* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Download Bilateral Presentation Yorkshire
Audiology and hearing health professionals in developed and developing countries wikipedia , lookup
Sound localization wikipedia , lookup
Noise-induced hearing loss wikipedia , lookup
Sensorineural hearing loss wikipedia , lookup
Speech perception wikipedia , lookup
Lip reading wikipedia , lookup
Olivocochlear system wikipedia , lookup
The Yorkshire Auditory Implant Service Sequential Bilateral Cochlear Implantation in Children: Assessment, Rehabilitation and Outcomes Jane Martin, Catherine Totten, Catherine Killan and Prof. Chris Raine NICE Guidance January 2009 National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence • ‘Simultaneous cochlear implantation is recommended as an option for the following groups of people with severe to profound deafness who do not receive adequate benefit from acoustic hearing aids: • Children • Adults who are blind or who have other disabilities that increase their reliance on auditory stimuli…’ Sequential Implantation • ‘Bilateral cochlear implantation carried out in separate operations is not recommended as an option for people with severe to profound deafness. However, people who had a unilateral implant before publication of this guidance, and who fall into one of the categories described for bilateral implantation….’ following assessment by the responsible clinician. YAIS Response • Numbers of potential candidates • General Newsletter • Devised Sequential Cochlear Implant Profile (SCIP) • Targeted letter Assessment SEQUENTIAL COCHLEAR IMPLANT PROFILE (SCIP) Factors Chronological age (current) Age at first implant (congenital) Otology (ear infection and scan results) Medical (fitness for GA) Hearing history of non-implanted ear Child’s ability to participate in programming Consistent unilateral c.i. use established Development of functional spoken language Family commitment to long term support Educational support Chronological Age Sequential Cochlear Implant Profile (SCIP) definitions Assessment Factors No Concern Mild to Moderate Concern Great Concern a) Plasticity of auditory system < 3.5 years 4 – 7 years 8 years unless bimodal b) Ability to adjust to 2nd implant < 7 years 7 – 12 years > 12 years Chronological Age Demographics of Implantees • 78 children • Age range at 1st CI: 1yr 2mths – 7yrs 9mths • Age range at 2nd CI: 1yr 11mths – 15yrs 3mths • Length of sequential use: 4 months – 7yrs 8mths Age at First and Second Implant 30 Age at 1st CI 25 Number of Children Age at 2nd CI 20 15 10 5 0 1-2 2-3 3-4 4-5 5-6 6-7 7-8 8-9 Age in years 9-10 10-11 11-12 12-13 13-14 14-15 15-16 Interval Between the First and Second Implants 14 Number of Children 12 10 8 6 4 2 0 0-1 1-2 2-3 3-4 4-5 5-6 6-7 7-8 8-9 Time between implants in years 9-10 10-11 11-12 12-13 Rehabilitation Support Support and guidance offered to the child/teenager, the family and local professionals • Consistent use of both speech processors • Auditory training for second side (depending on age and gap) • Expectations, motivation and commitment, long term Outcomes-2nd Ear Cochlear Implant Use 14 12 Number of Children 10 8 Non-users Poor users 6 Good users 4 2 0 0-1 1-2 2-3 3-4 4-5 5-6 6-7 7-8 8-9 9-10 10-11 11-12 12-13 14-15 15-16 Age at 2nd Implant (years) n = 78 Outcomes-Categories of Auditory Performance CAP 6 months - 2nd ear L3 7% L4 22% L6 49% Level 3 Level 4 L5 22% Level 5 Level 6 CAP 12 months - 2nd ear Level 7 L7 3% N = 45 L4 13% L6 65% N = 37 L5 19% ABC-York Crescent of Sound: Test Battery • The Left-Right Discrimination Test • The Toy Localisation Test • The Toy Discrimination Test (Spatial Release from Masking for Speech) • The BKB Sentence Test Two ears better than one in background noise 7 Speech & Noise 2nd 1st 6 N = 14 Speech Benefit (decibels) 5 4 1st 3 2nd Noise 2 Speech 1 0 2 years 4 years 1st Noise 2nd Left / Right Discrimination Left / Right Discrimination at 2 years 6 10 Left / Right Discrimination at 4 years unable to tell right from left can tell right from left 16 Summary of Outcomes • Two non-users • Two thirds of children have achieved open-set sentence understanding using the 2nd implant alone by 12 months • Functional listening ability improves over time – Localisation ability – Listening in background noise Conclusions • Flexible approach to rehabilitation support, particularly targeting 9-11 age group • Recognition of long-term commitment and motivation is essential – Child – Parents • Co-operation from local professionals Thank You