Survey
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
IOC Research Centre Acute illness in sport Medical Complications and Return to Play Decisions Prof Martin Schwellnus Professor of Sport and Exercise Medicine Section Sports Medicine, Department of Orthopedics, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Pretoria Director: Institute of Sport, Exercise Medicine and Lifestyle Research, University of Pretoria Director: IOC Research Centre, University of Pretoria, South Africa Medical decision making process Acute illness Can my athlete, presenting with symptoms or signs of an acute illness, participate in exercise training or competition? IOC Research Centre Physiological response to exercise IOC Research Centre Host (Athlete) response to infection Microbe invasion 1. Non specific host response 2. Microbe specific host response • • End–organ / system tissue injury Immune response Cellular release of proinflammatory cytokines by macrophages and other cells IOC Research Centre Acute Phase Response “The acute phase response (APR) is a prominent systemic reaction of the organism to local or systemic disturbances in its homeostasis caused by infection (and tissue injury, trauma / surgery, neoplastic growth or immunological disorders)” Gruys E, et al. J Zhejiang Univ, 2005 6B(11) 1045-1056 IOC Research Centre Acute Phase Response to Infection Microbe invasion Endocrine / metabolic Neuromuscular Skeletal muscle CNS Brain / Brain Liver Muscle breakdown Negative nitrogen balance Altered motor endplate function Fatigue / malaise Altered thermoregulation Anorexia Pathogen opsonisation IOC Research Centre Clinical manifestations (and biomarkers) of the APR Liver 1. Supression of cytochrome P-450 enzyme system 2. Induce heat shock proteins 3. Induce acute phase proteins (APP) • Growth factors • Pro-inflammaory • Anti-inflammatory 1. • • • 2. Biomarkers of APR Increased plasma viscosity – Raised ESR Increased CRP Increased procalcitonin (PCT) Also increased fibrinogen, ferritin, haptoglobin, α-1 anti-trypsin, complement Neuromuscular 1. Catabolism 2. Loss of muscle protein 3. Altered motor end-plate function 1. Decreased muscle function 2. Loss of muscle mass 3. Reduced neuromuscular control Endocrine / metabolic 1. Increased catecholamines 2. Increased ACTH 3. increased insulin 1. Increased heart rate (rest and exercise) 2. Reduced substrate availability for muscle during exercise Brain / CNS 1. 2. 3. 4. Hypothalamus (resetting thermostat) Reduced ADH Anorexia Malaise 1. 2. 3. 4. Fever Dehydration Anorexia Malaise (fatigue) IOC Research Centre The basics of infections in athletes and medical complications / reduced performance End organ injury Reduced exercise performance Microbe invasion Medical complications Endocrine / metabolic Skeletal muscle Neuromuscular Liver Breakdown Altered motor endplate function Fatigue / malaise End organ injury Altered thermoregulation Anorexia Pathogen opsonisation IOC Research Centre Negative effects of APR on exercise performance System Neuromuscular Cardiovascular Metabolic Pathophysiology in infection Effect on performace • Muscle wasting (decrease in protein content) • Mitochondrial abnormalities • Decreased muscle enzyme activity • Decreased muscle strength (isometric strength reduction 515%) • Decreased isometric muscle endurance 13-18% • Decreased neuromuscular transmission • Impaired motor coordination • Decreased performance in precision sports • Dehydration • Increased heart rate at submaximal exercise intensity • Decreased in stroke volume → decrease in cardiac output • Increased plasma viscosity • Decreased mobilisation of fatty acids from the fat deports • Increased proportion of energy from CHO metabolism • Increased glucagon, growth hormone and cortisol • Higher lactate levels at all stages during a graded exercise test • Hyperinsulinemia with Inability to maintain euglycemia • Reduced endurance capacity up to 25% • Reduced substrate availability for working muscle IOC Research Centre Physician diagnosed acute pre-race illness and race completion (localised vs. systemic) (Did not finish rate - % runners started) * 1. *: Significantly Illness determinants and race perfromance: * different from CON group • localised vs. systemic • time of diagnosis before the race 2. Runners with physician diagnosed systemic illness < 24 hours before the race had a 7 X greater chance of not completing the race Gordon L, Schwellnus M, et al; BJSM 2017 (in review) IOC Research Centre Microbe specific causes of medical complications Common infections in athletes 1. 2. 3. 4. Respiratory / ENT Gastrointestinal Dermatological Urogenital tract 1. Myocarditis / pericarditis (viral - respiratory and gastrointestinal) 2. Myositis – rhabdomyolysis – renal failure 3. Gastroenteritis – dehydration – renal failure, electrolyte imbalances 4. Risk of transmission (droplets, skin contact, blood borne, oral-fecal) 5. Organomegaly (spleen, liver) and rupture (e.g. IM) 6. Others …… IOC Research Centre Potential medical complications of an acute infective illness during exercise (APR and end organ injury) System Pathology Cardiovascular • Viral myocarditis • Myopericarditis • Medication use Neuromuscular • • Respiratory system • Renal system Thermoregulatory • • • • Others • Medical complication • • • • • • Aggravating / prolonging illness Dysrhythmias Cardiac failure Sudden death Myositis Rhabdomyolysis Impaired motor function Joint, ligament and tendon and neuromuscular control injuries Impaired immune function • Prolonging illness • Bronchial hyper-reactivity Rhabdomyolysis • Acute renal failure Dehydration Medication use Aletred tenperature • Heatstroke regulation “set point” Impaired immune function • Increased duration and severity of symptoms of illness • Post-viral fatigue syndrome IOC Research Centre Physician diagnosed acute pre-race illness and risk of medical complications Medical complica ons rate (per 100 runners in each group) (MC rate - % runners who start the race) 1,8 1,6 1,4 1,2 1 0,8 0,6 0,4 0,2 0 * *: Significantly different from control 1,55 Runners with physican diagnosed acute pre-race acute illness, who started the race, have0,68a 2.3 X greater chance of developing a medical complication during the race Control group (n=43 425) Acute illness group (n=193) Gordon L, Schwellnus M, et al; (unpublished) IOC Research Centre Medical decision making process Acute illness Can my athlete, presenting with symptoms or signs of an acute illness, participate in exercise training or competition? IOC Research Centre History of the medical decision making process Acute illness • “Neck check’ - first described in 1993 • Clinical tool - based on an abbreviated medical history • “If your symptoms are “above the neck” (stuffy or runny nose, sneezing, watery eyes, scratchy throat), try a “test drive” at “half speed;” if you feel better after 10 minutes, you can “rev up” and finish the workout” • Never been systematically studied IOC Research Centre Return to play guidelines for an athlete with acute respiratory infective illness – modified “neck check” Athlete with acute infection Localized RTI symptoms (above neck) Normal examination Systemic and RTI symptoms (below neck) Examination abnormal Exercise at 70% max for 10 min Asymptomatic Symptomatic No exercise Re-assess in 24 hrs Continue exercise at 70% max IOC Research Centre Return to play guidelines for an athlete with 2014 an infection Scharhag, J, Meyer, T: J Sports Sci 2014; 32 (13), 1237-42 IOC Research Centre Medical decision making process Acute illness Can we improve on this approach in 2017? IOC Research Centre Question 1: Is there evidence of the APR? Microbe invasion Endocrine / metabolic Skeletal muscle 1.Fever 2.Dehydration 3.Anorexia 4.Malaise (general fatigue) 5.Muscle pain 6.Muscle fatigue 7.Increased heart rate (rest and exercise) 8.? Altered balance co-ordination Neuromuscular Liver Breakdown Altered motor endplate function Fatigue / malaise Altered thermoregulation Anorexia Pathogen opsonisation IOC Research Centre Biomarkers of the APR Markanday A: OFID 2015; 1-7 IOC Research Centre Biomarkers of the APR CRP Hrs to 3 days 1.Produced by liver 2.More sensitive than ESR 3.Sensitive to subtle changes 4.Starts rise about 12 hours and peaks in 2-3 days 5.Low levels (2-10mg/L) can be measured using “high sensitivity CRP” IOC Research Centre Biomarkers for the APR Future? Procalcitonin (PCT) 1.Secretion stimulated by cytokines / TNFalpha 2.PCT increased in bacterial infections (not in viral infections) 3.Detected 3-4 hrs and peaks in 6-24 hrs 4.Not increased in non-infectious inflammatory conditions (except massive trauma) 5.Used as a guidelines for antibiotic treatment (RTI’s) • • • • < 0.01ug/L – strongly discourage AB use <0.25ug/L - discourage AB use >0.250ug/L – encourage AB use > 0.50ug/L - strongly encourage AB use IOC Research Centre Question 2: Is there tissue damage (microbe specific) in your athlete? 2. End organ injury Reduced exercise performance Medical complications 2. End organ injury IOC Research Centre Make an accurate microbe specific diagnosis!!! What is the causes of the acute illness in athletes? a. Clinical diagnosis: Infective (viral, bacterial, fungal, parasitic, other) b. Rapid diagnostic panel testing in future? c. Consider other non-infective causes of symptoms: – Allergies – Physical factors related to increased air movement during exercise (cold, dry air, increased air turbulence, mouth-breathing, and inhaled physical or chemical irritants) – Other diseases Schwellnus M, et al; Current Allergy & Clinical Immunology, June 2010; 23 (2) IOC Research Centre Question 3: Is there a normal physiological response to an exercise test? a. Submaximal exercise test b. Symptoms c. Measure response to exercise: – Temperature (resting and exercise) – Heart rate (resting and exercise) – Respiratory response (resting and exercise) – RPE – Muscle function – Neuromuscular control d. Performance outcomes e. Graded return to play IOC Research Centre Return to play guidelines for an athlete with acute respiratory infective illness – modified “neck check” Athlete with acute infection Localized RTI symptoms (above neck) Normal examination Systemic and RTI symptoms (below neck) Examination abnormal Exercise at 70% max for 10 min Asymptomatic Symptomatic No exercise Re-assess in 24 hrs Continue exercise at 70% max IOC Research Centre Suggested 2017 Medical decision making in the athlete with acute infective illness Athlete with acute infection 1. Is there clinical evidence of an Acute Phase Response? Systemic symptoms and signs (malaise / fatigue, anorexia, fever, tachycardia, myalgia / arthralgia, dehydration) Assess biomarkers for APR (ESR, CRP, PCT) Yes No 2. Is there evidence of end-organ injury / damage (affecting the exercise response)? Clinical assessment and special investigations [respiratory, cardiac (myo-pericardial}, vascular, renal, CNS, GIT, muscle, bone, tendon, joint, other] No exercise Re-assess in 24 hours No 3. What is the response to a sub-maximal exercise test at 70% max for 10 min? Abnormal / Symptomatic Symptoms, signs (HR, ECG, ventilation, RPE, other) Normal / Asymptomatic Continue exercise at 70% max Graded return to play (monitor symptoms and signs) IOC Research Centre Take home messages – Acute illness is common in athletes – Team physicians regularly make decisions about return to play in ill athletes – “Neck check” or modifications have been used > 20 years, but little research – In 2017 - consider three main steps in medical decision making in acute illness: 1. Is there evidence of an acute phase response (clinical and biomarkers) 2. Is there clinical / laboratory evidence of microbe specific end-organ damage (exercise performance or medical complication risk) 3. Introduce a graded return to sport with monitoring and re-assessment IOC Research Centre Thank you for your attention IOC Research Centre