university (IOP-UNIFESP) and serves 330 new cases per month. It is located in Sao Paulo, but receives patients from all regions of Brazil without any socio-economic bias. Used as a parameter measuring the "Programme for International Student Assessment (PISA) of the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD)," for this to work with measures that relate to educational content developed skills applied to everyday life. The PISA mathematics literacy meant by an individual's ability to identify, understand and reflect mathematical constructions in various sectors of life, and that issue is in concordance with the objectives of the hospital school (EMAE) [6], [7] and [8]. The study design follows the profile of the student selected by PISA in terms of age, and cancer incidence in the study matches the age specified in PISA (15 years old students). PISA seeks to verify the operation of cognitive schemes in terms of: (1) content or knowledge structures that students need to acquire in areas selected for evaluation, (2) processes to be executed, (3) contexts in which these domains (knowledge and skills) are applied. For each domain, there is a continuous scale where the individual performance levels and distributions of the performance of populations can be represented. The student's performance is defined through successive levels of proficiency.[9] The OECD believes that students should be evaluated at six levels of proficiency in mathematics and literacy: Level 1: responses involving familiar contexts, observed at the School Hospital in a diagnostic initial assessment, Level 2: Answers that require direct extraction of information from a single source, observed by a literal interpretation of results; Level 3: Answers that require descriptive procedures for the purpose of selecting strategies to solve simple problems observed by the need of representation; Level 4: Answers that require complex decision-making, observed by the need of multiple representations; Level 5 answers starting from the modeling of complex situations, seen through assumptions and Level 6: Answers that require conceptualization, generalization and observed by modeling complex problemsituations. PISA studied a population of 4,452 Brazilians aged 15 years, whose indexes are shown in Table-1: Brazil PISA data and EMAE students, describes the percentage of satisfactory responses for each of the levels described above. 1. Method The study is preliminary, descriptive and interpretative, and aims to build knowledge about the impact of school enrollment in mathematics literacy in hospital of cancer patients in treatment. Research subjects are a total of 54 patients, divided among these: Bone Tumors (n = 39), Hodgkin's lymphoma (n = 08) and non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (n = 07), with 15 years of age and one year of beginning treatment. We performed an exploratory analysis of formative assessments carried out in the process of attending school hospital between 2001 and 2008 [10], [11] and [12]. One measures the skills that an individual has to identify, understand, apply and make well-founded judgments in solving math problems involving situations of life's necessities. In relation to each of the levels proposed by the PISA, the teacher aplying the method proposes a communicative interaction in order to bring the contents near to the student life, then later the teacher adds socio-historically established components to the analysis. For Level 1, where the understanding of the application of world knowledge does not occur in the process of problem solving, inferential aspects will be established. This type of intervention provides a measure of the ability to engage in applying knowledge in the context of solving problems. Level 2, the extraction of text information is covered by the activation of world knowledge and this is done during the reading of all the proposed problems. As in a "guessing game" the information is local and so this skill can be measured. At Level 3, the descriptive procedures are caused by the mediation of the survey and search hypotheses, hence allows new representations to gauge skill. Level 4 the mediation of the teacher is done by comparing information from the student to list the differences and similarities between the information produces representations that are being measured. Both the Level 5 and 6 asks to the students about their ability to build models and generalizations that are caused by local instantiation and inference. 2. Results With the refinement of the analysis and grouping classes as we come to the PISA results outlined in Table-1: Brazil PISA data and EMAE students from 2001 to 2008. Table 1. Brazil PISA 2003 data and EMAE students. Source: Inep in http://download.inep.gov.br/download/internacional/pisa/result_pisa2003_resum_tec.pdf for the 4452 brazilian students and EMAE data in GRAACC for the other 54. Result Bellow level 1 Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Level 4 Level 5 Level 6 N Brazil PISA 2003 53% 22% 14% 7% 3% 1% 0% 4452 EMAE2001 to 2008 17% (n = 9) 26% (n = 14) 24% (n = 13) 24% (n = 13) 6% (n = 3) 0% (n = 0) 3% (n = 2) 54 3. Discussion Prior to treatment, these students belong to the universe of the 4,452 surveyed by PISA and feature the following indexes: 53%, 22%, 14%, 7%, 3% 1% and 0% on the levels bellow 1,1,2,3,4,5 and 6, respectively. In literature the rate is 14% of students who, at age 15 with less than 4 years of schooling. The methodological approach of EMAE, which discusses the contents of the significant from school for each student, causes a change beyond the withdrawal of explicit information from the text (level 1 and bellow) and tends to criticism and the resolution of problems (level 2 and above). 4. Conclusion The construction of mathematical knowledge takes place in working with the historically established cultural awareness, with the disciplinary aspects contemplated without prejudice or bias. It is taken mainly on the possibility of expression that each child perceives as the holder [13], [14] and [15]. Bellow are listed take main conclusions and proposals for this paper: EMAE(Hospital School) had a positive impact gaugeable according to PISA, the hypothesis would be that students in the study group would have a rating lower than the national average, which can not be observed. There is a lack of similar studies in the literature for comparison purposes and for stratification of the study group due to dimensional problems (with larger N would be possible to disaggregate groups into specific cancers, treatment type, duration of treatment, social and economic bias, etc...). The question of specificity of treatment (individual lessons) is supported by the heterogeneity of the group studied in relation to proficiency in mathematics, and other reasons that led to this option (and specificity of cancer treatment, difference in education between different locations, etc...). References [1] COVIC A.N., KANEMOTO E, PETRILLI AS. A Frequência e a Matrícula Escolar de Crianças e Adolescentes com Câncer. RSBC, n.1, (2004), p.10-15. [2] GEERTZ G., O saber local: novos ensaios em antropologia interpretativa., Vozes, Rio de Janeiro, 1997. [3] COVIC A.N., Aprendizagem: um estudo a partir do atendimento escolar hospitalar, http://www.dominiopublico.gov.br/pesquisa/DetalheObraForm.do?select_action=&co_obra=114394, São Paulo, 2008 [4] BRASIL: Ministério da Educação. Orientações Curriculares para o Ensino Médio (OCEM), Ciências Exatas e Matemática, códigos e suas tecnologias. Ministério da Educação Secretaria de Educação Básica, Brasília, 2006. [5] CARSTENS L.E. Teacher's experience of teaching in a hospital school: research essay magister education. Republic of South Africa: Rand Afrikaans University, Faculty of Education and Nursing, Republic of South Africa,2004. [6] PIAGET, J. Formação Do Símbolo Na Criança. São Paulo: LTC, 1990. [7] BOSCH, M., CHEVALLARD, Y. La sensibilité de l’activité mathématique aux ostensifs. Objet d’étude e problematique. Recherches en Didactique des Mathématiques. Genoble: La Pensée Sauvage, vol. 19, n° 1, p. 77-124, 1999. [8] BROUSSEAU, G. La Théorie des situations didactiques. Textes rassemblés e preparés par Nicolas Balacheff, Martin Cooper, Rosamund Sutherland, Virginia Warfield, Recherches en Didactique des Mathématiques. Grenoble: La Pensée Sauvage, 1998. [9] CHEVALLARD, Y, JOHSUA, M. A. La transposition didactique. Grenoble: La Pensée Sauvage, 1991. [10] PETRILLI, AS.(coord.) Oncologia. In: Terapêutica e Prática Pediátrica, CARVALHO,ES., & CARVALHO, WB. São Paulo: Atheneu, 2000; p. 1251-1256. [11] PIZZO P.A.Rehabilitation of the Child with Cancer , IN: Principles and Pratice of Pediatric Oncology. USA, Raven, Publisher,1997. [12] CARAN E.M. M.; LUISI F. A.V.; CTPRIANO M., Tumores abdominais malignos mais frequentes na infância: diagnóstico diferencial, http://bases.bireme.br/cgibin/wxislind.exe/iah/online/?IsisScript=iah/iah.xis&src=google&base=LILACS&lang=p&nextAction=l nk&exprSearch=518482&indexSearch=ID , 2009. [13] VERGNAUD G., Au fond de l ‘action, la conceptualisation. In: BARBIER, J. M. (org.). Savoirs théoriques et savoirs d’action, PUF, Paris, 1996. [14] FREITAS, M.C. de & BICCAS, M.de S., História Social da Educação no Brasil (1926-1996). Cortez,São Paulo, 2009. 5.