Download Acetylsalicylsyra Hexal 75 mg gastro

Survey
yes no Was this document useful for you?
   Thank you for your participation!

* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project

Document related concepts

Drug interaction wikipedia , lookup

Adherence (medicine) wikipedia , lookup

Clinical trial wikipedia , lookup

Theralizumab wikipedia , lookup

Polysubstance dependence wikipedia , lookup

Bad Pharma wikipedia , lookup

Pharmacogenomics wikipedia , lookup

Pharmacognosy wikipedia , lookup

Bilastine wikipedia , lookup

Biosimilar wikipedia , lookup

Transcript
Public Assessment Report
Scientific discussion
Acetylsalicylsyra Hexal
(acetylsalicylic acid)
SE/H/1259/02/MR
This module reflects the scientific discussion for the approval of Acetylsalicylsyra Hexal.
The procedure was finalised on 2015-03-19. For information on changes after this date
please refer to the module ‘Update’.
Postadress/Postal address: P.O. Box 26, SE-751 03 Uppsala, SWEDEN
Besöksadress/Visiting address: Dag Hammarskjölds väg 42, Uppsala
Telefon/Phone: +46 (0)18 17 46 00 Fax: +46 (0)18 54 85 66
Internet: www.mpa.se E-mail: [email protected]
Template version: 2015-03-26
I.
INTRODUCTION
Hexal A/S has applied for a marketing authorisation for Acetylsalicylsyra Hexal, 75 mg,
gastro-resistant tablet. The active substance is acetylsalicylic acid. Acetylsalicylic acid is a
non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID) and has a well-characterised antiplatelet effect.
For approved indications, see the Summary of Product Characteristics.
The marketing authorisation has been granted pursuant to Article 10a (well-established use) of
Directive 2001/83/EC.
For recommendations to the marketing authorisation not falling under Article 21a/22 of
Directive 2001/83 and conditions to the marketing authorisation pursuant to Article 21a or 22
of Directive 2001/83/EC to the marketing authorisation, please see section VI.
II.
QUALITY ASPECTS
II.1
Drug Substance
The structure of the drug substance has been adequately proven and its physico-chemical
properties are sufficiently described.
The manufacture of the drug substance has been adequately described and satisfactory
specifications have been provided for starting materials, reagents and solvents.
The drug substance specification includes relevant tests and the limits for impurities and
degradation products have been justified. The analytical methods applied are suitably
described and validated.
Stability studies confirm the retest period.
II.2
Medicinal Product
The medicinal product is formulated using excipients listed in section 6.1 in the Summary of
Product Characteristics.
The manufacturing process has been sufficiently described and critical steps identified.
The tests and limits in the specification are considered appropriate to control the quality of the
finished product in relation to its intended purpose.
Stability studies have been performed and data presented support the shelf life and special
precautions for storage claimed in the Summary of Product Characteristics, sections 6.3 and
6.4.
2/10
III.
NON-CLINICAL ASPECTS
III.1
Introduction
Since Acetylsalicylic acid (ASA) has been used clinically for a very long time there is an
extensive clinical experience with ASA that largely supersedes non-clinical data. No further
non-clinical data have been submitted or are considered necessary.
III.2
Ecotoxicity/environmental risk assessment
No environmental risk assessment has been performed. This is acceptable. ASA has been in
medicinal use within the community for a long time and it may be assumed that there will be
no significant increase of the use and therefore also no significant increase in the
environmental exposure.
III.3
Discussion on the non-clinical aspects
Products containing Acetylsalicylic acid (ASA) have been available in the EU for a very long
time and their use is well-established with recognised efficacy and acceptable safety. There
have been no objections for approval of this product from a non-clinical point of view.
IV.
CLINICAL ASPECTS
IV.1
Introduction
The efficacy and safety characteristics of ASA are well documented through the longstanding
clinical experience.
IV.2
Pharmacokinetics
To support the statement that this formulation is sufficiently similar to the formulations used in
the bibliographic data referred to, the applicant has submitted four single-dose bioequivalence
studies with the 100 mg tablet strength; one in the fed state and three in the fasting state. The
reference product was Aspirin Protect 100 mg gastro-resistant tablet (Bayer). From a
pharmacokinetic perspective, it was deemed acceptable to extrapolate the results from studies
performed with the 100 mg tablet strength to the 75 mg tablet strength.
For all four studies, plasma concentrations of ASA were determined with a validated
LC/MS/MS method and plasma concentrations of SA were determined with a validated HPLC
method with UV detection. Bioequivalence for SA was considered as supportive evidence
only.
Study in the fed state (1268/07)
The study was a randomised, two-treatment, two-period, two-sequence single-dose crossover
study conducted under fed conditions. The 90% confidence intervals for the test/reference ratio
of the population geometric means for AUC0-t and Cmax for ASA and SA were within the
conventional acceptance range of 80-125%.
3/10
Study in the fasting state (1267/07)
The study was a randomised, two-treatment, two-period, two-sequence single-dose crossover
study conducted under fasting conditions. The 90% confidence intervals for the test/reference
ratio of the population geometric means for AUC0-t and Cmax for ASA was outside the
conventional acceptance range of 80-125% (for Cmax also outside the prospectively widened
acceptance range of 75-133 %). The 90% confidence intervals for the test/reference ratio of the
population geometric means for AUC0-t and Cmax for SA were within the conventional
acceptance range of 80-125%.
Study in the fasting state (1321/07)
The study was a randomised, two-treatment, two-period, two-sequence single-dose crossover
study conducted under fasting conditions. The 90% confidence intervals for the test/reference
ratio of the population geometric means for AUC0-t for ASA was within the conventional
acceptance range of 80-125%, but for Cmax the interval was outside the conventional as well as
the prespecified widened acceptance range. The 90% confidence intervals for the test/reference
ratio of the population geometric means for AUC0-t and Cmax for SA were within the
conventional acceptance range of 80-125%.
Study in the fasting state (1747/08)
The study was a randomised, two-treatment, two-period, two-sequence single-dose crossover
study conducted under fasting conditions. The 90% confidence intervals for the test/reference
ratio of the population geometric means for AUC0-t and Cmax for ASA was outside the
conventional acceptance range of 80-125% (for Cmax also outside the prospectively widened
acceptance range of 75-133 %). For SA, the 90% confidence intervals for the test/reference
ratio of the population geometric means for AUC0-t was within the conventional acceptance
range of 80-125% and for Cmax it was just outside the conventional acceptance range.
Study
1268/07 (fed)
1267/07 (fasting)
1321/07 (fasting)
1747/08 (fasting)
Ratio (90% CI) for AUC0-t for ASA
1.14
(1.05-1.23)
1.18
(1.05-1.33)
0.98
(0.88-1.10)
1.12
(0.97-1.29)
Ratio (90% CI) for Cmax for ASA
1.03
(0.93-1.14)
1.22
(1.03-1.43)
0.76
(0.65-0.89)
1.24
(1.04-1.47)
Pharmacokinetic conclusion
Bioequivalence has been demonstrated between test and reference product for both ASA and
SA in the fed state. However, strict bioequivalence has not been demonstrated for ASA in
three studies in the fasting state (study 1267/07 showed an 18 % increase in AUC and a 22 %
increase in Cmax with test compared to reference, study 1321/07 was bioequivalent for AUC but
showed a 24 % decrease in Cmax with test compared to reference and study 1747/08 showed a
12 % increase in AUC and a 24 % increase in Cmax with test compared to reference). This is
not considered a critical finding as the products are applied via a bibliographic application
where the bibliographic clinical data on ASA in the applied indication consists of studies
performed with several different formulations and doses. Our conclusion is that the presented
studies demonstrate that the formulation is sufficiently similar to the formulations used in the
bibliographic data referred to.
4/10
IV.3
Pharmacodynamics
No new data has been submitted, however, an overview on published data on the
pharmacodynamics of acetylsalicylic acid has been provided.
The mechanism of action and pharmacodynamics of ASA is well known and has been
adequately summarised by the applicant. ASA inactivates COX irreversibly. Since platelets do
not have a cell nucleus they cannot synthesise new proteins. Therefore, the action of ASA on
platelet COX is permanent, lasting for the life of the platelet (7 to 10 days). Repeated, low,
doses of ASA therefore produce a cumulative inhibitory effect on platelet function. Via the
effect on COX, ASA also has an inhibitory action on prostacyclin biosynthesis. This
potentially counteractive effect, however, may be limited due to the rapid recovery of the
synthetic capacity of vascular endothelium. The anti-inflammatory properties of ASA may
have an additive effect in the prevention of cardiovascular disease.
IV.4
Clinical efficacy
The applicant has provided an overview based on published literature to support the efficacy of
ASA in the sought indications. The data provided supports the well-established efficacy in the
approved indications.
Since the current application concerns a gastro-resistant formulation which is not suitable in
acute conditions, the indication “Acute myocardial infarction” is not included in the approval.
As pointed out by the applicant, there are no regular dose-finding studies for ASA available in
these indications. Over time, the recommended dose for the prevention of cardiovascular
events has been adjusted towards lower levels (75-150 mg daily) for all indications except
after coronary bypass, where the lowest recommended dose is 150 mg daily.
The dosing recommendation in the treatment and prevention of cerebrovascular events is still a
matter of debate; however, a recommendation of a daily dose between 75 and 320 mg is
supported by both clinical and pharmacodynamic data as well as current guidelines.
The SPC has been updated to reflect the posology as recommended in the submitted
publications and current European guidelines.
IV.5
Clinical safety
The safety profile for ASA is well known and has been extensively described in the literature.
The applicant has provided a comprehensive summary of the data. The applicant has also
provided safety data from the four bioavailability studies performed with the product under
assessment which supports that the product has a similar safety profile as already described for
other ASA products.
The safety aspects are adequately reflected in the SPC.
IV.6
Risk Management Plans
The MAH has submitted a risk management plan, in accordance with the requirements of
Directive 2001/83/EC as amended, describing the pharmacovigilance activities and
interventions designed to identify, characterise, prevent or minimise risks relating to
Acetylsalicylsyra Hexal.
5/10
Safety specification:
Risk minimisation measures:
Safety concern
Increased risk of bleeding
tendency/haemorrhage
Gastrointestinal bleeding/
ulceration
Routine risk
minimisation measures
Reference is given in
sections
4.4 “Special warnings and
special precautions for
use”, 4.5 “Interaction with
other medicinal products
and other forms of
interaction” and 4.8
“Undesirable effects” of the
SmPC. Moreover it is
contraindicated in patients
with
active, or history of
recurrent
peptic ulcer and/or
gastric/intestinal
haemorrhage,
or other kinds of bleeding
such
as cerebrovascular
haemorrhages,
haemorrhagic
diathesis, coagulation
disorders such as
haemophilia and
thrombocytopenia.
The PIL also describes this
safety concern adequately
to the patient.
Reference is given in
sections
4.4 “Special warnings and
special precautions for
use”, 4.5 “Interaction with
other medicinal products
6/10
Additional risk
minimisation measures
None
None
and other forms of
interaction” and 4.8
“Undesirable effects” of the
SmPC. Moreover it is
contraindicated in patients
with active, or history of
recurrent peptic ulcer
and/or gastric/intestinal
haemorrhage.
The PIL also describes this
safety concern adequately
to the patient.
Deterioration
of
renal Reference is given in
function
sections
4.2 “Posology and method
of
administration”, 4.4
“Special
warnings and special
precautions for use”, 4.5
“Interaction with other
medicinal products and
other forms of interaction”,
4.6 “Pregnancy and
lactation”, 4.8 “Undesirable
effects” and 5.3 “Preclinical
safety data” of the SmPC.
Moreover it is
contraindicated in patients
with severe renal
impairment.
The PIL also describes this
safety concern adequately
to
the patient
Hypersensitivity reactions
Reference is given in
sections
including bronchospasm
and
4.4 “Special warnings and
asthma attacks
special precautions for
use” and 4.8 “Undesirable
effects” of the SmPC.
Moreover it is
contraindicated in patients
with hypersensitivity to
salicylic acid compounds
or prostaglandin
synthetase inhibitors (e.g.
certain asthma patients
who may suffer an attack
or faint) and to any of the
excipients.
The PIL also describes this
7/10
None
None
Increased serum levels of
uric
acid
Steven-Johnson’s
syndrome
Lyell’s syndrome
Interaction with Ibuprofen
safety concern adequately
to the patient.
Reference is given in
sections
4.4 “Special warnings and
special precautions for
use”, 4.5 “Interaction with
other medicinal products
and other forms of
interaction” and 4.8
“Undesirable effects” of the
SmPC.
The PIL also describes this
safety concern adequately
to the patient.
Reference is given in
sections
4.4 “Special warnings and
special precautions for
use” and 4.8 “Undesirable
effects” of the SmPC.
The PIL also describes this
safety concern adequately
to
the patient.
Reference is given in
sections
4.4 “Special warnings and
special precautions for
use” and 4.8 “Undesirable
effects” of the SmPC.
The PIL also describes this
safety concern adequately
to the patient.
Reference is given in
sections
4.5 “Interaction with other
medicinal products and
other
forms of interaction” and
5.1
“Pharmacodynamic
properties” of the SmPC.
The PIL also describes this
safety concern adequately
to the patient.
The RMP is approved.
8/10
None
None
None
None
V.
USER CONSULTATION
A user consultation with target patient groups on the package information leaflet
(PIL) has been performed on the basis of a bridging report making reference to
Acetylsalicylsyra Actavis 50 mg, 75 mg, 100 mg, 150 mg and 160 mg gastroresistant tablets, SE/H/1020/02-05/DC. The bridging report submitted by the
applicant has been found acceptable.
VI.
OVERALL CONCLUSION, BENEFIT/RISK ASSESSMENT
AND RECOMMENDATION
The quality of the product is found adequate.
The benefit/risk ratio is considered positive and Acetylsalicylsyra Hexal, 75 mg, gastroresistant tablet is recommended for approval.
List of recommendations not falling under Article 21a/22 of Directive 2001/83 in case of a
positive benefit risk assessment

Update Module 2.5 and 5.4
An updated clinical overview (module 2.5, based on an updated module 5.4 including
recent references published since 2009) will be implemented via a variation
application submitted within 6 months following finalisation of the procedure.

Gastro-resistance
The applicant commits to undertake formulation trials for improving the gastroresistance by means of changes in composition and packaging material. The applicant
commits to initiate stability studies on full scale production batches with the new
formulation, covering all proposed container types to be used in the future. These
studies will be continued until the end of the proposed shelf life. The changes will be
proposed via a future grouped variation. The variation will be submitted within 12
months following finalisation of the procedure.
The applicant commits to re-evaluate the dissolution test specifications for the
new formulation (with respect to an eventual harmonization of the shelf-life
specification with the release specification) as soon as new stability data is
available.
List of conditions pursuant to Article 21a or 22 of Directive 2001/83/EC
N/A
VII.
APPROVAL
The Mutual recognition procedure for Acetylsalicylsyra Hexal, 75 mg, gastro-resistant tablet
was positively finalised on 2015-03-19.
9/10
Public Assessment Report – Update
Scope
Procedure number
Product Information
affected
Date of start of the
procedure
Date of end of
procedure
Approval/
non approval
Assessment report
attached
Y/N (version)
Postadress/Postal address: P.O. Box 26, SE-751 03 Uppsala, SWEDEN
Besöksadress/Visiting address: Dag Hammarskjölds väg 42, Uppsala
Telefon/Phone: +46 (0)18 17 46 00 Fax: +46 (0)18 54 85 66
Internet: www.mpa.se E-mail: [email protected]
Template version: 2015-03-26