Survey
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Importance of Glycemic Control in the Treatment of Surgical Patients Michael J Patney, D.O., FAOAO Notice of Disclosure • I have no Disclosures in regards to this lecture or topic Goals of this Lecture • Understand why glycemic control is important • Realize the contribution of tight glycemic control during the preoperative and perioperative periods • Achieve awareness of the importance of preoperative HgbA1C and the necessary values in medical clearance • Achieve awareness of the perioperative requirements of perioperative blood glucose levels Why this lecture? • New government rules and regulations regarding: • • • • Bundled payments Quality of care guidelines Readmission rules Monitoring of outcomes • Insurance company limitations • Insurances will now be limiting access to elective procedures for patients with “modifiable” risk factors. “Modifiable” Risk factors • Bosco et al (2010) • Preoperative considerations include: • • • • • • • Inflammatory Disease Sickle Cell Diabetes Renal Failure Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV) Smoking Obesity Diabetes as a risk factor • Bosco et al • Patients with diabetes all receive a preoperative check of their HgbA1C • Recommend a preoperative HgbA1C < 6.9 • Also recommends that if this level can not be achieved or maintained then an endocrine consult should be obtained. More on “modifiable” risk factors • Moucha et al (2011) • Multiple modifiable risk factors for surgical site infection. • Rheumatoid Arthritis • • • • NSAID Corticosteroid Methotrexate Disease modifying agents • Chemical • Plaquenil • Sulfasalazine • Biologic • TNF-antagonists • IL-1 antagonists More on “modifiable” risk factors • Moucha cont’d • Multiple modifiable risk factors for surgical site infection. • • • • • • • • • Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV) Diabetes Mellitus and Hyperglycemia Malnutrition Smoking Obesity Staph Colonization Oral Hygiene Urinary Tract Infection Anemia What are the risks of not having tight glycemic control • Lazar et al (2003) • Studied blood glucose control post CABG using standard measures and a combination of glucose, insulin and potassium (GIK) in the ICU • 141 patients randomized into tight post op control with GIK and standard sliding scale coverage. • Showed an improvement in survivability with tight control • Also showed a decrease in ischemic events and in wound complications. Further Evidence of the need for glycemic control • Underwood et al (2014) • 1775 Diabetics • Only 622(35%) had a preoperative HgbA1C • These were broken down into 4 groups • • • • <6.5 6.5-8 8-10 >10 Further Evidence of the need for glycemic control • Underwood Cont’d • Results • <6.5 and 6.5-8 groups had similar rates of complication • Greater than 8 had a longer length of stay (LOS) • The population was too small to determine the types of complications but were able to determine that preoperative HgbA1C was a predictive variable for hospital length of stay. The importance of perioperative glycemic control • Richards et al (2012) • Compared patients with 2 random BS >200 or a hyperglycemia index >1.76 to controls • Hyperglycemia index was calculated as the area under the curve of all glucose levels for the entire hospital stay. Averaged out to be a BS > 140 mg/dL • Orthopedic trauma cases match for variables • 294 patients had BS >200 at least twice • 134 patients had a glycemic index greater than 1.76 The importance of perioperative glycemic control • Richards Cont’d • Both the blood glucose being over 200 and the hyperglycemia index were independent predictors of infection • Further extrapolation leads to the conclusion that blood glucose over 140 mg/dL would have an adverse effect on the chances of having an infection. • In the conclusion they state their data corroborates other studies; however, they made no treatment recommendations based on their conclusions Results from a managed population • Adams et al (2013) • Retrospective cohort study from Kaiser Permanente • Outcomes of total knee replacement according to diabetes status and glycemic control. • Looked at complications of DVT, PE, Deep Infection and Revision • Studied 3 groups • Nondiabetic • Well controlled Diabetic (HgbA1C <7) • Median 6.2 • Poorly controlled Diabetic (HgbA1C >7) • Median7.6 Results from a managed population • Adams Cont’d • Found no adverse effect in any cohort • This corroborates the earlier Underwood study showing little effect of a HgbA1C < 8 ; however, this study fails to evaluate those patients with higher HgbA1c • This may be due to restrictions in access to surgery in the Kaiser system to patients with modifiable risk factors outside certain limits • This may also be due to the fact that there is a focus of “resources on chronic disease management through proactive involvement of clinicians and case managers with patients.” What are the other complications associated with hyperglycemia • Stryker et al (2013) • Looked at 30 patients who had complications after a total knee • • • • • • • Delayed healing Drainage Nondraining Hematoma Draining Hematoma Superficial Infection Superficial Skin Necrosis Dehiscence What are the other complications associated with hyperglycemia • Stryker Cont’d • Comparison of the study group with matched controls (both diabetic) • • • • Study group mean BS = 217 Study group max BS = 272 Control group mean BS = 185 Control group max BS = 227 • Also compared the preoperative HgbA1C • Study group mean preop A1C = 6.8 • Control group mean preop A1C = 6.4 What are the other complications associated with hyperglycemia • Stryker Cont’d • Concluded that both BS and A1C were associated with wound complications within 30 days post op. • Further concluded an upper limit on A1C to be 6.7 % from their statistical analysis • Discussed the limitations of the study with such a small subgroup, multifactorial effects of the complications and the limitations in measuring A1C Bringing it Full Circle • Boraiah et al (2015) • Developed a Readmission Risk Tool • Incorporates multiple modifiable variables and takes into account: • • • • • • • • Colonization Smoking Obesity Cardiovascular Disease Venous Thromboembolic Disease Neurocognitive, psychological and behavioral problems Physical Deconditioning Diabetes Bringing it Full Circle Bringing it Full Circle Bringing it Full Circle Bringing it Full Circle • Boraiah Cont’d • A RRT score of greater than 3 was significant for readmission and a score greater than 5 was significantly predictive of readmission. Bringing it Full Circle • Everhart et al (2016) • Develop a Surgical Site Predictor • Includes type of procedure and risk factor • Risk • • • • • • • • factors include COPD Diabetes Long Term Insulin Use Rheumatoid or inflammatory arthropathy Tobacco use Prior infection Obesity Septicemia Bringing it Full Circle Conclusions • Preoperative HgbA1c • Is an independent variable affecting the chances of post op infection • Patients undergoing elective procedures should have a HgbA1C baseline within 30 days of the proposed surgery • Preoperative glycemic control with a goal of < 7% and ideally less than 6.8% should be our target. • Spot glucose monitoring is NOT enough to complete preoperative clearance on a known diabetic • Screening for Hyperglycemia with spot BS should prompt further workup and treatment if elevated Conclusions • Perioperative tight control of the blood glucose should be our goal • BS < 200mg/dL and ideally less than 180mg/dL in all hyperglycemic patients • Close monitoring with the help of endocrinology to obtain this control in the perioperative setting is beneficial to the patient. • All “modifiable" risk factors should be maximized prior to surgical clearance • This will shortly be required when scheduling preop workup and patients not meeting criteria will not be able to proceed with surgery • Be aware of the new government guidelines and quality control measures Finally • The care we offer to patients shouldn’t be about their satisfaction but about the quality of care they receive. • Giving a peanut butter cup to a 350 lb. women with a BS of 350 may make her satisfied but is it quality medicine? Thank You • Michael J Patney, D.O., FAOAO • Bibliography available on request .