Download Document

Survey
yes no Was this document useful for you?
   Thank you for your participation!

* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project

Document related concepts
no text concepts found
Transcript
Supplemental Digital Content 1. Real-time quantitative PCR amplicons
Target
Primers and probes
Eff.
Ref.
Bacteria
TCC TAC GGG AGG CAG CAG T
1.07
[1]
0.91
[2]
1.15
[3]
0.82
[4]
0.62
[5]
0.94
[6]
FAM-CTG ATT ACC GCG GCT GCT GGC ACTAMRA
GGA CTA CCA GGG TAT CTA ATC CTG TT
Bacteroides
GAA AGC ATT AAG TAT TCC ACC TG
fragilis
FAM-TGA AAC TCA AAG GAA TTG ACG GGGTAMRA
CGG TGA TTG GTC ACT GAC A
Escherichia coli
GTG TGA TAT CTA CCC GCT TCG C
FAM-TCG GCA TCC GGT CAG TGG CAG TTAMRA
AGA ACG GTT TGT GGT TAA TCA GGA
Bifidobacterium
TGG AAG ACG TCG TTG GCT TT
longum
FAM-CGC ACC CAC CGC A-MGB
ATC GCG CCA GGC AAA A
Lactobacillus
CAT AAA TCC AAG AAC CGC ATG G
rhamnosus GG
FAM-CTT GGC TGA AAG ATG-MGB
CAC GCC GAC AAC AGT TACT CT GC
Helicobacter pylori TTT GTT AGA GAA GAT AAT GAC GGT ATC
TAA C
FAM-CGT GCC AGC AGC CGC GGT-TAMRA
CAT AGG ATT TCA CAC CTG ACT GAC TAT C
Staphylococcus
GGC GCT TGT AAA ATT TTC GT
aureus
FAM- TTG TTC ACG ATA TGC GTA CAC GTG-
0.78
[7]
0.91
[5]
0.81
[8]
Not
[9]
TAMRA
TGC GCA AAG TTT TAT TGA ACA
Bifidobacterium
AGA ACC ACG GCG GCG TC 0.91
animalis subsp.
FAM-TGC GCT CGC CGA CG-MGB
lactis Bb-12
CGC GGT CTT CTC GAG CAC T
Lactobasillus
GAA AGA GCC CAA ACC AAG TGA TT
acidophilus La-5
FAM-TAC CAC TTT GCA GTC CTA CA-MGB
CTT CCC AGA TAA TTC AAC TAT CGC TTA
Bacteroides
CGTTCCATTAGGCAGTTGGT
determi
thetaiotaomicron
FAM-CTGAGAGGAAGGTCCCCCACATTGGA-
ned
TAMRA
ACACGGTCCAAACTCCTACG
1.
Nadkarni MA, Martin FE, Jacques NA, Hunter N. Determination of bacterial
load by real-time PCR using a broad-range (universal) probe and primers set.
Microbiology 2002;148:257-66.
2.
Malinen E, Kassinen A, Rinttila T, Palva A. Comparison of real-time PCR
with SYBR Green I or 5'-nuclease assays and dot-blot hybridization with rDNAtargeted oligonucleotide probes in quantification of selected faecal bacteria.
Microbiology 2003;149:269-77.
3.
Frahm E, Obst U. Application of the fluorogenic probe technique (TaqMan
PCR) to the detection of Enterococcus spp. and Escherichia coli in water samples.
Journal of microbiological methods 2003;52:123-31.
4.
Haarman M, Knol J. Quantitative real-time PCR assays to identify and
quantify fecal Bifidobacterium species in infants receiving a prebiotic infant formula.
Appl Environ Microbiol 2005;71:2318-24.
5.
Storro O, Oien T, Langsrud O, Rudi K, Dotterud C, Johnsen R. Temporal
variations in early gut microbial colonization are associated with allergen-specific
immunoglobulin E but not atopic eczema at 2 years of age. Clin Exp Allergy
2011;41:1545-54.
6.
Roussel Y, Wilks M, Harris A, Mein C, Tabaqchali S. Evaluation of DNA
extraction methods from mouse stomachs for the quantification of H. pylori by realtime PCR. Journal of microbiological methods 2005;62:71-81.
7.
Liu D, Lawrence ML, Austin FW. Evaluation of PCR primers from putative
transcriptional regulator genes for identification of Staphylococcus aureus. Letters in
applied microbiology 2005;40:69-73.
8.
Haarman M, Knol J. Quantitative real-time PCR analysis of fecal
Lactobacillus species in infants receiving a prebiotic infant formula. Appl Environ
Microbiol 2006;72:2359-65.
9.
Shanks OC, Atikovic E, Blackwood AD, Lu J, Noble RT, Domingo JS, et al.
Quantitative PCR for detection and enumeration of genetic markers of bovine fecal
pollution. Appl Environ Microbiol 2008;74:745-52.
Related documents