Survey
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Regulation of Thyroid Hormone Receptor Isoforms in Physiological and Pathological Cardiac Hypertrophy Koichiro Kinugawa, Katsunori Yonekura, Ralff C.J. Ribeiro, Yoko Eto, Teruhiko Aoyagi, John D. Baxter, S. Albert Camacho, Michael R. Bristow, Carlin S. Long, Paul C. Simpson Downloaded from http://circres.ahajournals.org/ by guest on August 3, 2017 Abstract—Physiological and pathological cardiac hypertrophy have directionally opposite changes in transcription of thyroid hormone (TH)-responsive genes, including ␣- and -myosin heavy chain (MyHC) and sarcoplasmic reticulum Ca2⫹-ATPase (SERCA), and TH treatment can reverse molecular and functional abnormalities in pathological hypertrophy, such as pressure overload. These findings suggest relative hypothyroidism in pathological hypertrophy, but serum levels of TH are usually normal. We studied the regulation of TH receptors (TRs) 1, ␣1, and ␣2 in pathological and physiological rat cardiac hypertrophy models with hypothyroid- and hyperthyroid-like changes in the TH target genes, ␣- and -MyHC and SERCA. All 3 TR subtypes in myocytes were downregulated in 2 hypertrophy models with a hypothyroid-like mRNA phenotype, phenylephrine in culture and pressure overload in vivo. Myocyte TR1 was upregulated in models with a hyperthyroid-like phenotype, TH (triiodothyronine, T3), in culture and exercise in vivo. In myocyte culture, TR overexpression, or excess T3, reversed the effects of phenylephrine on TH-responsive mRNAs and promoters. In addition, TR cotransfection and treatment with the TR1-selective agonist GC-1 suggested different functional coupling of the TR isoforms, TR1 to transcription of -MyHC, SERCA, and TR1, and TR␣1 to ␣-MyHC transcription and increased myocyte size. We conclude that TR isoforms have distinct regulation and function in rat cardiac myocytes. Changes in myocyte TR levels can explain in part the characteristic molecular phenotypes in physiological and pathological cardiac hypertrophy. (Circ Res. 2001;89:591-598.) Key Words: thyroid hormone receptor 䡲 physiological and pathological hypertrophy 䡲 ␣1-adrenergic receptor 䡲 cardiac myocyte 䡲 rat C also called the fetal program.9 The fact that TH treatment can reverse these genetic changes in some models of pathological hypertrophy is additional evidence for a hypothyroid state, but TH blood levels are usually normal.3 Conversely, physiological hypertrophy caused by exercise is characterized by hyperthyroid-like changes in TH target genes, yet again blood TH levels are normal.10 Only in cardiac hypertrophy during normal postnatal development are changes in TH-responsive genes attributable clearly to altered TH levels.11,12 Transcription of TH target genes is mediated by nuclear TH receptors (TRs), with 2 genes, ␣ and , encoding at least 4 major TRs, 1, 2, ␣1, and ␣2,13,14 as well as minor variants, including TR3.15 TRs 1, ␣1, and ␣2 are expressed widely. TR2 is present mainly in pituitary cells but might be a small fraction of T3-binding TRs in heart, as found in one study.16 TR␣2 binds thyroid response elements (TREs) on DNA but does not bind 3,3⬘,5-triiodo-L-thyronine (T3), the ardiac hypertrophy is sometimes considered a single process that leads invariably to myocardial dysfunction (pathological hypertrophy). However, physiological hypertrophy exists in which cardiac function is maintained or enhanced, including normal cardiac development, exercise training, and thyroid hormone (TH) treatment. Exercise and TH can reverse molecular and functional abnormalities in pathological hypertrophy without decreasing ventricular mass, indicating that physiological and pathological hypertrophy are qualitatively distinct processes.1– 6 TH-responsive genes in cardiac muscle include ␣-myosin heavy chain (MyHC) and sarcoplasmic reticulum Ca2⫹ATPase (SERCA), which are induced by TH, and -MyHC, which is repressed.7,8 An intriguing observation is that pathological hypertrophy is characterized by hypothyroid-like changes in these target genes, with decreases in ␣-MyHC and SERCA and increases in -MyHC, a molecular phenotype Original received June 19, 2001; revision received July 26, 2001; accepted July 27, 2001. From the Division of Cardiology (K.K., M.R.B.), University of Colorado Health Sciences Center, Denver, Colo; Department of Cardiovascular Medicine (K.Y., Y.E., T.A.), Graduate School of Medicine, University of Tokyo, Japan; Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences (R.C.J.R.), University of Brasília, Brazil; Metabolic Research Unit, Diabetes Center, and Department of Medicine (J.D.B.), University of California, San Francisco, Calif; Department of Medicine (Cardiology) (S.A.C.), San Francisco General Hospital, San Francisco, Calif; Cardiology Section (C.S.L.), Denver Health Medical Center, Denver, Colo; and Veterans Affairs Medical Center and Cardiovascular Research Institute and Department of Medicine (P.C.S.), University of California, San Francisco, Calif. Presented in part at the 71st and 73rd Scientific Sessions of the American Heart Association, Dallas, Tex, November 8 –11, 1998, and New Orleans, La, November 12–15, 2000, and published in abstract form (Circulation. 1998;98[suppl I]:I-837 and 2000;102[suppl II]:II-72). Correspondence to Paul C. Simpson, MD, VA Medical Center (111-C-8), 4150 Clement St, San Francisco, CA 94121. E-mail [email protected] © 2001 American Heart Association, Inc. Circulation Research is available at http://www.circresaha.org 591 592 Circulation Research September 28, 2001 Downloaded from http://circres.ahajournals.org/ by guest on August 3, 2017 active form of TH, and can function as a dominant negative.13,17 TRs 1 and ␣1 bind T3 with similar affinity but exhibit subtle differences in binding to TREs and cofactors and in forming homodimers and heterodimers with retinoid X receptors.13,18 –20 Consistent with these biochemical differences, mouse TR knockouts reveal nonredundant TR functions in many tissues.19 –21 In the heart, however, TR knockouts suggest that the transcription effects of TH are mediated largely by TR␣1.17,22 TR functions have not been evaluated systematically in isolated myocytes. In this study, we tested the hypothesis that hypothyroidand hyperthyroid-like transcription changes in pathological and physiological hypertrophy are caused by altered TR levels in heart and myocytes. Recent studies in the aging rat and in human end-stage heart failure reveal changes in myocardial TR levels that correlate with changes in TH target gene transcription.23,24 However, possible changes in TR levels in hypertrophy have not been examined, and TR functions on target promoters in myocytes have not been compared. We measured TRs in rat hypertrophy models in culture and in vivo and tested TR functions in culture using transfection and treatment with T3 or a TR1-selective agonist. Materials and Methods Cell Culture, Hypertrophy, and Transfection Ventricular myocytes from 1-day-old rats were plated at low density in MEM with 5% calf serum and studied in serum-free MEM exactly as in Deng et al.25 Cardiac nonmyocytes in preplates were expanded to near confluence in MEM with 5% serum.26 Cultures were treated with phenylephrine (PE) (Sigma No. P6126), T3 (Sigma No. T5516), GC-1 (gift from G. Chiellini and T.S. Scanlan, Department of Pharmaceutical Chemistry and Cellular and Molecular Pharmacology, University of California, San Francisco, Calif),18 or their vehicles (ascorbic acid for PE, NaOH for T3, and DMSO for GC-1). Myocyte hypertrophy was quantified by content of radiolabeled protein (RLP) after continuous incubation with 14C- or 3Hphenylalanine. Myocytes were doubly transfected using calcium phosphate coprecipitation27 with expression plasmids for the human TRs under control of the cytomegalovirus promoter (CMV)28 and chloramphenicol acetyl transferase (CAT) reporter plasmids containing the rat promoters for ␣-MyHC (2900 bp), -MyHC (3300 bp), or SERCA (3500 bp).29 Hypertrophy In Vivo Hypertrophy was induced in adult male Wistar rats by voluntary wheel running for 10 weeks (age 7 to 17 weeks) or by ascending aortic constriction (pressure gradient ⬇75 mm Hg) for 4 weeks (age 10 to 14 weeks).30 Serum levels of total 3,3⬘,5,5⬘-tetraiodo-Lthyronine (T4) and total T3 were measured by ELISA (ICN Pharmaceuticals). RNase Protection Assay (RPA) for TH-Responsive mRNAs Total RNA was extracted from cells or ventricles with TRIZol (GIBCO) and used in RPA with a probe for ␣- and -MyHC and a probe for SERCA2a plus GAPDH as an internal control (see expanded Materials and Methods, available in the online data supplement at http://www.circresaha.org).25 TH Receptors For TR mRNAs, RPA was used with probes specific for the rat TR isoforms, and GAPDH was used as an internal control (see the expanded Materials and Methods section).24 For TR proteins, cul- tured myocyte nuclear and cytoplasmic fractions27 were used in Western blot with monoclonal antibodies from Santa Cruz (J51/SC737 specific for human TR1; J52/SC-738 reactive with rat and human TR1).31 Human and rat TR1 proteins for standards were synthesized using rabbit reticulocyte lysate (TNT T7 Quick Coupled Transcription/Translation System, Promega).28,32 Statistics Data shown are mean⫾SE and were compared by one-way ANOVA and the Newman-Keuls test. An expanded Materials and Methods section can be found in the online data supplement available at http://www.circresaha.org. Results TH-Responsive mRNAs in Hypertrophy Models in Culture and In Vivo We first confirmed regulation of TH target mRNAs in cardiac hypertrophy models in culture and in vivo (Table 1). In cultured neonatal rat myocytes, TH (T3 100 nmol/L) caused hypertrophy, increased ␣-MyHC and SERCA mRNA levels, and repressed -MyHC to 5% of control. The ␣1-adrenergic receptor (AR) hypertrophic agonist PE (20 mol/L) had opposite effects on these mRNAs, increasing -MyHC and decreasing SERCA and ␣-MyHC. Prazosin (2 mol/L) inhibited all PE effects, confirming ␣1-AR dependence (n⫽3 cultures, data not shown). Under our basal, serum-free culture conditions, medium T3 levels averaged about 0.1 nmol/L over the 3-day time course of these experiments, presumably reflecting myocyte release of stored T3.33–35 Interestingly, when 1000-fold excess T3 (100 nmol/L) was added to PE-treated myocytes, all PE effects on TH-responsive transcripts were reversed, with significant increases in ␣-MyHC and SERCA and decreases in -MyHC (Table 1). The antagonistic relationship between ␣1-AR and T3 signaling was not explained by a lesser degree of hypertrophy, because hypertrophy was even greater with PE plus T3 (Table 1). In intact rat hypertrophy models, voluntary running exercise stimulated hypertrophy with an mRNA profile similar to T3 in culture (Table 1). Conversely, pressure overload by ascending aortic constriction caused hypertrophy with changes in TH target mRNAs opposite to exercise and similar to PE in culture (Table 1). Thus, in agreement with previous studies (discussed in the Introduction), 2 hypertrophy models had signature mRNA changes of heightened thyroid signaling, T3 in culture and exercise in vivo. In contrast, 2 other models had a directionally opposite pattern of hypothyroidlike signaling, PE in culture and pressure overload in vivo. T3 and T4 blood levels in the intact rat models were similar among all 4 groups, with total T4 ⬇40 nmol/L (3 to 3.2 g/dL) and total T3 ⬇1 nmol/L (52 to 55 ng/dL) (n⫽6 to 13, P⫽NS), as found by others.3,10 Thus, mRNA changes were not explained by changes in circulating TH concentration. TR Levels in Hypertrophy Models in Culture To test if some change in thyroid signaling besides TH concentration might explain changes in transcription of THresponsive genes in hypertrophy, we first measured TR levels in cultured myocytes. In cultured myocytes under basal, serum-free conditions, RPAs detected the mRNAs for TRs Kinugawa et al TABLE 1. Thyroid Hormone Receptors in Hypertrophy 593 TH-Responsive mRNAs in Hypertrophy Models in Culture and in Vivo In culture Vehicle Cultures, n 5 RLP, % T3 100 nmol/L 5 PE 20 mol/L 5 194⫾16* PE⫹T3 5 (RLP 3) 100 148⫾2* 244⫾15† ␣-MyHC 100 256⫾8* 82⫾8 155⫾5† -MyHC 100 5⫾1* 298⫾30* 127⫾8† SERCA 100 142⫾13* 56⫾10* 103⫾7† Sham mRNAs, % In vivo Sedentary Ex AC Rats, n 13 29 14 Body, g 467⫾18 459⫾12 484⫾11 494⫾14 Heart, g 1.00⫾0.04 1.12⫾0.02* 1.49⫾0.06† 1.04⫾0.07 Left ventricle, g 0.77⫾0.03 0.88⫾0.01* 1.16⫾0.05† 0.83⫾0.06 LV/body, g/kg 1.66⫾0.03 1.94⫾0.04* 2.40⫾0.08† 1.68⫾0.04 100 117 145 101 Hypertrophy, % 8 Downloaded from http://circres.ahajournals.org/ by guest on August 3, 2017 mRNAs, % ␣-MyHC 100 118⫾1* 43⫾6† 102⫾5 -MyHC 100 29⫾2* 262⫾8† 105⫾4 SERCA 100 120⫾2* 50⫾6† 98⫾4 In culture, neonatal rat cardiac myocytes were treated with vehicle, T3, or PE for 72 hours; in the PE⫹T3 group, T3 was also present for the final 24 hours. RLP was an index of hypertrophy, and MyHC and SERCA mRNAs were quantified by RNase protection in 3 g total RNA. In adult male rats, hypertrophy was induced by voluntary running exercise (Ex) for 10 weeks or ascending aortic constriction (AC) for 4 weeks, and left ventricular (LV) mRNAs were quantified as in culture. The mRNA levels are normalized to the vehicle or sedentary groups. -MyHC as fraction of total MyHC mRNA was 44% in vehicle cultures and 18% in sedentary hearts. Values are mean⫾SE. *P⬍0.05 vs vehicle or sedentary; †P⬍0.05 vs PE or sham. ␣2, ␣1, and 1, with a molar ratio of ⬇7:3:1. TR2 mRNA was not found, using a probe validated in rat pituitary GC cells (not shown), and TR3 was not tested. Treatment with T3 under conditions that stimulated hypertrophy (Table 1) caused an increase in TR1 mRNA, with a maximum ⬇2-fold and an EC50 ⬇3 nmol/L, but had no effect on TR␣2 or ␣1 (Figure 1A). T3 induction of TR1 in myocytes was significant as early as 12 hours and maximum at 48 hours (data not shown). Thus TR1 itself was a TH-responsive gene in myocytes and was increased in T3-stimulated hypertrophy. PE-induced hypertrophy in cultured myocytes had an effect different from T3 and reduced the levels of all 3 TR isoform mRNAs to 50% to 75% of control (Figure 1B). The EC50 for TR repression was about 3 mol/L (Figure 1B), similar to the EC50 for PE-induced hypertrophy, and the PE effect was detected as early as 6 hours (data not shown). PE is an ␣1-AR agonist with weak -AR activity, and specific ␣1-AR repression of TRs was confirmed in separate experiments with norepinephrine, isoproterenol, prazosin, and timolol (all 2 mol/L, n⫽3 to 4 cultures for each, data not shown). Interestingly, and similar to the other TH target mRNAs (Table 1), addition of T3 reversed PE repression of TR1, but TRs ␣1 and ␣2 were not changed (Figure 1B). To test if TR mRNA levels reflected TR protein, we measured endogenous TRs in cultured myocytes by Western blot. None of the commercial antibodies from Santa Cruz or Affinity BioReagent gave specific signals for TRs ␣1 and ␣2 (not shown), but TR1 protein was detected in nuclear extracts (Figure 1). PE reduced TR1 protein significantly, whereas T3 increased TR1 and reversed TR1 repression caused by PE (Figures 1A and 1B). Thus TR1 mRNA and protein changes were concordant. Cultured cardiac nonmyocytes also expressed mRNAs for all 3 of the TRs found in myocytes, ␣1, ␣2, and 1, but levels were not altered by PE 20 mol/L or T3 100 nmol/L (n⫽3 cultures, data not shown). No response to PE can be explained by the absence of ␣1-ARs in nonmyocytes.36 No response to T3 is compatible with a requirement for cellspecific factors such as MEF-2 in myocyte TR signaling.37,38 TR mRNA Levels in Hypertrophy Models In Vivo Control adult male rat hearts contained mRNAs for TRs ␣2, ␣1, and 1 at equal molar ratios (⬇1:1:1). Physiological hypertrophy stimulated by voluntary running exercise mimicked T3 in culture, with an increase in TR1 mRNA and no change in TRs ␣1 and ␣2 (Figure 2). Pathological hypertrophy stimulated by ascending aortic constriction was similar to PE in culture, with decreases in all 3 TR isoform mRNAs (Figure 2), detectable as early as 1 week after banding (not shown). Thus, in distinct hypertrophy models in vivo as in culture, TR isoform levels and TH-responsive transcript levels were related directly (Figure 2 and Table 1). Cotransfection of TR Isoforms and TH-Responsive Promoters To test directly whether changes in TR levels could alter TH-responsive transcription, we cotransfected cultured myo- 594 Circulation Research September 28, 2001 Downloaded from http://circres.ahajournals.org/ by guest on August 3, 2017 Figure 1. Regulation of TR isoforms with hypertrophy in culture. Cultured neonatal rat cardiac myocytes were treated with T3 (A) or PE (B) for 72 hours, and TR isoform mRNAs were assayed in 10 g total RNA by RNase protection (left and middle). Alternatively, cells were treated for 120 hours, and TR1 protein in equal numbers of myocyte nuclei was quantified by Western blot (right). In the PE⫹T3 groups, cells treated with PE 20 mol/L were also treated with T3 100 nmol/L for the final 24 hours (mRNA) or 72 hours (protein). Representative gels are shown; mean data are from 5 cultures for mRNA and 3 cultures for protein. cytes with expression plasmids for the human TR isoforms and reporter plasmids for the TH-responsive genes (Figure 3). The Western blot in Figure 3A shows that human TR1 was detected in nuclear extracts from TR1-transfected myocytes, with overflow of transfected TR1 into the cytosolic fraction, suggesting saturating levels.31 Similarly, an antibody recognizing both human and rat TR1 indicated that total TR1 nuclear levels in transfected cultures were about 2-fold over endogenous (Figure 3A). With ⬇5% of myocytes transfected,39 this result implied about 40-fold overexpression of TR1. We used this system to test the effects of increasing TR isoform levels on ␣-MyHC, -MyHC, and SERCA promoters. In vehicle-treated control myocytes, overexpression of TR␣1 activated the ␣-MyHC promoter, and TR1 repressed -MyHC (Figure 3B). TR␣2 had no effect. Induction of ␣-MyHC indicated that TR␣1 was expressed, even though Western blots were unsatisfactory for TR␣ protein levels. In PE-treated myocytes transfected with empty vector, the -MyHC promoter was activated, and ␣-MyHC and SERCA promoters were repressed (Figure 3C), similar to the PE effects on endogenous mRNAs (Table 1). Increasing the levels of TR␣1 by transfection reversed PE repression of ␣-MyHC, whereas TR1 overexpression significantly op- Figure 2. Regulation of TR isoforms with hypertrophy in vivo. Hypertrophy was induced in adult male rats by voluntary running exercise (Ex) for 10 weeks or ascending aortic constriction (AC) for 4 weeks, and left ventricular TR isoform mRNAs were assayed as in Figure 1. Top, Representative gel is shown. Bottom, Mean values from the indicated numbers of rats, normalized to the sedentary control group. posed the effects of PE on both -MyHC and SERCA. Interestingly, forced expression of TR␣2, the non-T3-binding TR, slightly but significantly enhanced PE repression of ␣-MyHC and SERCA (Figure 3C). In T3-treated myocytes transfected with empty vector, the -MyHC promoter was repressed and ␣-MyHC and SERCA were activated (Figure 3D), as expected from T3-induced mRNA changes (Table 1). Overexpression of TR1 in T3-treated myocytes significantly enhanced induction of the SERCA promoter, but TRs ␣1 and ␣2 had no effects over T3 alone (Figure 3D). Taken together, these cotransfection results showed that increasing the levels of T3-binding TRs altered THresponsive transcription and antagonized the effects of PE on TH-responsive genes. In addition, the results suggested different functions of TRs in myocytes, regulation of ␣-MyHC by TR␣1, and regulation of -MyHC and SERCA by TR1. The repressive effect of TR␣2 only in PE-treated cells Kinugawa et al Thyroid Hormone Receptors in Hypertrophy 595 TABLE 2. Potencies of T3 and GC-1, a TR1-Selective Agonist, in Cultured Myocyte Transcription and Hypertrophy EC50, nmol/L Assay mRNA level and promoter activity -MyHC T3 GC-1 0.06–0.09 0.05–0.08 SERCA 0.6–0.8 0.7–1 TR1 3 2 ␣-MyHC RLP 0.1–0.2 1 0.1 2 EC50s were estimated from the dose-response curves in Figures 1A and 4A through 4C. The curve for TR1 mRNA induction by GC-1 is not shown, and TR1 promoter activity was not tested. GC-1 is at least 10-fold less potent than T3 in stimulation of ␣-MyHC and RLP; the true EC50s for GC-1 induction of ␣-MyHC and RLP might be even higher, because the responses are not quite saturated at the highest doses studied (Figures 4B and 4C). Downloaded from http://circres.ahajournals.org/ by guest on August 3, 2017 ␣-MyHC and RLP. These data were consistent with the cotransfection experiments (Figure 3) and suggested preferential coupling of TR1 to -MyHC and SERCA, whereas TR␣1 regulated ␣-MyHC and total protein content. In addition, GC-1 increased TR1 mRNA by 203⫾28% at 100 nmol/L with an EC50 of 2 nmol/L (P⬍0.05 versus vehicle, n⫽5), almost identical to the effect of T3 (Figure 1 and Table 2), consistent with the notion that TR1 activated its own transcription. Figure 3. TR transfection in cultured myocytes. Cultured myocytes were cotransfected with CAT reporter plasmids (5 g) and CMV-driven human TR expression plasmids or equal amounts of empty CMV vector (2 to 5 g). SV40-driven secreted alkaline phosphatase (1 g, Clontech) was included to control for transfection efficiency. A, Western blots used TR1-specific antibodies from Santa Cruz (human-specific J51/SC-737 and rat- and human-reactive J52/SC-738) with myocyte nuclear and cytosolic extracts after 72 hours of transfection (left and middle). Rat and human TR1 proteins from in vitro transcription/translation were used as standards (⬇55-kD) (right). B through D, Myocytes were treated for 72 hours after transfection with vehicle (B); PE 20 mol/L (C); or T3 10 nmol/L (D). Values are from 5 cultures. (Figure 3C) was consistent with a weak dominant-negative effect of this non–T3-binding TR (see the Introduction) that could be detected only when levels of the T3-binding TRs were reduced by PE (Figure 1B). Effects of a TR1-Selective Agonist on Myocyte Transcription and Hypertrophy To test different functional roles for TR isoforms by a second approach not involving transfection, we treated myocytes with GC-1, which has ⬇10-fold selectivity for TR1 versus TR␣1 but has not been tested with TRs 2 and 3, and compared the responses to T3, which binds with similar affinity to both TRs 1 and ␣1.18,35 We assayed both TH-responsive promoter activities and endogenous mRNAs (Figures 4A and 4B) and also RLP, an index of total protein content or overall myocyte size (Figure 4C). As shown in Figures 4A through 4C and summarized in Table 2, the EC50s for GC-1 induction of SERCA and repression of -MyHC were identical to the EC50s for T3, whereas GC-1 was at least 10-fold less potent than T3 in induction of Discussion The main new finding in this study was the direct relationship between TR levels and transcription of TH-responsive genes in different types of hypertrophy. All TRs were downregulated in pressure overload, a model of pathological hypertrophy with a hypothyroid-like molecular phenotype. Conversely, TR1 was upregulated in the exercise model of physiological hypertrophy, where TH-responsive transcription was enhanced. These results, together with the TR overexpression experiments in cultured myocytes, suggest that the distinct molecular signatures in different types of hypertrophy can be caused in part by altered TR levels. Thus the fetal program in pathological hypertrophy can be viewed as the result of cellular hypothyroidism, caused by reduced TR levels, whereas physiological hypertrophy can be seen as a state of relative cellular hyperthyroidism, attributable to increased TR1. The results also indicate that TR isoforms have different transcription functions in rat myocytes and raise the possibility of additional alteration of TH signaling in hypertrophy. We detected 3 TRs in rat myocytes, 1, ␣1, and ␣2, and all were reduced by pressure overload in vivo and ␣1-AR signaling in culture (Figures 1 and 2), the models with hypothyroid-like transcription changes (Table 1). Reversal of hypothyroid signaling when TRs 1 and ␣1 were overexpressed in the PE culture model supported the causal significance of TR downregulation (Figure 3C). Downregulation of dominant-negative TR␣2 in both models would have been expected to partly counteract the hypothyroid effects of decreased TRs 1 and ␣1, because overexpressed TR␣2 had hypothyroid effects when TRs 1 and ␣1 were reduced by PE (Figure 3C). Nevertheless, global TR downregulation in both 596 Circulation Research September 28, 2001 Downloaded from http://circres.ahajournals.org/ by guest on August 3, 2017 Figure 4. Effects of GC-1, a TR1 agonist, in cultured myocytes. Cultured myocytes were treated for 72 hours with the indicated doses of T3 or GC-1. A, Myocytes were transfected with 5 g of each CAT reporter plasmid. B, Endogenous mRNAs were assayed in 3 g total RNA by RNase protection. C, Cells were labeled continuously with 14Cphenylalanine to quantify RLP. Values are from 3 to 4 cultures. models of pathological hypertrophy was associated with reduced transcription of TH target genes. Abnormal TR levels are also seen at a terminal stage of pathological hypertrophy, severe human heart failure. In human heart failure, TR␣1 is decreased and TR␣2 is increased, probably because of altered splicing of the TR␣ gene, and the increase in TR␣2 correlates with reduced ␣-MyHC transcription.24 In our rat models of PE treatment and pressure overload, the global decrease in all TR mRNAs could be explained by reduced TR gene transcription or increased TR mRNA degradation. Thus the specific mechanism for altered TR levels might differ among species or models, but the human and rat studies both suggest that TR downregulation is a mechanism for hypothyroid-like signaling in pathological hypertrophy. This relationship was additionally strengthened by our converse results in physiological models. TR upregulation was seen in exercise, a model of physiological hypertrophy with normal or enhanced contractile function.30 Voluntary running exercise caused an increase in TR1 but no change in TR␣ (Figure 2). T3 in culture also caused selective induction of TR1 (Figure 1) and similarly induces a physiological hypertrophy in vivo.5 Our finding that the TR1 gene is TH-responsive in myocytes but the TR␣ gene is not agrees with some studies in the intact rat,40,41 but not with others,42 and can be explained by positive TREs in the TR1 promoter that are absent in TR␣.43,44 Furthermore, the TR1 gene seemed to be activated by TR1 itself, because T3 and the TR1-selective agonist GC-1 induced TR1 with similar potency (Table 2). Thus, exercise-induced increases in TR1 levels should be partly self-sustaining, and the increase in TR1 would augment transcription of downstream TH target genes on the basis of our transfection studies (Figure 3). TR1 in myocytes differed from TR␣1 in induction by T3 and also in function. In this study, we made the first systematic comparison of TR function in isolated myocytes and found by 2 complimentary approaches that TR1 induced SERCA and TR1 itself and repressed -MyHC, whereas TR␣1 increased ␣-MyHC and protein content (Figures 3 and 4 and Table 2). Notably, the same pattern of TR function was seen with TR cotransfection and with GC-1, which has ⬇10-fold selectivity for TR1.18 Distinct TR isoform effects on different promoters might be explained by isoform-specific interactions with cofactors or differing affinities for TREs (see the Introduction). Interestingly, target gene–specific differences were evident even for a single TR isoform in that TR1 more potently repressed -MyHC than it activated SERCA and activated SERCA more potently than TR1 itself (Table 2). Also intriguing was the correlation of TR␣1 signaling with increased total protein content, an index of overall hypertrophy (Figure 4C and Table 2). Increased Kinugawa et al Downloaded from http://circres.ahajournals.org/ by guest on August 3, 2017 protein content requires increased translation as well as transcription, thus raising the question of nongenomic effects of T3 via TR␣1. Previous results from rat and human models are consistent with the distinct transcription functions of TR isoforms we show in this study. In the aging rat, increased -MyHC transcription correlates with decreased TR1 levels and reduced ␣-MyHC correlates with reduced TR␣1.23 A correlation between levels of TR␣1 and ␣-MyHC is also seen in the failing human heart.24 A preferential effect of GC-1 on myocardial SERCA and -MyHC is not seen in the rat in vivo, but this might be because of lower bioavailability of GC-1 in cardiac tissue.35 On the other hand, the mouse might be different from rat and human, because knockout studies suggest that most cardiac effects of T3 can be accounted for by TR␣1.17,22 Whether both TRs are required for full TH effects in heart is one key consideration in potential therapeutic uses of TH signaling,8 and additional study is needed. Finally, the question arises of whether other mechanisms alter TH signaling in hypertrophy in addition to changes in TR levels. Pertinent is the effect of T3 in the culture model, where a 1000-fold increase in medium T3 (from 0.1 to 100 nmol/L) reversed PE antagonism of all TH-responsive genes, including the MyHCs, SERCA, and TR1, despite PE reduction of TR levels (Table 1 and Figure 1). Thus, excess T3 in culture could counteract the hypothyroid effects of reduced TRs. In vivo as well, high doses of T3 reverse hypothyroid transcription in pressure overload models3,5 despite the reduced TR levels we show in this study (Figure 2). The reversal effect of excess T3 can be explained partly by induction of TR1 and downstream changes in other THresponsive genes, but the T3 effect also suggests that cellular T3 levels might be limiting in some cases. Thus it is possible that myocyte T3 metabolism33–35 is changed in hypertrophy, with increases in cellular T3 with exercise and decreases with pressure overload and PE, and this requires additional study. In summary, changes in TR levels can explain at least in part the characteristic hypothyroid- and hyperthyroid-like transcription in different types of hypertrophy. TH signaling is impaired in pathological hypertrophy and enhanced in physiological hypertrophy. Acknowledgments This work was supported in part by grants from the National Institutes of Health to P.C.S. and C.S.L. J.D.B. is consultant and Deputy Director for Karo Bio AB, which has commercial interests in this area of research. We thank Marietta Paninbatan, Heather Lucas, Anna Casulo, Yuren Wei, Gail Morris, and Mary Atz for excellent technical assistance. References 1. Scheuer J, Malhotra A, Hirsch C, Capasso J, Schaible TF. Physiologic cardiac hypertrophy corrects contractile protein abnormalities associated with pathologic hypertrophy in rats. J Clin Invest. 1982;70:1300 –1305. 2. Schaible TF, Ciambrone GJ, Capasso JM, Scheuer J. Cardiac conditioning ameliorates cardiac dysfunction associated with renal hypertension in rats. J Clin Invest. 1984;73:1086 –1094. 3. Izumo S, Lompre AM, Matsuoka R, Koren G, Schwartz K, Nadal-Ginard B, Mahdavi V. Myosin heavy chain messenger RNA and protein isoform transitions during cardiac hypertrophy: interaction between hemodynamic and thyroid hormone-induced signals. J Clin Invest. 1987;79:970 –977. Thyroid Hormone Receptors in Hypertrophy 597 4. Orenstein TL, Parker TG, Butany JW, Goodman JM, Dawood F, Wen WH, Wee L, Martino T, McLaughlin PR, Liu PP. Favorable left ventricular remodeling following large myocardial infarction by exercise training: effect on ventricular morphology and gene expression. J Clin Invest. 1995;96:858 – 866. 5. Chang KC, Figueredo VM, Schreur JHM, Kariya K, Weiner MW, Simpson PC, Camacho SA. Thyroid hormone improves function and Ca2⫹ handing in pressure overload hypertrophy: association with increased sarcoplasmic reticulum Ca2⫹-ATPase and ␣-myosin heavy chain in rat hearts. J Clin Invest. 1997;100:1742–1749. 6. Gomberg-Maitland M, Frishman WH. Thyroid hormone and cardiovascular disease. Am Heart J. 1998;135:187–196. 7. Dillmann WH. Biochemical basis of thyroid hormone action in the heart. Am J Med. 1990;88:626 – 630. 8. Klein I, Ojamaa K. Thyroid hormone and the cardiovascular system. N Engl J Med. 2001;344:501–509. 9. Simpson PC, Long CS, Waspe LE, Henrich CJ, Ordahl CP. Transcription of early developmental isogenes in cardiac myocyte hypertrophy. J Mol Cell Cardiol. 1989;21(suppl V):79 – 89. 10. Rupp H, Wahl R. Influence of thyroid hormones and catecholamines on myosin of swim-exercised rats. J Appl Physiol. 1990;68:973–978. 11. Chizzonite RA, Zak R. Regulation of myosin isoenzyme composition in fetal and neonatal rat ventricle by endogenous thyroid hormones. J Biol Chem. 1984;259:12628 –12632. 12. Lompre AM, Nadal-Ginard B, Mahdavi V. Expression of the cardiac ventricular ␣- and -myosin heavy chain genes is developmentally and hormonally regulated. J Biol Chem. 1984;259:6437– 6446. 13. Lazar MA. Thyroid hormone receptors: multiple forms, multiple possibilities. Endocr Rev. 1993;14:184 –193. 14. Ribeiro RC, Apriletti JW, Wagner RL, West BL, Feng W, Huber R, Kushner PJ, Nilsson S, Scanlan T, Fletterick RJ, Schaufele F, Baxter JD. Mechanisms of thyroid hormone action: insights from x-ray crystallographic and functional studies. Recent Prog Horm Res. 1998;53:351–392. 15. Williams GR. Cloning and characterization of two novel thyroid hormone receptor  isoforms. Mol Cell Biol. 2000;20:8329 – 8342. 16. Schwartz HL, Lazar MA, Oppenheimer JH. Widespread distribution of immunoreactive thyroid hormone 2 receptor (TR 2) in the nuclei of extrapituitary rat tissues. J Biol Chem. 1994;269:24777–24782. 17. Macchia PE, Takeuchi Y, Kawai T, Cua K, Gauthier K, Chassande O, Seo H, Hayashi Y, Samarut J, Murata Y, Weiss RE, Refetoff S. Increased sensitivity to thyroid hormone in mice with complete deficiency of thyroid hormone receptor ␣. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2001;98: 349 –354. 18. Chiellini G, Apriletti JW, al Yoshihara H, Baxter JD, Ribeiro RC, Scanlan TS. A high-affinity subtype-selective agonist ligand for the thyroid hormone receptor. Chem Biol. 1998;5:299 –306. 19. Hsu J-H, Brent GA. Thyroid hormone receptor gene knockouts. Trends Endocrinol Metab. 1998;9:103–112. 20. Zhang J, Lazar MA. The mechanism of action of thyroid hormones. Annu Rev Physiol. 2000;62:439 – 466. 21. Forrest D, Vennstrom B. Functions of thyroid hormone receptors in mice. Thyroid. 2000;10:41–52. 22. Gloss B, Trost SU, Bluhm WF, Swanson EA, Clark R, Winkfein R, Janzen KM, Giles W, Chassande O, Samarut J, Dillmann WH. Cardiac ion channel expression and contractile function in mice with deletion of thyroid hormone receptor ␣ or . Endocrinology. 2001;142:544 –550. 23. Long X, Boluyt MO, O’Neill L, Zheng JS, Wu G, Nitta YK, Crow MT, Lakatta EG. Myocardial retinoid X receptor, thyroid hormone receptor, and myosin heavy chain gene expression in the rat during adult aging. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 1999;54:B23–B27. 24. Kinugawa K, Minobe WA, Wood WM, Ridgway EC, Baxter JD, Ribeiro RC, Tawadrous MF, Lowes BA, Long CS, Bristow MR. Signaling pathways responsible for fetal gene expression in the failing human heart: evidence for altered thyroid hormone receptor gene expression. Circulation. 2001;103:1089 –1094. 25. Deng X-F, Rokosh DG, Simpson PC. Autonomous and growth factorinduced hypertrophy in cultured neonatal mouse cardiac myocytes: comparison with rat. Circ Res. 2000;87:781–788. 26. Palmer JP, Hartogensis WE, Patten M, Fortuin FD, Long C. Interleukin-1 induces cardiac myocyte growth but inhibits cardiac fibroblast proliferation in culture. J Clin Invest. 1995;95:2555–2564. 27. Kariya K, Karns LR, Simpson PC. An enhancer core element mediates stimulation of the rat -myosin heavy chain promoter by an ␣1-adrenergic agonist and activated -protein kinase C in hypertrophy of cardiac myocytes. J Biol Chem. 1994;269:3775–3782. 598 Circulation Research September 28, 2001 Downloaded from http://circres.ahajournals.org/ by guest on August 3, 2017 28. Umesono K, Evans RM. Determinants of target gene specificity for steroid/thyroid hormone receptors. Cell. 1989;57:1139 –1146. 29. Patten M, Hartogensis WE, Long CS. Interleukin-1 is a negative transcriptional regulator of ␣1-adrenergic induced gene expression in cultured cardiac myocytes. J Biol Chem. 1996;271:21134 –21141. 30. Eto Y, Yonekura K, Sonoda M, Arai N, Sata M, Sugiura S, Takenaka K, Gualberto A, Hixon ML, Wagner MW, Aoyagi T. Calcineurin is activated in rat hearts with physiological left ventricular hypertrophy induced by voluntary exercise training. Circulation. 2000;101:2134 –2137. 31. Lin KH, Willingham MC, Liang CM, Cheng SY. Intracellular distribution of the endogenous and transfected beta form of thyroid hormone nuclear receptor visualized by the use of domain-specific monoclonal antibodies. Endocrinology. 1991;128:2601–2609. 32. Ribeiro RC, Kushner PJ, Apriletti JW, West BL, Baxter JD. Thyroid hormone alters in vitro DNA binding of monomers and dimers of thyroid hormone receptors. Mol Endocrinol. 1992;6:1142–1152. 33. Everts ME, Verhoeven FA, Bezstarosti K, Moerings EP, Hennemann G, Visser TJ, Lamers JM. Uptake of thyroid hormones in neonatal rat cardiac myocytes. Endocrinology. 1996;137:4235– 4242. 34. Ribeiro RC, Cavalieri RR, Lomri N, Rahmaoui CM, Baxter JD, Scharschmidt BF. Thyroid hormone export regulates cellular hormone content and response. J Biol Chem. 1996;271:17147–17151. 35. Trost SU, Swanson E, Gloss B, Wang-Iverson DB, Zhang H, Volodarsky T, Grover GJ, Baxter JD, Chiellini G, Scanlan TS, Dillmann WH. The thyroid hormone receptor–selective agonist GC-1 differentially affects plasma lipids and cardiac activity. Endocrinology. 2000;141:3057–3064. 36. Stewart AFR, Rokosh DG, Bailey BA, Karns LR, Chang KC, Long CS, Kariya K, Simpson PC. Cloning of the rat ␣1C-adrenergic receptor from 37. 38. 39. 40. 41. 42. 43. 44. cardiac myocytes: ␣1C, ␣1B, and ␣1D mRNAs are present in cardiac myocytes, but not in cardiac fibroblasts. Circ Res. 1994;75:796 – 802. Lee Y, Nadal-Ginard B, Mahdavi V, Izumo S. Myocyte-specific enhancer factor 2 and thyroid hormone receptor associate and synergistically activate the ␣-cardiac myosin heavy-chain gene. Mol Cell Biol. 1997;17: 2745–2755. Moriscot AS, Sayen MR, Hartong R, Wu P, Dillmann WH. Transcription of the rat sarcoplasmic reticulum Ca2⫹ adenosine triphosphatase gene is increased by 3,5,3⬘-triiodothyronine receptor isoform-specific interactions with the myocyte-specific enhancer factor-2a. Endocrinology. 1997;138:26 –32. Kariya K, Karns LR, Simpson PC. Expression of a constitutively-activated mutant of the -isozyme of protein kinase C in cardiac myocytes stimulates the promoter of the -myosin heavy chain isogene. J Biol Chem. 1991;266:10023–10026. Bishop CM, McCabe CJ, Gittoes NJ, Butler PJ, Franklyn JA. Tissuespecific regulation of thyroid hormone receptor mRNA isoforms and target gene proteins in domestic ducks. J Endocrinol. 2000;165:607– 615. Haddad F, Qin AX, McCue SA, Baldwin KM. Thyroid receptor plasticity in striated muscle types: effects of altered thyroid state. Am J Physiol. 1998;274:E1018 –E1026. Balkman C, Ojamaa K, Klein I. Time course of the in vivo effects of thyroid hormone on cardiac gene expression. Endocrinology. 1992;130: 2001–2006. Ishida T, Yamauchi K, Ishikawa K, Yamamoto T. Molecular cloning and characterization of the promoter region of the human c-erbA ␣ gene. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 1993;191:831– 839. Sakurai A, Miyamoto T, DeGroot LJ. Cloning and characterization of the human thyroid hormone receptor 1 gene promoter. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 1992;185:78 – 84. Downloaded from http://circres.ahajournals.org/ by guest on August 3, 2017 Regulation of Thyroid Hormone Receptor Isoforms in Physiological and Pathological Cardiac Hypertrophy Koichiro Kinugawa, Katsunori Yonekura, Ralff C.J. Ribeiro, Yoko Eto, Teruhiko Aoyagi, John D. Baxter, S. Albert Camacho, Michael R. Bristow, Carlin S. Long and Paul C. Simpson Circ Res. 2001;89:591-598; originally published online September 13, 2001; doi: 10.1161/hh1901.096706 Circulation Research is published by the American Heart Association, 7272 Greenville Avenue, Dallas, TX 75231 Copyright © 2001 American Heart Association, Inc. All rights reserved. Print ISSN: 0009-7330. Online ISSN: 1524-4571 The online version of this article, along with updated information and services, is located on the World Wide Web at: http://circres.ahajournals.org/content/89/7/591 Data Supplement (unedited) at: http://circres.ahajournals.org/content/suppl/2001/09/11/hh1901.096706.DC1 Permissions: Requests for permissions to reproduce figures, tables, or portions of articles originally published in Circulation Research can be obtained via RightsLink, a service of the Copyright Clearance Center, not the Editorial Office. Once the online version of the published article for which permission is being requested is located, click Request Permissions in the middle column of the Web page under Services. Further information about this process is available in the Permissions and Rights Question and Answer document. Reprints: Information about reprints can be found online at: http://www.lww.com/reprints Subscriptions: Information about subscribing to Circulation Research is online at: http://circres.ahajournals.org//subscriptions/ 2901/R1 online methods Expanded Methods: Thyroid Hormone Receptors in Hypertrophy Expanded Methods. Thyroid Hormone Receptors in Hypertrophy, Kinugawa et al. RNase protection assays for TRs, MyHCs, and SERCA. Probes for TR RNase protection assays A. TRα probe PF 538 bp Probe TR α1 mRNA Pst I DBD Xba I LBD TRα1 protein Probe TR α2 mRNA PF 159 bp Pst I DBD TRα2 protein B. TRβ1 probe PF 329 bp Probe TRβ1 mRNA Xba I DBD LBD TRβ1 protein C. TRβ2 probe PF 521 bp Probe TRβ2 mRNA Xba I LBD DBD TRβ2 protein The Figure depicts the riboprobes used in RNase protection assay for TR mRNAs. Similar shading within TR α or β isoforms indicates identical mRNA sequence. PF is the mRNA 1 Expanded Methods: Thyroid Hormone Receptors in Hypertrophy fragment protected by the probe. The corresponding TR proteins are shown, with the DNAbinding domain (DBD) and ligand-binding domain (LBD) indicated. The TRα probe (Panel A) contained a PstI-XbaI fragment of rat TRα1 cDNA and protected a fragment of 538-bp for TRα1 (1279-1816 nucleotides of GenBank Accession number M18028) and 159-bp for TRα2 (14711629 nucleotides of M31174). The TRβ1-specific probe (Panel B) contained the fragment from the 5’-untranslated region to an XbaI site and protected 323-bp (227-555 nucleotides of J03933). The TRβ2-specific probe (Panel C) contained the fragment from the 5’-untranslated region to an XbaI site and protected 521-bp (1-521 nucleotides of M25071). All plasmids for riboprobes were sequenced, and linealized at the 3’-end of the antisense strand with appropriate restriction enzymes. TR probes were made with a specific activity of ~9x108 cpm/µg, and hybridized with 10 µg total RNA. After incubation at 42°C overnight, the RNA-probe mix was digested with RNase A/T1 (1:100, RPAII, Ambion) at 37°C for 30 min, and protected fragments were separated on a 6% denaturing polyacrylamide gel. In each gel lane, all TR isoforms, and GAPDH as an internal control, were quantified by densitometry and corrected for background. TR signals were normalized to GAPDH. The StyI-digested rat glyceraldehyde 3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH) probe (pTRIGAPDH-Rat, Ambion) protected a 134-bp fragment (complimentary to nucleotides 369-503 of X02231). The GAPDH probe (specific activity ~2x108 cpm/µg for experiments with MyHC and SERCA, ~0.5x108 cpm/µg for experiments with TRs) was mixed in each sample as an internal control. The probe specific for the rat SERCA2 gene protected a 333-bp fragment of SERCA2a (3014-3347 nucleotides of X15635). The probe for rat MyHC was complimentary to the 3’-end of β-MyHC mRNA; it protected a 300-bp fragment (5626-5925 nucleotides of X15939), but also hybridized to α-MyHC, and protected a 175-bp fragment (5656-5830 nucleotides of X15938). Riboprobes were labeled with [α-32P]UTP using Maxiscript kit (Ambion). The MyHC and SERCA probes had a specific activity of ~0.5x108 and ~1.0x108 cpm/µg, respectively, and were 2 Expanded Methods: Thyroid Hormone Receptors in Hypertrophy used with 3 µg total RNA. All probe mixes were run on the same gel with RNA from the in vivo experiments. 3