* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Download Falling Short of Expectations - Legacy Private Trust Company
Survey
Document related concepts
Transcript
Volume 11, May 2016 Falling Short of Expectations Here we go again. Like a scene from “Groundhog Day”, economists once again fell into the trap of hoping things would be different in the first quarter. But as was the case in both 2014 and 2015, we once again woke up to an eerily familiar pattern – an economy that is stumbling out of the starting gate. To make matters worse, forecasters – both in the private and policy-making sectors – were convinced until recently that growth would stage a solid rebound from the tepid showing in the fourth quarter of last year. Indeed, last December Federal Reserve officials thought conditions would be strong enough to justify four interestrate increases this year. Things are not turning out that way, at least for now. The advance estimate released by the Bureau of Economic Analysis in late April reports that real GDP expanded at a mere .05 percent annual rate in the first quarter, even weaker than the already-tepid 1.4 percent pace of the 2015 fourth quarter. That would be the weakest twoquarter reading in three years and offers little hope that the economy will break out of the subpar growth rate that has characterized the nearly seven-year old recovery from the Great Recession. Keeping to the script, the Federal Reserve dialed down its expectations and now plans to raise rates only twice before year-end. Private forecasters and financial markets are even more skeptical, placing even odds that only one hike will be forthcoming. Some statisticians wonder if there is a disturbing bias in the first-quarter data that makes the economy seem weaker than it actually is. But when things don’t change year in and year out, quarterly quirks don’t seem to matter. Call it the new normal or, as the International Monetary Fund (IMF) Chief Christine Lagarde prefers, the new mediocre. Speaking of the IMF, its revised World Economic Outlook released in April is also painting a gloomier picture for the global economy, lowering global growth estimates this year to 3.2 percent from 3.4 percent projected in January. Ironically, the IMF singles out the U.S. as a relatively bright spot in the larger scheme of things, noting that less restrictive fiscal policies, healthy balance sheets and a steadily improving housing market will sustain growth at about last year’s pace of 2.4 percent. Spain’s projected 2.6 percent is the only advanced economy expected to be stronger, but it reflects a decline from the 3.2 percent growth rate in 2015. So if nothing else, give credit to the U.S. for being the best house in a deteriorating neighborhood. First-Quarter Growth: Weak but Resilient Like the IMF world outlook, the Federal Reserve also cut its growth forecast for the U.S. at its March policy meeting, revising it down to 2.2 percent for 2016 from 2.4 percent projected last December. But even that lowered growth forecast will be hard to meet as it was made before the Fed knew how sickly the first quarter would turn out to be. By all accounts, the final The vast majority of month of the period was much weaker than expected, economists believe the reflecting surprisingly soft odds of a recession this retail sales and production. year are very small. To meet the Fed’s growth ...most believe the forecast for the year, activity first-quarter slowdown would have to accelerate strongly over the next three overstates the economy’s quarters, something that’s fundamental weakness. hardly a sure thing. That said, the skeptical statisticians may be on to something. In five of the past six years, the first quarter has been significantly weaker than the rest of the year, a recurring pattern that raises questions about the accuracy of seasonal adjustments. Some feel that the outsized contraction in output during the Great Recession may have messed up computations of seasonal patterns, albeit the jury of experts is still out on this issue. Still, the Great Recession ended nearly seven years ago, and the ups and downs since then have not lifted the overall growth rate much beyond the lackluster 2 percent or so. If the economy were growing faster – say close to the 4 percent-plus typical of past expansions – a recurring slowdown in a particularly quarter would not be worrisome. However, with growth hovering near stall speed for the last two quarters, economists understandably worry that a sudden shock can knock the recovery off the rails. Continued next page Persistently Weak First Quarter GDP Growth Rate 4.0 Rest of Year (Average Growth Rate) 3.0 2.0 1.0 0.0 First Quarter -1.0 -2.0 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 Falling Short of Expectations Continued from front page However, the vast majority of economists believe the odds of a recession this year are very small. That appears to be an indication that most believe the first-quarter slowdown overstates the economy’s fundamental weakness. Like the corresponding first quarters before it, the latest setback is widely perceived to be a temporary soft patch that opens the door for another revival in the spring and summer months. Indeed, considering the headwinds buffeting the economy during the quarter – the lagged effects of the strong dollar, extreme turbulence in the financial markets, weak foreign demand and uncertainty created by geopolitical turmoil surrounding repeated terrorist attacks – even the tepid advance can arguably be viewed as more a sign of resilience that weakness. Consumers Pulling Back The uncertainty is whether the economy can recover from its recent malaise and deliver a respectable performance over the rest of the year, much as was the case in 2015. By respectable, of course, we are talking about a growth rate within the upper level of the 2.0 – 2.5 percent range seen since the end of the Great Recession – not the 3.0 to 4.0 percent typical of previous upturns. Despite the slow start, last year’s 2.4 percent increase in real GDP was just a tad under the strongest annual gain of the recovery so far – the 2.5 percent increase in 2010. Keep in mind that last year’s growth was powered mainly by consumers. The 3.1 percent increase in real personal consumption was the strongest annual gain in ten years, far exceeding the 2.0 percent average growth rate over the previous five years. A key contribution came from higher expenditures on health care, which largely reflects the increase in households enrolled in Obamacare. Also, Americans resumed their love affair with cars, the biggest discretionary purchase outside of a home. In 2015, sales of autos and SUVs soared to 17.33 million, the most in fifteen years. But those two key drivers may not be as influential this year. The growth in health care spending is already starting to wane, as the biggest growth spurt in enrollment under the Affordable Care Act (Obamacare) is behind us and medical care costs are slowing. Meanwhile, the ardor for autos is starting to cool. After hitting a peak annual rate of 18.1 million last October, sales of autos and SUVs have Continued next page Legacy’s Core Equity Portfolio Legacy’s Global Tactical Growth Portfolio The Core Equity Portfolio is designed to ensure broad participation in the equity market, with less than average market volatility, while effectively producing a meaningful performance edge for our clients. Our active valuation strategy and analysis focuses on individual stock selection in conjunction with economic sector discipline that looks beyond mainstream consensus to construct customized client portfolios. The The Global Tactical Growth (GTG) Portfolio is a disciplined, proprietary investment solution designed to maximize long-term investment returns with moderate risk. Legacy’s goal is to position the GTG portfolio in the best performing asset classes (domestic equity, fixed income, foreign equity, foreign and domestic real estate, commodities and currencies) using all Exchange Traded Products. The graphic below shows the sector weightings in the Core Portfolio as of April 2016. The chart below shows the GTG asset allocation mix across the four major asset classes over the past six months. Global Tactical Growth Portfolio Composition Core Equity Portfolio Composition Financials 16% Energy 100 4% Utilities 4% 80 Information Technology 16% 60 Industrials 16% 40 20 Health Care 16% Materials 4% Consumer 0 Discretionary 16% Consumer Staples 8% 100% 100 80% 80 60% 60 40% 40 20% 20 0% 0 Nov ’15 Dec ’15 Jan ’16 Feb ’16 Mar ’16 Apr ’16 Domestic Equity Foreign Equity Fixed Income Alternatives (Real Estate, Commodities, Foreign Currency) Past performance does not predict future results. Current and future results may be lower or higher than those referenced in this newsletter. Investments are not FDICinsured, nor are they deposits of or guaranteed by a bank or any other entity. Investment return and principal value will fluctuate and investments may lose value. Falling Short of Expectations Continued from previous page since fallen erratically, hitting 16.5 million in March. The slowdown in auto sales, both in numbers and dollars spent, contributed importantly to the retail sales slump that month. Vital Housing Support If, as seems likely, consumers will be less of a driving force this year, the economy’s growth engine will need to draw fuel from elsewhere to match last year’s performance. The prospects are few, but there is at least one promising candidate. Homebuilding activity, which made a significant contribution to growth last year, should continue to provide meaningful support going forward. Housing starts increased by 10.5 percent in 2015 and are up 14.5 percent in the first quarter from a year ago. Importantly, the biggest gains are now coming from singlefamily as opposed to multifamily construction, which had previously been the biggest driver of the housing recovery. This is important for two reasons. First, single family construction delivers a bigger bang for the buck in terms of overall GDP growth, as an individual home requires more resources – labor, building materials and supplies – than an apartment unit. Adding up these resources translates into a construction value of $323 thousand for an average single family home compared to $128 thousand for a multifamily rental apartment, according to the National Association of Home Builders. Second, construction of a single family home generates 2.97 full-time jobs, nearly three times as many per unit as a multifamily building. This is already energizing the labor market. Over the past six months, the increase in housing starts has generated 200 thousand construction jobs, the largest total for a similar span since 2006 that turned out to be the tail-end of the housing boom. The good news is that single-family construction should lead the housing recovery going forward, reflecting the ongoing strength in the job market that is boosting incomes and spurring more household formations. Crosscurrents Will Keep Growth in Check On balance, housing should provide moderately stronger support for the economy this year than in 2015. Some additional help is expected from the public sector, as state and local governments are loosening their purse strings even as Washington moves further away from fiscal austerity, reflecting a projected widening of the budget deficit this year. However, the business sector is still not stepping up to the plate. Corporations are retaining a tightfisted attitude towards expanding capacity or investing in productivity-enhancing equipment that crimped growth late last year and the first quarter of this year. One daunting headwind is the weak global economy, which together with the dollar’s climb from mid-2014 to late last year clobbered exports and manufacturing activity last year. That drag has carried over into this year as exports continued to slump through the first quarter. However, the drag from trade may soon ease, as the dollar has stabilized and even weakened a bit against major currencies in recent months. That said, the greenback’s pullback is a mixed blessing because it largely reflects perceptions that the U.S. economy will be too weak to justify as many rate hikes as the Federal Reserve had planned to put into effect late last year. Putting it all together, the economy’s growth engine is still not firing on all cylinders, dampening hopes that it will shift into a much higher gear this year. One wild card is the election. Ordinarily, the economy tends to fare better in the fourth year of a presidential cycle, growing faster than the third year in 10 out of the last 14 elections. In the four times it hasn’t, the economy was in a recession. Barring a sudden shock, it’s unlikely that a downturn is in the cards for the U.S. this year. However, the escalating rancor being expressed during the current campaign and the increasing acceptance of candidates espousing some revolutionary ideas for the economy could well heighten uncertainty over future policies. That’s something economists can’t put into their crystal ball. n Growth Boost in Presidential Election Years Pecent Change from Previous Year in Real GDP 6.0 4.0 2.0 0.0 -2.0 -4.0 -6.0 60 64 68 72 76 80 84 88 92 96 00 04 08 12 To learn more about Legacy and our services, call 920.967.5020. Two Neenah Center | Suite 501 | Neenah, WI 54956 | 920-967-5020 | www.lptrust.com © 2016 Legacy Private Trust Company. All rights reserved.