Survey
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Proposal for United Nations Study on Disarmament and Non-Proliferation Education Transcendent Politics - Towards a New Paradigm Weapons proliferation is a symptom of a militaristic worldview, a hegemonic ideological belief system characterized by a preoccupation with enemies and a resolve to overcome them through domination by threat and use of violent force and other forms of punishment. Disarmament and non-proliferation represent a paradigm shift - a quantum leap in consciousness. In order to foster this shift we must go beyond removing the symptoms - weapons. We must deal with the underlying causes so that the symptoms are no longer produced. A shift in consciousness is primary. It is essential to elaborate the new paradigm (Thomas Kuhn), by proposing a "counter-hegemonic theory” (Gramsci and Lustick) . According to Richard Wendell Fogg, Director of the Center or the Study of Conflict, the goal is not merely "abolishing war" but "replacing war" with something that works better. The idea of disarmament frequently provokes strong negative emotional reactions and psychological resistance since it doesn’t answer the question of how to deal with enemies (Iraq and N Korea now for the US). It is experienced as the taking away of necessary “defenses”, and stimulates fears of vulnerability, as it does not provide a convincing alternative. In our collective thinking at present, we have two categories of response - do nothing or attack. We have no well developed category of thinking about the transcendent path of creative conflict transformation, win-win strategies, uses of nonviolent force. There are optimal ways to address even the most intractable conflicts -- based on theory, research, observation, and historical examples which are most likely to yield a best case scenario. A basic knowledge of psychological dimensions which underlie conflict would lay a sound foundation upon which all strategies would be built. For example; people are most dangerous when they are afraid, the way to be more secure is to make your enemy more secure, developing empathy for the Other's history and psychology, anticipating counterproductive reactions to one's language and strategies, especially humiliation, powerlessness, etc. would go a long way to prevent violence. An understanding of human development,attachment, loss, trauma, identity, gender, the psychology of otherness and the image of the enemy would be valuable. The first part of the educational agenda would focus on understanding the human psyche as it relates to relationship, conflict, and life and death issues. The second part would use 2 that knowledge to inform new, healthy, adaptive, psychologically informed strategies to foster a quantum shift in consciousness as a basis to build institutions that can creatively reduce tension and fear, prevent or effectively address the most extreme forms of conflict and violence. These are characterized as political intelligence, wisdom, maturity and visionary or transcendent leadership. Topics include: Part 1 * Human development - attachment, trauma, identity, the Other. * Gender and Authoritarianism - the warping of masculinity and the splitting of the Self under patriarchal domination and punishment * Nuclearism (defined by Robert Jay Lifton and Richard Falk, in Indefensible Weapons), an extension of Militarism - as the "psychological political, and military dependence on nuclear weapons, the embrace of the weapons as a solution to a wide variety of human dilemmas, most ironically that of security." (p. ix) From a psychological perspective, this attitude is irrational, pathological, delusional, and extremely dangerous to self and others (grounds for commitment). We are collectively in the grip of a militaristic consciousness, which precludes imagination leading to more effective ways of dealing with conflict. * the Image of the Enemy - archetypes of enemy images, the mirror image of the enemy, manipulation of the image of the enemy to incite fear and promote militarism, resistance of the enemy image to change, self – fulfilling prophecy and the psychological cost of *Stages in enemy development- the need for survival and fear of annihilation, the need for attachment and fear of strangers, the need to be good and projection of the shadow, the need to belong and us against them, the need to be superior and dehumanization. This would include child rearing patterns, and the work of Alice Miller and Erik Erikson * Factors in escalation of conflict and violence, debunking deterrence theory (Rob Green - the Naked Nuclear Emperor) * Economic investment in the Military Industrial Complex, and the need for conversion Part 2 * Political Intelligence (Perlman) , criteria for a transcendent view of conflict * The Interconnectedness among militarism, poverty, the environment, the economy, and human rights issues. * Conflict Transformation - addressing fears, tension reduction (Osgood), language, techniques. * Peacemaking - Use of nonviolent force and strength (Richard Wendell Fogg) including "spiritual, moral, intellectual, emotional, social, political, economic, physical and aesthetic forms." Fogg asks what if nonmilitary defense had the 5 advantages of Military defense, including "1 - organization by governments, 2 - vast amounts of resources, 3 - planning, 4 training, and 5 - allies? Military action usually has had all 3 these advantages: nonviolence has never had all of them." and a proposal for a Global Nonviolent Peace Force, by David Hartsough and Mel Duncan * New Zealand’s example of transformation to a non-militarist consciousness * Towards a Global Consciousness Diane Perlman, PhD 507 Fairview Road Narberth, Pa. 19072 (h) 610 667 4704 (o)610 667 6703 fax610 667 2747 [email protected] * Licensed clinical psychologist * Political psychologist * Vice president, The Philadelphia Project for Global Security * Co-chair, Committee for Militarism, Disarmament and Conversion of Division 48 (Peace Psychology) of the American Psychological Association and Psychologists for Social responsibility * Founding member, The Transcending Trauma Project (studying adaptation of Holocaust survivors and their children) * Fellow, The Solomon Asch Center for the Study of Ethnopolitical Conflict at the University of Pennsylvania * Research Associate, the Citizens Panel on Ultimate Weapons at the Center on Violence and Human Survival. * Founding member of Collaborative Family Law Affiliates * Speaker for Physicians for Social responsibility in the 1980s and early 1990s * Presented at American Psychological Association, the Hague Appeal for Peace, the NGO Forum of the UN Fourth World Conference on Women, The Gaza Community Mental Health Program International Conferences, the International Psychohistorical Association, and other places. *****