Survey
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
DFG Senate Commission on Food Safety SKLM Update of the toxicological assessment of furanocoumarins in foodstuffs (Update of the SKLM statement of 23rd/24th September 2004) Issued in German on January 25th 2010 English Version: September 27th/28th 2010 Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft Kennedyallee 40 · 53175 Bonn www.dfg.de/sklm DFG Members and guests of the DFG Senate Commission on Food Safety 2010 Members: Prof. Dr. Gerhard Eisenbrand (Chairman), Prof. Dr. Karl-Heinz Engel,, Prof. Dr. Johanna FinkGremmels, Prof. Dr. Jan G. Hengstler, Prof. Dr. Thomas Hofmann, Prof. Dr. Hans-Georg Joost, Prof. Dr. Dietrich Knorr, Prof. Dr. Ib Knudsen, Prof. Dr. Sabine Kulling, Prof. Dr. Doris Marko, Prof. Dr. Reinhard Matissek, Prof. Dr. I.M.C.M. Ivonne Rietjens, Dr. Josef Schlatter, Prof. Dr. Peter Schreier, Prof. Dr. Dr. Dieter Schrenk, Prof. Dr. Pablo Steinberg, Prof. Dr. Rudi F. Vogel Permanent guests: Prof. Dr. Manfred Edelhäuser, Prof Dr. Alfonso Lampen, Prof Dr. Gerhard Rechkemmer, Prof. Dr. Christian Steffen, Prof. Dr. Stefan Vieths The Commission would like to thank the members of the working group „Substances in food“: Dr. Josef Schlatter (WG Chairman), Dr. Klaus E. Appel, Dr. Matthias Baum, Prof. Dr. Hubertus E. Brunn, Prof. Dr. Manfred Edelhäuser, Prof. Dr. Gerhard Eisenbrand, Prof. Dr. Hans-Ulrich Humpf, Prof. Dr. Doris Marko, Dr. Anette Poeting, Prof. Dr. Dr. Dieter Schrenk, Dr. Gerrit I.A. Speijers, Prof. Dr. Peter Winterhalter for the preparation of the opinion and the SKLM staff represented by Dr. Michael Habermeyer, Dr. Sabine Guth and Dr. Barbara Kochte-Clemens for their support. SKLM Commission Secretariat Food Chemistry and Toxicology, University of Kaiserslautern Erwin-Schroedinger-Str. 52, 67663 Kaiserslautern, Germany E-Mail: [email protected] • Tel.: +49 631 2054200 • Fax: +49 631 2054005 The DFG Senate Commission on Food Safety (SKLM) has discussed the toxicological assessment of furanocoumarins in foodstuffs and adopted an opinion on 23rd/24th September 2004. At that time, no analytical data were available on the occurrence and content of furanocoumarins in citrus oils, especially in lime oil and the foodstuffs produced from it. According to the SKLM, the highest levels were likely to be found in products containing lime or bergamot oil. Distilled and cold pressed oils differ in their levels of furanocoumarins; in distilled oils, no furanocoumarins were found. The original estimate of the average daily intake of furanocoumarins in Germany made by the SKLM is based on the assumption that flavoured foods contain cold-pressed citrus oils exclusively (worst case scenario). Recent data, however, indicate that distilled citrus oils are mainly used in flavoured soft drinks. The SKLM has, therefore, decided to update the assessment of the average intake of furanocoumarins from flavoured food. Contents in flavoured soft drinks and citrus juices New analytical data about furanocoumarin contents in flavoured soft drinks and citrus juices show that in 17 out of 18 samples analysed, the furanocoumarins isopimpinellin, 5-methoxypsoralen (5-MOP) and bergamottin were not found (Gorgus et al., 2010). According to the authors, the detection limit was 2.5μg/100ml1. In one sample (soft drink with lime flavouring) 113μg/100ml ( of furanocoumarins) were found. This suggests that distilled citrus oils are used for the flavouring of soft drinks. The levels in pure lime juice and lime syrup were, on average, 743 or 525μg per 100ml, respectively. In these studies, grapefruit juice was found to contain a higher level (1650μg/100ml) of furanocoumarins than estimated in 2004. Update of the exposure assessment According to the SKLM, the considerations regarding the maximum acute exposure made in 2004 are still valid. In particular, higher intake values might be reached by consuming microbially infected celery bulbs or parsnips. Consuming 200g of such parsnips with a furanocoumarin content of 500mg/kg may result in an intake of 100mg per person. Consumption of the same amount of commercially available parsnips or celery with an average furanocoumarin content of 20-50mg/kg leads to an intake estimate of approximately 4-10mg per person. 1 Eva Gorgus, Dieter Schrenk, personal communication 1 In 2004, no published data about the content of furanocoumarins in flavoured foodstuffs were available in the literature. Based on the assumption that only cold pressed citrus oils are used for flavouring purposes, the SKLM estimated an average intake of furanocoumarins in flavoured foods at around 1.4mg per person per day. However, based on the new data, flavoured soft drinks do not seem to contribute significantly to the overall exposure to furanocoumarins, even if the number of samples is not yet representative. Assuming a proportion of approximately 5% of positive findings (maximum value 113μg/100ml), an average furanocoumarin content of approximately 9μg/100ml can be calculated2. This results in a negligible increase in the daily intake from flavoured food (0.01mg). Sweets and bakery goods contribute with 0.08mg per person per day to the exposure from flavoured foods. This latter value is taken from the estimate in 2004, since the data related to these products remained unchanged. The average daily intake from flavoured foods can thus be estimated to be 0.09mg per person (see Table 1). According to current data, the average daily intake of furanocoumarins from fruits and vegetables has also changed. The estimate from 2004 resulted in a value of 0.04mg per person per day. Current consumption data from the National Food Consumption Survey II (NVS II, 2008) show, however, that the consumption of fruit juices (251g/day) is significantly higher than previously estimated. The consumption of soft drinks remained in approximately the same range. According to the NVS II, vegetable juices are only consumed in very small quantities and therefore are not relevant for the exposure assessment of furanocoumarins. Based on the assumption that fruit juice consumption consists of 10% grapefruit juice, 1% lime juice and 60% orange juice, an estimated average intake from fruit and vegetable juices of around 0.43mg per person per day can be calculated. As the data from NVS II do not allow for a distinction between individual varieties of fruits and vegetables, the intake from other non-flavoured foods (0.04mg) was taken from the 2004 assessment. Thus, the estimated daily contribution from non- 2 Average content from 17 samples with contents at the detection limit (2.5μg/100ml, worst case) and 1 sample at 113μg/100ml (maximum value). 2 flavoured foods is about 0.47mg per person for the average consumer and around 2mg per person for a high level consumer (95th percentile). The average total daily intake of furanocoumarins from non-flavoured foods and flavoured foods is estimated to be approximately 0.56mg (Table 1), representing only about a third of the estimated value from the 2004 statement. Flavoured foods contribute to about 10% to the total intake. Table 1: Estimated average daily intake of furanocoumarins in Germany (modified from Gorgus et al., 2010) Foodstuff Fruit/vegetable juices estimated: 10% grapefruit juice 1% lime juice 60% orange juice with 0.25% orange oil Total Average consumption (g per day)2 Maximum consumption (g per day)3 251 1100 25.1 2.51 150.6 0.38 110 11 660 1.65 Other non-flavoured foods1 A. Total intake from nonflavoured foods Soft drinks, including those 156 containing caffeine Sweets/bakery goods1 B. Total intake from flavoured foods Total (A + B) 1 According to SKLM, 2004 2 Averaged for men and women 3 95th percentile for men and women Average furanocoumarin content (μg/kg) Average (maximum) furanocoumarin intake (µg/person/ day) 16 500 7 430 414 (1815) 19 (82) 0.5 0.0002 (0.0008) 433 (1897) 39 (91) 472 (1988) 915 90 14 (82) 76 (248) 90 (330) 562 (2318) 3 Summary and conclusion The toxicological data on furanocoumarins have not changed significantly since the SKLM statement from 2004: “It is not possible to specify a no observed adverse effect level for the repeated intake of furanocoumarins. Sub-chronic studies in dogs revealed, 48 mg 5-MOP/kg bw/day to still be hepatotoxic. In monkeys, a dose of 6 mg 8-MOP/kg bw/day still led to gastrointestinal toxicity (vomiting). Both, 5-MOP and 8-MOP are genotoxic. In a 2-year study with 8-MOP in rats, even the lowest tested dose of 37.5 mg/kg bw/day was nephrotoxic and carcinogenic. According to Brickl et al. (1984), the lowest furanocoumarin dose in combination with UVA that led to detectable phototoxic effects in adult humans is approximately 14 mg 8-MOP, corresponding to about 0.23 mg/kg bw for a 60 kg bw person. Schlatter et al. (1991) determined 10 mg 8-MOP + 10 mg 5-MOP or 15 mg 8MOP equivalents corresponding to 0.25 mg/kg bw for a 60 kg bw person.” In recent years, the human dietary exposure to furanocoumarins has been estimated for several countries and has produced average figures of 1.3mg (USA), 1.45mg (Germany) and maximum values of 1.2mg (United Kingdom) per person per day, corresponding to 0.020 to 0.023mg/kg bw per day (Wagstaff 1991; SKLM 2004; COT 1996). At that time, no analytical data were available on the occurrence and content of furanocoumarins in citrus oils, especially in lime oil and the foodstuffs produced from it. Lime oil is mostly obtained by distillation, whereby furanocoumarins can be separated. Recent findings suggest that primarily distilled oils are used for soft drink flavouring. Accordingly, these drinks are not likely to contribute significantly to human exposure to furanocoumarins. However, grapefruit juice appears to be a major source of exposure in Western countries. Based on recent data for Germany, a provisional average daily intake of about 0.56mg per person per day, corresponding to approximately 0.01mg/kg bw per day can be assessed. The values might be higher if consumers, due to brand loyalty, prefer to 4 consume products with higher furanocoumarin contents. Considering the limited database, a final exposure estimation is not possible so far and the SKLM emphasizes that there still is a need for further research. Thus estimated furanocoumarin intakes for Germany lie in a similar range as for other Western countries. These values are approximately two to three orders of magnitude below the lowest doses that are toxic in sub-chronic and chronic animal studies. The margin to the therapeutic dosage (0.5 to 0.6mg 8-MOP/kg bw) corresponds to a factor of around 50; and compared to the lowest phototoxic dosage (0.23 mg/kg bw) to a factor of around 20. The SKLM assessment concerning the maximum acute exposure to furanocoumarins has not changed. The updated conclusions on the toxicological assessment of furanocoumarins in foodstuffs confirm the SKLM statement from 2004. In summary, the SKLM concludes that the consumption of typical quantities of plantderived foods that potentially contain furanocoumarins does not represent a significant risk for phototoxic effects when appropriately stored or processed. For celery and parsnips in particular there is a risk for significant increases in furanocoumarin concentrations under inappropriate storage, processing and production conditions. In such cases, consumption of phototoxic quantities cannot be ruled out. A conclusive estimation of the carcinogenic risk is currently not possible, due to the complexity of the influencing factors, particularly the levels of exposure, the metabolism and its modulation and the influence of light. The typical consumption of foods containing furanocoumarins, including flavoured soft drinks, leads to an exposure that remains well below the phototoxic dose-range. As a result, an additional risk of skin cancer is considered to be negligible. High consumption of improperly stored tubers can lead to extreme intakes and should be avoided, particularly by children. 5 References: Brickl R, Schmid J, Koss FW, ‘Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of psoralens after oral administration: considerations and conclusions’. J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr 66, 1984, pp. 63-67. COT, Committee on Toxicity of Chemicals in Food, Consumer Products and the Environment, Toxicity, Mutagenicity and Carcinogenicity Report, 1996, viewed October 2010, http://www.archive.official-documents.co.uk/document/doh/toxicity/chap-1c.htm Gorgus E, Lohr C, Raquet N, Guth S, Schrenk D, ‘Limettin and Furanocoumarins in Beverages Containing Citrus Juices or Extracts.’ Food Chem Toxicol 48, 2010, pp. 93– 98. Max Rubner Institute (Editor), Federal Research Institute of Nutrition and Food, ‘National Food Consumption Survey II. Report on findings Part 1’, 2008, viewed October 2010, http://www.was-esse-ich.de/uploads/media/NVS_II_Abschlussbericht_Teil_1.pdf Max Rubner Institute (Editor), Federal Research Institute of Nutrition and Food, ‘National Food Consumption Survey II. Report on findings Part 2’, 2008, viewed October 2010, http://www.was-esse-ich.de/uploads/media/NVSII_Abschlussbericht_Teil_2.pdf Schlatter J, Zimmerli B, Dick R, Panizzon R, Schlatter C, ‘Dietary intake and risk assessment of phototoxic furanocoumarins in humans’. Food Chem Toxic 29, 1991, pp. 523-530. 6 SKLM, ‘Toxikologische Beurteilung von Furocumarinen in Lebensmitteln [Toxicological assessment of furanocoumarins in foodstuffs]’; German version from 23th/24th September 2004; in Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft, Lebensmittel und Gesundheit II, Sammlung der Beschlüsse und Stellungnahmen [German Research Foundation, Food and Health II, Collection of Decisions and Statements] (1997-2004), Communication 7, Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim, 2005. English Version ‘Toxicological assessment of furanocoumarins in foodstuffs’ adopted on 22th September 2006. Wagstaff DJ, ‘Dietary exposure to furanocoumarins’. Regul Toxicol Pharmacol 14, 1991, pp. 261-272. 7