* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Download final1-template-publishable-summary-pdman
Ground (electricity) wikipedia , lookup
Voltage optimisation wikipedia , lookup
Thermal runaway wikipedia , lookup
Opto-isolator wikipedia , lookup
Power engineering wikipedia , lookup
History of electric power transmission wikipedia , lookup
Electrical engineering wikipedia , lookup
Alternating current wikipedia , lookup
Portable appliance testing wikipedia , lookup
Electronic engineering wikipedia , lookup
Stray voltage wikipedia , lookup
Mains electricity wikipedia , lookup
PDMAN Partial Discharge Management In Compact Insulation Systems State of the art – Background Electrical systems used in aircraft have previously been used at reasonably low voltages which have not been associated with a significant risk of electrical discharge. A move towards More Electric Aircraft (MEA) has increased the load requirements and quantity of power electronics on-board modern aircraft. These additional power requirements have led to an increase in system voltage, placing the components at increased risk of electrical discharges occurring. Through this push to increase performance, the requirements to ensure they operate safely and reliably remain the same. This project focused on the means to eliminate, control and evaluate partial discharge in power electronic components. The use of any high voltage system on an aircraft introduces a risk of damage from electrical discharge. Partial discharges are small discharges that do not completely bridge a gap between two electrodes and can occur in a range of locations, such as within voids in machine and actuator winding encapsulation systems, around sharp edged electrodes and on the surfaces of insulating material across which an electric field is present. Partial discharge is difficult to detect, yet the presence of partial discharge can reduce the service life of a system by degrading insulation. Repetitive discharge events can cause irreversible mechanical and chemical deterioration of the insulating material. Damage can be caused by the energy dissipated by high energy electrons or ions, ultraviolet light from the discharges and ozone attacking the insulation. The chemical transformation of the dielectric can also tend to increase the electrical conductivity of any surrounding dielectric material and can increase the electrical stress in the remaining unaffected insulation, leading to an acceleration of the breakdown process. The ideal insulation system design would see partial discharge eliminated and to some extent the above issues can be managed through careful design of converter and selection of insulation materials. However, the low air density of a low pressure / high temperature environment experienced by many machine insulation systems is still likely to make elimination of partial discharge an option that can only be achieved through significant compromise in power density. The alternative to eliminating partial discharge is the evaluation of the insulation system to ensure it remains resilient to partial discharge over the duration of its life, i.e. partial discharge can exist without compromising operational performance. The manner in which to evaluate the ability of an aerospace insulation system to fulfil this role is, however, not clearly defined by standards which are designed to cover machines operating in a standard industrial environment. Objectives This project aimed to progress the state of the art in aerospace power electrical component design by delivering the following outputs / innovations: • Providing clear design guidelines for the selection of insulation systems for use in wound components and connecting components for a range of environmental conditions along with illustrative guidance on how the choice influences the power density of the component • Demonstrating the key mechanisms associated with the ageing of wound components and connecting components to support best practice in the selection of insulation systems and the development of appropriate test methodologies for use during equipment qualification • Delivering recommendations for test procedures required to support equipment qualification and assessment during series production. These recommendations, where appropriate, will be based on existing IEC guidance in this area but will be modified to reflect the challenges associated with deployment in an aerospace system. Description of work WP1 began with the definition of a reference system. This system included a wound component representative of a typical electric motor or generator used in commercial aircraft along with suitable connecting components. In addition to the components it was also important to define a range of operating conditions; such as pressure, temperature, humidity and electrical loads. These were all defined to be representative of a real flight cycle. In parallel to defining the system to be investigated, a series of models were developed to simulate the partial discharge behaviour under a range of operating conditions. These models became the basis for the first draft of the design tool. WP2 saw the requisition of a number of test samples that were representative of the reference system. These samples ranged from twisted pairs, motorettes and fully assembled stators. In addition to the large quantity of reference samples a number of alternative design motorettes were ordered to compare the relative performance of different materials. WP2 mostly comprised experimentation, with all the samples being benchmarked for Partial Discharge Inception Voltage (PDIV) and several investigations into the effects of environment and voltage waveform on the PDIV. It was quickly discovered that there were issues with impulse testing according to IEC61934 when the sample was at low pressure. The database of results accrued during WP2 was also used to optimise and validate the suite of design tools. WP3 was predominantly focused on the effects of several ageing mechanisms on the insulation performance of the components. The ageing mechanisms identified as key for investigation were: Thermal Ageing: Thermal degradation of polymeric insulation can occur because of many different processes. The objective was to determine at which temperature there would be a significant decrease in the dielectric performance of the insulation system as a whole. Thermal Cycling: Aside from the risk of elevated temperatures causing thermal degradation, there is also a risk of mechanical stress on the insulation due to differential thermal expansion. This is especially true for secondary flight control systems that may be sat at ambient temperatures (as low as -55°C) before being energised. Vibration: Degradation could occur through friction or fatigue. Electrical Ageing: Predominantly caused by operating at voltages above PDIV where the cumulative effect of discharges can result in the erosion of the insulation. A number of samples were aged using the above mechanisms to determine at which point they would become an issue from a partial discharge perspective. After each ageing phase the samples were tested for PDIV, subjected to a high humidity environment, an overvoltage applied and their insulation resistance checked. Results The knowledge gained from the project has resulted in a series of design guidelines to help better inform the design of insulation systems for aerospace components. Specifically, the findings were used to develop a bespoke version of the qualification procedure in IEC 60034-18-41. This procedure is more relevant to the types of wound component used in aerospace environments. Another major output of the project is the design tool which will enable different insulation designs to be compared at the early design stage. It is expected that, pending SAE approval, the knowledge gained from the project will be disseminated in an SAE Aerospace Recommended Practice. This information should benefit the wider aerospace community and help to advance the state of the art. a) Timeline & main milestones 1 - Kick-off meeting (M1) 2 - Development of reference system (M2) 3 - Agreement of sample types / materials to be tested in WP2/3 (M4) 4 - Receipt of test information from WP2 to improve design tool accuracy (M9) 5 - Agreement on manufacturing process techniques to be investigated in WP2 (M8) 6 - Development of ageing test rigs (M6) 7 - 12 month review (M12) 8 - Project closeout (M30) b) Environmental benefits By improving the design of insulation systems the overall power density of machines can be improved. This will have an effect on the efficiency and mass of the components and ultimately have a positive impact on the fuel efficiency. c) Maturity of works performed The main outputs of the project will provide many benefits for the topic manager by aiding their design and qualification procedures. This will enable the next generation of electrical systems to be developed faster and cheaper as well as ensuring they remain safe. Increased power density should bring performance benefits such as a reduction in fuel consumption and a reduction in CO2 emissions. Project Summary Acronym: PDMAN Name of proposal: Partial Discharge Management In Compact Insulation Systems Technical domain: SGO Involved ITD Grant Agreement: 338528 Instrument: Clean Sky JU Total Cost: EUR 482359.2 Clean Sky contribution: EUR 361769.4 Call: SP1-JTI-CS-2012-03 Starting date: 01/10/2013 Ending date: 31/03/2016 Duration: 30 Coordinator contact details: Ian Cotton. [email protected], +44 0161 306 8735 Project Officer: Antonio Vecchio [email protected] Participating members