Download Document

Survey
yes no Was this document useful for you?
   Thank you for your participation!

* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project

Document related concepts
no text concepts found
Transcript
DRAFT-Do not distribute
Introduction
1
II. Introduction
2
Unintentional carbon monoxide (CO) poisoning is a leading cause of poisonings in the US. CO is a colorless,
3
odorless, nonirritating gas that is produced through incomplete combustion. Sources of CO include common
4
household and workplace devices such as boilers, furnaces, motor-vehicle exhaust, generators, gas space
5
heaters, woodstoves, gas stoves, and fireplaces. Sources of CO are ubiquitous and can lead to unintentional CO
6
poisoning if not properly checked or maintained.
7
8
CO poisoning can often be misdiagnosed as health effects include a range of nonspecific symptoms from minor
9
flu-like symptoms (e.g., headache, dizziness, nausea, vomiting, fatigue, and confusion) to more severe effects
10
(e.g., impaired memory, collapse, cardiac irregularities, coma, and death) [5] [6] CO poisoning is treated by
11
removing the person from the CO exposure and administration of oxygen.
12
13
Primary, secondary and tertiary forms of prevention are effective in reducing CO-related morbidity and mortality
14
(citation?). Examples of primary prevention include substituting electric -powered for fuel powered equipment,
15
using fuel-based products only in well ventilated areas, installing CO alarms, and maintaining non-electric home
16
heating systems and appliances. CO alarms are an important primary and secondary prevention strategy [5].
17
Laws and ordinances requiring installation of CO alarms can reduce the number of CO exposures. (Iqbal et al.
18
2012) Treatment or tertiary prevention of CO poisoning include removing the persons from the exposure to CO
19
and administering oxygen.
20
21
Unintentional, non-fire related CO poisoning is responsible for approximately 415 deaths [In clearance paper
22
Sircar et al] and 21,000 emergency department (ED) visits each year. [1] [2] [3] Between 2000 and 2009, 68,316
23
calls about CO exposure or poisoning were reported to poison control centers (PCCs) nationally, of which 36,691
24
calls (53.7%) led to treatment at a health care facility [4].
25
Page 1 of 2
DRAFT-Do not distribute
Introduction
26
To help understand the burden of CO poisoning and guide public health action in their state, many health
27
departments formed surveillance systems. Ten jurisdictions (Connecticut, Florida, Louisiana, Maine, Michigan,
28
Minnesota, Missouri, New York, New York City, and Wisconsin) conduct case-based CO surveillance that is
29
supported by public health reporting requirements and utilize multiple data sources. The states vary in their CO
30
poisoning prevention programs and case definitions that are used.
31
With the absence of active surveillance data, national surveillance depends on secondary data sources. (Iqbal,
32
2012). CDC’s National Center for Environmental Health (NCEH)’s Air Pollution and Respiratory Health Branch
33
provides national estimates of unintentional non-fire related CO poisoning by using various sources such as PCC,
34
Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project’s (HCUP) National Emergency Department Sample and Nationwide
35
Inpatient Sample and National Vital Statistic System.
36
This report is the first surveillance summary on CO poisoning surveillance. It will summarize CO poisoning
37
surveillance data from 10 state and local jurisdictions and the national level. The data in this summary will focus
38
on 2009-2011, [the most recent data available to the majority of the contributing states and juridictionswhy this
39
period]. Additionally, it includes a discussion of the importance of jurisdiction’s implementation of standardized
40
CO surveillance. Finally, it provides illustrations on how surveillance data has been used to initiate successful
41
public health actions.
Page 2 of 2