Download "quantitative" easing. Like lowering interest rates, QE is supposed to

Survey
yes no Was this document useful for you?
   Thank you for your participation!

* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project

Document related concepts

Financialization wikipedia , lookup

Shadow banking system wikipedia , lookup

Global saving glut wikipedia , lookup

Money supply wikipedia , lookup

Interest rate ceiling wikipedia , lookup

History of the Federal Reserve System wikipedia , lookup

Bank wikipedia , lookup

Interest rate wikipedia , lookup

Interbank lending market wikipedia , lookup

Quantitative easing wikipedia , lookup

Transcript
The Economist explains:
What is quantitative easing?
Jan 14th 2014, 23:50 by R.A.
AMERICA'S Federal Reserve surprised markets in December by starting to "taper" (ie,
gradually reduce) its programme of monthly purchases of government and mortgage
bonds—a process known as "quantitative easing", or QE—from $85 billion a month to
$75 billion. Some worry that scaling back QE could endanger America's recovery or
create financial instability in emerging markets. Meanwhile, expectations are rising that
the European Central Bank may soon launch its own QE programme to boost the euroarea economy, where high unemployment is contributing to deflation. But what exactly
is quantitative easing, and how is it supposed to work?
Central banks are responsible for keeping inflation in check. Before the financial crisis of
2008-09 they managed that by adjusting the interest rate at which banks borrow
overnight. If firms were growing nervous about the future and scaling back on
investment, the central bank would reduce the overnight rate. That would reduce banks'
funding costs and encourage them to make more loans, keeping the economy from
falling into recession. By contrast, if credit and spending were getting out of hand and
inflation was rising then the central bank would raise the interest rate. When the crisis
struck, big central banks like the Fed and the Bank of England slashed their overnight
interest-rates to boost the economy. But even cutting the rate as far as it could go, to
almost zero, failed to spark recovery. Central banks therefore began experimenting with
other tools to encourage banks to pump money into the economy. One of them was QE.
To carry out QE central banks create money by buying securities, such as government
bonds, from banks, with electronic cash that did not exist before. The new money swells
the size of bank reserves in the economy by the quantity of assets purchased—hence
"quantitative" easing. Like lowering interest rates, QE is supposed to stimulate the
economy by encouraging banks to make more loans. The idea is that banks take the
new money and buy assets to replace the ones they have sold to the central bank. That
raises stock prices and lowers interest rates, which in turn boosts investment. Today,
interest rates on everything from government bonds to mortgages to corporate debt are
probably lower than they would have been without QE. If QE convinces markets that the
central bank is serious about fighting deflation or high unemployment, then it can also
boost economic activity by raising confidence. Several rounds of QE in America have
increased the size of the Federal Reserve's balance sheet—the value of the assets it
holds—from less than $1 trillion in 2007 to more than $4 trillion now.
The jury is still out on QE, however. Studies suggest that it did raise economic activity a
bit. But some worry that the flood of cash has encouraged reckless financial behaviour
and directed a firehose of money to emerging economies that cannot manage the cash.
Others fear that when central banks sell the assets they have accumulated, interest
rates will soar, choking off the recovery. Last spring, when the Fed first mooted the idea
of tapering, interest rates around the world jumped and markets wobbled. Still others
doubt that central banks have the capacity to keep inflation in check if the money they
have created begins circulating more rapidly. Central bankers have been more cautious
in using QE than they would have been in cutting interest rates, which could partly
explain some countries' slow recoveries. At least a few central banks are now
experimenting with stimulus alternatives, such as promises to keep overnight interestrates low for a very long time, the better to scale back their dependence on QE.
- See more at: http://www.economist.com/blogs/economist-explains/2014/01/economist-explains7#sthash.eo8S6AYf.dpuf
Questions: Answer questions using the space provided.
1. Is an easing monetary policy considered expansionary or contractionary?
_________________
2. Is an easing monetary policy used to fight unemployment or inflation?
_________________
3. How do Central Banks such as the Fed typically use their Open Market Operations to
conduct easing policies?_______________________________________________
4. What is the primary difference between Quantitative Easing and more typical Open
Market Operations?____________________________________________________
5. What is the primary effect of Quantitative Easing that typical expansionary policies
may not create?________________________________________________________
6. The Fed has begun to taper the amount of QE it conducts each month. Explain why
this policy of gradually removing the policy may be wiser than completely
discountinuing the policy immediately.