Survey
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Classifications for potential inclusion in the Family United Nations Statistics Division History At its meeting in 2011, the Expert Group reviewed the previous mandate of the group and the previously used concept of the Family of International Economic and Social Classifications The group agreed on a change of the scope of the Family as follows: New Family The EG agreed that the concept of the International Family of Classifications should be maintained It should be referred to as the International Family of Classifications, rather than International Family of Economic and Social Classifications indicates that classifications from other statistical domains, like environment statistics, are included as well New Family The Family will be restricted to international classifications only, i.e. it will not include regional or national classifications and it will be restricted to statistical classifications The scope of the Family was changed from its previous narrow scope to include all international classifications that represent standards for a given statistical domain New Family A first list of classifications was supposed to be developed using the Classification of Statistical Activities, identifying relevant international classifications for each domain After review of the classifications in the list, a decision will be taken on how to categorize the classifications according to their degree of compliance with the best practices criteria. New process Did the CSA approach work well? Identifies areas, but not easily the standards Alternative approach Since the Family is supposed to be restricted to international classifications only, it may be more reliable to consider as candidates for the Family all classifications that have been embedded in adopted international standards New approach This approach on one hand ensures that the classifications have gone through an official approval process – even though not explicitly for the classifications themselves therefore they are recognized and recommended for use at a world-wide level On the other hand it ensures better coverage, since it is easier to identify the key standards in different statistical domains New approach Where dedicated organizations/offices exist for specialized fields of statistics, their expertise can help to identify the standards and classifications to be included Derived and related classifications In the past only applied to regional / national classifications Has less meaning in the traditional Family, when restricted to international classifications May also be possible for international classifications (with extended scope) e.g. with WHO definitions interesting: related = candidates ? Examples The following table summarizes the classifications found in the following areas and frameworks: System of National Accounts (SNA 2008) System of Environmental-Economic Accounting (SEEA) Framework for the Development of Environment Statistics (FDES) Agricultural Statistics Health (WHO-FIC) is another example Total classifications listed here: 48 Only 11of those were part of the “traditional” Family International Standard Industrial Classification of All Economic Activities Central Product Classification Standard International Trade Classification Harmonized commodity description and coding System International Standard Classification of Occupations International Classification of Status in Employment Classification of the Functions of Government Classification of Individual Consumption by Purpose Classification of the Purposes of Non-profit Insitutions Serving Households Classification of Outlays of Producers by Purpose International Classification of Diseases International Classification of Non-Profit Organizations Classification of Environmental Activities Classification of aquatic resources International Standard Statistical Classification for Aquatic Animals and Plants Land Cover Classification Land Use Classification or Classification of Land Use Standard International Energy Product Classification United Nations Framework Classification for Fossil Energy and Mineral Reserves and Resources, 2009 Classes of natural inputs Classification of groups of residuals (also: List of Solid Waste) Classification of environmental assets Classification of inland water bodies SNA institutional sector classification Common International Classification of Ecosystem Services UNECE Standard Statistical Classification of Marine Water Quality (1992) UNECE Standard Statistical Classification of Surface Freshwater Quality for the Maintenance of Aquatic Life (1992) UNECE Standard Statistical Classification of Ambient Air Quality (1990) CRED EMDAT general classifications IUCN classification of protected areas IUCN Red List of Threatened Species Government Finance Statistics Manual Balance of Payments and International Investment Position Manual Classification of assets Classification of non-financial assets Classification of financial assets and liabilities UNECE Classification of Statistical Activities FAOSTAT commodity list Definitions and classifications of agricultural machinery and equipment Definitions and classifications of pesticides Definitions and classification of land use and irrigation Classification and definitions of forest products 1982 International Standard Statistical Classification of Fishery Commodities International Standard Statistical Classification of Fishing Gears International Standard Statistical Classification of Fishery Vessels FAO Major Fishing Areas Integrated Food Security Phase Classification WHO-FIC The WHO Family of International Classifications also provides an interesting example of how to categorize the members into derived and related classifications Questions Is the approach described acceptable? Where do we want to draw the boundaries of the Family? Advantages / disadvantages Can we apply a subdivision? Would there be “candidates”? What would the actual process of “induction” be?