Download NOURISH: Nutritional Outcomes from a Randomised Investigation of

Survey
yes no Was this document useful for you?
   Thank you for your participation!

* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project

Document related concepts

Gastric bypass surgery wikipedia , lookup

Nutrition wikipedia , lookup

Human nutrition wikipedia , lookup

Transcript
1789
NOURISH: Nutritional Outcomes from a Randomised Investigation of Intradialytic Oral
Nutritional Supplements in Patients Receiving Haemodialysis. A Pilot Randomised controlled
trial.
Jackson, L. (1) Sully, B. (2) Cohen, J. (2) and Julious, S. (2)
Northern General Hospital, Sheffield teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Sheffield.
Introduction
Malnutrition is reported to affect 20% - 50% of the haemodialysis population. Causes are
multifactorial but include poor appetite and the catabolic effect of dialysis. Nutrition support
interventions are known to improve measures of nutritional status but the most effective methods of
support and the outcome measures to use to validate their efficacy have not been confirmed to date.
Methods
NOURISH is a two arm randomised, parallel group, external pilot trial of intradialytic oral
nutritional supplements (ONS) during haemodialysis (HD) versus standard care. Eligible
participants (HD patients ≥18 years, dialysis 3 times per week for at least last 6 months, Body Mass
Index ≤22 kg/m2) were randomised to either receive an ONS each haemodialysis session or
standard care for 2 months, stratified by gender and age.
Primary outcomes were recruitment and feasibility: recruitment rate (recruit to time, t = 6 weeks),
barriers, data completion, and acceptability of assessment methods. Secondary outcome measures
included palatability of supplements, oral intake (dietary recall), handgrip strength (dynamometry)
and quality of life (QOL) using SF-12 completed at baseline, 1 and 2 months. The trial was
designed to help inform the feasibility of a larger study, timing of assessments, and sample size
requirements.
Results
10 participants were recruited, 5 randomised to each arm, representing 4% of the screened
population. 7.2% of the screened population were eligible to participate but declined mainly due to
a dislike of ONS. The main reason for ineligibility was a body mass index greater than 22kg/m2.
Average time for monthly assessments was 35 to 55 minutes, which patients found acceptable. The
completion of the session questionnaire to identify food intake on HD and ONS preferences had a
completion rate of just 23.1%.
Significance tests were not performed for secondary outcome measures due to small sample size.
181 participants would be needed to identify a significant change in handgrip strength in a
definitive trial based on 90% power and a minimally clinically important difference of 4Kg,
requiring 10 centres of approximately 250 HD patients, recruiting for x time.
Conclusion
A definitive trial would be feasible in the UK, but some aspects need further consideration.
Inclusion criteria - possibly increase BMI to 24kg/m2 and use additional measures of muscle mass
to better indicate nutritional status. Timing of ONS during the intradialytic period should be clearly
defined. Monthly assessments of oral intake, QOL, weight and routine blood results are advised but
the use of session questionnaires is not indicated.