Survey
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Shoulder Injury – Paratriathlon AAPM&R Annual Meeting October 1, 2015 Cheri A. Blauwet, MD Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Harvard Medical School, Boston MA History • Chief Complaint – Left shoulder pain • History of Present Illness – – – – 34 yo right hand dominant female triathlete with h/o spina bifida Training for Ironman World Championships in 6 weeks Left shoulder pain progressive for 2 months, prohibiting training Currently training 15 hours/week, combination of swimming, handcycling, wheelchair racing History, cont’d • Three components of paratriathlon – Swimming painful – Handcycling (equivalent to the bike) painful – Wheelchair racing (equivalent to the run) not painful Painful Painful Not painful History, cont’d • Pain Description – – – – – – Left anterior shoulder, “deep” Radiates to medial elbow when severe Average 3/10, flares to 9/10 Worse: handcycling, swimming, transfers Better: ice, naprosyn Episodic pain at rest, no pain at night History, cont’d • Shoulder History – Primary wheelchair user since 6 years old – Played competitive wheelchair basketball in college (10 years ago) – Started triathlons in 2012 – competed in 2 prior Ironmans • 2012 – minimal L shoulder pain, no intervention • 2013 – L shoulder pain recurred, required PT and subacromial steroid injection able to compete • 2014 – L shoulder pain beginning 2 months prior, progressive patient requesting further work-up – Continues with PT exercises on her own 2-3x/week Past Medical and Surgical History • Spina bifida leading to L1-2 neurologic level of injury – Can ambulate but slowly, uses wheelchair for efficiency • Tethered cord release in youth • Club foot repair in youth • Ureteral re-implantation in youth Functional and Social History • Functional History – – – – – Independent with manual wheelchair use Independent with transfers and all ADLs Lives independently, travels internationally Lives in high rise condo, elevator building Works full-time at a non-profit • Social History – No tobacco use, 2-3 alcoholic drinks/week, single Physical Examination • Inspection: Left scapula resting in protracted position, increased medial winging with active FF/abduction (negative lateral scapular slide test) • ROM: Active IR to T3 on right compared to T6 on left (with pain); otherwise normal • Palpation: Tenderness over left proximal biceps tendon and supraspinatus insertion on greater tuberosity • Neurovascular: Normal Physical Examination • Special Tests (focus on left): – Spurling’s negative bilaterally – Positive Neer’s, positive Kennedy-Hawkins – Positive empty can (pain, no weakness), full strength to resisted IR/ER bilaterally, negative belly press bilaterally – Positive Obrien’s, positive dynamic labral shear (with palpable click), negative sulcus sign, negative apprehension/relocation – Positive Speed’s, negative Yergason’s, negative bear hug – Negative cross-arm adduction Differential Diagnosis • Shoulder Soft Tissue – – – – – – – – • Cervical/Plexus Subacromial/subdeltoid bursitis – Cervical radiculitis Scapulothoracic dyskinesis – Brachial neuritis Biceps tenosynovitis/tendinopathy – Thoracic outlet syndrome Rotator cuff tendinopathy Rotator cuff tear (partial) • Other AC joint osteoarthritis – Neoplasm Glenohumeral labral tear – Occult fracture Glenohumeral osteoarthritis (early) Questions? Narrowed Differential Diagnosis • • • • • Supraspinatus partial tear Supraspinatus tendinopathy Biceps tendinopathy Glenohumeral labral tear Cervical radiculitis Diagnostic Tests • Left shoulder musculoskeletal ultrasound obtained in office – Focused study – used as extension of physical exam • Left shoulder MR arthrogram for evaluation of labrum Ultrasound Proximal Biceps Tendon Tendinopathic changes most severe as tendon becomes intra-articular Long axis Short axis Ultrasound Supraspinatus Tendon Tendinopathic changes and partial articular sided tear MRI Coronal Oblique T2 Fat Sat MRI Coronal Oblique T2 Fat Sat MRI Coronal Oblique T2 Fat Sat Moderate to severe intra-articular long head of biceps tendinosis MRI Coronal Oblique T2 Fat Sat MRI Coronal Oblique T2 Fat Sat Moderate to severe supraspinatus tendinosis, partial tear articular surface, anterior fibers MRI Glenoid Labrum Superior labral tear from anterior to posterior, extending from superior 12 o’clock position to the posterior 10 o’clock position Axial T1 DESS (dual echo steady state) Coronal Oblique T2 Fat Sat Final Diagnosis • Left superior glenohumeral labral tear from anterior to posterior • Supraspinatus tendinopathy with partial tear • Long head biceps tendinopathy, intra-articular portion Final Diagnosis • Left superior glenohumeral labral tear from anterior to posterior • Supraspinatus tendinopathy with partial tear • Long head biceps tendinopathy, intra-articular portion Goal: Ironman triathlon in 6 week’s time Initial Treatment • Left glenohumeral joint steroid injection under US guidance • Single injection treats pain due to: – Glenohumeral labral pathology – Articular sided tear of the supraspinatus – Proximal biceps tendinosis (Clark, JBJS Am 1992) • Referral to PT to re-establish home exercise program Follow-Up • At 2-week follow-up 90% relief of pain • Ramped back up to full training load within the following 2 weeks • Completed the swim and bike portions of the Ironman, not limited by pain What’s Next? • Athletes who utilize their shoulders for mobility AND sport participation require a unique approach – Heightened focus on conservative management and injury prevention • Functional implications of shoulder arthroscopy: Before Surgery After Surgery (for ~ 6 months) Manual wheelchair Power wheelchair Independent in transfers Requires full assist Independent with ADLs Requires assist for dressing/bathing Traveling, working Limited to home-based activities Next Steps • Athlete given information regarding obtaining a surgical opinion and advised to establish care • Continues with an aggressive rehabilitation program – currently without pain on a daily basis • Plans to decrease the intensity of endurance events in attempt to maintain shoulder function longitudinally and prolong length of time until arthroscopy is required Discussion Thank You • Colleagues participating in this symposium • Colleagues and mentors at Spaulding Rehabilitation Hospital/Brigham and Women’s Hospital