Survey
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
#757 Investigation of Dental Care Mobile Services in the Amish Marc Harrison1, Masahiro Heima1 , Gerald A. Ferretti1, Amritha Minisandram1, 1Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio Objectives Results Method Retrospective chart reviewing study analyzing all of the Amish patients’ charts treated by the DCM from May 20, 2011 to May 19, 2012 (N=206). Each patient chart includes an oral examination record and a parent questionnaire. Results Background The Dental Care Mobile(DCM) provides dental treatment to underserved Amish children in Northeast Ohio. Characteristic data Age: 3.12 - 17.75 years (Mean±SD = 10.27±3.70) Gender rate: male / female = 54.9 / 45.1 Parents’ (94.7% mothers) education level: 99% did not graduate from high school Dental visit Accessibility of dental care Never been to dentist 32.1% of children could not go to dentist: 28% the most common reason was Been to “couldn't afford“ at 65.7% dentist 72% While living their seemingly healthy lifestyle, very little dental research has been done for the Amish. Traveling distance of Amish patients Percentage of Insured Children Private insurance 1.4% 25% of children visited from more than 14 km 50% of children visited from within 8.5 km Medicaid 10.7% Not insured 88% ] Insured 12.1% Oral health Mean±SD of dft: 4.66±3.54 (n=149) Mean±SD of DMFT: 5.24±4.81 (n=169) Toothache during the past 6 months: 38.1% Reason of last dental visit: oral problems 43.8% Parent’s perception of children’s oral health NS NS Mean ±SD of decay score To investigate the impact of the DCM on Amish children’s oral health and to gain a greater understanding of the oral health of Amish children. Said oral health was “good” 8 6 Said oral health was “poor” 4 2 5.0 3.8 4.4 3.1 0 Primary Permanent Interesting Findings Another important result came from comparing family members with diabetes (DM) and the child’s dft. If the child had a family member with DM, they had less dental caries (a mean dft of 3.51±3.26) compared to those who did not have a family member with DM (a mean dft of 5.03±3.63). (t=2.247, df=135, p=0.026, 95% CI of the Difference 0.182-2.851) Currently, we cannot explain these findings. Conclusion The DCM is making a great impact on Amish children’s oral health; but alarmingly, the study reveals that the Amish children have dental access difficulty, poor accuracy of parents’ perception of children’s oral health, and similarities to other high caries risk populations. This research is supported by the student summer research program at Case Western Reserve University School of Dental Medicine