Survey
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
We read with interest the review by Takach Lapner and Kearon on pulmonary embolism (PE)1, but were disappointed to see that, with regard to ventilation/perfusion (V/Q) scanning, the paper does not reflect the current standard of clinical care. Planar (two-dimensional) scans, as described in the paper, are being replaced by (three-dimensional) single-photon emission computerized tomography (SPECT) scans, following publication of guidelines by the relevant European2;3 and American4 specialist societies. V/Q SPECT allows detection of subsegmental PE5 and clearer depiction of some segmental PE that cannot be visualised on planar scans6. For the referring clinician, SPECT does away with probability-based reporting and simply diagnoses or excludes PE, with very few (<5%) non-diagnostic scans. V/Q SPECT has been compared to CTPA using at least 16 slice scanners in two small studies, both using a composite reference standard (all available imaging, clinical data, follow-up): study Bajc7 Gutte8 patients 152 81 sensitivity 97% 97% V/Q SPECT specificity PPV 89% 85% 88% 82% NPV 98% 98% sensitivity 43% 68% CTPA specificity 73% 100% PPV 50% 100% NPV 68% 83% These data show that the diagnostic performance of V/Q SPECT for diagnosing PE is at least as good as that of CTPA. Instead, we believe that the choice of imaging test for suspected PE should be based on contraindications to exposure to X-ray iv contrast medium, radiation dose and local availability of either test. Thomas Grüning, Consultant in Nuclear Medicine [email protected] Brent E Drake, Consultant in Nuclear Medicine and Radiology Derriford Hospital, Plymouth Reference List (1) Takach Lapner ST, Kearon C. Diagnosis and management of pulmonary embolism. BMJ 2013; 346:f757. (2) Bajc M, Neilly JB, Miniati M, Schuemichen C, Meignan M, Jonson B. EANM guidelines for ventilation/perfusion scintigraphy : Part 1. Pulmonary imaging with ventilation/perfusion single photon emission tomography. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2009; 36(8):1356-1370. (3) Bajc M, Neilly JB, Miniati M, Schuemichen C, Meignan M, Jonson B. EANM guidelines for ventilation/perfusion scintigraphy : Part 2. Algorithms and clinical considerations for diagnosis of pulmonary emboli with V/P(SPECT) and MDCT. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2009; 36(9):1528-1538. (4) Parker JA, Coleman RE, Grady E, Royal HD, Siegel BA, Stabin MG et al. SNM Practice Guideline for Lung Scintigraphy 4.0. J Nucl Med 2012; 40(1):57-65. (5) Bajc M, Bitzen U, Olsson B, Perez dS, V, Palmer J, Jonson B. Lung ventilation/perfusion SPECT in the artificially embolized pig. J Nucl Med 2002; 43(5):640-647. (6) Morrell NW, Roberts CM, Jones BE, Nijran KS, Biggs T, Seed WA. The anatomy of radioisotope lung scanning. J Nucl Med 1992; 33(5):676-683. (7) Bajc M, Olsson B, Palmer J, Jonson B. Ventilation/Perfusion SPECT for diagnostics of pulmonary embolism in clinical practice. J Intern Med 2008; 264(4):379-387. (8) Gutte H, Mortensen J, Jensen CV, Johnbeck CB, von der RP, Petersen CL et al. Detection of pulmonary embolism with combined ventilation-perfusion SPECT and low-dose CT: head-to-head comparison with multidetector CT angiography. J Nucl Med 2009; 50(12):1987-1992.