Survey
* Your assessment is very important for improving the work of artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
* Your assessment is very important for improving the work of artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
La compétition de tous contre tous A system’s biology approach to understand stochasticity in gene expression Olivier Gandrillon. Mars 2009 1. Why investigate stochasticity in gene expression? 2. A system’s biology approach 3. The models 4. The experiments 5. Toward a virtuous circle 1. Why investigate stochasticity in gene expression? 2. A system’s biology approach 3. The models 4. The experiments 5. Toward a virtuous circle Gene expression is a stochastic phenomenon • Elowitz et al., Science 2002 « Given the exploding experimental progress there is little doubt that stochastic gene expression is establishing itself as one of the most central and exciting problems in molecular biology. » Johan Paulsson, 2005 Stochasticity in gene expression could play a role in various phenomena, The fingerprints of identical twins are readily distinguished on close examination (Jain AK, et al. Pattern Recognition 2002;35:2653.) including differentiation… Stochastic generation of diversity… Kupiec JJ. (1997). Mol Gen Genet 255, 201208. Interstabilisation … upon which a selective constraint is applied Kupiec JJ. (1997). Mol Gen Genet 255, 201208. Quantitative variations can unravel qualitative differences: Chang et al (2008). Nature 453, 544548 1. Why investigate stochasticity in gene expression? 2. A system’s biology approach 3. The models 4. The experiments 5. Toward a virtuous circle In order to analyze the biological function of stochasticity, one has to be able to manipulate it. For this, it is mandatory to understand its molecular basis. Data Models In contrast with most system’s biology approaches which are data driven, we decided in the present project to opt for a question driven approach. 1. Why investigate stochasticity in gene expression? 2. A system’s biology approach 3. The models 4. The experiments 5. Toward a virtuous circle Gene expression is a multistep process. Stochasticity can arise at all steps Transcription factors Chromatin Gene mRNA Transcription Nucleus Cytoplasm mRNA Protein Maturation Fluorescent Protein Translation Previous models tended to underestimate the promoter contribution: Our model focuses on the promoter level 2nd model: taking space into account. Transcription factors TF binding site DNA [Soula et al. 2005 , BMC Bioinformatics; Coulon et al. 2008, Methods in Molecular Biology] 1. Why investigate stochasticity in gene expression? 2. A system’s biology approach 3. The models 4. The experiments 5. Toward a virtuous circle T2EC: primary avian erythrocytic progenitor cells Self renewal TGFα TGFβ1 Dexamethasone Differentiation > erythrocytes Anaemic chicken serum Insulin 4.1: Involvement of the chromatin structure T2ECs Transfection Tol2 CMV Cherry Tol2 mKO Tol2 or Tol2 CMV Mass culture Mass culture FACS Clone 1 Clone 2 Clone 3 Clone 1 Extracting DNA Acquiring fluorescence Cloning and sequencing integration points (work in progress) FACS or single cells in real time 4.1: measuring endogenous genes stochasticity Quantum Dot + Molecular Beacon Preliminary conclusions: • The construction of the theoretical model has revealed many previously unsuspected counterintuitive sources of stochasticity; • We have designed an experimental system through which we will be able to correlate the position of a transgene within the genome to the amount of stochasticity it displays; • We have set up an experimental system thank’s to which one can acquire gene expression levels through fluorescence at a very high frequency (up to 0.08 Hz; every 2 minutes) on normal eukaryotic cells. 1. Why investigate stochasticity in gene expression? 2. A system’s biology approach 3. The models 4. The experiments 5. Toward a virtuous circle Raise the temperature Compare Change the promoter Compare Antoine COULON Mathieu GINESTE Gaël KANEKO Camila MEJIAPEREZ José VINUELAS Labo Biopuce (CEA Grenoble) François CHATELAIN Alexandra FUCHS Manuel THERY ENS Paris Jean Jacques KUPIEC Antoine COULON Guillaume BESLON Gaël KANEKO