Download IBD Cases - Amazon S3

Survey
yes no Was this document useful for you?
   Thank you for your participation!

* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project

Document related concepts

Gene therapy wikipedia , lookup

Harm reduction wikipedia , lookup

Psychedelic therapy wikipedia , lookup

Pharmacogenomics wikipedia , lookup

Pharmacokinetics wikipedia , lookup

Management of multiple sclerosis wikipedia , lookup

Multiple sclerosis research wikipedia , lookup

Transcript
IBD Cases
Stephen B. Hanauer, MD
Professor of Medicine
Feinberg School of Medicine
Medical Director, Digestive Health Center
24 year old female
States that she is “fatigued”
2-4 bloody, loose stools with urgency and cramping daily
for 3 weeks
No weight loss
24 year old female
Past Medical
History
Unremarkable
Family History
No family history of IBD
Social History
No recent foreign travel, non-smoker
Review of Systems Unremarkable
Medications
None
Allergies
None
24 year old female
Vital Signs
Abdomen
Laboratory
Findings
BP: 110/60, P=80, afebrile
Wt = 65 kg (no change from baseline)
BS-present, soft nontender, no guarding or rebound
tenderness and normal perianal examination
Hematologic:
• WBC = 8.9/mm3
• Hgb = 11.2 g/dL
• Plt = 433/µL
Renal and liver function: Normal
Stool studies:
• Enteric pathogens - Negative
• Ova & parasites x 3 - Negative
• C difficile toxin (A & B) - Negative
24 year old female
DX: Moderate active left sided ulcerative colitis
What options are available for treatment of
this patient ?
Management Algorithm
Ulcerative Colitis
MODERATE
MILD
SEVERE
5ASA +/- prednisone
Oral 5-ASA/ SASP
+/- topical 5-ASA
Budesonide MMX
Fail 2-4
weeks
Respond to 1-2
rounds of steroid
tapered over 6-8
weeks
Continue 5-ASA
Admit + IV
steroids 3-5
days
2-4 weeks
No
response
Unable to taper
prednisone
Steroid
refractory
Steroid dependent
SASP=sulfasalazine
IFX=infliximab
ADA=adalimumab
GOL=golimumab
AZA/6MP alone
or IFX/ ADA/GOL
or IFX/ ADA/GOL
and AZA/6MP
evaluate after
12 weeks
Fail
AZA/6MP
alone
IFX/ADA/GOL
+/-AZA/6MP
evaluate after
12 weeks
IFX therapy or
cyclosporine
+/- AZA
Surgery
No
response
Modified from Panaccione R, et al. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2008;28:674-88.
24 year old female
Mesalamine 2.4 g/d
No significant improvement at 2 wks
Treatment
Follow-up at 6
weeks
Mesalamine dose escalated to 4.8 g/d
Due to persistent symptoms at 4 wks
Budesonide MMX 9mg one po qd
added
Symptoms slightly improved some
days
24 year old female
For 2 months
Symptoms
Chief Complaint
On mesalamine and Budesonide MMX
(for 4 weeks)
Transiently better but now continues to
worsen
4 to 6 stools per day with occasional
bleeding
What should be done at this point ?
What are her options?
1. Continue current therapy for 4 more weeks
2. Stop Budesonide MMX and treat with
prednisone
3. Add 6MP or Azathioprine after checking TPMT
4. Switch Budesonide MMX to Budesonide EC
24 year old female
Treated with prednisone 40 mg/day for 1 week duration
Stool frequency decreased to one formed BM a day with no
fecal urgency
Began to taper prednisone at 5mg/day every week
At a dose of 20 mg a day of prednisone disease she had
recurrence of diarrhea (6 BM/day) with minimal bleeding,
fecal urgency and tenesmus
Steroid-Dependent Ulcerative Colitis:
Treatment Choices
Continue steroids?
Treatment choices in
the steroiddependent ulcerative
colitis patient
Immunomodulator
therapy?
Biologic therapy?
Surgery?
Steroid-Dependent Ulcerative Colitis:
Treatment Choices
Continue steroids?
Treatment
choices in the
medically
refractory or
severe
ulcerative
colitis patient
Immunomodulator
therapy?
Biologic therapy?
Surgery?
Steroid-Dependent Ulcerative Colitis:
Treatment Choices
Continue steroids?
Treatment choices in
the medically
refractory or severe
ulcerative colitis
patient
Immunomodulator
therapy?
Biologic therapy?
Surgery?
Steroid-Dependent Ulcerative Colitis:
Treatment Choices
Continue steroids?
Treatment choices in
the medically
refractory or severe
ulcerative colitis
patient
Immunomodulator
therapy?
Biologic therapy?
Surgery?
Who should NOT be offered continued
medical therapy?
• Emergent indications for surgery
‒ Fulminant disease activity unresponsive to maximal
medical therapy
‒ Toxic megacolon
‒ Colonic perforation
‒ Massive hemorrhage
• Elective indications for surgery
‒
‒
‒
‒
‒
Disease activity refractory to medical therapy
Mucosal dysplasia
Diagnosis of carcinoma
Colonic stricture
Growth retardation in children
Ford D; American Society of Colon & Rectal Surgeons. Ulcerative colitis. Available at
http://www.fascrs.org/physicians/education/core_subjects/2005/ulcerative_colitis/ Cyma RR, et al.
Arch Surg. 2005;140:300-310.
Colectomy for UC
• Delay in surgery more important predictor of poor
outcome than hospital volume
• OR for death 2.12 (1.1-3.9) if colectomy after 6 days of
hospitalization
• OR increases to 2.89 (1.4-5.9) if colectomy after 11 days
• Emergently admitted patients 5 times more likely to die
compared to electively
Kaplan G. Gastroenterology. 2008;134:680-687.
Risk-Benefit Ratio of Surgery in UC
Benefit
• Probably reduces rate of mortality
in the sickest patients
• Considered “cure” for UC
• Subtotal colectomy during acute
phase
– IPAA
– Permanent ileostomy
Risk
• Post-surgical complications
– Infection
– Small bowel obstruction
– Sepsis
– Leak
– Pouch dysfunction
– Irritable pouch
• Pouchitis/Cuffitis
• Crohn’s disease
• Reduced female fertility
• Risk male erectile dysfunction
Case 2
 40-Yr-Old Man With Long-Standing Ileocolonic
Crohn’s Disease
 s/p 2 ileocecal resections
 Recurrent disease in small and large bowel despite
steroids and azathioprine
2.5 mg/kg with therapeutic 6-TGN levels
Case 2 Treatment History
 Treated with single infusion of infliximab
• Excellent response lasting ~6 mo
 Second infliximab infusion
• Complicated by an acute infusion reaction
• Response lasted ~8 wk
 Third infliximab infusion
• Pretreated with prednisone, diphenhydramine, and
acetaminophen
• Flushing and headache
• Response lasted ~4 wk
 Fourth infliximab infusion
• Pretreated as above and increased dose to 10 mg/kg
• Headache and flushing
• Benefits lasted only 12 wk
Case 2
What is the mechanism for his loss of response?
Comments on Biologics
•Despite “humanness” they are all
immunogenic
Immunogenicity is reduced by Immune
suppressants…..
•Anticipate dose adjustment with all
•There will be diminishing returns with 2nd
and/or 3rd agent
Duration of Disease
Refractory Disease
Immunogenicity
Therapeutic Levels for Anti-TNF Agents
5.0
10.0
50.0
Theoretical threshold
1.0
Adalimumab 160 mg (day 1), 80 mg (day8)
and 40 mg every two weeks
Adalimumab 40 mg every two weeks
0.5
Simulated anti-TNF biologic conc
Infliximab 5 mg/kg at day 1, day 15, day 43 and every 8 weeks
Infliximab 3 mg/kg at day 1, day 15, day 43 and every 8 weeks
Subtherapeutic
0
20
40
60
Time (days)
80
100
120
Implications of Low Drug (trough) Levels
•Disease Recurs
No longer maintenance but re-treatment
•Development of anti-drug antibodies
Eventual loss of response
Factors that Influence the Pharmacokinetics of
Biologics
Impact on Pharmacokinetics
Presence of Anti-Drug Antibodies
(ADAs)
Decreases drug concentration
Increases clearance
Worse clinical outcomes
Ordas I et. al. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2012; 10:1079-1087. 24
Factors that Influence the Pharmacokinetics of
Biologics
Impact on Pharmacokinetics
Concomitant use of immunosuppressives
Reduces ADA formation
Increases drug concentration
Decreases drug clearance
Better clinical outcomes
Ordas I et. al. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2012; 10:1079-1087. 25
Factors that Influence the Pharmacokinetics of
Biologics
Impact on Pharmacokinetics
Low serum albumin concentration
Increases drug clearance
Worse clinical outcome
High baseline CRP concentration
Increase drug clearance
High baseline TNF concentration
May decrease drug concentration by
increasing clearance
Ordas I et. al. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2012; 10:1079-1087. 26
Factors that Influence the Pharmacokinetics of
Biologics
Impact on Pharmacokinetics
High body size
May increase drug clearance
Sex
Males have higher clearance
Ordas I et. al. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2012; 10:1079-1087. 27
Case 2 Continued
• How should loss of response in this
patient be assessed?
• What are your current options to treat
him?
Algorithm for loss of response to Anti-TNF
Is there active disease?
Yes
No
Measure Drug Level and AntiDrug Antibodies
Therapeutic Levels
IBD refractory
to anti-TNF
Alternative Class
(e.g. vedolizumab)
Undetectable Drug &
undetectable ADA
Suboptimal Dosing
Increase Drug dose
or frequency
Undetectable Drug &
Detectable ADA
Loss of response
due to ADA
Switch within same
Drug Class
IBS
SBBO
Bile-acid diarrhea
Strictures
Case 2 continued
• Patient was prescribed adalimumab
• 160 mg at wk 0; 80 mg at wk 2; and then
40 mg EOW
• He initially responded with resolution of diarrhea
and abdominal pain
• He then developed recurrent abdominal pain and
loose stools
Case 2 Continued
• How should loss of response in this
patient be assessed?
• What are your current options to treat
him?
Case 2 Summary
• Several mechanisms can lead to loss of response to a
biologic
 For patients who respond to anti-TNF therapy and then
lose response or become intolerant, switching within the
anti-TNF class is a reasonable option
• Absolute likelihood of response to second anti-TNF agent
is lower than response in naïve patients
 Loss of response requires
• Evaluation for active inflammation (eg, CRP, imaging,
endoscopy)
• Exclusion of inflammatory and non-inflammatory
complications