* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Download Forests and Grasslands
Survey
Document related concepts
Habitat conservation wikipedia , lookup
Conservation movement wikipedia , lookup
Sustainable forest management wikipedia , lookup
Private landowner assistance program wikipedia , lookup
Biological Dynamics of Forest Fragments Project wikipedia , lookup
Operation Wallacea wikipedia , lookup
Transcript
Forests and Grasslands Forests—enough precipitation to support stands of trees Tropical, temperate and polar (boreal) Tropical Forests Heavy rainfall most days Diversity of life forms Occupy variety of specialized niches in distinct layers Near equator Dominated by broadleaf evergreens Tree tops form dense canopy Tropical Forests Vines –climb to reach sunlight Epiphytes—grow on trunks, absorb nutrients Forest floor—plants with huge leaves capture sunlight Animal life---insect, bats, birds—most live in canopy Tropical Forests Specialized plants and animal niches—enables coexistence 2% of terrestrial surface area 50% of terrestrial species Temperate Deciduous Forests Survive winter by dropping leaves Leaves decay and leave rich soil Average temperatures vary with season Long warm summers Cold, but not severe winters Abundant precipitation throughout year Tropical Deciduous Fewer tree species than tropical Light penetration allows great plant diversity on forest floor Thick litter layers Used to have large predators Evergreen Coniferous Cold climates Cone-bearing trees that keep needles year-round Boreals or taigas Winters—long, dry and extremely cold Sunlight—6-8 hours/day Summers—short, mild to warm Evergreen Coniferous Diversity—plant is low—too cold Soils—acidic, thin, nutrient-poor Large herbivores, smaller carnivores, birds Temperate Rain Forests Coastal Huge cone-bearing evergreens Redwoods, Douglas firs Forests Forests with 10% tree cover occupy 30% land surface Closed canopy—tree crowns spread over 20% Open canopy—tree crowns less than 20%, woodland Forests Classified by age and structure Old growth: uncut or regenerated forest not disturbed for several hundred years, biodiversity treasures, usually remote Second-growth: secondary ecological succession, human activities or natural disaster Tree farm: managed tract, one species, uniform age Forest Products Industrial timber & roundwood—lumber and lumber products U.S., Canada, Russia—largest producers Japan—largest consumer Forest Management Intensive but sustainable management of 1/5 of the forests meet demands for wood and fiber Area=2 x area of India Forest Products Fuel wood—1/2 of wood harvested 1.5 billion rely on fuel wood Open fires<10% efficiency Metal stoves: 20% efficient Ceramic stoves: 40% efficient Non-timber products Food Wildlife habitat Recreation Oxygen Carbon sinks Reduce erosion Forest Management Even-aged management—same age and size, economically desirable Harvested every 6-10 years Forest Management Uneven-aged management—variety of species, many ages and sizes Harvested as ready Goal—sustainability, biodiversity, quality lumber Harvesting Trees Build logging roads—access lumber and remove Increase erosion, introduce new species, increase other uses Logging road precludes wilderness designation Harvesting— Harvesting Trees Selective cutting of intermediate-or mature-aged trees Shelterwood—remove all mature trees in 2-3 cuttings over time period Seed-tree—harvest nearly all trees, except for few uniformly distributed seed-producing trees Harvesting Trees Clearcutting—remove all trees from area in single cutting Strip cutting—harvest strips of trees, leave room for regeneration Deforestation Temporary or permanent removal of large area of forest for agriculture or other uses Decreased soil fertility Soil erosion Extinction of species with specialized niches Deforestation Habitat loss for migratory species (birds and butterflies) Regional climate change Releases CO2 into atmosphere from burning and tree decay Accelerates flooding Swidden agriculture Slash and burn—clear area for farming and grazing Can be sustainable, based on rotation and crops Can cause permanent degradation Fire Management Surface fires—burn undergrowth and leaf litter Remove flammable materials, stimulate germination, etc Crown fires—start on ground, move op tree, jump from tree to tree Devastating, kill wildlife, erosion increases U. S. Forest Service Part of Dept. of Agriculture Provide timber Maintain roads into area, clean debris, rivers Subsidize logging companies Sell rights to harvest, less than cost to maintain area & roads U. S. Forest Service Mixed uses—logging, recreation, grazing, wilderness Cross purposes Change of administrations Bush—salvage logging (what is salvage?) No new studies for id of wilderness Thinning Decrease environmental review and comment period Tropical Rainforest Deforestation Population growth Poverty Government subsidies Foreign debt No value to assess ecological value/benefits Debt-for-nature Tropical Rainforest Steeply discount debt--OK Decrease sovereignty, change political administrations, etc. Grasslands Intensely used and altered Rainfall enough to support grasses, but not forests 27% of land surface Temperate Grasslands Cold winters, hot, dry summers Deep, fertile soil Plains, rolling hills in interiors of North and South America Europe Asia Grasslands Pasture—enclosed or managed grasslands Rangelands—unfenced, natural prairie and open woodlands Should be sustainable Overgrazed Overfarmed Grazing Conditions of range—rainfall, plant conditions, cover, nutritional value Dictate number of animals grazed Rotational grazing 60% of rangeland –privately owned 26%--BLM (Interior Dept.) 15%--Forest Service Grazing BLM—resource utilization Cheap rent Grazing animals exceed carrying capacity Overgrazed Unpalatable plants Competing herbivores Erosion Grazing U. S. fees vs. private fees Encourages grazing where it shouldn’t be Overgrazing Studies have shown that some grassland soils and plants are harmed by large hooved animals Who Owns the Land? Landowners vs. landless Rural landless and urban slum dwellers—most poor individuals Human dignity, social justice, environmental misuse Land Reform Redistribute land from the few Mixed success Indigenous people Guardians How compensated