Survey
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
TFP, intangible assets and spatial dependence in the European regions Barbara Dettori, Emanuela Marrocu, Raffaele Paci University of Cagliari and CRENoS, Italy EU FP7 SSH Project "Intangible Assets and Regional Economic Growth" Liverpool, ERSA Conference, 2008 General aim of the paper To provide a measure of the Total Factor Productivity in the European regions through the estimation of a production function with the inclusion of traditional inputs (physical capital, labour) and to asses the role of the “intangible assets” (human capital, social capital, technology) within a dynamic spatial model Motivation Since the Lisbon declaration in 2000 there is a growing attention in Europe to the “intangible” assets as they play a key role in the development of a “knowledge economy” and thus in determining the economic performances of countries and regions. In the industrialized economies the ability to compete in the open markets is more and more based on production factors like the quality of labour (human capital), the degree of cohesion and trust in the society (social capital), the level of innovation (technology). However there is a lack of systematic studies on the simultaneous effects of intangible assets on the economic performance at the regional level. Our contribution In our study we estimate a Cobb-Douglas production function in order to measure the effects of various inputs on the level of production. We consider 200 regions of 17 countries in Europe, the 15 members of the EU15 plus Switzerland and Norway and compute a measure of TFP for those regions. We augment the production function including intangible assets (human capital, social capital, technology) to assess their simultaneous role in the determination of the production level. We control for the presence of spatial association by estimating dynamic spatial models: spatial lag dependent variable and error models. Outline of the presentation 1. Estimation of the production function with only traditional inputs for a long time period 1985-2006 and measure of TFP at the regional level • • • • Data Estimation methods Econometric results TFP 2. Estimation of the production function with the inclusion of intangible assets for the period 2002-2004 • • • Data Estimation methods Econometric results The European regions considered Appendix 1. Regions and NUTS level Country Austria Belgium Denmark Finland France Germany Greece Ireland Italy Luxembourg Netherlands Norway Portugal Spain Sweden Switzerland United Kingdom N. regions 9 3 1 6 22 40 13 2 20 1 4 7 5 15 8 7 37 NUTS 2 1 0 2 2 2 2 2 2 0 1 2 2 2 2 2 2 Data sources Cambridge Econometrics, 2008 • Value Added: constant price • Labour: unit of labour (full time equivalent) • Hours: total number of hours worked in the year • Investment: gross fixed investment, constant price The calculation of the physical capital stock Methodology For the period 1985-2006, the stock of physical capital Kit for each region i and time t is constructed from the flow of gross investment I by using the perpetual inventory method and assuming an annual depreciation rate d equal to 10% and constant over time and region: Kit = (1 - d) Kit-1 + Iit-1 The capital stock value for the initial year 1984 has been assumed equal to the cumulative sum of discounted investment flows over the ten-years period 1975-1984. Map 1. Physical capital stock (pc average values 1985-2006) Map 2. Value Added (pc average values 1985-2006) Map 3. Units of labour (pc average values 1985-2006) Production function estimation with traditional inputs Yit = Ai K itα Lβit Cobb-Douglas production function with pooled data where: Y = value added at base prices K = stock of capital L = labour units (or total number of worked hours per year) i =1..., 200 regions t =1985, ... 2006 time period All variables are normalised to population in order to control for different size of regions. Univariate time series properties of the data According to a wide battery of panel unit root tests, (Levin, Lin & Chu t*; Breitung t-stat ; Im, Pesaran and Shin Wstat; ADF - Fisher Chi-square; PP - Fisher Chi-square; Hadri Z-stat) the time series variables of value added, labour units and capital stock exhibit a nonstationary kind of behaviour over the sample period 1985-2006. The results are robust with respect to different specification of the lag structure and of the deterministic components included in the test regressions (individual effects, individual effects and individual trends). Long run properties of the data Both panel and group cointegration tests (Pedroni tests and Kao test) provide evidence that the estimated production function is a nonspurious long run relationship. Estimation of error correction models allows to test for weak exogeneity of the variables included in the production function regression. The test is a t-statistic for the null hypothesis that the coefficient λi associated with the previous period disequilibrium term is not significantly different from zero. The ECM specification for value added is in the form (similar models are estimated for the two production inputs): p p p j =1 j =1 j =1 ∆y it = c1 + λ1εˆi ,t −1 + ∑ β 11, j ∆y i ,t − j + ∑ β 12, j ∆k i ,t − j + ∑ β 13, j ∆l i ,t − j + u1it Results: only the labour unit variable can be considered weakly exogenous with respect to value added and capital. Spatial models We detect the presence of spatial autocorrelation and therefore spatial models has been estimated: - lag dependent variable - error term Results from the two models are similar, here only the lag dependent variable is presented. Weight matrix (W): inverse of distance in km. We have also used the contiguity matrix, results are similar Estimation procedures Given the previous results on endogeneity, the production function has been also estimated with instrumental variables where the instruments are the values of the variables with one year lag. In most regressions Time and Regional fixed effects have been included. The econometric model: yit = ai + αkit + β lit + δWyit + TFE + RFE + ε it TFP for the European regions. Average 1986-2006 (reg.4) TFP for the European regions (computed from regional fixed effect of regr. 4) The role of intangible assets /1 We include in the production function also the intangible assets whose positive role on the economic performance is becoming increasingly important in the industrialized economies. Human capital. The literature has emphasized its the positive role on productivity level and growth (Mankiw et al., 1992). At the regional level a higher availability of well educated labour forces represents an advantage for the localization of innovative firms thus promoting local productivity (Rauch, 1993). Social capital. A high social capital in a certain area correspond to an increase of trust among agents, a reduction of the transaction costs for both firms and consumers (Diani, 2004) and a wider diffusion of knowledge (Helliwell-Putnam, 1995). All these effects enhance the economic performances (Coleman, 1990; Temple and Johnson 1998, Guiso et al 2007). The role of intangible assets /2 Technology. The inclusion in the production function of a direct measure of technology has been originally suggested by Griliches (1979) and afterwards it has been used at the firms, industries and aggregate levels. The idea is that technology is partly a public goods and therefore a higher degree of knowledge capital available in a certain area benefits firms and thus it improves aggregate productivity. (Fischer et al 2008 for EU; Robbins 2006 for US). In general, these “intangible” inputs reinforce together and improve the level of production because they create a more favourable economic environment to the firms (see for Italian regions Marrocu, Paci 2008 AE) Data sources for intangible assets • Human capital : population that has attained at least a university degree (ISCED 5-6) over total population (source: Eurostat). • Social capital (social participation): population that have taken part at least once in the last 12 months in social activities such as voluntary service, unions and cultural associations meetings over total population (source: European Social Survey, Round 1 and Round 2). • Technology : Patent applications for 1000 inhabitants (source: OECD, Patent Cooperation Treaty) also used R&D expenditure but we have data for only one period (correlation coefficient between patent and R&D =0.82). Only two time observations are available: 2002 and 2004 Map 5. Human capital (pc average values 2002, 2004) Map 6. Social capital (pc average values 2002, 2004) Map 7. Technology (pc average values 2002, 2004) Production function estimation with intangible inputs Yit = Ai K itα Lβit HK itγ 1 SK itγ 2Titγ 3 Y = value added at base prices, L = labour units, K = stock of capital; HK = human capital, SK = social capital, T = technology, i=1.. 199 regions (Berlin excl.) t = 2002, 2004 time period. All variables are normalised to population in order to control for different size of regions. The econometric model with spatial lag dependent variable: yit = ai + αkit + β lit + γ 1hkit + γ 2 skit + γ 3tit + δWyit + ε it General Results There is a strong evidence for the presence of spatial autocorrelation in the production levels across the European regions. The coefficient of the spatial lag production level is always positive and significant and it shows a high elasticity. The geographical distribution of the estimated TFP confirms a centre-periphery pattern with low values for the southern regions in Spain, Italy, Greece and Portugal. The intangible assets (human capital, social capital and technology) prove to play a positive and significant role in determining the production levels.