Survey
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
IJE : Volume 6 • Number 1 • June 2012, pp. 111-130 Relationship of Rate of Unemployment and Inflation in Pakistan (Empirical Status Estimation of NAIRU) Mazhar-ul-Haq Baluch* & Azam Amjad Chaudhry** Abstract: The NAIRU is defined as the rate of unemployment at which there is no tendency for inflation to change (Weiner, 1993). The constant NAIRU as well as Time Varying-NAIRU was estimated by applying appropriate needed techniques associated with Hodrick Prescott filter. The NAIRU was estimated considering uni-variate model. The results reflected weak model specification, but expected negative relationship between unemployment and inflation. The results reflected unstable long run relationship between inflation and unemployment since the estimated constant NAIRU was different for every considered periodical segment. The time varying NAIRU was estimated by following the Ball and Mankiw (2002) approach and finally Hodrick Prescott (HP) filter technique. The estimated results were according to the expectations, since the inflation rate remained high during 1981 to 2000. However inflation started declining, the estimated NAIRU also declined and it was lower than inflation for the period. In 2006 the inflation and the unemployment remained up the NAIRU but inflation was relatively higher than the unemployment. Finally, the derived conclusion confirmed the existence of trade off between inflation and unemployment and this trade off ascertain the Phillips curve. Despite measurement problems, NAIRU can be used as a forecasting tool to assess its relationship with unemployment and inflation for policy implication and provide base for inflation targeting and keep unemployment as low as possible without accelerating inflation. 1. INTRODUCTION The rate of unemployment below which rate of inflation tends to accelerate is labelled as the Non-Accelerating Inflation Rate of Unemployment—NAIRU (Shostak. F, 2005). Low Unemployment refers to expansion in production activities in an economy. This implies indirectly strongdemand for goods and services. Under the phenomenon of low unemployment the expansion in demand of goods and services by workers put the pressure to increase the wages, which adversely affect the prices of goods and services due to upward shift of cost of production .This leads to rise in inflation. Rising inflation rate associated with low level of unemployment becomes a challenging component of sound macro-economic policies. In Pakistan inflation and cyclical unemployment pattern have negating effects on the economy as a whole and on individual as well, since the consumption increases without upward shift in production due to challenging increase in cost following the increased input prices. Basically the changes in the inflation rate depend upon labour market slack or the unemployment rate. Actually the direction of movement of inflation could be predicted by * ** Senior Research Fellow ([email protected]) Dean, Department of Economics 112 Mazhar-ul-Haq Baluch & Azam Amjad Chaudhry unemployment level. Conceptually, changes in aggregate demand push inflation and unemployment in opposite directions specifically in the short run. Paul Samuelson and Robert Solow (1960) phrased the term “Phillips Curve” at the 1959 AEA (American Economic Association) meetings to describe that relationship, reacting to the publication of Phillips (1958). A few years later, Melton Friedman (1968) termed it as “natural rate of unemployment,” which more recently has come to be known by the acronym “NAIRU,” standing for the Non-Accelerating Inflation Rate of Unemployment (Gordon, 1997).This leads towards the conclusion that Tobin’s concept “the NAIRU, is expansion of Phillips curve as it provides the base for NAIRU. The unemployment that occurs at full employment, when the economy is producing at potential output, is called the natural rate of unemployment .Consequently the NAIRU is defined as that rate of employment at which there is no tendency for inflation to change (Weiner, 1993). The main problem encountered with the NAIRU is that it was not observed but estimated. Thus considering the prevalent economic environment of the country, inflation and unemployment status, it is essential to assess the relationship of inflation and unemployment in the light of Phillips curve and NAIRU to chalk out the relevant policies theoretically suitable for smoothing economic concern functions. The principal Objective of the study is to assess the relationship between inflation and actual unemployment in the introduced economic environment and estimate the gap between NAIRU and actual unemployment and their relationship with inflation in Pakistan. 2. REVIEW OF LITERATURE Staiger, D; Stock, J. H; and Watson, M .W (1997); in their article titled, “The NAIRU, Unemployment, and Monetary Policy,” focused on “state of the art” models that allows the NAIRU to change overtime. There is evidence that the NAIRU has declined by approximately 1 percentage point over the past 10 years. They also concluded that a natural rate does not exist. This argument could either be based on behalf on a belief that the NAIRU has shifted, or on the wide confidence intervals surrounding the estimates. A theoretical justification for such a position could be that the hysteresis that has been proposed as a description of European unemployment (Blanchard and Summers, 1986) is present in the U.S. economy as well, so that there is no rate of unemployment that is general consistent with constant inflation. We do not believe that the evidence supports this view. Although there is evidence that the NAIRU has shifted, the shifts have been relatively minor over the past three decades. Using total civilian unemployment and the GDP deflator, the NAIRU moved from a low of 4.9 in 1966 to a high of 7.0 in 1978. A more useful, if more difficult, task is to focus on the general problem of forecasting inflation. Certainly, the recent history of the unemployment rate helps to predict inflation over the next year, although it is less valuable over the next two years but other variables are as good or better, including the capacity utilization rate, over labour market variables, interest rates and, at longer horizons, some monetary aggregates. The results suggested that monetary policy should be informed by a wide range of variables, not just unemployment. Wanningen (2000) In his working paper, “NAIRU and Inflation: An Empirical Analysis for Netherlands,”The empirical results show that it is difficult to obtain robust estimates of the NAIRU for the Netherlands. Moreover for short horizons (two years or less) inflation forecasts Relationship of Rate of Unemployment and Inflation in Pakistan… 113 turn out to be quite invariant to changes in thelevel of NAIRU. It is concluded that the NAIRU is not a very reliable information variable for monetary policy. Whelan, K. (1999) In his paper titled, “Real Wage Dynamics and the Phillips Curve,” has examined the role of real wage dynamics in determining aggregate inflation and shown that the Phillips Curve relationship between the change in price inflation and the unemployment rate does not depend on a specific assumption about the pattern of auto-regression in micro level real wages. He also concludes the accelerationist relationship between the change in price inflation and the unemployment rate is consistent with any type of microeconomic real wage dynamics. However these dynamics will determine how supply shocks affect inflation. Evidence on supply shocks and inflation indicates against the traditional real wage formulation. Implications for the recent behaviour of the NAIRU are explored. Llaudes. R, (2005), In his paper titled, “The Phillips Curve and Long –term Unemployment,” studies the role of long-term unemployment in the determination of prices and wages. Labour market theories such as insider- outsider models predict that such type of unemployed are less relevant in the wage formation process than the newly employed. He looks for evidence of this behaviour in a set of OECD countries. He proposes a new specification of the Phillips Curve that contains different unemployment lengths in a time – varying NAIRU setting. He constructs an index of unemployment that assigns different weights to the unemployed based on the length of their spell. The results show that unemployment duration matters in the determination of prices and wages, and a smaller weight ought to be given to the long term unemployed. This modified model has important implications for the policy makers; it produces more accurate forecasts on inflation and more precise estimates of the NAIRU. Rodenburg, P. (2007) In his research article titled, “Derived Measurement in Macroeconomics: Two Approaches for Measuring the NAIRU Considered,” investigates two different procedures for the measurement of the NAIRU; one based on structural modelling while the other is a statistical approach using Vector Auto Regression (VAR)models. Both measurement procedures are assessed by confronting them with the dominant theory of measurement, the Representation Theory of Measurement, which states that for sound measurement a strict isomorphism (strict one-to-one mapping) is needed between variations in the phenomenon (the NAIRU) and numbers. The paper argues that shifts of the Phillips-curve are not a problem for the structural approach to measurement of the NAIRU, as the NAIRU itself is a time-varying concept. It is however, the impossibility to identify the exact shape of the Phillips-curve that causes problems of multiple empirical, relational forms and hence non-unique isomorphic mappings for measurement. While VARmodels are being accused of being ‘theoretical macro econometrics’ in the literature, the Wold decomposition theorem applied to the VAR brings out a stable correspondence between variance of the phenomenon (the NAIRU) and numbers and turns the set of equations into isomorphic mapping that can serve as a useful foundation for the construction of a measuring instrument. 3. METHODOLOGY The Phillips curve is briefly an inverse relationship between the rate of unemployment and rate of increase in money wages or in other words there is a trade-off between wage inflation and 114 Mazhar-ul-Haq Baluch & Azam Amjad Chaudhry unemployment. Phillips (1958) and Friedman (1968) consider the shift of the curve due to the supply side factors and demand side factors. So it is defined as: πt = πte = ε (Ut - UNAIRU) + ε (1) πt = Inflation Rate πet = Expected Inflation Rate Ut = unemployment Rate UNAIRU =Non-accelerating Inflation Rate of Unemployment ε = Parameter that measures the responsiveness of inflation to unemployment The series for inflationary expectations, as is given in equation–1 require for empirical assessment. Following Tootell (1994), Fuhrer (1995) and Eisner (1995) “random walk” model for inflationary expectations is πte = πt-1, so πt -πte=∆πt. When the lags of π t -πte are included in the right hand side of equation-1, this is equivalent to specifying the Phillips relation in the level of inflation and imposing the restriction that sum of the lags add to one i.e. 1 (Staiger, Stock and Waston, 1996). According to Dornbusch and Fisher, 1990; Lipsey et al , 1993, as is given in equation (1) inflation (πt) will decline relative to the expected inflation (πte), if the actual unemployment rate (Ut) exceeds the non-accelerating inflation rate of unemployment (UNAIRU ). In words equation (1) states that the level of price is falling (πt 0) when the unemployment rate exceeds the nonaccelerating inflation rate of unemployment (Ut>UNAIRU), rising (πt> 0) when the unemployment rate is less that the non-accelerating inflation rate of unemployment (Ut > UNAIRU) and is stable (πt = 0) when the unemployment rate is equal to the non–accelerating inflation rate of un- employment (Ut =UNAIRU). Equation (1) has been modified into the ‘expectations augmented and change –in –unemployment extended Phillip curve’ πt= πet- ε( Ut - UNAIRU ) – (Ut – Ut-1) (2) Where, = is a parameter that measures the extent to which changes in unemployment (Ut – Ut-1) affect the level of inflation. This parameter indicates that the larger is , the more important is the effect of changing unemployment on the inflation rate. Equation (2) the consideration reflects the situation where in the case that the unemployment gap (Ut-UNAIRU) is negative, and increasing in absolute terms, then actual unemployment is decreasing, meaning that Ut – Ut-1< 0. On the contrary, in the case that the unemployment gap (Ut - UNAIRU) is negative and decreasing in absolute terms, then actual unemployment is increasing, meaning that Ut – Ut-1> 0. Usually are expected higher inflationary pressures or less rapidly falling inflation in the former case than in the latter (Pekos et al., 2004). The NAIRU is generally defined as the level of unemployment that is consistent to a stable expectations-augmented Phillips relation. Setting aside the lagged effect, the expectationsaugmented Phillips relation can be estimated as: πt= πet- ε (Ut -1-UNAIRU ) + xt+ vt (3) where, Ut = the unemployment rate Relationship of Rate of Unemployment and Inflation in Pakistan… 115 π = the rate of inflation πte = the expected rate of inflation = πt-1 UNAIRU = the NAIRU vt = error term X = the additional regressors These regressors are included in some of the empirical specifications to control for supply shocks to the prices of food and energy, which some have argued would shift the intercept of the Phillips curve (Gordon, 1990). As already described above, the expected rate of inflation is πet = πt-1, so πt -πet ∆πt. Consequently expected inflation, considered in this study is previous year inflation rate. Moreover unem01 or unemployment Ut-1 is used in order to accommodate the assumption that unemployment causes inflation in time 1 or time 2. Thus the equation will be: ∆πt = ε (Ut -1 - UNAIRU ) + xt +vt (4) The above equation describes the natural rate of unemployment where the inflation rate is constant and leads towards Phillips curve in the absence of supply shocks. Due to the introduction of new methods of estimation in econometrics, the estimation of the NAIRU has drawn attention as important topic of research in economics (Katos et al, 2004). Accordingly, equation (2) has been extended in to the following: πt= πet- ε (Ut - UNAIRU) – (Ut – Ut-1) (5) Where, UtNAIRU = time varying non- accelerating inflation rate of unemployment. 4. ESTIMATION OF TIME VARYING (TV) NAIRU According to available literature time varying NAIRU is estimated considering the estimated Phillip curve or estimating constructed equations in methodology by applying ordinary least square method. Relaxing the estimated constant NAIRU, the estimated values ofY on the basis of estimated coefficients is finally estimated. Finally, the Ball-Mankiw approach for estimating the time varying NAIRU postulates the following standard expectations-augmented specification for the Phillip curve: πt= πet - a(Ut - UNAIRU) + vt (6) * v is the supply shock and NAIRU is U (Ball and Mankiw 2002) As described above in the methodology expected inflation equals the last period actual inflation. Under this assumption the Phillip curve equation will be as under: πt= πt-1- α(Ut - U* ) + vt (7) Equation-6 can be written as: ∆π Ut + t a Where πt - πt-1= ∆πt νt * =U + a 116 Mazhar-ul-Haq Baluch & Azam Amjad Chaudhry For a given of the slope of the Phillip curve (α) the left side of the above equation can be νt derived from the data of the study yielding an estimate of U* + ( ) . a νt νt * ( * ) , the element U represents long term trend, while ( ) is Within the sum U + a a proportional to the short term supply shocks. νt Ball and Mankiw (2002) suggested that estimates of U*could be extracted from U*+ ( ) a by means of a standard approach for estimating a time series trend. Then they proceeded to use the Hodrick – Prescott (HP) filter for further final estimation. Consequently, the HP filter was applied to separate the value of U* from that sum. The value of the HP smoothing parameter applied in the study on hand was 1000. 5. HODRICK- PRESCOTT FILTER Hodrick Prescott Filter is a mathematical tool used for estimating cyclical and trend component of a time series using a frequency cut off or smoothness parameter. It is widely used specifically in real business cycle theory to have smooth estimate of the long term components of the series. It allows the slope of linear time trend to change gradually overtime. It formally minimizes the sum of square deviation between the trend and the actual series. The Hodrick Prescott Filter was also applied by Ball and Mankiw (2002) to estimate the NAIRU in US economy. Consequently the HP Filter has been applied to estimate the NAIRU. They applied the Phillips standardized equation to calculate the NAIRU as follows: ∆π = αU* - αU + υ The parameter ‘α’ indicates the slope of the inflation and unemployment relationship, the above equation has been rearranged such as: U* + V/α = U +∆π/α In this case the estimated U*+ V/α presents the shift in the Phillips curve. U* represents the long term trends and V/α was proportional to the short term supply shocks. To estimate the trend in applied series or to separate U* from U* +V/α Hodrick Prescott filter was applied following Ball and Minkaw (2002) to derive estimates regarding time varying NAIRU. The Phillips curve is briefly an inverse relationship between the rate of unemployment and rate of increase in money wages or in other words there is a trade-off between wage inflation and unemployment. Phillips (1958) and Friedman (1968) consider the shift of the curve due to the supply side factors and demand side factors. So it is defined as: πt = πte = ε (Ut -UNAIRU) (8) where Under prevalent economic environment of Pakistan, the behaviour of the labour market created critical situation for policy makers to develop practically feasible reforms for the betterment of human beings. Generally, the unemployment trends directly or indirectly affect the economic activities of all the sectors of the economy by affecting production costs as well as product prices. Theoretically unemployment reflects inverse relationship with inflation, however, when labour market reaches equilibrium point and became stable with sustainable Relationship of Rate of Unemployment and Inflation in Pakistan… 117 situation in the goods and services markets, it becomes about complicated to adhere the situation for isolating the effects of both these considered variables. The role of both these variables becomes more crucial when it is determined by supply shocks or exogenous factors exclusive to own emerged relationship. In addition the supply shock can persuade the policy. 6. RESULTS OF THE STUDY Inflation (%) A person refersan un-employed when he/she must be out of job and actively looking for work. However when ones stops looking for a job than considered out of the labour force and is no longer counted as unemployed. It is also worth noting that even if certain economy is reflecting at or near full employment, the un-employment rate will never be zero. The inflation rate in economics is referred to the rate of change of price index positively in percentage term or percentage rate of change in price level overtime. Inverse to it the rate indicating decrease in the purchasing power of money will also approximately similar change and leads towards changes in price level. Consequently in simple term the rate of change of prices or as indicated by a price index calculated on specific time period (monthly or annually) is referred as inflation rate. There are three major categories of unemployment. These are frictional, structural, and cyclical. Beyond economic environment of the country concerned there will always be frictional and structural unemployment. Frictional unemployment occurs from movement of people between jobs, careers and location, while structural unemployment refers to absence of the demand for workers that are available. However, cyclical unemployment rate moves in the opposite direction as the GDP growth rate. So when GDP growth rate is small or negative unemployment is high. The relationship between un-employment and price level is generally negative, though there is an inconsistency with the classical theory that there appear to be a systematic relationship between the rate of change of wages and unemployment. Theoretically, the movement of production pattern towards capacity output reaches close to it, an increase in demand will result upward change in the overall price level. Since the production process or resource use pattern specifically had a little option to change frequently and thus unemployment pattern also following the production adjustment results in slow adjustment responding to inflation or rising wage prices. This responsiveness measure of inflation to unemployment however supports the Phillips curve—the higher the rate of unemployment, the lower the rate wage inflation. Considering all these theoretical aspects, trend of relationship has been developed applying data and presented in the Figure 1. Figure 1: Relationship of Inflation and Unemployment in Pakistan (1980 to 2007) 118 Mazhar-ul-Haq Baluch & Azam Amjad Chaudhry Generally, the unemployed workers would prefer that the firms should reduce the wages to create demand for jobs. In other wordsthere existed a Phillips curve supporting relationship between inflation and unemployment. However there remained the data problem regarding the unemployment, which has been manipulated or forecasted for several years except that of the labour survey periods. Despite this data ambiguity, the displayed reflection of inflation and unemployment supports the Phillips curve in the initial period of 1980s. However in certain cases both the products and prices rise in short and medium periods, while this shift in aggregate supply leads to higher unemployment and higher inflation as well. The policy makers in such case of supply shocks also respond to it by increasing aggregate demand. Consequently this resulted in unfavourable trade off between inflation and unemployment for certain periods. Since the supply shocks directly affect production cost and ultimately this situation shift the Phillips curve, as it was in 1990s. Consequently during the census periods the results lead towards provision of support favouring Phillips curve. With the consequent there existed Phillips curve relationship between unemployment and inflation during the considered series period except that of affected supply shocks behaviour in certain years, but there remained generally Phillips curve supporting situation throughout the considered periods. Moreover to delineate the historical trend indicating the relationship of unemployment rate and inflation the considered periods (1980 to 2007) was confined by grouping it into six observations. Basically the observations concerning to inflation were arranged in ascending order to trace minimum and maximum level for the whole considered period. Since the inflation recorded was the lowest at 3.1 per cent, it was given the level < 4.0 per cent in grouping the data, whereas the other considered group was 4.0 to <6 percent. The next group considered was at 6 to < 8 percent. Similarly the last group was ≥ 12.0. Subsequently, within the considered ranges of inflation the variations in movement of unemployment rate were indicated in the graph. In the Figure 2 below there was found a specific relation observed in linear movement of inflation and respective unemployment rate. It was also obvious that up to inflation <8 percent the theoretically acceptable inverse relationship existed there between unemployment rate and rate of inflation, since with increased inflation rate unemployment decreased at every increased periodical step. However this relation deviated and reflected positive relationship up to <10 per cent inflation rate. The emerged situation led towards existence of NAIRU in between 8 to 10 per cent in case of Pakistan. Beyond 10 per cent inflation rate the unemployment rate indicated again inverse relation to inflation rate in the prevalent economic environment of the country. Ultimately there existed theoretically Phillips curve supporting relationship between inflation and unemployment rate. By this could be concluded that unemployment may prove a valuable instrument to forecast the future inflation. However the above given precise assessed value of NAIRU by applying bi-variate graph must be the intersecting point of both the observations, which would be ambiguous and uncertain in real value term. Though hypothetically the NIARU was suggested precisely, but it was not a reliable approach, since it does not capture the effects of additional lags and specifically the effects of supply shocks. Relationship of Rate of Unemployment and Inflation in Pakistan… 119 Figure 2: Relationship of Unemployment with Linear Inflation (1980 to 2007) 7. RELATIONSHIP OF INFLATION, UNEMPLOYMENT AND ECONOMIC GROWTH Centrally focussed point of discussion on any economic activity has been the economic betterment or economic growth. Economic growth has mainly concerned with growth of Gross Domestic Product of the country or GDP growth. Since the concerned activities may contribute positively, negatively or have no effect for the considered period, assessment of the relationship has been made by graphic presentation in Figure 3. Figure 3: Relationship of Inflation, Unemployment and Economic Growth in Pakistan (1980 to 2007) 120 Mazhar-ul-Haq Baluch & Azam Amjad Chaudhry The above figure reflected uneven relationship of the considered variables with all the time volatile and disposition situation. However in 1991 and 2004 all the variables were found intersecting each other indicating equilibrium situation under the available economic circumstances. However beyond this, the theoretical concerning made the GDP growth rate down with relative upward inflation rate creating exceptional downward position of unemployment. Ultimately no determined relationship of the concerned variables could be weighted. 8. EXPECTATIONS-AUGMENTED PHILLIPS CURVE Empirical evidence on the expectations-augmented Phillips curve in the absence of supply shocks has been reflected in the Figure 4. This reflected year-wise changes in the inflation (consumer price index) by plotting symbols only against the annual unemployment of the last year in Pakistan for the considered period (1980 to 2007). This figure reflected negative relationship between both the considered variables, since lower unemployment is associated with higher inflation and vice versa at every considered unit of the period. This gave indication that both the variables (Inflation and Unemployment) remained fluctuated during the considered period, but visionary assessment considers this graphic method an uncertain and incredible primary reflection concerning the assessment of NAIRU. Figure 4: Annual Changes in Inflation Vs unemployment (t-1) 8.1. Inflation and Unemployment Relationship Very firstly an effort has been made to estimate the relationship of both the considered variables i-e.inflation and unemployment by applying regression model of single variable equation such as: ∆inf = c +unem01 ∆inf = Change in inflation (Consumer Price Indx) Unem01 = Unemployment lagged by one year Relationship of Rate of Unemployment and Inflation in Pakistan… 121 By applying the above given equation the estimates were assessed by distributing the considered in various segments. The overall period of the study concerned pertained to 1980 to 2007. The overall period was classified into 4 random segments i.e (1980 to 2007), (1985 to 2007), (1990 to 2007) and (1995 to 2007).The results are given in the Table 1. The results in this table reflected expected negative relationship between unemployment and inflation. However the results—derived reflected weak model specification of the considered variables on the basis — of R2 and R2 . R is generally negative in all the considered periodical segments. The estimated values of various test statistics specifically F-ratio in all the periodical segments were found statistical insignificant. The NAIRU was estimated considering un-ivariate model ignoring all other weak specification of model and the derived unjustified results were presented in the Table 1. However the estimated environment indicated that to derive relative reliable estimates certain theoretically accepted additional variables and supply shocks are essentially needed to estimate Phillips curve for Pakistan. Consequently, by including certain additional variables strength of the estimates would be determined. Table 1 Results of Models by Applying Uni-variate Model for all the Considered Periodical Segments — Periodical Segment Constant UNEM01 R2 R2 NAIRU 1980 to 2007 1985 to 2007 1990 to 2007 1995 to 2007 1.0804 1.1498 0.4182 -3.2119 - 0.2061 - 0.2082 -0.0938 +0.4503 0.014 0.017 0.002 0.054 -0.023 -0 .029 -0.060 -0.032 5.24 5.52 4.46 7.13 8.2. Constant NAIRU Estimates by Multi-Variables The constant NAIRU was estimated by applying regression analysis by considering the model estimated coefficients. Since the study’s principal objective is to determine the relationship of inflation and unemployment, the constant NAIRU has been derived by applying the value of constant (a0) and the coefficient lagged unemployment (unem01). By this it was concluded that NAIRU was the ratio of a0 and a1 . To estimate the NAIRU, as is given in methodology certain additional variables and supply shock were considered appropriate to estimate the constant NAIRU. Consequently food and energy price inflation were included in the models to derive relatively reliable results. The following equations were found theoretically appropriate to include in the model to derive reliable results. Ultimately the following equations were applied to estimate the coefficients for further estimation of NAIRU for the considered periodical segments. ∆inf = a0 + a1unem01 +a2 cpi01+a2finf +a3 engy +ε (9) ∆inf = a0 + a1unem02 +a2cpi01 +a2cpi02 +a3 finf +a4 engy 02 + engy + ε (10) The estimated results of equation-1 considering various periodical segments have been presented in the Table 2. In this Table, beyond presentation of the results of equation-1, the constant NAIRU was estimated on the basis of regression with not only unemployment level but also considering expected shocks to the prices of food and energy, which are expected to shift the intercept of the Phillip curve (Gordon, 1990). SSW (1997), proposed changes in energy prices and term of 122 Mazhar-ul-Haq Baluch & Azam Amjad Chaudhry Table 2 The Results of Equation-1 on the Basis of Considered ‘Periodical Segments ∆inf = a0 + a1unem01 +a2cpi01 +a2finf +a3 engy +ε Periods 1980 to 2007 1985 to 2007 1990 to 2007 1995 to 2007 — Constant Unem01 Cpi01 finf engy R2 R2 1.3005 1.2629 4.2632 1.9673 -0.1084 -0.1244 -0.4330 -0.1644 -0.8586 -0.8111 —0.9094 -0.7948 0.6264 0.5872 0.5710 0.5255 0.0747 0.8295 0.0781 0.0664 0.80 0.76 0.82 0.89 0.77 0.70 0.77 0.0.84 NAIRU 12.0 10.15 9.84 11.97 trade as supply shocks. A relative price of food inflation and relative price of import inflation has been used as supply and exchange rate shocks respectively (Julio, 2001). Consequently, two variables ( Food price and energy price inflation) were included in regression controlling supply shocks. The constant NAIRU was estimated on the assumption of constant NAIRU and random walk expectations. The NAIRU was estimated on the basis of estimated constant (a0 ) and coefficient of lagged unemployment (a1). Since a0 = a1U*, the U* = a0/ a1. Thus the NAIRU is the ratio of a0/a1. The Table presents estimated NAIRU was 12.0 percent during 1980 t0 2007, 10.17 percent during 1985 to 2007, 9.84 per cent during 1990 to 2007 and 11.97 during 1995 to 2007. These results reflected unstable long run relationship between inflation and unemployment since the estimated NAIRU was different for every considered periodical segment under the existing environment of the country. It was about equal during 1980 to 2007 and 1995 t0 2007. However, the difference in estimated NIARU for various periodical segments could be attributed to non existence of formal stable relationship between inflation and economic growth (Haq and Shahid, 2009). Since both the variables remained fluctuated indifferently, but the results were supporting to the Phillip’s Curve indicating negative relationship between inflation and unemployment for all the periodical segmented equations. On the basis of Equation -2 the results of the model has been interpreted in the Table 3. Table 3 The results of Equation-2 on the Basis of Considered Periodical Segments (1980 to 2007) ∆inf = a0 + a1unem02 +a2cpi01 +a2cpi02 +a3 finf +a4 engy02 + engy + ε Period 1980- 2007 1985 - 2007 1990 - 2007 1995 - 2007 Constant Unem02 1.4862 1.8698 4.1158 0.3701 -0.1552 -0.1113 -0.4304 0.0483 — Cpi01 Cpi02 Finf Engy Engy02 R2 R2 NAIRU -0.8986 -0.9144 -1.0328 -0.7848 0.1202 0.2087 0.1558 0.0622 0.6091 0.5389 0.5750 0.5147 0.0705 0.0746 0.0869 0.0667 -0.0338 -0.0977 -0.0307 -0.0223 0.826 0.805 0.856 0.895 0.776 0.732 0.777 0.790 9.58 16.80 9.56 7.68 The above table reflected relatively better results to interpret the Phillip’s curve, since with the inclusion of additional variables of unemployment, inflation and supply shocks, the relationship of inflation and unemployment was changed. By adding lagged variables of unemployment and inflation and other supply shocks variables, it was found that change in inflation was negatively to its first lag and positively related to its second lag. This could be Relationship of Rate of Unemployment and Inflation in Pakistan… 123 attributed to short and long run behaviour of the considered variables with respect to contribution. The inverse results were obvious in case of change in unemployment pattern. The results derived indicated that the change in unemployment lagged by one year was positively related to change in inflation except 1995-2007, and negatively related to its second lag. However Phillips’ curve specifications were also assessed for the various periodical segments. The estimated coefficients of unemployment lagged by second year were positive for the period 1995 to 2007, while the unemployment parameter lagged by one year confirmed the Phillip’s relationship with negative contribution (-0.450) to change in inflation during the same period. However from certain different derived situation, this could be concluded that the data though was taken from governments’ publication, the data on both the variables (Inflation and Unemployment) created complicated situation. Unemployment data was correct only for the census year or the labour survey year. The similar situation was observed in case of inflation, since the inflation data has not been regularly collected by concerned agencies. However, estimated NAIRU was different for periodical segments and it was the highest (16.8 per cent) during 1985 to 2007. A more flexible technique is available to estimate time- varying NAIRU. 8.3. Estimation of Time–Varying NAIRU As described above the estimated constant NAIRU was different, while estimated on various periodical segments in economic environment of Pakistan. Consequently, relaxing the assumption of constant NAIRU, the time varying NAIRU was estimated by following the Ball and Mankiw approach applying the above described equations and finally Hodrick Prescott (HP) filter technique. The equations used was as follows : ∆inf = a0 + a1unem02 +a2cpi01 +a3cpi02 +a4 finf +a5engy02 + ε To apply HP filter technique for the estimation of Time Varying NAIRU, the above described equation was practically processed as under: a U*+v/α = (∆cpi) + unem02+α2/α1(cpi01)+α3/1(cpi02) +α4 /α1(finf) +α5 /α1(engy02) α1 After processing the equations the HP filter technique was applied. However various equations were practised but the results were relatively better by considering the above equation than other equations. So finally this equation was considered for the results. U*+v/α showed the shift in Phillip curve. Within this sum U* represents the TV-NAIRU (long term trend ) while v/α is proportional to the short term supply shocks. HP filter technique was applied to separate U* from the sum following Ball and Mankiw, 2002.The details regarding estimated NAIRU were presented in Figures 5 & 6. The figures reflected that Time-varying NAIRU supported overtime changing occurring in NAIRU. The sum U* +v/α1 remained fluctuatingon the basis of NAIRU plus trend (proportional to the short term supply shocks. However the U* was separated by applying Hodrick Prescott (HP) filter technique by applying the value of HP smoothing parameter adopted in this exercise for annual data was λ = 100 and λ = 1000 considering the above equation. The graph presented indicated the results concerning the U*+v/a estimates derived by applying the above described procedure and separating the U* and V/a by applying HP filter technique by using two different values of smoothing parameter. The sum was, though, 124 Mazhar-ul-Haq Baluch & Azam Amjad Chaudhry fluctuating on the basis of inclusion of trend line, however the estimated NAIRU was derived by separating the value of U* from the sum. Consequently the sum U*+ v/a and U* and v/a were given separately. Firstly the considered value of smoothing parameter λ = 100 in Figure 5. Figure 5: Hodrick- Prescott Filter ( = 100) inf = a0 + a1unem02 +a2cpi01 +a2cpi02 +a3 finf +a4 engy02 + The estimated NAIRU reflected more volatility by considering the value of Hp smoothing parameter (λ = 100) ranging from 2.50 per cent to 14.96 percent. In this case the estimated NAIRU fluctuated over time with upward and downward movement with specific trend for the period concerned ,as was in case of value of HP smoothing parameter λ = 1000 in Figure 6. Figure 6: Hodrick- Prescott Filter ( = 1000) inf = a0 + a1unem02 +a2cpi01 +a2cpi02 +a3 finf +a4 engy02 + Relationship of Rate of Unemployment and Inflation in Pakistan… 125 Similarly, the HP filter technique was applied by considering the value of HP smoothing parameter (λ = 1000) following Ball and Mankiw (2002) to impose greater smoothing of the considered series and presented in Figure 6. The similarity was generally observed in reflected trend by separating the sum (U*+ V/a). The estimated NAIRU reflected more volatility by considering the value of Hp smoothing parameter (λ = 100), but considering the HP smoothing parameter (λ = 1000) the range expectedly squeezed to 6.45 to 9.57. Moreover, the results reflected that the estimated NAIRU decreased from 9.57 per cent in 1999 to 6.45 percent in 2007. It was 8.75 per cent in 1980 and then decreased to7.63 per cent in 1991. It then again rose to 9.57 percent in 1999. The estimated confidence interval bound around time varying NAIRU at 95% precision level and it ranged between 5.13 lower bound and 13.87 upper bound (Annexure-1). 8.4. Relationship of Unemployment, Inflation and NAIRU The relationship of inflation (t-1), unemployment (t-1) and estimated NAIRU was presented in the Figure 6a. It was worth noting that the actual rate of unemployment remained below the estimated NAIRU throughout the considered period except that of 2004-07. The estimated results were according to the expectations, since the inflation rate remained higher than unemployment during 1981 to 2000. However inflation started declining and remained relatively lower than unemployment during 2000-05. The estimated NAIRU also declined and it was lower than inflation up to considered period. In 2006 the inflationand the unemploymentremained up the NAIRU but inflation was relatively higher than the unemployment. The actual rate of unemployment remained below the estimated NAIRU throughout the considered period except that of 2004-07. The estimated results were according to the expectations, since the inflation rate remained high during 1981 to 2000. However inflation started declining and remained relatively lower than unemployment during 2000-05. The estimated NAIRU also declined and it was lower than inflation for the period. In 2006 the inflationand the unemploymentremained up the NAIRU but inflation was relatively higher than the unemployment. From 2003 NAIRU Figure 6a : Relationship of Inflation, Unemployment and Tv-NAIRU (U*) (1980 to 2007) 126 Mazhar-ul-Haq Baluch & Azam Amjad Chaudhry (U*=100) decreased from 10.55 percent to 3.1 percent in 2007. However inflation touched the bottom (3.1 percent) in 2004 and rose to 9.3 in 2006 and then fell monotonically to 7.9 per cent in 2007. Theestimated figures by considering both the values of HPsmoothing parameter (U* = 100 and U* = 1000) reflected the similar trend (Annexure-1). 8.4.1. Relationship of Unemployment and NAIRU Generally, adoption of any simple or complex strategy, the estimation of the NAIRU remained a question, since the joint behaviour of inflation, increased wages and disturbance in unemployment ratio caused the concept ofNAIRU seriously disrupted. However,the relationship of unemployment and the estimated NAIRU has been reflected in a relatively better way in Figure 7. It was observed that NAIRU was below in 1980 and beyond that the NAIRU remained higher then unemployment throughout the remaining period up to 2004. Both the variables i.e. NAIRU and actual unemployment showed a continuous increase but this increase was relatively far more in case of NAIRU. However there remained short term fluctuations in them. NAIRU tended touched the peak in 2000. During 2004 and 2006 the NAIRU remained below the unemployment and inflation. Figure 7 Estimated NAIRU (= 100) and Unemployment 5. CONCLUSIONS Considering the prevalent economic environment of the country, the relationship of inflation, unemployment and estimated NAIRUhas been assessed in the light of Phillips curve to chalk out the relevant policies, theoretically suitable for smoothing economic concern functions. The results derived applying uni-variate model, reflected weak specification,however, expected negative relationship between unemployment and inflation. However the estimates indicated that certain theoretically accepted additional variables and supply shocks are essentially needed to derive reliable estimates regarding Phillips curve for Pakistan. Consequently food and energy price inflation were included in the models to derive relatively reliable results. Relationship of Rate of Unemployment and Inflation in Pakistan… 127 The results reflected unstable long run relationship between inflation and unemployment since the estimated constant NAIRU was different for every considered periodical segment under the existing environment of the country by adding lagged variables of unemployment and inflation and other supply shocks variables. Relaxing the assumption of constant NAIRU, the time varying NAIRU was estimated by following the Ball and Mankiw (2000) approach applying the described equation and finally Hodrick Prescott (HP) filter technique. The actual rate of unemployment remained below the estimated NAIRU throughout the considered period except that of 2004-07. The estimated results were according to the expectations, since the inflation rate remained high during 1981 to 2000. However inflation started declining and remained relatively lower during 2000-05. The estimated NAIRU also declined and it was lower than inflation for the period. In 2006 the inflationand the unemploymentremained up the NAIRU but inflation was relatively higher than the unemployment. From 2003 NAIRU decreased from 10.55 percent to 3.1 percent in 2007. However inflation touched the bottom (3.1 percent) in 2004 and rose to 9.3 in 2006 and then fell monotonically to 7.9 per cent in 2007. NAIRU remained higher then unemployment throughout the considered period up to 2004. The NAIRU and actual unemployment showed a continuous increase but this increase was relatively far more in case of NAIRU. However there remained short term fluctuations in them. NAIRU tended touched the peak in 2000. Lastly, the NAIRU remained changing overtime and supported the idea of time varying NAIRU. The effecting factors such as public policies developed and implemented overtime, labour productivity, and behavioural attitude of local and abroad marketing of the products were responsible for the prevalent economic situation and NAIRU as well. Finally, the derived conclusion confirmed existence of trade off between inflation and unemployment and this trade off ascertains the Phillips curve. However, despite encountering measurement problems, NAIRU can be used as a forecasting tool to assess its relationship with unemployment and inflation for policy implications in future.It provides base for policy makers to use other available tools for inflation targeting and keep unemployment as low as possible without accelerating inflation. References Ball, L and Mankiw, G.. N. (2002), “The NAIRU in Theory and Practice,” Working Paper 8940, National Bureau of Economic Research 1050 Massachusetts Avenue Cambridge, MA 02138. Blanchard, Olivier and Lawrence Summers (1986), “Hysteresis and the European Unemployment Problem,” NBER (National Bureau of Economic Research) Macroeconomics Annual. Cambridge, Massachusetts: The MIT Press. Blanchflower, D. G and Andrew J .O (1994), “Estimating a Wage Curve for Britian, 1973–1990,” Working Paper No. 4770, (NBER) 1050 Massachusetts Avenue Cambridge, M. A 02138. Barczi. N. (2003), “Inflation , Productivity, and The NAIRU During the Great Depression,” 14.731Economic History, Department of Economics, Massachusetts Institute of Tchnology, (MIT, 77 Massachusetts Avenue Cambridge, MA 02139, United States (617) 253-1000. Berger. T. and Everaert. G. (2008), “Unemployment Persistence and the NAIRU: A Bayesian Approach,” Scottish Journal of Political Economy, Volume 55, Issue 3, Published by John Wiley Inc., pp. 281–299. 128 Mazhar-ul-Haq Baluch & Azam Amjad Chaudhry Beyene J., and Rahim M. (2005), “Methods for Confidence Interval Estimation of a Ratio Parameter with Application to Location Quotients.” (http://www.ncib.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1274325) Braun, Steven N (1990), “ Productivity and the NAIRU (and Other Phillips Curve Issues),” working paper no. 34 Division of Research and Statistics, Federal Reserve Board, Washington, D.C. Dias F.C, Esteves.P.s and Felix R.M (2004), “Revisiting the NAIRU Estimates for the Portuguese Economy.” http://www.bportugal.pt/enUS/BdP%20Publications%20Research/AB200406_e.pdf. Dornbusch, R. and Fischer, S. (1990), Macroeconomics. 5th ed. New York: McGraw-Hill. Ferreira, A ., Aguirre, A. and Gomes, F. (2003), “Estimates of the NAIRU for Brazil using the BallMankiw Approach,”CEPE (Centre for Research in International Economics). Rua Curitiba, 832Belo Horizonte – Brazil-30170-120. Fisher I. (1973), “I Discovered the Phillips Curve :A Statistical Relation between Unemployment and Price Changes,” Journal of Political Economy (The University of Chicago Press) 81 (2), 496-502. Doi:10.1086/ 260048 (http://dx.doi.org/10.1086%2F260048). Friedman, M. (1968), “The Role of Monetary Policy,”American Economic Review, (American Economic Association), Vol. 58, No. 1 (March) pp. 1-17. Friedman, M. (1977), “Nobel Lecture: Inflation and Unemployment, Journal of Political Economy, June, 85, 451-472. Fuhrer, C. J. (1995), “The Phillips Curve is Alive and Well,” Research Department, New England Public Policy Centre—NEPPC. Gordon R. J. (1997), “The Time Varying NAIRU and its Implications for Economic Policy,” The Journal of Economic Perspectives Vol. 11, No. 1(winter) pp. 11-32. Government of Pakistan, “ Various Issues of Economic Survey,” Finance division, Economic Advisor Wing, Islamabad Gujrati D. N. (2003), “Basic Econometric,” 4 th ed., McGraw-Hill, New York. Hirschberg J.G. and J.N. Lye (2007), “Providing Intuition to the Fieller Method with Two Geometric Representations using STATA and E-views, Department of Economics, Research Paper No. 992 The University of Melbourne, Victoria 3010 Australia. Julio. J. M (2001), “How Certain are NAIRU Estimates in Colombia?” No.184 . Banco de la Republica Llaudes, R. (2005), “The Phillips Curve and Long Term Unemployment,” Working Paper Series No. 441, European Central Bank , Germany. Melliss, C. And A. E.Webb (1997), “The United Kingdom NAIRU: Concept, Measurement and Policy Implication,” OECD Economics Department Working Paper No. 182, Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development, Paris. Pallis D. (2006), “The Trade –Off between Inflation and Unemployment in the New European Union Member States,” International Research Journal of Finance and Economics, Issue 1, Euro Journals Publishing Inc. 2006. Phelps, E. S. (1967), “Phillips Curves, Expectation of Inflation, and Optimal Unemployment Overtime,” Economica , Vol. 34, No. 135, 254-281. Phelps, Edmund S. (1968), “Money-Wage Dynamics and Labor-Market Equilibrium”. Journal of Political Economy (Chicago University Press) 76: 678–711.doi:10.1086/259438. Phillips. A.W. (1958), “The Relationship between Unemployment and the Rate of Change of Money Wages in the United Kingdom (1861 to 1957) ,” Economica, 25 (100):283-299. Relationship of Rate of Unemployment and Inflation in Pakistan… 129 Rocheteau G , Peter. R and Wright . R. (2008), “Inflation and Unemployment in General Equilibrium,” The Scandinavian Journal of Economics, Volume 109, Issue 4, Feb, 2008 , pp. 837-855. Rodenberg P. (2007), “Derived Measurement in Macroeconomic: Two Approaches for Measuring the NAIRU Considered,” Tinbergen Institute Discussion Paper (TI 2007-017/1) University of Amsterdam (The Neatherland). Romer, D. (2005), Advanced Macroeconomics. Boston, MA: McGraw Hill. ISBN 0-072-87730-8. Rummery, S. (2002), “What is the Relationship between Price Inflation and the Unemployment Rate,” Labour Market Information Department, Texas Work Force Commission. (www.texasworkforce.org/ lmi) Shostak. F (2005), “(Subscribe to BrookesNews’ Bulletin)—www.brookes News.com/051107 nairu.htm. Staiger, D. Stock, J. H. and Waston, M.W (1997), The NAIRU, Unemployment and Monetary Policy, Journal of Economic Perspective, Vol. 11, Issue 1, (Winter 1997) pp. 33-49. Staiger, D. Stock, J. H and Waston, M. W. (1996), “How Precise are the Estimates of the National Rate of Unemployment?” Working Paper 5477, National Bureau of Economic Research 1050 Massachusetts Avenue Cambridge, M A 02138. Stephanidees G. (2006), “Measuring the NAIRU: Evidence from the European Union, USA and Japan,” International Research Journal of Finance and Economics, ISSN 1450-2887 Issue 1 (2006) © EuroJournals Publishing, Inc. 2006. Stock H. J., (1987), “Asymptotic Properties of Least Square Estimators of Cointergrating Vectors,” Econometrica, Vol. 55, No. 5, (September, 1987), pp. 1035-1056. Szeto, L. K. and Melody G. (2004), “Estimating a New Zealand NAIRU,” Working paper 04/10 New Zealand Treasury wellington 6015 New Zealand. Tobin J. (1972), “Inflation and Unemployment,” The American Economic Review, Volume 62, No. ½ March 1972, pp. 1-18. Tootell, G.M.B. (1994), “Restructuring, the NAIRU, and the Phillips Curve,” New England Economic Review, Federal Reserve Bank of Boston, Issue Sep., pp. 31-44. Vogel, L (2008), “The Relationship between the Hybrid New Keynesian Phillips Curve and the NAIRU Overtime,” Macroeconomics and Finance Series 3/2008, Department Economics and Politics, Hamburg, Germany. Waud, R. N. (1970), “Public Interpretation of Federal Discount Rate Changes: Evidence on the ‘Announcement Effect’.” Econometrica, 38: 231–250.(www.springerlink.com/index/ H35345805085112V.html) Wanningen, H. G. (1998), “NAIRU and Inflation: An Empirical Analysis for Netherland,” Research Department, Netherland Central Bank, Netherland. Whelan, K. (1999), “Real Wage Dynamics and the Phillips Curve,” Division of Research and Statistics, Federal Reserve Board, US. 130 Mazhar-ul-Haq Baluch & Azam Amjad Chaudhry ANNEXURE—1 Years U** Lower Upper 1980 8.747915 7.422326 13.05091 1981 8.749066 7.423477 13.05207 1982 8.718333 7.392744 13.02133 1983 8.611094 7.285505 12.91409 1984 8.410447 7.084858 12.71345 1985 8.173149 6.84756 12.47615 1986 7.921245 6.595656 12.22425 1987 7.685816 6.360227 11.98882 1988 7.512515 6.186925 11.81551 1989 7.447891 6.122302 11.75089 1990 7.497735 6.172146 11.80074 1991 7.627332 6.301743 11.93033 1992 7.851594 6.526005 12.15459 1993 8.125696 6.800107 12.4287 1994 8.436328 7.110739 12.73933 1995 8.778385 7.452795 13.08138 1996 9.120357 7.794768 13.42336 1997 9.395095 8.069506 13.6981 1998 9.561712 8.236123 13.86471 1999 9.568768 8.243179 13.87177 2000 9.414288 8.088699 13.71729 2001 9.111969 7.78638 13.41497 2002 8.705865 7.380276 13.00887 2003 8.231356 6.905767 12.53436 2004 7.736955 6.411366 12.03996 2005 7.272285 5.946696 11.57529 2006 6.856095 5.530505 11.15909 2007 6.452958 5.127368 10.75596 U** = Estimated NAIRU.