Download Cosmic scaffolding and the growth of structure

Survey
yes no Was this document useful for you?
   Thank you for your participation!

* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project

Document related concepts

Big Bang wikipedia , lookup

Gravitational microlensing wikipedia , lookup

Circular dichroism wikipedia , lookup

Dark matter wikipedia , lookup

Weakly-interacting massive particles wikipedia , lookup

Redshift wikipedia , lookup

Astronomical spectroscopy wikipedia , lookup

Weak gravitational lensing wikipedia , lookup

Gravitational lens wikipedia , lookup

Transcript
Cosmic scaffolding and
the growth of structure
Cosmic scaffolding and the growth of
structure
Richard Massey (CalTech)
with
Jason Rhodes (JPL), David Bacon (Edinburgh),
Joel Bergé (Saclay), Richard Ellis (CalTech),
Alexis Finoguenov (Garching), Catherine Heymans (UBC),
J-P Kneib (Marseilles), Alexie Leauthaud (Marseilles),
Alexandre Refregier (Saclay), Nick Scoville (CalTech),
Elisabetta Semboloni (Bonn), James Taylor (Waterloo),
Ludovic Van Waerbeke (UBC) and the 70+ COSMOS team
Core HST data in COSMOS field
N. Scoville et al. (ApJ 2007)
Largest ever HST survey
• 577 contiguous ACS pointings
• 1.6 square degrees in IF814W band (VSDSS at z=1)
• Depth IF814W<26.6 (at 5 )
• 2 million galaxies
• ~80 resolved galaxies/arcmin2
http://irsa.ipac.caltech.edu/Missions/cosmos.html
Multicolour data in COSMOS field
P. Capak et al. (ApJ 2007), B. Mobasher et al. (ApJ 2007)
z/(1+z)= 0.05 , 0.15
Lensing sensitivity with redshift
1/r2
Resolved background galaxies
Foreground lensing
sensitivity
Redshift
Weak lensing analysis
Convergence  projected mass
• Real data (no Bhuvnesh here!)
• RRG shear measurement
• Calibrated on STEP3-like sims
• PSF model varies with focus
• Parametric CTE correction
Multiscale wavelet reconstruction method
J.-L. Starck, S. Pires & A. Refregier (A&A 2006)
B-mode check for residual systematics
R. Massey et al. (Nature 2007)
Comparison with baryons
Weak lensing
mass contours
(HST)
Extended x-ray
emission
(XMM-Newton)
Galaxy number
density
(Subaru/CFHT)
Galaxy stellar
mass
(Subaru/CFHT)
R. Massey et al. (Nature 2007)
Dealing with photometric redshift degeneracies
P. Capak et al. (ApJ 2007), B. Mobasher et al. (ApJ 2007)
Faint galaxies
probability
X
2
photo-z
3
4
Faint galaxies
1
X
0
Redshift tomography (palaeocosmology)
z=0.7
z=0.5
z=0.3
Mass vs light tomography (z~0.3)
R. Massey et al. (Nature 2007)
~19Mpc  19Mpc
Mass vs light tomography (z~0.5)
R. Massey et al. (Nature 2007)
~26Mpc  26Mpc
Mass vs light tomography (z~0.7)
R. Massey et al. (Nature 2007)
~31Mpc  31Mpc
Bacon & Taylor 3D reconstruction
z=1
z=0.7
z=0.5
z=0.3
z=0
3D dark matter map animation
QuickTime™ and a
decompressor
are needed to see this picture.
ESA/Hubble (M. Kornmesser & L. L. Christensen)
3D cosmic shear
Shear-shear correlation function +()
R. Massey et al. (Astrophysical Journal 2007)
z=0.7
z=0.5
z=0.3
Cosmological parameter constraints
R. Massey et al. (Astrophysical Journal 2007)
Full 3D analysis
Traditional
2D analysis
Growth of structure
Fraction of mass on different scales
R. Massey et al. (Astrophysical Journal 2007)
Conclusions
Largest ever HST survey - ideal proof of concept for future, dedicated
missions in space. Various problems encountered, but all HST-specific
and none generic to space. Know what needs to be done better!
Comparison of the large-scale distribution of baryons to that of mass,
which could not have been done from the ground. In general, mass
traces light - consistent with a scenario where baryonic
structures are built inside a preformed dark matter
scaffold. Discrepancies on small scales reveal the
different nature of dark matter.
Statistical analysis of the mass distribution constrains
cosmological parameters, traces the growth
of structure (and measures the expansion
history of the universe). Multicolour
follow-up, particularly in near IR, is
essential! 3D analysis yields ~3x
improvement.
Fin
PSF variation
J. Rhodes (ApJ 2007), J. Jee (ApJ 2005)
HST’s thermal
“breathing” affects
both size and
ellipticity of PSF
Effective focus
changes by
• 3m per orbit
• 12m in ~days
PSF variation
J. Rhodes (ApJ 2007)
Charge Transfer (in)Efficiency
STIS image, courtesy Paul Bristow
CCD readout register
Trailing during CCD readout creates a spurious, coherent ellipticity.
Affects photometry, astrometry and morphology of faint galaxies.
Effect of CTE trailing on the mass map
Compare to simulations
Gravitational lensing convergence  projected mass
• Largest ever survey with HST
• 1.6 square degrees in IF814W band
• Depth IF814W<26.6 (at 5)
• 2 million galaxies, zmedian=1.2
• Small, diffraction-limited PSF
• ~80 resolved galaxies/arcmin2
• Follow-up from radio to x-rays
• Photo-zs from 17 optical/IR bands
Dark matter simulation at z=0.5
Andrey Kravtsov and Anatoly Klypin
(National Center for Supercomputer Applications)
Lensing sensitivity with redshift
1/r2
Resolved background galaxies
Foreground lensing
sensitivity
Redshift