Survey
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
New perspective on towns in Europe: From analysis to policy reflections ESPON TOWN project Loris Servillo Vilnius (Li), 04 December 2013 What is a town? Linguistic differences and translating problems Conventional wisdom on towns Town: 1) an urban area that has a name, 2)defined boundaries and 3)local government, AND that is larger than a village and generally smaller than a city Definition within the TOWN project Town: 1) a built-up area (a polygon that has a number in a database!), 2) with boundaries possibly crossing administrative limits, and 3) where you search (and sometimes find) for local capacity and horizontal and multi-level local governance Morphological interpretation Small and medium-sized towns Morphological interpretation POPULATION (inh.) DENSITY (inh. / kmq) < 300 300 - 1500 > 1500 < 5000 OTHER SETTLEMENTS VST VST 5000 50000 OTHER SETTLEMENTS SMST SMST > 50000 OTHER SETTLEMENTS large SMST HDUC General picture ~8,350 urban settlements can be classified as SMSTs ~70,000 urban settlements can be classified as Very Small Towns (below the 5.000 inhabitant threshold) SMST: about 27% of EU population Very Small Towns: 19% of EU population ! Policy message Complexity and institutional diversity across Europe concerning the relationship between administrative and morphological definitions Not only a technical aspect: - Data issue (thus) - Policy issue N (SMST polygons in database) Mean number of intersections between SMST polygons and: local authority units NUTS3 regions (2006) (LAU) Belgium (BE) 184 1.23 1.05 Czech Republic (CZ) 222 1.73 1.01 Spain (ES) France (FR) Italy (IT) Poland (PL) Sweden (SE) Slovenia (SI) England & Wales (UK) Total 65 881 252 42 41 43 574 2304 1.78 2.89 2.41 1.33 1.00 1.26 1.19 2.05 1.00 1.06 1.11 1.02 1.00 1.00 1.12 1.07 ! Policy message EU Settlement polygons NUTS3 with prevailing settlements Preliminary results EU macro-trends Variation of Population and GDP at NUTS3 level between 2001 and 2011 Measured on 3 types of regions: - - Region predominantly populated in small and medium settlements (pop in HUDC < 30%) Highly urbanized regions (pop in HUDC > 70%) Region with population evenly distributed in various settlements (in between) In relation with early suppositions - Have we assisted to a general shift of population toward cities and metropolitan areas? - Have we registered a general impoverishment of (regions characterized by) smaller settlements? - Can we consider towns as isolated and independent settlements? - National policies matter? Meso-level: relationship with urban regions? Objective 1 regions ! Policy message What makes SMSTs different • On average, SMSTs (in database) are different from large cities on a range of measures: • Social (older working population, more pensioners, higher ‘nonforeign’ population) • Economic (greater proportion employment in manufacturing, more self-employment, more likely to be net exporter of labour (dormitory), less diverse in sectoral mix) • Housing issues (more second homes) 18 • • Changes in SMSTs during the period 2001-11 are different from the change that are observed in cities over the same period • Demographic (faster growing, net migration rate higher) • Economic (slightly greater rate) However between group and between country differences: ‘All’ Small towns (N=1339) 19 Small towns in Slovenia Small towns in NW Italy Migrationenhanced aging? Shrinking Growing Labour exporters Net migration by country So what? ! Policy message • Do SMSTs across Europe face ‘common problems’? • Social and economic problems for SMSTs are only ‘common’ in an abstract sense • In practice the ‘problems’ of towns are mainly framed by their national/regional context (clusters of ‘problem-sets’) • What concerns of European policy touch down on SMSTs? • Giving SMSTs a voice in regional debates • Small town does not mean small problem • No ‘one size fits all’…. • Supporting alternative visions of the local economy • Collective action within/among small towns • Supporting the definition of micro-regionalism processes 21 So what? ! Policy message Place-based approach recommended? Endogenous growth vs specialized towns with urgent challenges (retail trade, deindustrialization) In many case, at the local level, difficult to anticipate problems, to make choices (and alliances); How does the national/regional policy deal with a town specificity (and specific cases of towns)? Investment driven? Bottom-up and top down? How is it negotiated, coproduced with the local stakeholders? Does the national, regional, local level prioritize, discriminate? Is there a ‘policy model’? 22 Thank you Loris Servillo [email protected] 23