Survey
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
A new approach for locating the Dynamics of QCD phase diagram critical point in RHIC low energy and the locating of critical point scan experiments in RHIC low energy scan • Introduction Xu Mingmei, Yu Meiling, Liu Lianshou • New approach for locating critical point Presented by Liu Lianshou • Application to RHIC energy-scan SQM08, October 2008, Beijing Introduction The difficulty in understanding the mechanism of crossover Part I The Molecule-like Aggregation Model- MAM Application to the study of liquid property of sQGP Part II A new approach for locating the critical point in RHIC low energy scan experiment Introduction The difficulty in understanding the mechanism of crossover Commonly accepted phase diagram • 1st order phase transition line ends at the critical point, above it is analytic crossover. • How is the mechanism of crossover? How is it different from 1st order phase transition? 1st order phase transition vs. crossover order phase transition Example-1 1st 1st order phase transition in QCD Boundary Some nucleons combine to a big bag - QGP droplet Co-existenceofofQGP two phases Nucleon gas Co-existence and HG Analytical crossover Example-2 Analytical crossover in QED + + + + ++ + + + + + + + + E-M plasma Ionization atoms Mixture of two Mixture ofofelectrons, components positive-ions and neutral atomsand phase separation. Without phase boundary Neutral atom gas Example-3 Analytical crossover in QCD - 1 wQGP BEC-BCS is a phase change within deconfined phase. 2 quarks of opposite spin form a di-quark, They might also form loose-knit Cooper pair, leading to BoseEinstein condensation. leading to BCS superconducting. Mixed state In the intermediate stage of crossover di-quarks and Cooper pairs mixed in perturbative vacuum. Example-4 Analytical crossover This case is special. in QCD - 2 Crossover between HG andcases. QGP Let us compare the different A possible mechanism: Hadrons in Physical vacuum Hadrons decompose to quarks, Used in AMPTand qMD Quarks combine (hadronize) to hadrons Partons in Perturbative vacuum In the intermediate stage there are: quarks moving in physical vacuum or hadrons moving in perturbative vacuum Contradicts color confinement. Atomic gas ~ EM plasma BEC ~ BCS HG ~ QGP + + + Mixture of electrons, positive ions and neutral atoms No vacuum problem Mixture of diquarks and Cooper pairs The mixture of quarks (colored objects) and hadrons (color-singlets) Color objects in perturbative vacuum. No problem Contradicts confinement, Causing big problem. Part I The Molecule-like Aggregation Model . Let us take still another example . Example 5: Geometrical bond model site percolation Dynamical Model A bond could be formed between two adjacent hadrons We borrow the concept of quark from Thedelocalization hadrons connected by Screening bonds formModel clusters Quark Delocalization and Color in low energy nuclear physics. When an infinite cluster, i.e. a cluster extending from one boundary to the other, is formed, we say that the system turns to a new phase. In this way the crossover from one phase to the other is realized. No contradiction with QCD When the distance of two hadrons is large, quarks are confined in each hadron by a confinement potential. When two hadrons close enough, the infinite potential in between drops down, forming a potential barrier. Quarks can tunnel the barrier and move in a delocalized orbit. Bond is formed by quark delocalization Since color can flow through bonds, hadrons in a cluster become colored objects. Only the cluster as a whole is color-singlet Inspired by the above observation we propose: Our basic assumption: molecule-like aggregation Usual scheme of hadron aggregation can serve as the picture for 1st order phase transition. Use it for crossover Form ideal gas, • contradicts color confinement. Form QGP with liquid property, • no contradiction with color confinement. Using this assumption we propose a model for the crossover between hadronic and partonic phases Molecule-like Aggregation Model Tc Before crossover Start of crossover Tc’ End of crossover Clusters of Begin to formof crossover, All hadrons are connected At the intermediate stage various sizes infinite cluster to an infinite cluster. there is a mixture of gQGP (infinite cluster) Grape-shape QGP clusters). (gQGP) and hadronic states (small Grape-shape (gQGP) a special form of sQGP. Both QGP of them areiscolor-singlets. No contradiction with color-confinement. A simple application of MAM ----- the liquid property of sQGP The liquid property of gQGP — Studied by pair distribution function Pair distribution function: the probability of finding two atoms at a distance r from each other. When there is no correlation, g(r)=1. In our case, chemical distance D: D r Define new pair distribution function: : correction factor to eliminate the boundary effect. Before crossover T=0.475Tc Start of crossover T=Tc T=0.67Tc T=0.80Tc Middle stage T=1.21Tc T=0.93Tc End of crossover T=1.31Tc T=1.39Tc • The first high peak is due to intra-cell correlations among quarks; • Long before crossover there is no correlation peak beside the first high one; • Going nearer to crossover some shoulders appear, which develop to peaks, indicating short-range order at the start of crossover; • In the process of crossover, correlation peaks appear more and more and extend farther and farther, indicating the reduction of viscosity . Part II A new approach for locating the critical point in RHIC low energy scan experiments In order to experimentally test the predicted phase diagram, RHIC has started Low-Energy Scan program LQCD predictions for critical points Chemical freeze-out Experimental freeze-out What to measure? The region covered by Low-E Scan WhatThe variable iscovered effective for locating critical point? total region by RHIC Many variables have been proposed. Most of them are based on the assumption that these variables have large fluctuations at the critical point. These fluctuations are Event-by-Event, and so are contaminated by the statistical ones coming from the limited number of particles in a single event. Various attempts have been made to eliminate the statistical fluctuations, but none are decisive. It is unclear whether such a kind of fluctuationsignal for critical point could survive after the elimination of statistical fluctuations. Since the systems have arrived equilibrium, there is no This Collide is a 2nd A+A order at various phase energies transition How whether to avoid troublesome SF? difference theythe are different systems produced Duringcollisions the 2ndor order phase transition, the in different they are the evolution of a single Let us examine the energy scan process. system willtohave noticeable change system A instructure T,μplane due the exchange of heat and particle withwhile an external heat-critical and particlebath. passing point. second order phase transition second order phase transition Let us find a variable to chracterize first order first order phase transition change while the structure phasepassing transition critical point. When system goes along ph-trans-line, passing critical The change inapassing CP point the structure pT distribution will present noticeable change Crossover Molecule-like aggregation Basic elements are clusters. First order phase transition Gas-like aggregation Basic elements are single particles --- partons at ABC, This effect should be observable and could serve as and hadrons at A’B’C’abc. a signal for locating the critical point Thermal motion + Zero-point vibration Besides thermal + radial flow pT, the hadrons get extra pT from zero-point vibration Thermal motion While freezeout the hadrons get thermal + radial flow pT In order to get an idea about how large is the effect of we use the experimentally fitted parameters β and Tfz of Au+Au collisions at sNN 4.88 GeV and 62.3 GeV to make an interpolation. Assuming that the critical point is located in this energy region, e.g. at sNN 20 GeV, T fz A jump at the critical point can clearly be seen. For ω= 0.15 and 0.40 GeV the relative rise of the first, second, third order moments are 5.8, 8.7, 9.9 % and 14, 23, 27 %, respectively. Such an effect should be observable in a high quality data. The sensitivity of the amount of moment-rising on the value of ω can be used to get the value of ω and wherefrom obtain the bond strength, which is a piece of useful information in the study of QCD phase structure. Advantage of the new approach • pT moments are averaged over whole sample instead of single event. No statistical fluctuation. • For the fluctuation signal, If it is not by occasion that some energy used in the first round just locates at the vicinity of the fluctuation peak, we will see nothing in the first round and the subsequent scan has to be carried out in finer steps over the whole energy range. • On the contrary, if the higher order scaled pT moments have a sudden rise while passing through the critical point, then already in the first round of energy scan we will observe a rise of these moments, and most probably the critical point is located in the region of the moment-rising. Summary • Applying the usual gas-like aggregation to crossover contradicts color confinement. • Molecule-like aggregation is the appropriate scheme for crossover. • Using Molecule-like Aggregation Model - MAM to study the pair distribution function the liquid property of sQGP is obtained. • Basing on MAM a new approach for locating critical point is proposed which is free from the contamination of statistical fluctuations and is easier to be used. Thank you for attention ! As the increasing of T, correlation distance range of effective interaction potential mean free path viscosity Thank you for attention ! QCD has complicated phase structure. No analytical calculation is possible, due to color-confinement or “infra-red slavery”. Most reliable information comes from lattice QCD.