Survey
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
IMACLIM-SA Insights from version 2 J. Schers, F. Ghersi, F. Lecocq AfD, 4 December 2014 1 Photo : Mairie Paris Objectives of the presentation Describe status of part II (modeling) of AfD research convention RCH262-2011 • “Green growth and its implications for public policy - The case of South Africa” Obtain feedback on version 2 of IMACLIM-SA model and results Prepare final report (in the “Recherche” AfD publication series) 4 December 2014 2 Outline Context and objectives Existing literature The IMACLIM-SA_v2 Model Scenarios Results 4 December 2014 3 CONTEXT AND OBJECTIVES 4 December 2014 4 A coal-based economy generating high CO2 emissions South Africa is a rapidly growing middle-income economy • World 25th largest economy (in PPP GDP) • World 72nd GDP per capita in 2012 South Africa per capita CO2 emissions, however, are on par with richest economies • World 33rd Emissions per capita in 2010 Economic development driven by abundant coal resources, long subsidized electricity from coal, and coalto-liquids technology • Energy-intensive mining and industry historic drivers of SA economy 4 December 2014 Source: World Bank World Development Indicators 5 Structure of current (2011) GHG emissions South Africa France 51.6 65.4 11 848 36 248 GHG emissions (MtCO2e) 456 487 CO2 emissions (MtCO2) 374 338 CO2 emissions from electricity generation (MtCO2) 229 60 Population (millions) GDP per capita (USD PPP) Sources: World Bank, World Resources Institute CAIT 2.0 4 December 2014 6 Ambitious decarbonization objectives Mitigation pledge announced at COP15 (2009) • Reduce GHG emissions by 34% in 2020 and by 42% in 2025 relative to baseline • Conditional on finance and technological support from international community 2011: Climate Change Response white paper • Outlines strategy • Including carbon pricing, possibly carbon tax 2013: Revised carbon tax plan for consultation “To allow for further consultation, implementation of the carbon tax is postponed by a year to 2016” 4 December 2014 7 Interacting with energy sector policies Long-Term Electricity Investment Plan • Urgent need to ease the tension between supply and demand • 2030 targets: • 35% energy efficiency improvements in demand • Renewables largest contribution to additional capacity. • Coal share would fall from 93% to 46% of installed capacity Electricity prices rising sharply to recover system costs and maintain ESKOM financial viability • From ca. R0.25/kWh in 2005 to R0.65/kWh in 2013 • Further increases approved by NERSA Price-competitive procurement for volume of RE Energy efficiency and demand side management initiatives Sources: IEA, 2013 ; Baker et al. 2014 4 December 2014 8 Within a rapidly transforming society facing important challenges South Africa is experiencing rapid economic growth • Real GDP has doubled over the past 30 years Population is also growing rapidly • 51M in 2010 (+14.6M relative to 1990) Unemployment remains large • 25% unemployment rate (39% if “discouraged workseekers” are included) • Particularly for low-skilled individuals With persisting inequalities in the society • South Africa has one of the highest Gini indices in the World Sources: SA Treasury; UN population data 4 December 2014 9 Objectives of the project To provide numerical insights on articulation between decarbonization and other key development objectives • In the context of the ‘green growth’ conversation Interactions have been mostly with academics • Energy Research Center (Univ. Cape Town): 3 missions, including MAPs workshop Oct./Nov. 2014 • June 13, 1st meeting w/SA Treasury modeling team • Further exchanges since (e-mail and de visu in Cape Town) 4 December 2014 10 EXISTING LITERATURE 4 December 2014 11 An already deep spectrum of analysis Carbon taxes already much analyzed • Van Heerden et al. 2006 • De Pauw 2007 • Devarajan et al. 2009, 2010 • Alton et al. 2014 • Musango et al. 2014 To our knowledge few countries, OECD included, have such depth of analysis • 4 models in France 4 December 2014 12 van Heerden et al. 2006 Question: Can revenue recycling from a C tax generate double dividend in SA? Model: Static CGEM of SA • High-skill labor supply inelastic to real wages • Low-skill labor supply perfectly elastic to real wages Timeframe: 1998 Policy scenarios: • 4 instruments: C tax; fuel tax; electricity tax ; energy tax • 3 recycling targets: direct taxes, indirect taxes, food taxes Outcome: • Recycling policy critical for dividends (over policy instrument) • Food tax break can induce triple dividend on GHG emissions, GDP, poverty reduction 4 December 2014 13 De Pauw 2007 Question: what impact of various mitigation scenarios on SA economy? Model: Dynamic CGEM of SA Timeframe: 2005-2015 Policy scenarios: • 3 mitigation scenarios, one of them w/ C tax • Informed by MARKAL energy system modeling Outcome: • C tax scenario yields -2% GDP in 2015 4 December 2014 14 Devarajan et al. 2009, 2011 Question: What role of prior market distortions on C tax impacts in SA? Model: Static CGE of SA economy Time: 2003 Policy scenarios: • -15% CO2 emissions achieved through C tax, energy input tax or energy-intensive goods tax • Lump-sum rebate to households • Sensitivity analysis on economic rigidities and labor market distortions Outcome: • Market rigidities critical in choice of instrument and impact on welfare and equity 4 December 2014 15 Alton et al. 2012, 2014 Question: What impact of a C tax on SA? Model: Dynamic CGEM of SA linked to energy sector model Time: 2005 to 2025 Policy scenarios: • Domestic C tax ; C tax + border tax adjustment; Unilateral C tax + BTA in SA trading partners • 3 recycling options: sales tax; corporate tax; transfers Outcome: • Phased-in C tax reaching $30/tCO2 in 2022 achieves 2025 SA emissions target • Recycling option strongly impacts trade-off between distribution and growth 4 December 2014 16 Musango et al. 2014 Objective: Multicriteria analysis of “green economy” policies Model: South Africa Green Economy Model • Differential equations • Economic and natural resource dynamics Timeframe: 2001 to 2030 Policy scenarios: • BAU (BAU2%): continuation (slight increase) of investment in natural resources, energy, agriculture and transport • GETS (GE2%): additional 2% investment in above mentioned sectors, targeted to energy (evenly distributed) Outcome: • GE policies do not impact real GDP, increase employment and reduce environmental pressures (including CO2 emissions) Insignificant economic impact of additional investment questionable 4 December 2014 17 THE IMACLIM-SA_V2 MODEL 4 December 2014 18 IMACLIM-SA_v2 Overview Recursive, exogenous growth, “GE” model of a small, open economy IMACLIM approach 2 periods: 2005 (calibration year) to 2035 Calibrated on “hybrid” data • National accounts hybridized with energy data • Agent-specific net-of-tax prices Second-best features in equilibrium structure • Markup prices • Rigid real wages Hybrid top-down/bottom-up vision of technical change • Part nested CES, part BU-informed Leontief 4 December 2014 19 Rationale of IMACLIM approach Experience with France, Brazil suggests that reconciling economic and energy calibration data significantly impacts model outcome “Second-best” market features and explicit integration of technical constraints allow testing broad range of views/beliefs about the functioning of the economy 4 December 2014 20 Modeling scope 4 primary factors • Capital (FCC), 3 labour classes 10 goods/production sectors: • 5 E sectors, E-intensive, Manufacture, High-skill services, Low-skill sectors, Transport services 5 household (expenditure) classes Secondary income distribution • Taxes and transfers between agents • Debt positions (under constant rate assumption) 4 December 2014 21 Specific development for IMACLIM_SA Hybridization of national accounts and energy tables for South Africa Skill level differentiation with varying degrees of rigidities and limited substitutability Integrating bottom-up information on the SA energy sector from SATIM energy model 4 December 2014 22 10 Production sectors Sector Name Content COA Coal Coal OIL Oil Oil resources GAS Gas Gas resources, Gas distribution REF Refineries Refineries ELC Electricity Electricity EIN Energy Intensive Industries Gold, Other mining, Petrochemical industry, Other NMM products, Basic iron/steel, Non-ferrous metals MAN Manufacturing Food, Footwear, Metals basic manufacturing, Electrical machinery, Radio, Transport equipment, Other manufacturing TRS Transport Transport services LSS Low-Skill Sectors Agriculture, Construction, Trade, Hotels and restaurants, Domestic and other services HSS High-Skill Services Water, Communications, Financial intermediation, Real estate, Business activities, General government, Health and social work, Education Sectors in IMACLIM_SA model (left) matched with South Africa Social Accounting Matrix sectors (w/energy sectors split up during hybridization process) – Automatic aggregation / disaggregation 23 Factor trade-offs in production Y EIN MAN COA Mat KLE OIL GAS TRS LSS KL E REF L12 L1 4 December 2014 L K ELC HSS L3 L2 Constant Elasticity of Substitution (CES) Fixed production coefficients (Leontieff) 24 Producer costs Net wage in each sector varies proportionally to average wage Labour costs pL1,2,3 are net wages + labour taxes Capital cost pK is weighted average price of investment goods (homogeneous capital good) Production prices are factor costs + output tax τY + markup τNOS 10 𝑝𝑌,𝑖 = 𝑝𝑗,𝑖 𝛼𝑗,𝑖 + 𝑗=1 4 December 2014 3 𝑝𝐿𝑗,𝑖 𝑙𝑗,𝑖 + 𝑝𝐾 𝑘𝑖 + 𝜏𝑌,𝑖 𝑝𝑌,𝑖 + 𝜏𝑁𝑂𝑆,𝑖 𝑝𝑌,𝑖 𝑗=1 25 Agent-specific consumer prices Consumption prices pile up trade, transport and agent-specific margins, then taxes 𝑝𝐶,𝑖 = 𝑝𝑌,𝑖 1 + 𝜏𝑀𝐶,𝑖 + 𝜏𝑀𝑇,𝑖 + 𝜏𝑀𝑆𝐶,𝑖 + 𝑡𝐶1,𝑖 + 𝑡𝐶2,𝑖 Negative trade and transport margins adjust to balance out positive (calibrated) ones 4 December 2014 26 Households behaviour GDI of class h is wages + share of operating surplus GOS + pensions RP + unemployment benefits RU+ residual social transfers RA + residual transfers AT – income tax TIT – interest payments ih Dh 𝐺𝐷𝐼ℎ = 𝑤𝑗,𝑖 𝐿𝑗ℎ,𝑖 + 𝜔𝐾ℎ 𝐺𝑂𝑆 + 𝑖,𝑗 𝑅𝑖ℎ + 𝜔𝐴𝑇ℎ 𝐴𝑇 − 𝑇𝐼𝑇 − 𝑖ℎ 𝐷ℎ 𝑃,𝑈,𝐴 Classes consume, save and invest proportionally to GDI ; their self-financing capacity SFC is the difference between their savings S and investments GFCF 𝑆𝐹𝐶ℎ = 𝑆ℎ − 𝐺𝐹𝐶𝐹ℎ = 𝜏𝑆ℎ 𝐺𝐷𝐼ℎ − 𝜏𝐺𝐹𝐶𝐹ℎ 𝐺𝐷𝐼ℎ 4 December 2014 27 Households consumption trade-offs CONS + basic needs of: ELC, REF, COA, TRS COMP TRS EIN MAT 4 December 2014 LSS HSS EAG REF ELC 28 Agents’ positions: Firms Firms’ GDI is share of operating surplus GOS + pension levies TACS + residual transfers AT – business tax TBT – pensions RP – debt service iS DS 𝐺𝐷𝐼𝑆 = 𝜔𝐾𝑆 𝐺𝑂𝑆 + 𝑇𝐴𝐶𝑆 + 𝜔𝐴𝑇𝑆 𝐴 𝑇 − 𝑇𝐵𝑇 − 𝑅𝑃 − 𝑖𝑆 𝐷𝑆 Firms invest constant proportion of own GDI 𝐹𝐵𝐶𝐹𝑆 = 𝜏𝐹𝐵𝐶𝐹𝑆 𝐺𝐷𝐼𝑆 Self-financing capacity SFCS is GDIS remainder 𝑆𝐹𝐶𝑆 = 𝑅𝐷𝐵𝑆 − 𝐹𝐵𝐶𝐹𝑆 = (1 − 𝜏𝐹𝐵𝐶𝐹𝑆 )𝑅𝐷𝐵𝑆 4 December 2014 29 Agents’ positions: public admin. Government gross disposable income is computed as households’ and firms’: GDIG = Tax revenues + share of gross operating surplus – unemployment benefits - other social benefits + share of residual transfers Public expenditures pG G and public investment GFCFG are fixed shares of GDP Public budget deficit SFCG is remainder of GDIG 10 𝑆𝐹𝐶𝐺 = 𝐺𝐷𝐼𝐺 − 𝑝𝐺,𝑖 𝐺𝑖 − 𝐺𝐹𝐶𝐹𝐺 𝑖=1 4 December 2014 30 Trade and the Rest-of-the-World Domestic and international goods assumed homogeneous in each sector Imports market shares and absolute exports (quantities) elastic to terms-of-trade + exogenous trend for exports 𝑀𝑖 𝑀𝑖2005 𝑝𝑀𝑖2005 𝑝𝑌𝑖 = 𝑌𝑖 𝑌𝑖2005 𝑝𝑌𝑖2005 𝑝𝑀𝑖 𝜎𝑀𝑝𝑖 𝑋𝑖 𝑋𝑖2005 = 1+𝜃 30 𝑝𝑋𝑖2005 𝑝𝑀𝑖 𝑝𝑀𝑖2005 𝑝𝑋𝑖 𝜎𝑋𝑝𝑖 ROW agent balances current account 𝑆𝐹𝐶𝑅𝑂𝑊 = 𝑝𝑀𝑖 𝑀𝑖 − 𝑝𝑋𝑖 𝑋𝑖 + 𝑖𝑖 𝐷𝑖 − 𝐴𝑇 𝐻,𝑆,𝐺 4 December 2014 31 Debt accumulation Self-financing capacities of 8 agents’ net of debt interest payments are assumed to linearly transit from their 2005 to their 2035 values • Agents are: firms, public administration, 5 household classes, and the rest-of-the-world This allows computing compounded interest payments as functions of 2005 debt levels and 2005 observed agent-specific interest rates (ratios of payments to net debt), which are assumed constant to the horizon 4 December 2014 32 Goods & investment market balances Mass conservation equation: domestic output and imports balance household and public consumptions, immobilization and exports 𝑌𝑖 + 𝑀𝑖 = 𝐶𝑖 + 𝐺𝑖 + 𝐼𝑖 + 𝑋𝑖 Total GFCF of agents matches immobilization by adjustment of the GOS share accruing to firms 𝐺𝐹𝐶𝐹𝑖 = 𝑝𝐼𝑖 𝐼𝑖 𝐻,𝑆,𝐺 Immobilized capital is homogeneous; investment ratio to consumption of fixed capital is fixed 𝐼𝑖 = 𝑘𝑗 𝑌𝑗 4 December 2014 𝐼𝑖2005 𝑘𝑗2005 𝑌𝑗2005 33 Market Balance - Employment Labor endowment 𝐿 proportional to total active population, split in 3 skill levels 𝐿1 , 𝐿2 , 𝐿3 For each skill j unemployment uj is endogenous 1 − 𝑢𝑗 𝐿𝑗 = 𝑙𝑗,𝑖 𝑌𝑖 𝑖 … and real sector-average wage wj /CPI corrected for share ωLPj of labor productivity gains Φj accruing to workers is elastic to unemployment (wage curve) 1 − 𝜔𝐿𝑃𝑗 4 December 2014 𝑤𝑗 𝑢𝑗2005 = 𝑤𝑗2005 𝐶𝑃𝐼 + 𝜔𝐿𝑃𝑗 𝜙𝑗 𝐶𝑃𝐼 𝑢𝑗 𝜎𝑤𝑢𝑗 34 Model implementation 4 December 2014 35 Model implementation (cont.) Programmed under Excel and VBA Advantage: • Ease of use and of communication • Easy visualization of data/result in accounting matrix term • Link to input data Limitations: • Equation programming less efficient • Excel solver constraints About 5 mn/run on a recent computer 4 December 2014 36 CALIBRATION & SCENARIOS 4 December 2014 37 Overview Base year: 2005 • Data availability Selected Horizon: 2035 • Consistent with planning horizon Step #1: Build image of 2005 economy Step #2: Build projected image of 2035 economy w/o carbon tax (RP) Step #3: Introduce C-tax at constant budget position, with no recycling and 5 recycling options 4 December 2014 38 Data hybridization Reconciling material and monetary balances Material Flows Energy balances + energy price stats Monetary Flows I/O Tables Data hybridization: Methodology Sources statistiques disponibles Étape 1 Matrice en volume (unité physique) CF CI MAT MAT CI Matrice en prix (monnaie/unité physique) Qij Pij M M Étape 2 CF Factures des achats de matière MAT CI CF M Vij = Pij . Qij AUTRE MAT CF M VA MAT AUTRE Étape 3 Vij Insertion des factures des achats (Vij) & réarrangement des nomenclatures Data hybridization: Application to SA An example: SAM vs. "electricity bills" Supplied by electricity sector to… Refineries SAM, incl gas distr. (MZAR) Energy balance and prices (MZAR) Difference (to EIN) 222 1 112 + 890 5 484 1 451 - 4 033 646 1 137 + 491 Basic Iron & Steel 2 563 4 278 + 1 715 Non-ferrous 1 562 2 919 + 1 357 889 685 - 204 Other sectors 23 265 18 551 - 3 777 All sectors 33 704 30 133 - 3 571 Petro- & chemical industry NMM Basic metals manufacturing 4 December 2014 41 Population growth assumptions 15 287 14 407 None 1 589 287 Primary 7 530 3 764 Lower secondary 13 248 15 075 Upper secondary 9 701 18 989 Post secondary 1 407 2 241 33 477 40 356 65+ 2 689 4 765 All 51 453 59 528 0-14 15-64 Total Skill 1 2035 Skill 3 Skill 2 2010 Population per age group and education in 2010 and 2035; Source: UN projections, distributed by education class following IIASA projections 4 December 2014 42 Integration of bottom-up information Energy Investment Plan Technical coefficients for inputs to electricity based on outcomes of SATIM, ERC of Univ of Cape Town’s bottom-up (TIMES) model • PJ fuel per PJ of ELC • Units of capital per PJ of ELC • Interpretation of O&M costs for labour, and goods & services inputs per PJ of ELC SATIM simulations include South Africa’s Energy Investment Plan (IRP policy updated) and different carbon tax levels 4 December 2014 43 Economic growth assumptions Generating real per capita growth and reducing unemployment at the same time turns out to be difficult • Base year unemployment is already high • Population growth is rapid We achieve both in RP by combining: • Autonomous labor productivity increase of +0.375% (skill 1) to +1.25%/year (skill 3) • Increase in demand for exports (+2%/year) • Only part of productivity gains passed on to wages (percentage skill-class dependent) • Capital productivity gains (+1.5%/year) • Material & services intensity decreases (-0.25%/year) 4 December 2014 44 Key features of RP 2005 2035 - RP Population (millions) 47.6 59.5 GDP (billion 2005 Rands) 1 571 5 757 4.4% annual growth rate GDP per capita (2005 USD PPP) 9 448 27 701 Equivalent to Spain in 2005 Unemployment (%) 38.8% 24.6% 443 1017 CO2 emissions (MtCO2) note +129% Though economically plausible, this outcome is strongly dependent on parameters 4 December 2014 45 Discussion of RP – Structural transformation of labor market According to projections, skill 3 population more than doubles relative to 2005, while skill 1 + skill 2 population increases by 8%. Total working age population (thousands) 2005 2035 Skill 1 7 748 3 530 Skill 2 16 161 22 662 Skill 3 6 182 14 164 Correlated to this, tensions on skill 3 jobs ease, while tensions on skills 1-2 appear. Broad unemployment rate 4 December 2014 2005 2035 (RP) Skill 1 41% 10% Skill 2 44% 23% Skill 3 26% 31% 46 Carbon Taxes Economy-wide Carbon tax (Ctax), applied to intermediate consumption of firms and on household final direct consumption of energy Given (long-term) production trade-offs embedded in the model, the Ctax is implicitly assumed to be imposed progressively over time Purely domestic scheme: • No levy on imports • No rebate for exports C tax in 2035: R100/tCO2 to R500/tCO2 4 December 2014 47 Recycling options R0. No recycling: C revenues are added to government resources (no budget position constraint) R1. VAT rate is adjusted downward, budget deficit held identical to RP (-2%) • Homogeneous reduction in VAT rate across all products R2. Income tax rate is adjusted downward (same budget rule) R3. Combines R1 and R2 R4. Proceeds from carbon tax add up to government expenditures on “public administration” (salaries and consumption) R5. Proceeds from carbon tax directed to an across the board increase in “other transfers” • Transfers increase by same amount for all households (lumpsum) 4 December 2014 48 RESULTS 4 December 2014 49 Environmental outcome RP (IRP) RP R0 R1 R2 R3 R4 Carbon tax scenarios (ZAR/tCO2) 100 300 500 853 (-16%) 896 (-12%) 869 (-15%) 878 (-14%) 867 (-15%) 656 (-36%) 768 (-25%) 659 (-35%) 721 (-29%) 693 (-32%) 596 (-41%) 559 (-45%) 1 017 R5 Total South Africa CO2 emissions in 2035 with IRP investment plan for electricity, for different scenarios in IMACLIM-SA-v2 (MtCO2, and difference to RP in percentage) 4 December 2014 Emissions increase significantly relative to 2005 (+129%) Rapid but decreasing response to Ctax • Calibration of degrees of flexibility • Basic consumption levels • Break-even point of other technologies with coal lies above ZAR 100/tCO2 50 Environmental outcome w/o IRP Ref w/o IRP Carbon tax scenarios (ZAR/tCO2) 100 Ref w/o 300 500 1 148 877 655 (-24%) (-43%) 921 757 669 R1 (-20%) (-34%) (-42%) 894 R2 (-22%) 903 715 610 R3 (-21%) (-38%) (-47%) 892 689 573 R4 (-22%) (-40%) -50% 898 702 593 R5 (-22%) (-39%) (-48%) Total South Africa CO2 emissions in 2035 for different scenarios in IMACLIM-SA-v2 w/o IRP (MtCO2, and difference to RP in percentage) R0 4 December 2014 Reference emissions higher than RP • CES underestimates planned investments in low-carbon technologies But is also more responsive to Ctax 51 Economic outcome All C tax scenarios have growth prospects of higher than 2,8% average real growth per year RP growth rate sensitive to assumptions on drivers of growth Still, Ctax recycling schemes have lower real growth forecasts than RP RP (IRP) Carbon tax scenarios (ZAR/tCO2) 100 300 R0 3,9% 3,0% R1 4,2% 3,9% 3,5% R2 4,0% R3 4,0% 3,5% 2,9% R4 4,0% 3,4% 2,8% R5 4,0% 3,3% 2,8% RP 500 4,4% Average real GDP growth per year (for 2005 – 2035) for different scenarios in IMACLIM-SA-v2 R1, recycling through VAT reduction has significantly higher economic growth rates than other scenarios (but higher emissions as well) Scenarios have slightly different results for public debt 4 December 2014 52 Economic outcome (absolute terms) RP RP R0 R1 R2 R3 R4 R5 Carbon tax scenarios (ZAR/tCO2) 100 300 500 315% -14% 344% -6% 321% -12% 329% -10% 324% -12% 322% -12% 245% -33% 314% -14% 278% -24% 280% 237% 271% -26% 268% -27% 228% -38% 228% -38% 366,5% Average real GDP growth (for 2005 – 2035) for different scenarios in IMACLIM-SA-v2 (and difference with RP) 4 December 2014 53 w/o IRP, CES would yield slightly higher growth Ref w/o IRP Carbon tax scenarios (ZAR/tCO2) 100 300 R0 4,1% 3,3% R1 4,4% 4,1% 3,9% R2 4,1% R3 4,2% 3,7% 3,3% R4 4,2% 3,6% 3,2% R5 4,2% 3,6% 3,1% Ref w/o 500 4,6% Average real GDP growth per year (for 2005 – 2035) for different scenarios in IMACLIM-SA-v2 w/o IRP 4 December 2014 54 Economic outcome w/IRP Economic outcome: average annual real GDP growth IRP ref 100 300 R0 3,9% 3,0% R1 4,2% 3,9% 3,5% R2 4,0% R3 4,0% 3,5% 2,9% R4 4,0% 3,4% 2,8% R5 4,0% 3,3% 2,8% RP 4 December 2014 Carbon tax scenarios (ZAR/tCO2) 500 4,4% 55 Employment outcome IRP ref Carbon tax scenarios (ZAR/tCO2) 100 300 R0 31,0% 41,0% R1 26,9% 29,1% 32,7% R2 29,3% R3 28,5% 33,6% 39,5% R4 28,7% 34,4% 40,8% R5 28,9% 34,8% 40,7% RP 500 25,4% Broad unemployment levels in 2035 (% of active population) for different scenarios in IMACLIM-SA-v2 4 December 2014 Employment outcomes follow pattern for real GDP growth: Most scenarios improve versus base year unemployment (38,8%) Significantly better outcome of R1 recycling option 56 Employment outcome w/o IRP RP Carbon tax scenarios (ZAR/tCO2) 100 300 R0 29,7% 38,5% R1 25,6% 27,2% 28,9% R2 28,0% R3 27,2% 31,5% 35,4% R4 27,4% 32,2% 36,8% R5 27,6% 32,8% 37,3% RP 500 24,6% Broad unemployment levels in 2035 (% of active population) for different scenarios in IMACLIM-SA-v2 4 December 2014 Employment outcomes follow pattern for real GDP growth: All scenarios improve versus base year unemployment (38,8%) Significantly better outcome of R1 recycling option 57 Distributional implications Large decrease of inequality in RP and all Ctax scenarios • GDI per capita ratio between class 5 and class 1 decreases from 41 to 21 Decrease in inequality follows from relaxation of constraint on high-skilled labour market Results are sensitive to labour market hypotheses Lumpsum transfers of carbon tax revenues (R5) have a large impact, due to still low income levels in classes 1 to 3 4 December 2014 IRP ref Carbon tax scenarios (ZAR/tCO2) 100 300 R0 20,2 19,8 R1 20,5 20,6 20,5 R2 20,8 R3 20,7 21,1 21,3 R4 20,3 19,9 19,5 R5 15,5 11,2 9,1 RP 500 20,5 Ratio of class 5 GDI per capita over class 1 GDI per capita for different scenarios in IMACLIM-SAv2 (higher means larger income inequality) 58 Distributional implications w/o IRP are slightly worse Large decrease of inequality in RP and all Ctax scenarios RP Carbon tax scenarios (ZAR/tCO2) 100 300 R0 20,4 20,1 Decrease in inequality follows from relaxation of constraint on high-skilled labour market R1 20,7 20,8 20,9 R2 21,1 R3 20,9 21,3 21,6 Results are sensitive to labour market hypotheses R4 20,5 20,2 19,9 R5 15,6 11,5 9,5 • GDI per capita ratio between class 5 and class 1 decreases from 41 to 21 Lumpsum transfers of carbon tax revenues (R5) have a large impact, due to still low income levels in classes 1 to 3 4 December 2014 RP 500 20,7 Ratio of class 5 GDI per capita over class 1 GDI per capita for different scenarios in IMACLIM-SAv2 (higher means larger income inequality) 59 CARBON TAX FOR INVESTING IN EDUCATION? 4 December 2014 60 Labour market and education (1/2) By assumption of constant allocation of degrees over skill levels, South Africa changes from a country with a lot of people (63%) with only a high school degree working in skill 3 jobs, 2005 RP 38,8% 25,4% - skill 3 26,5% 31,0% - skill 2 43,7% 23,2% - skill 1 41,0% 10,2% Overall (broad) unemployment level 2005 and RP 2035 unemployment levels disaggregated by skill level into a country with over-supply of skill 3 Labour market model is segmented, meaning no spill-over of high-skilled people to low-skilled jobs 4 December 2014 61 Does RP justify progress in education? If… • we follow IIASA’s projection of educational attainment, and • we follow international data on expenditure by student by type of education for South Africa (UNESCO, World Bank, StatsSA) • and if we assume education keeps the same share of public expenditures (20% in 2005), and given: • (i) relative stagnation in number of pupils, • (ii) gov expenditures increase as GDP • (iii) wage moderation in HSS Then: there is ample room for largely decreasing pupils to teacher ratio – continuing current trends (currently 29, against 32 in 2005) If… share of education in public expenditure drops to 10% (France in 2013), there is room for keeping pupil to teacher ratio constant • In that case answer is: yes, RP and education prospects are aligned. 4 December 2014 62 Labour market and education (2/2) What if companies stop hiring (most) high-school leavers for high skilled jobs? When assuming "degree inflation" disaggregated labour market results change radically, and economic growth is negatively affected by "degree rigidity" 4 December 2014 RP Degree inflation 25,4% 26,1% - skill 3 31,0% 7,3% - skill 2 23,2% 35,7% - skill 1 10,2% 13,3% 4,4% 4,1% Overall broad unemployment level Real avg GDP growth per year RP 2035 unemployment levels disaggregated by skill level compared to with degree inflation 63 What model for investment in education? We want to keep technological coefficients for labour factor by skill level in the production function We do not model "degree inflation" with unemployment level endogenously Therefore: • in our segmented labour market model for South Africa investing in having more people with a degrees for highskilled jobs doesn’t make sense What we can model is additional impact of investment in education through productivity gains 4 December 2014 64 Investment in education scenario For projection year the education budget increases 10%, compared to 20% of government expenses • Meaning: government expenses in 2035 are 2% higher compared to constant expenses over PIB assumption Forced social return: • The benefits from the investment in productivity terms is a reduction of costs on labour (for domestic production) • These should be 10% bigger than the increase in expenses on education in the same year (2035) Model outcomes are: • A required (for social return) additional labour productivity gain • Other macro-economic outcomes 4 December 2014 65 Results for IRP plus R0, R1, and R2 Educational investment with… R0 (no) R1 (VAT) R2 (income tax) Carbon tax level: 100 ZAR/tCO2 Resultsing changes for period of 2005 to 2035: Additional labour productivity +3,23% +3,18% +3,23% GDP growth (2005 - 2035) +1,59% -0,29% +1,25% Overall 2035 unemployment -0,97% +1,48% +1,03% Comparison of results of carbon tax recycling scenarios with additional investment in education vs. Recycling scenarios without additional investment in education Impacts of investment in education under our assumptions slightly improves either slightly deteriorates outcomes of recycling 4 December 2014 66 CONCLUSION AND DISCUSSION 4 December 2014 67 Reference projection sensitivity A large number of runs allow us to stress… The conflicting impacts of labour productivity on growth and employment in our second-best setting: imperfect labour markets, markup pricing, partially Leontief input structures require adjustments of other inputs productivities to balance growth The impact on unemployment and growth of the share of productivity gains accruing to workers vs. to cost reduction The importance of trade: the exogenous upward trend of export markets (with terms-of-trade corrections) accounts for more than a third of growth of Reference projection after feedbacks • What impact of carbon taxes abroad on international prices? 4 December 2014 68 Labour market segmentation Labour market segmentation is tricky in our modelling timeframe of one long leap into the future • Unchanged segmentation rules over 30 years questionable; changing rules strongly impacts unemployment distribution • Risk of double counting by simultaneously programming LP increases and massive skill shifts • Uncertainty about the costs of the shifts envisioned by IIASA: built in the reference or requiring extra investments? Further work will look into • Dedicated literature stressing the differentiated substitutabilities among skill levels/aggregates and K 4 December 2014 69 Recycling options Clear differences in environmental and economic impacts of C tax recycling options • Recycling through VAT reduction (Sc. R1) better option by focusing on consumption incentive • Whereas income tax and lump-sum recycling partly absorbed by savings • Lumpsum recycling (scen. R5) outperforms RP on reducing inequality … but no free lunch • R1 still costs 0.2pts average annual growth and increases unemployment by 1pt per ZAR100 tax 4 December 2014 70 Technical change and CO2 emissions Technical assumptions are central to CO2 emissions in RP and to responses to Ctax • Strong contrast between nested CES and BU-informed runs illustrates biases attached to poorly-backed elasticity estimates 4 December 2014 71 Thank you 4 December 2014 72