Survey
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Inventory and Assessment of NBCCEDP Interventions Evaluation November 1, 2007 Purpose of Study Inventory NBCCEDP interventions used to recruit women for screening Inventory interventions used for the professional development of program staff and healthcare providers Create a database of these interventions Purpose of Study Assess the interventions for their application of evidence-based cancer prevention practices Disseminate the findings to encourage effective, evidence-based interventions for recruiting women and the professional development of healthcare providers Research Questions The inventory project will answer the following questions: What is the range of recruitment and professional development activities conducted by NBCCEDP grantees? What recruitment and professional development activities are perceived to be effective by NBCCEDP grantees? What dissemination strategies for evidence-based interventions to increase cancer screening are effective for NBCCEDP grantees? What factors influenced NBCCEDP adoption of interventions in general (e.g., intervention, organizational)? What factors influenced adoption of EBIs? Research Questions What is the knowledge and use of evidence-based resources for increasing cancer screening by NBCCEDP grantees (i.e., Community Guide, RTIPS)? To what extent do the recruitment and professional development activities match evidence-based interventions to increase breast and cervical cancer screening? To what extent do NBCCEDP grantees implement process steps or core elements from evidence-based interventions for their recruitment and professional development activities? (intervention fidelity) Inventory Project Progress Development of Conceptual Models Development of Interview Guides Feedback from Advisory Committee on Guides in August Calls/meetings with CDC/Program Services Branch staff and representative coordinators to discuss project promotion and the interview guides Pilot-testing of the Interview Guides for Recruitment and Professional Development Interventions Grant Timeline Phase 1 Development of Conceptual Frameworks and Interview Guides October 2006September 2007 Phase 2 Inventory and Assessment of Interventions October 2007March 2008 Data Analysis May – July 2008 Dissemination of Findings August September 2008 Phase 3 Categories: Recruitment Strategies Individual - Patient Reminders* - Cost Reduction* - Financial Incentives* - Access Enhancing* - Educational Materials* - One-on-One Education/Counseling* Interpersonal - Group Education* - Social Network Organizational Multi-component - Multi-component Interventions* Community - Mass Media* *Strategy reviewed in the Community Guide to Preventive Services Categories: Professional Development Strategies Individual - Educational Materials - Conferences/Courses Interpersonal - Educational Outreach - Local Opinion Leaders Organizational - Audit and Feedback* Provider Reminders* Financial Interventions* Regulatory Interventions Organizational Interventions Multi-component - Multi-component Interventions *Strategy reviewed in the Community Guide to Preventive Services Project Methods Study Design – Cross sectional data collection through telephone interviews Population – Recruitment and professional development coordinators from all 68 NBCCEDP grantee programs Section Description A Program Information Program coordinator’s professional background information B Professional Development Activities Brief list of program’s professional development activities or strategies within the last year C Activity Categories Lists eight professional development activities from which to categorize the specific activity D Description of the 5 Major Activities Questions about each activity: types of screening how program learned about and chose the activity main objectives logistics of how the intervention was carried out E Implementation of the Professional Development Activity Conduct of: needs assessment pilot-testing use of theory conduct of process steps / core elements Section F Results and Evaluation of Professional Development Activity Description Any evaluation results or markers for success Brief Description of Abbreviated profile of D-F Other Activities Challenges in conducting professional development activities Perceived level of effectiveness of professional development activities Characteristics important when choosing an activity Dissemination strategies G General Questions about Professional Development Activities H Evidence-based Knowledge, satisfaction, and use of effective Cancer programs from different national cancer Prevention resources Knowledge and Practices Instrument: Interview Guide Program Information (Section A) List of Activities in Past Year Major Activities? “Top 5” (Section B) How learn about activity Major Activities Full Description (C-E) Other Activities Brief Description General Questions about Recruitment/ Professional Development (Section G) Sources of EBIs Use of EBIs Evidence-based Cancer Prevention Knowledge and Practices (Section H) Factors in Choosing activity Potential Areas of Research from the Inventory Project Dissemination Research – Grantees will report on how they learned about programs and what EBIs they are using – Test strategies to spread knowledge about evidence-based public health interventions to achieve greater use and impact of EBIs Evaluating Promising Program Strategies – Grantees may report “promising intervention strategies” that are intervention categories listed as having “insufficient evidence” or are not a recommended strategy in the Community Guide or the intervention literature – Collaboratively evaluate “promising strategies”