Survey
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
An emerging market Structured commodity finance has remained the exclusive purview of a small group of banks. February 2005 By Tony McAuley The world of structured commodity financing has resisted any impulse to become trendy, and with good reason. Though it may seem to be at the swashbuckling frontier of finance-facilitating commodities trade from exotic emerging marketsevery deal does, in fact, require the laborious analysis of a menu of risks. They are all bespoke deals, and though the margins for the banks can be high, the volume of deals remains low. In banking, a low volume of transactions isn't sexy. Two trends may perk this up, however. For one thing, there is broad-based recovery in the economies of the emerging markets, especially those in the former Soviet Union and Asia. Usually some region lags when others are growing, but this time around Latin American economies are moving ahead at nearly 2% GDP growth, while in Russia and Asia it is running at between 7% and 8%. But perhaps the more immediate factor causing excitement is the new Basel II regime for banks, which doesn’t go into effect until December 2006 but is already driving the way banks lend, especially in Europe. Among other things, it tightens rules on counterparty risk in trade financing. “The first thing Basel II is doing is making financing for commodity traders in the traditional way far more difficult,” says Prabhat Vira, head of the global commodity finance group at ABN Amro. The bulk—perhaps 95%—of commodity finance for metals, oil and gas, grains and other “softs” is provided in the form of bank lines, either “clean lines” or “borrowing base lines” (with some loose collateral stipulation), to mid-sized trading houses, Vira explains. Very few of these will have any formal debt ratings, never mind investment-grade ratings. As Basel II comes into force, the capital risk weighting against these bank lines will squeeze them out. John MacNamara, managing director of structured trade and export finance at Deutsche Bank in Amsterdam, says “Basel II is the major business opportunity for commodity trade finance this decade.” From a base of between €20 billion and €30 billion now, bankers estimate that the market could double in size because of the bank changes. The Basel II committee at the Bank for International Settlements “is forcing companies, especially in emerging markets and especially non-rated companies, to be more creative,” says Karel Valken, finance director of Nidera, a privately owned agri-business trader based in Rotterdam. “Our deal is an illustration of that because we had some other alternatives,” he says, referring to a $150m (€115m) “pre-export financing” he did for Argentinian grain at the end of 2004. Risk assessment Valken explains the basic rationale for the deal: “Financial markets make the distinction between transfer risk and performance risk. If a borrower in a country is only selling domestically the bank has difficulty getting paid because of transfer risk issues. Financing exporters, the risk is limited to performance risk. In a crisis environment, no country will restrict exports.” For Nidera, the guarantee of sustainable export flows allows it to raise long-term financing, thus optimising working capital. “You are basically getting long-term funds using inventories,” says Valken. Nidera this year is expecting to do a financing of $300m, double the size of last year’s deal. It is also looking at more complicated transactions, incorporating the storage of grain for a deal in Egypt, also financing the sale of soy beans to crushers in Asia and the repurchase of the soy oil. But Valken says the risks that make the market possible also put limitations on it. He recalls that two years ago, Nidera tried to do a kind of securitisation with Marsh & McLennan, the insurance group, that would have provided the credit-enhancement on a bond issued by a special purpose vehicle. “But ultimately investors still really didn’t feel familiar with this business” and the deal never got off the ground, Valken says. Taking the complicated risk out, however, can destroy the rationale for the market, as Lamon Rutten, chief of finance and energy at the UN Conference on Trade and Development in Geneva, explains: “In Russia, several of the large metal, oil and diamond companies used to rely on structured finance. Many moved out and into the corporate bond markets once they became better known to investors. Structured finance can become uncompetitive very fast.” Tony McAuley