Survey
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Original article Identification of a T cell surface molecule using a monoclonal antibody produced by TCR/CD3 complex immunization Kodchakorn Mahasongkram,1 Supansa Pata,1,2 Nuttapol Chruewkamlow1 and Watchara Kasinrerk1,2 Summary Background: Several molecules are known to be involved in T-cell activation via the TCR/CD3 complex and while the mechanisms of late T cell signaling have been well characterized, the very early events are still not fully understood. Objective: The aim of this study was to identify yet unknown molecules associated with the TCR/CD3 complex. Results: To identify new molecules associated with the TCR/CD3 complex, a monoclonal antibody termed MT3 was produced by immunoprecipitated beads immunization. Colocalization of the MT3 mAb recognizing molecules with the TCR/CD3 complexes was verified by confocal microscopic analysis. The surface antigen recognized by MT3 antibody was expressed on a subpopulation of CD3+ T cells, and on both CD4+ and CD8+ lymphocytes. The antigen was also expressed on naïve CD4+ T cells and on a subset of memory CD4+ T cells. In contrast, in the CD8 population, the majority of MT3+ cells were found in the naïve population. The MT3 mAb recognizing molecules were also expressed on red blood cells but only in particular subjects. Similar to peripheral blood leukocytes, MT3 mAb recognizing molecules are exclusively expressed on T cell lines. From 1. Division of Clinical Immunology, Department of Medical Technology, Faculty of Associated Medical Sciences, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai 50200, Thailand 2. Biomedical Technology Research Center, National Center for Genetic Engineering and Biotechnology, National Science and Technology Development Agency at the Faculty of Associated Medical Sciences, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai 50200, Thailand Corresponding author: Watchara Kasinrerk E-mail: [email protected] Submitted date: 1/7/2014 Accepted date: 14/10/2014 Conclusions: Based on the cellular distribution patterns and confocal microscopic analysis, the MT3 mAb recognizing molecule that we investigated is proposed to be a TCR/CD3 associated molecule and might be involved in the antigen recognition of T cells. (Asian Pac J Allergy Immunol 2015;33:107-16) Keywords: TCR/CD3 complex, hybridoma, immunoprecipitation, leukocyte surface molecule, T cell activation Introduction T cell activation is a crucial step for initiating adaptive immune responses.1-3 Initiation of T cell activation requires extracellular ligation of the T cell receptor (TCR) with antigen presented by antigenpresenting cells, and the subsequent formation of dynamic signaling complexes.2,4-6 On T cells surface, the TCR is expressed as a complex with CD3 molecules, TCR/CD3 complex, to convey intracellular signals.2 Upon TCR/CD3 triggering, several other molecules are required for full-fledged T cell activation.7-11 Although the mechanisms of T cell activation inside T cells have been well characterized, evidence suggests that that new or not-so-well-defined molecules might be associated to TCR/CD3 complexes and involved in the TCR/CD3 activation and need further characterization. Recently, the immunoprecipitated bead immunization was established in our laboratory in order to effectively produce monoclonal antibody (mAb) of interest.12 By this technique, mAbs specific to the molecule of interest are coated on beads and used to precipitate protein of interest in the samples. The antigen bound immunoprecipiated beads are, then, directly used for inoculating mouse. Using this strategy, we have produced several mAbs of interests.12,13 In order to identify new/yet unknown molecules associated with TCR/CD3 complex which will lead to a better understanding of the early events after TCR engagement, the immunoprecipitated beads 107 Asian Pac J Allergy Immunol 2015;33:107-16 DOI 10.12932/AP0538.33.2.2015 immunization strategy was employed. In this study, anti-CD3 mAb coated beads were used to precipitate the TCR/CD3 complex from the human peripheral blood mononuclear cell lysate. We presumed that the putative TCR/CD3 associated molecules would be co-precipitated and thus bound on the immunoprecipitated beads. The immunoprecipitated beads were then used as an immunogen for the mAb production. By this approach, a mAb named MT3 which reacted to a sub-population of T lymphocytes and colocalized with TCR/CD3 molecules, was obtained. From the cellular distribution pattern, the MT3 mAb recognizing molecule might be an undefined molecule which associate to the TCR/CD3 complex and might play an important role in T cell activation. Methods Cells, cell lines, cell lysates and Reagent Peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) were isolated from EDTA blood by standard FicollHypaque gradient centrifugation method using Ficoll-Hypaque solution (GE Healthcare Life Sciences, Uppsala, Sweden). Cell lines including SupT1, Molt4, Jurkat, HuT78, HPB-ALL, Daudi, Ramos, Raji, U937, THP-1, HL-60, K562, and KG1a were used in this study. All the cell lines were maintained in RPMI-1640 medium (GibcoInvitrogen, Grand Island, NY, USA) supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS; GibcoInvitrogen), 40 μg/ml gentamycin, and 2.5 μg/ml amphotericin B (10%FBS-RPMI) in a 5% CO2 incubator at 37°C. For preparation of cell lysates, PBMCs (5x107 cells) were solubilized in 1 ml of lysis buffer (1% Brij-58, 50 mM Tris-HCl pH 8.2, 100 mM NaCl, 2 mM EDTA, 1 mM PMSF, 5 mM Iodoacetamide, 10 µg/ml aprotinin) for 30 min on ice. Cell lysate was clarified by centrifugation at 12,000 rpm for 30 min at 4°C. Anti-CD99 (MT99/3; IgM isotype),14 antiCD147 (M6-1D4; IgM isotype)15 and antihemoglobin (Hb1a; IgM isotype) were produced in our laboratory. Anti-CD14 (VIM-13; IgM isotype) mAb was kindly provided by Prof. Vaclav Horejsi (Institute of Molecular Genetics, Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic, Prague, Czech Republic). PerCP-Anti-CD3 (SK7), PE-anti-CD4 (SK3), PE-anti-CD8 (SK1) mAbs were purchased from BD Biosciences (San Jose, CA, USA). PECy7A-anti-CD3 (UCHT1), PB-anti-CD4 (SK3), PerCP-anti-CD8 (SK1) and FITC-anti-CD45RA (HI100) mAbs were purchased from BioLegend (San Diego, CA, USA). PE-anti-CD56 (MEM-188, Caltag Laboratories, Burlingame, CA, USA), PEanti-CD19 mAbs (HIB19, eBioscience, San Diego, CA, USA), FITC-anti-mouse IgM (µ chain specific) Ab (Beckman coulter, Marseille, France), PE-antimouse IgM (µ chain specific) Ab (Beckman coulter, Marseille, France) and APC-anti-mouse IgM (µ chain specific) Ab (Jackson ImmunoResearch, West Grove, PA, USA) were used in the flow cytometric experiments. Alexa 568-labeled goat anti-mouse IgG and Alexa 488-labeled goat anti-mouse IgM Ab were purchased from Molecular Probes-Invitrogen. Production of monoclonal antibody to molecule associated with TCR/CD3 complex A Hybridoma line producing mAb reacting with molecule associated with TCR/CD3 complex was established using the TCR/CD3 immunoprecipitated beads immunization technique.12,13 In brief, TCR/CD3 complexes contained in PBMC lysates were precipitated using anti-CD3 mAb (OKT3) coated CNBr sepharose beads. A BALB/c mouse was immunized with the immunoprecipitated beads three times at 2-weeks interval. For beads immunization, 500 µl of beads in PBS suspension were intraperitoneally immunized. The immunizations were repeated following the same procedure 2 more times at 2-week interval. Five days after the last boosting, the mouse was sacrificed; splenocytes were collected and fused with P3-X63Ag8.653 myeloma cells by standard hybridoma technique using 50% polyethylene glycol. After HAT medium selection, the culture supernatants obtained from hybridoma containing wells were analyzed for antibody reactivity by indirect immunofluorescence analysis using PBMCs as antigens. A hybridoma clone, named MT3, which produces the mAb MT3 that reacts to a population of lymphocytes, was selected and subcloned by limiting dilution. The isotype of the mAb MT3 was determined using an isotyping ELISA kit (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA). The institutional guidelines were followed for the care and use of the animals. The hybridoma clone MT3 was cultured in serum-free medium (Gibco-Invitrogen) containing penicillin (100 U/ml) and streptomycin (100 µg/ml) for the large-scale production of mAb. The mAb MT3 was purified from the culture supernatants by using HiTrapTMIgM column (GE healthcare Life sciences). The purified mAb MT3 was then checked for its purity by SDS-polyacrylamide gel 108 Identification of a molecule associated with TCR/CD3 electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE) and its reactivity by indirect immunofluorescence. Flow cytometric analysis For lysed whole blood staining, EDTA bloods were stained with 30 µg/ml of the mAb MT3 or with the control mAbs for 30 min at room temperature (RT). After washing, the cells were stained with PE conjugated anti-mouse IgM (µ chain specific) Ab for 30 min at RT. Red blood cells were then lysed by using FACS lysis solution (BD Biosciences) for 15 min in the dark at RT. The stained cells were washed twice and analyzed using a FACSsort flow cytometer (BD Biosciences). For red blood cells (RBCs) staining, EDTA blood were centrifuged at 12,000 g for 1 minute and washed with PBS for 3 times. The packed RBCs were collected and adjusted to 0.3% cells in PBS containing 1% BSA and 0.02% NaN3 (1%BSAPBS-0.02%NaN3). The cells were stained with 30 µg/ml of the mAb MT3 or with the control mAbs for 30 min at 4°C. After washing, the bound mAbs were detected by counter staining with the FITC conjugated anti-mouse IgM (µ chain specific) Ab for 30 min at 4°C. The stained RBCs were gated and analyzed using a FACSsort flow cytometer (BD Biosciences). For PBMCs and cell lines, the cells were stained with 30 µg/ml of the mAb MT3 or with the control mAbs for 30 min at 4°C. After washing, the bound mAbs were detected by counter staining with the FITC conjugated anti-mouse IgM (µchain specific) Ab for 30 min at 4°C. The stained cells were analyzed using a FACSsort flow cytometer (BD Biosciences). For the two-color flow cytometric analysis, the PBMCs were incubated with 30 µg/ml of the mAb MT3 and PE-anti-CD3, or PE-anti-CD19, or PEanti-CD56 mAbs for 30 min at 4°C. The bound mAb MT3 was detected by staining with the FITCanti-mouse IgM (µ chain specific) Ab for 30 min at 4°C. The stained cells were analyzed by using a FACSsort flow cytometer (BD Biosciences). For the three-color flow cytometric analysis, PBMCs were stained with the mAbs MT3 (30 µg/ml) and the PerCP-anti-CD3, or PE-anti-CD4, or PE-anti-CD8 mAbs. The mAb MT3 was detected with the FITC-anti-mouse IgM (µ chain specific) Ab. Upon flow cytometric analysis, the CD3+ T cells were gated and the distributions of MT3 mAb recognizing molecules in CD4+ and CD8+ T cells were determined. For the five-color flow cytometric analysis, PBMCs were stained with the mAbs MT3 (30 µg/ml) and the PE-Cy7A-anti-CD3, FITC-antiCD45RA, perCP-anti-CD8, and PB-anti-CD4 mAbs. The mAb MT3 was detected using the APCanti-mouse IgM (µ chain specific) Ab. Upon flow cytometric analysis, the CD3+ T cells were gated. The CD4+ and CD8+ T cells were then gated and the distribution of MT3 mAb recognizing molecules in naïve and memory CD4+ and CD8+ T cells were determined. Confocal Microscopic analysis PBMCs or Jurkat cells were stained with the mAb MT3 (30 µg/ml) and anti-CD3 mAb (OKT3; 20 µg/ml) at 4°C for 30 min. The stained cells were washed, and incubated with Alexa 568-labeled goat anti-mouse IgG and Alexa 488-labeled goat antimouse IgM Ab at 4°C for 30 min. The stained cells were fixed for 10 min in 4% formaldehyde-PBS at RT and plated on a poly-D-lysine-coated slide. The images were acquired on a confocal microscope (Nikon, Tokyo, Japan). Expression of MT3 mAb recognizing molecules upon PBMC activation PBMCs (5×105cells/ml) were either unstimulated or stimulated with immobilized anti-CD3 mAb (OKT3; 60 ng/ml) or 10 ng/ml PMA and 1 μM ionomycin for 3 days in a 5% CO2 incubator at 37°C. The activated cells were harvested and stained with 30 µg/ml of mAb MT3 for 30 min at 4°C and PE conjugated anti-mouse IgM (µ chain specific) Ab at 4°C for 30 min. The expression of MT3 mAb recognizing molecules on lymphocytes was determined by FACSsort (BD Biosciences). Ethics The study was approved by the ethical and scientific committees of the Faculty of Associated Medical Science, Chiang Mai University. For experiment in animals, the institutional guidelines were followed for the care and use of the animals. Results Production of monoclonal antibody to TCR/CD3 associated molecule To produce mAb to TCR/CD3 associated molecule, in this study, the immunoprecipitated beads immunization technique was performed. AntiCD3 mAb coated beads were used to precipitate TCR/CD3 complexes and its associated molecules. The immunoprecipitated beads were, then, used for mouse immunization. Splenocytes from the 109 Asian Pac J Allergy Immunol 2015;33:107-16 DOI 10.12932/AP0538.33.2.2015 immunized mouse were then fused with mouse myeloma cells by standard hybridoma technique. Specificity of the obtained mAb produced by the generated hybridomas was examined by indirect immunofluorescent staining using PBMCs as target cells. By this screening procedure, a hybridoma clone produced mAb which selectively reacted with subpopulation of lymphocytes was chosen for further analysis (data not shown). This mAb was designated as MT3 and has IgM isotype. Cellular expression of MT3 mAb recognizing molecules on peripheral blood cells To determine the expression of molecule recognized by mAb MT3 (MT3 mAb recognizing molecule) on human leukocytes, whole blood staining was performed. It was found that the mAb MT3 reacted with a subpopulation of lymphocytes, but did not react to granulocytes and monocytes (data not shown). The subpopulations of lymphocyte which express the MT3 mAb recognizing molecules were further investigated by two color flow cytometric analysis. Within the lymphocyte population, the mAb MT3 selectively reacted to a subpopulation of CD3+ T cells, but did not react to CD19+ B cells and CD56+ NK cells (Figure 1A). We then determined the expression of MT3 mAb recognizing molecules on subsets of CD3+ T cells, CD4+ and CD8+ cells. Three color flow cytometric analysis revealed that MT3 mAb recognizing molecule expressed on a subpopulation of CD4+ (mean ± SD; 42.13±3.68%) and CD8+ T cells (mean ± SD; 21.14±1.96%; Figure 1B). The expression of MT3 mAb recognizing molecules on naïve and memory T cell subsets was also determined by five-color flow cytometric analysis. The results indicated that MT3 mAb recognizing molecules were differentially expressed on naïve and memory CD4+ and CD8+ T cell subsets. MT3 mAb recognizing molecules on all CD4+CD45RA+ naïve T cells and also on a subset of CD4+CD45RA- memory T cells (Figure 1C). In contrast, in the CD8 subset the majority of MT3+ cells were found in the naïve (CD45RA+) subpopulation, CD8+CD45RA+ T cells (Figure 1C). In addition, we analyzed the expression of MT3 mAb recognizing molecules on RBCs. Interestingly, we found that MT3 mAb recognizing molecule heterogeneously expressed on RBCs. About 60% of tested RBCs’ donors were reactive with mAb MT3 (Figure 2). No relation between MT3 mAb recognizing molecule expression on RBC and ABO blood group of the donors was found (data not shown). Expression of the MT3 mAb recognizing molecules on hematopoietic cell lines To determine the expression of MT3 mAb recognizing molecules on hematopoietic cell lines, various cell lines were stained with mAb MT3 or isotype matched control mAb. Similar to the results obtained with peripheral blood leukocytes, mAb MT3 specifically only reacted with to T cell lines (Figure 3A). Within the T cell lines, the MT3 mAb recognizing molecule was strongly expressed on SupT1 and Molt4 T cell lines, whereas expression was low on Jurkat, HuT78 and HPB-ALL cells (Figure 3A). Colocalization of MT3 mAb recognizing molecules and CD3 molecules on cell surface As mAb MT3 was produced by using the TCR/CD3 complex as the immunogen, we speculated that the MT3 mAb recognizing molecules were associated with the TCR/CD3 complexes. To test this assumption, colocalization of the MT3 mAb recognizing molecules and CD3 molecules was performed and the results were visualized using confocal microscopy. Colocalization of the MT3 mAb recognizing molecules and CD3 molecules was observed in peripheral T cells and also in the Jurkat T cell line (Figure 4 and 5, respectively). As shown in Figure 6A, the MT3 mAb recognizing molecules and CD3 molecules were clearly colocalized on T cell surface. However, in some T cells, not all of the MT3 mAb recognizing molecules and CD3 molecules were colocallized, as a few molecules were found to be expressed in free form as well as in Jurkat cell line (Figure 4B and 5). Down-regulation of MT3 mAb recognizing molecules upon T cell activation To determine the alteration of the expression of MT3 mAb recognizing molecules in resting and activated T cells, PBMCs were stimulated with or without immobilized anti-CD3 mAb (OKT3) or PMA and ionomycin. The MT3 mAb recognizing molecules on cell surface determined by flow cytometry. The expression of MT3 mAb recognizing molecules was down-regulated upon T cell activation (Figure 6). 110 Identification of a molecule associated with TCR/CD3 Figure 1. Expression of MT3 mAb recognizing molecules on human T cell subsets. (A) PBMCs were stained with the mAbs MT3 and the PerCP-anti-CD3, or PE-anti-CD19, or PE-anti-CD56 mAbs. The mAb MT3 was detected with the FITC-anti-mouse IgM (μ chain specific) Ab. The lymphocytes population was gated and the expression of MT3 mAb recognizing molecules in each subset are shown. The results are representative of four healthy individuals. (B) PBMCs were stained with the mAbs MT3 and the PerCP-anti-CD3, or PE-anti-CD4, or anti-CD8 mAbs. The mAb MT3 was detected with the FITC-anti-mouse IgM (μ chain specific) Ab. The CD3+ T cells were gated and the distributions of MT3 mAb recognizing molecules in CD4+ and CD8+ T cells are shown in the dot plot. The results are representative of four healthy individuals. (C) PBMCs were stained with the mAbs MT3, PECy7A-anti-CD3, FITC-anti-CD45RA, PerCP-anti-CD8, and PB-anti-CD4 mAbs. The mAb MT3 was detected using the APC-anti-mouse IgM (μ chain specific) Ab. The CD4+ and CD8+ T cells were gated and the distribution of MT3 mAb recognizing molecules in naïve and memory CD4+ and CD8+ T cells are shown in the plot. The results are representative of three healthy individuals. 111 Asian Pac J Allergy Immunol 2015;33:107-16 DOI 10.12932/AP0538.33.2.2015 Figure 2. Expression of the MT3 mAb recognizing molecules on red blood cells. (A) Red blood cells were stained with mAb MT3 (bold line) or IgM isotype matched control antibody (Hb1a, thin line). The bound mAbs were detected by FITC-anti-mouse IgM (μ chain specific) Ab and assessed by flow cytometry. Red blood cells from ten individual healthy donors were tested. (N represents the donor number). Figure 3. Expression of MT3 mAb recognizing molecules on hematopoietic cell lines. Several T cell lines (A) and non T cell lines (B) were stained with mAb MT3 or IgM isotype matched control antibody (VIM-13). The bound mAbs were detected by APC-anti-mouse IgM (μ chain specific) Ab and assessed by flow cytometry. The reactivity of mAb MT3 and isotype matched control antibody are represented in grey and open histogram, respectively. 112 Identification of a molecule associated with TCR/CD3 Figure 4. Colocalization of MT3 mAb recognizing molecules and CD3 molecules on peripheral T cells. The PBMCs were stained with the anti-CD3 mAb (OKT3) and the mAb MT3. The bound antibodies were then stained with Alexa 488-anti-mouse IgM μ chain specific and Alexa 568-anti-mouse IgG Abs. The colocalization of MT3 mAb recognizing molecules and CD3 molecules was investigated under confocal microscopy. The confocal microscopy detection of MT3 (green) and CD3 (red) on the cells surface are shown. TD represents the transmitted light channel. Colocalization of MT3 mAb recognizing molecules and CD3 molecules are shown in the overlay image. Discussion Monoclonal antibodies are an important tool in many applications, including biological research, medical diagnostics and therapy.16-21 Although the hybridoma technique has been discovered almost 40 years ago,22 it is still the standard method for production of monoclonal antibodies. Recently, for enhancing the efficiency of the conventional hybridoma technique, we have established an immunoprecipitated bead immunization strategy for mouse immunization prior to hybridoma technique.12 The established method combines the immunoprecipitation technique and bead immunization. The immunoprecipitation technique involves the interaction between a protein of interest and its specific antibody coated on beads. After immunoprecipitation, the immunoprecipitated beads are directly used, without an eluting process, for mouse immunization. By this strategy, antibodies specific to protein of interest was satisfactorily induced in the immunized mice. The spleen cells of the immunized mice could also be used to generate hybridomas producing mAb of interest.12,13 The advantage of this immunoprecipitated bead immunization is that the conjugation of antigen to particulate beads transforms the soluble protein antigen to the particulate antigen. The particulate immunogen stimulates phagocytic activity and cytokine production of antigen presenting cells better than soluble immunogen, resulting in enhanced immune responses.23 This technique provides a powerful approach for production of mAbs to proteins that are low in abundance or are difficult to purify. In an attempt to identify an undefined membrane protein which is associated with the TCR/CD3 complex, in this study, we applied the immunoprecipitated bead immunization. Anti-CD3 mAb immobilized on beads were used to capture TCR/CD3 complexes in PBMC lysate. We presumed that the TCR/CD3 associated molecules would be co-precipitated and bound on the immunoprecipitated beads. The immunoprecipitated beads were directly used as the immunizing agent for production of mAb using standard hybridoma technique. Our study resulted in obtaining a mAb named MT3 which reacted to a subpopulation of T lymphocytes. In this study, the cellular expressions of MT3 antigen which are recognized by the produced mAb 113 Asian Pac J Allergy Immunol 2015;33:107-16 DOI 10.12932/AP0538.33.2.2015 Figure 5. Colocalization of MT3 mAb recognizing molecules and CD3 molecules on Jurkat T cell line. Jurkat cells were stained with the anti-CD3 mAb (OKT3) and the mAb MT3. The bound antibodies were detected with Alexa 568-anti-mouse IgM and Alexa 488-anti-mouse IgG Abs. The confocal microscopy detection of MT3 mAb recognizing molecules (green) and CD3 (red) on the cells surface is shown. TD represents the transmitted light channel. Colocalization of MT3 mAb recognizing molecules and CD3 are shown in the overlay image. MT3 are described. MT3 mAb recognizing molecules were demonstrated to be specifically expressed on a subpopulation of CD3+ T cells. They, however, were not expressed on surface of other leukocytes including granulocytes and monocytes, B cells and NK cells. Within CD3+ T cells, the MT3 mAb recognizing molecule was expressed on subsets of the CD4+ and CD8+ T cells. The MT3 mAb recognizing molecule was also expressed on all naïve CD4+ T cells and on a subset of memory CD4+ T cells. In contrast, the majority of MT3+ cells were found in the naïve CD8+ T cells. We used confocal microscopic analysis to assess the hypothesis that MT3 mAb recognizing molecules should be associated with TCR/CD3 on T cells surface. Colocalization of the MT3 mAb recognizing molecules with CD3 molecules was indeed demonstrated. This indicates the colocalization of MT3 mAb recognizing molecules and TCR/CD3 complexes. As TCR/CD3 complexes express on all T cells, it is surprising that the MT3 mAb recognizing molecules do not express on all T cells but express only on a T cell subpopulation. We hypothesize that the MT3 mAb recognizing molecule may be associated with the TCR/CD3 complex in a particular subset of T cells and it would be interesting to analyze the functional consequences of this association. The expression of MT3 mAb recognizing molecules on RBCs was also verified. Surprisingly, we also found MT3 mAb recognizing molecules on RBCs surface. However, the expression of MT3 mAb recognizing molecule was demonstrated only in some subjects (6 in 10 tested subjects) and was not related to the ABO blood group. As TCR/CD3 complexes are antigen receptors and exclusively express on T cells.24,25 The expression of MT3 mAb recognizing molecules on RBCs indicated that MT3 mAb recognizing molecule expression also as TCR/CD3 un-colocalized form. This interpretation corroborate our observations made using confocal microscopy which demonstrated that some MT3 mAb recognizing molecules were expressed as TCR/CD3 un-colocalized form. To the best of our knowledge, this cellular distribution pattern of cell surface molecules has never been described before. The elucidation of the function of MT3 mAb recognizing molecules on RBCs was undertaken as a new research question. As we do not have direct evidence that the molecule on RBCs and lymphocytes that recognized by mAb MT3 are the same, it should be precised that the reaction of mAb MT3 with red blood cells may come from the cross reactivity of the mAbs. The expression of MT3 mAb recognizing molecules on various cell lines was determined. Similar to the peripheral blood leukocytes, MT3 mAb recognizing molecule express on surface of all T cell lines tested, but not on other hematopoietic cell lines. Confocal microscopic analysis of Jurkat cells indicated both MT3-TCR/CD3 colocalized form as well as un-colocalized form. The results confirmed the findings from primary peripheral blood T cells. Altogether, our results demonstrate the identification of a new TCR/CD3 associated molecule, named MT3. The immunoprecipitated bead immunization strategy was instrumental in characterizing this new molecule. The cellular distribution patterns suggest that the MT3 mAb 114 Identification of a molecule associated with TCR/CD3 Figure 6. Down-regulation of MT3 mAb recognizing molecules upon T cell activation. PBMCs were stimulated with or without immobilized mAb OKT3 (anti-CD3 mAb) or PMA and ionomycin or for 3 days. The cells were harvested and stained with mAb MT3 and the expressions of the molecule recognized by mAb MT3 were assessed by flow cytometry. The FACS histograms of un-stimulated cells, OKT3 activated cells and PMA/ ionomycin activated cells were shown. The results shown are representative of three healthy subjects. recognizing molecule is an undefined TCR/CD3 associated molecule, which is expressed as associated and un-associated form. The function of the MT3 mAb recognizing molecule that underlying antigen recognition and TCR/CD3 activation is under investigation. 5. Acknowledgments This study was supported by the NSTDA Research Chair Grant, National Sciences and Technology Development Agency (Thailand), The Thailand Research Fund and the National Research University Project under the Thailand Office of the Higher Education Commission. Kodchakorn Mahasongkram is a doctoral candidate in the Royal Golden Jubilee Ph.D. program of The Thailand Research Fund. We would like to thank Prof. Hannes Stockiger, Prof. Peter Steinberger and Dr. Ludith Leitner, Medical University of Vienna, for their kind assistances in flow cytometric analysis, suggestions and manuscript preparation. 7. PM, et al. The immunological synapse: a molecular machine controlling T cell activation. Science. 1999;285:221-7. 6. Bromley SK, Burack WR, Johnson KG, Somersalo K, Sims TN, Sumen C, et al. The immunological synapse. Annu Rev Immunol. 2001;19:375-96. Brownlie RJ, Zamoyska R. T cell receptor signalling networks: branched, MacDonald HR, Nabholz M. T-cell activation. Annu Rev Cell Biol. Rev Immunol. van der Merwe PA, Davis SJ. Molecular interactions mediating T the TCR:CD3 complex. Immunol Rev. 2009;232:7-21. cell antigen recognition. Annu Rev Immunol. 2003;21:659-84. 10. Cemerski S, Shaw A. Immune synapses in T-cell activation. Curr Opin Immunol. 2006;18:298-304. 11. Zaru R, Cameron TO, Stern LJ, Muller S, Valitutti S. Cutting edge: TCR engagement and triggering in the absence of large-scale molecular segregation at the T cell-APC contact site. J Immunol. 2002;168:4287-91. 12. Pata S, Tayapiwatana C, Kasinrerk W. Three different immunogen preparation strategies for production of CD4 monoclonal 13. Tayapiwatana C, Chotpadiwetkul R, Kasinrerk W. A novel approach using streptavidin magnetic bead-sorted in vivo biotinylated survivin for monoclonal antibody production. J Hommel M. On the dynamics of T-cell activation in lymph nodes. Immunol Methods. 2006;317:1-11. 14. Kasinrerk W, Tokrasinwit N, Moonsom S, Stockinger H. CD99 monoclonal antibody induce homotypic adhesion of Jurkat cells through protein tyrosine kinase and protein kinase C-dependent Huppa JB, Davis MM. T-cell-antigen recognition and the pathway. Immunol Lett. 2000;71:33-41. immunological synapse. Nat Rev Immunol. 2003;3:973-83. 115 Nat 9. Immunol Cell Biol. 2004;82:62-6. 4. bounded. Guy CS, Vignali DA. Organization of proximal signal initiation at Smith-Garvin JE, Koretzky GA, Jordan MS. T cell activation. Annu Rev Immunol. 2009;27:591-619. 3. and 8. 1986;2:231-53. 2. diversified 2013;13:257-69. antibodies. Hybridoma (Larchmt). 2009;28:159-65. References 1. Grakoui A, Bromley SK, Sumen C, Davis MM, Shaw AS, Allen Asian Pac J Allergy Immunol 2015;33:107-16 DOI 10.12932/AP0538.33.2.2015 15. Khunkeawla P, Moonsom S, Staffler G, Kongtawelert P, Kasinrerk thalassemia-1 Southeast Asian-type deletion. J Immunoassay W. Engagement of CD147 molecule-induced cell aggregation through the activation of protein kinases and reorganization of the Immunochem. 2014;35:194-206. 21. Phunpae P, Chanwong S, Tayapiwatana C, Apiratmateekul N, cytoskeleton. Immunobiology. 2001;203:659-69. Makeudom A, Kasinrerk W. Rapid diagnosis of tuberculosis by 16. Chiarella P, Fazio VM. Mouse monoclonal antibodies in biological identification of Antigen 85 in mycobacterial culture system. Diagn research: strategies for high-throughput production. Biotechnol Lett. 2008;30(8):1303-10. Microbiol Infect Dis. 2014;78:242-8. 22. Kohler G, Milstein C. Continuous cultures of fused cells secreting 17. Srithanaviboonchai K, Rungruengthanakit K, Nouanthong P, Pata antibody of predefined specificity. Nature. 1975;256:495-7. S, Sirisanthana T, Kasinrerk W. Novel low-cost assay for the 23. Heinz FX, Allison SL, Stiasny K, Schalich J, Holzmann H, Mandl monitoring of CD4 counts in HIV-infected individuals. J Acquir CW, et al. Recombinant and virion-derived soluble and particulate Immune Defic Syndr. 2008;47:135-9. immunogens for vaccination against tick-borne encephalitis. 18. Tayapiwatana C, Kuntaruk S, Tatu T, Chiampanichayakul S, Munkongdee T, Winichagoon P, et al. Simple method for screening Vaccine. 1995;13:1636-42. 24. Weiss A, Stobo JD. Requirement for the coexpression of T3 and the of alpha-thalassaemia 1 carriers. Int J Hematol. 2009;89:559-67. T cell antigen receptor on a malignant human T cell line. J Exp 19. Puttikhunt C, Prommool T, N Ut, Ong-ajchaowlerd P, Yoosook K, Med. 1984;160:1284-99. Tawilert C, et al. The development of a novel serotyping-NS1- 25. Clevers H, Alarcon B, Wileman T, Terhorst C. The T cell ELISA to identify serotypes of dengue virus. J Clin Virol. receptor/CD3 complex: a dynamic protein ensemble. Annu Rev 2011;50:314-9. Immunol. 1988;6:629-62. 20. Pata S, Khummuang S, Pornprasert S, Tatu T, Kasinrerk W. A simple and highly sensitive ELISA for screening of the alpha- 116