Download Vegetation management plan - Department of State Development

Appendix C – Property
Vegetation Management Plan
Adani Australia Company Pty Ltd
Property Vegetation Management Plan
Adani Australia Company Pty Ltd
Property Vegetation Management Plan
18 December 2014
CDM Smith Australia Pty Ltd
ABN 88 152 082 936
21 McLachlan St
Fortitude Valley
QLD 4006
Tel: +61 7 3828 6900
Fax: +61 7 3828 6999
Table of Contents
Section 1 Introduction ................................................................................................................................................. 2-1
1.1
Overview............................................................................................................................................................ 2-1
1.2
Purpose .............................................................................................................................................................. 2-1
1.3
Scope ................................................................................................................................................................... 2-1
1.4
Regulatory Framework and Cross-Reference ................................................................................... 2-1
1.4.1
Overview ..................................................................................................................................................... 2-1
1.4.2
Relevant Legislation ............................................................................................................................... 2-2
1.4.3
State Planning Policy ............................................................................................................................. 2-4
1.4.4
State Development Assessment Provisions ................................................................................. 2-5
Section 2 Existing Vegetation Environment ......................................................................................................... 2-1
2.1
Ecological Values............................................................................................................................................ 2-1
2.1.1
Regional and Local Context ................................................................................................................. 2-1
2.1.2
Flora Values ............................................................................................................................................... 2-1
2.1.3
Regional Ecosystems ............................................................................................................................. 2-2
2.1.4
Threatened Ecological Communities .............................................................................................. 2-2
2.1.5
Declared Weed Species ......................................................................................................................... 2-3
2.2
Field Surveys .................................................................................................................................................... 2-5
2.2.1
Overview ..................................................................................................................................................... 2-5
2.2.2
Findings ....................................................................................................................................................... 2-5
Section 3 Proposed Activities .................................................................................................................................... 3-7
3.1
Overview............................................................................................................................................................ 3-7
3.2
Vegetation Clearing ....................................................................................................................................... 3-7
3.2.1
Overview ..................................................................................................................................................... 3-7
3.2.2
Potential Impacts ..................................................................................................................................... 3-8
3.2.3
Lopping and Trimming ......................................................................................................................... 3-8
3.2.4
Tenure and Lot Description ................................................................................................................ 3-9
3.2.5
Details of any Commercial Timber Present on State Land ................................................... 3-9
Section 4 State Development Assessment Provisions .................................................................................... 4-13
4.1
Overview......................................................................................................................................................... 4-13
4.2
Relevant Purpose ........................................................................................................................................ 4-13
Section 5 Offsets and Environmental Management ........................................................................................ 5-14
5.1
Offsets .............................................................................................................................................................. 5-14
5.2
Environmental Management Measures ............................................................................................ 5-15
5.2.1
Management Measures ...................................................................................................................... 5-15
Section 6 References ..................................................................................................................................................... 6-1
List of Figures
Figure 2-1 Current RE and TEC Mapping .......................................................................................................... 2-4
Figure 2-2 Field Survey Sites and Transects ..................................................................................................... 2-6
Figure 3-1 Location and Extent of Vegetation Clearing - Southern ............................................................... 3-10
Figure 3-2 Location and Extent of Vegetation Clearing - Central................................................................... 3-11
Figure 3-3 Location and Extent of Vegetation Clearing - Northern ............................................................... 3-12
Property Vegetation Management Plan
iii
List of Tables
Table 1-1 Legislative Cross-Reference ............................................................................................................. 2-3
Table 1-1 Regulated Development within the Port Facilities Precinct............................................................. 2-4
Table 1-3 State Planning Policy ........................................................................................................................ 2-4
Table 2-1 Regional Ecosystems located within and adjacent to the Project area ........................................... 2-2
1
Table 3-1 Area of Mapped Regional Ecosystems to be Impacted .................................................................. 3-7
Table 3-2 Extent of Vegetation Clearing within the Project Boundary (ha) Based on Current EHP and Revised
Mapping ........................................................................................................................................................... 3-8
Table 3-3 Lot and Plans Impacted by Clearing ................................................................................................. 3-9
Table 5-1 Vegetation Management Table ..................................................................................................... 5-15
Table 5-2: Flora and Fauna Objectives, Performance Criteria, Control Strategies and Monitoring Plan ...... 5-16
Appendices
Appendix A - SDAP Module 8.1 - Queensland Vegetation Management State Code
Appendix B - Certified PMAV
Appendix C - State Vegetation Mapping
Document History and Status
Revision
A
B
C
Date Issued
Reviewed By
Approved By
Date Approved
Revision Type
08/12/2014
15/12/2014
16/12/2014
T Kinny
M Weston
J Kennedy
T Kinny
M Weston
T Kinny
09/12/2014
15/12/2014
18/12/2014
Draft
Final Draft
Final
Distribution of Copies
Version
Date Issued
Quantity
Final Draft
Final
15/12/2014
18/12/2014
1
1
Electronic
Issued To
PDF and Word
PDF
J Kennedy
J Kennedy
Printed:
18 December 2014
Last Saved:
18 December 2014 08:19 PM
File Name:
Property Vegetation Management Plan_Final_181214
Author:
Tim Kinny
Project Manager:
Miranda Weston
Client:
Adani Australia Company Pty Ltd
Document Title:
Property Vegetation Management Plan
Document Version:
Final
Project Number:
BES140088.01
Property Vegetation Management Plan
iv
Section 1
Introduction
1.1 Overview
Adani Australia Company Pty Ltd (Adani) is proposing to develop the Abbot Point Terminal 0 (T0)
Project (the Project) at the Port of Abbot Point. The onshore component of the Project (Figure 2-1)
is located within areas mapped as Regional Ecosystems (RE) under the Vegetation Management
Act 1999 (WM Act). The clearing will be located entirely within the Abbot Point State Development
Area (APSDA) and the Office of the Coordinator-General will be the assessment manager and as
such operation works associated with a new use is a self-assessment operational works. This selfassessment has been prepared as a separate attachment to enable an easy referral of the clearing
component if the CG determines input from the Department of Natural Resources and Mines
(DNRM) is desirable.
This Property Vegetation Management Plan (PVMP) provides an assessment of how the proposed
clearing intends to achieve best management measures to avoid, minimise, mitigate and
additionally offset the potential effects of native vegetation clearing in accordance with Module 8
of the SDAPs.
1.2 Purpose
The purpose of this PVMP is to provide the Office of the Coordinator-General, as the assessment
manager, and the DNRM, as the referral entity, with the information required to satisfy a selfassessment for the proposed Operational Works for the Clearing of Native Vegetation. This PVMP
addresses the requirements under Section 22A of the VM Act and in accordance with the matters
prescribed under Section 11 of the Vegetation Management Regulation 2012 (VM Regulation).
1.3 Scope
This PVMP has been developed based on desktop and field vegetation assessment surveys, and is
designed to address the matters prescribed under Section 11 of the VM Regulation. The PVMP
outlines the proposed actions, the locations and extent of clearing as well as mitigation and
management measures.
1.4 Regulatory Framework and Cross-Reference
1.4.1 Overview
Queensland's vegetation management framework contains six levels of regulatory instruments:

Legislation – Vegetation management is regulated through the VM Act, SP Act, and associated
regulations;

State Planning Policy – Documents the Queensland Government’s policy and describes the
outcomes for vegetation management and the actions proposed to achieve those outcomes;

State Development Assessment Provisions (Module 8) – Used to assess applications to clear
vegetation based on the relevant bioregional area (refer to Section 4 and Appendix A);

Offset Policy – Applies to an offset proposed under the Environmental Offsets Act 2014 (refer to
Section 5.1);
Property Vegetation Management Plan
2-1

Regrowth Vegetation Code – Clearing regulated regrowth must comply with the Regrowth
Vegetation Code unless it is for an exempt activity. No clearing of regulated regrowth is
proposed for the works of the Project and therefore the Regrowth Vegetation Code has not
been addressed in this PVMP;

Concurrence Agency Policies – Used by DNRM as the concurrence agency to assess remnant
vegetation clearing associated with proposed Material Change of Use (MCU) and Reconfiguring
a Lot (RaL) applications. There is currently no specific Operational Work Concurrence Agency
Policy and therefore this is not applicable to this PVMP.
1.4.2 Relevant Legislation
1.4.2.1 Sustainable Planning Act 2009
The Sustainable Planning Act 2009 (SP Act) is Queensland’s principal planning legislation and it
provides a complete planning framework and development assessment system for Queensland.
This system is a common assessment process to be used when assessing development.
The Sustainable Planning Regulation 2009 (SP Reg) complements the SP Act and prescribes certain
matters for the Integrated Development Assessment System (IDAS) and the SP Act generally.
Schedule 3 of the SP Reg lists assessable development, self-assessable development and the
appropriate levels of assessment. Under Schedule 3, the proposed activity triggers an Operational
Works development application for Vegetation Clearing [Sch 3, Part 1, Table 4 (1)].
1.4.2.2 Vegetation Management Act 1999
The Vegetation Management Act 1999 regulates activities that are considered assessable
development under the SP Act (Schedule 5, SP Reg). This includes activities that require the
clearing of vegetation. The definition of Vegetation under the VM Act [s8 (1)] includes:
“a native tree or plant other than the following:
(a) grass or non-woody herbage;
(b) a plant within a grassland regional ecosystem prescribed under a regulation;
(c) a mangrove”.
The VM Act regulates the conservation and management of vegetation communities and provides
protection for regional ecosystems classified as ‘endangered‘, ‘of concern‘ or ‘least concern‘ under
the VM Act.
Property Vegetation Management Plan
2-2
The VM Regulation [Section 11 (2)] specifies the information that is required to be included within
a PVMP that relates to a vegetation clearing application. Items have been cross-referenced in Table
1-1 below to clearly identify where they are addressed within this document.
Table 1-1 Legislative Cross-Reference
Relevant Document
Section
(2) The matters to be included in a property vegetation management plan to which a vegetation clearing
application relates:
(a) The location and extent of the area proposed to be cleared under the
Section 3.2.1, Figure 3application.
1, Figure 3-2 and Figure
3-3
(b) The relevant purpose under section 22A(2) of the Act to which the
Section 4.2
application relates.
(c) Details of the way (i) Module 8 (native vegetation clearing) of the State
Section 4
the proposed
Development Assessment Provisions.
clearing achieves the (ii) If the proposed clearing is within a declared area and N/A – the clearing is
required outcomes
a declared area code exists for the area—the declared
not within a declared
under:
area code for the area.
area
Information Required [VM Regulation, Section 11]
(d) If an offset is proposed to satisfy a performance outcome mentioned in paragraph (c)
– details of how the clearing of vegetation has been avoided or minimised.
Section 5.2
(3) The matters to be included in a property vegetation management plan to which a concurrence agency
application relates are:
(a) The location and extent of the area proposed to be cleared under the
Figure 3-1, Figure 3-2
application.
and Figure 3-3
(b) The relevant purpose under section 22A(2) of the Act to which the
Section 4.2
application relates.
(i) Infrastructure, including buildings, fences, roads and
Figure 2-1
electrical, telecommunication or sewerage services.
(c) Details of the
location and extent
N/A – no firebreak or
of:
(ii) Firebreaks and fire management lines.
management lines are
proposed
(d) details of the way the proposed clearing achieves the performance outcomes
under module 8 (native vegetation clearing) of the State development
Appendix A
assessment provisions.
(e) if an offset is proposed to satisfy a performance outcome mentioned in
paragraph (d)—details on how the clearing of vegetation has been avoided or
Section 5.2
minimised.
(4) The location and extent of the area proposed to be cleared must be shown by:
Figure 3-1, Figure 3-2
(i) The boundary of the area on an image base.
and Figure 3-3
(ii) 5 or more points visible in the image base that
Figure 3-1, Figure 3-2
correspond to identifiable fixed features.
and Figure 3-3
(iii) The Map Grid of Australia 1994 coordinates and
(a) A map showing:
zone references for each point, acquired by GPS or
Figure 3-1, Figure 3-2
similar system of satellites that receives and processes
and Figure 3-3
information.
(iv) A description of the feature that each point
Figure 3-1, Figure 3-2
represents.
and Figure 3-3
(b) A description of the boundary of the area by reference to Map Grid of
Figure 3-1, Figure 3-2
Australia 1994 coordinates and zone references for the area.
and Figure 3-3
(5) A property vegetation management plan may include any other information
the applicant considers may assist in the assessment of the application.
Property Vegetation Management Plan
2-3
1.4.2.3 APSDA Development Scheme 2014
The APSDA was declared in June 2008, and has since been varied to cover the Project area in
November 2014. The area was established to facilitate large scale industrial development,
including port facilities and infrastructure. The Project is located in the Port Facilities Precinct of
the APSDA and Table 1-2 below outlines regulated development within the precinct.
Table 1-2 Regulated Development within the Port Facilities Precinct
Column 1 – SDA self-assessable development within the
precinct
Operational Works
 Where necessary for a material change of use
or reconfiguring a lot that is authorised by an
SDA approval.
Column 2 – SDA assessable development within the
precinct
Material Change of Use

all uses, including uses that are not defined by
this development scheme.
Reconfiguring a lot
 All reconfiguring a lot
The vegetation clearing works will be associated with an SDA approval and this document is
providing the necessary information for the self-assessment, as such no separate operational
works permit is required under the SP Act.
1.4.3 State Planning Policy
The single State Planning Policy 2013 (SPP) is a statutory instrument developed by the State
Government to address matters of state interest in land use planning and development. The SPP is
prepared under the SP Act (section 26) and provisions of the SPP are required to be integrated
into state and local planning instruments. The SDA wide assessment criteria outlined in Section 2.5
of the APSDA Development Scheme requires an assessment against the relevant sections of the
SPP (Section 2.5.11). An assessment of the proposed clearing activity against the relevant
provision of the SPP is provided in Table 1-3 below.
Table 1-3 State Planning Policy
State Interest Requirement
Response
Biodiversity
A development application where the land relates to
a Matter of State Environmental Significance
(MSES), if the application is for a material change of
use other than a dwelling house.
Development:
(1) enhances matters of state environmental
significance where possible, and
(2) identifies any potential significant adverse
environmental impacts on matters of state
environmental significance, and
(3) manages the significant adverse
environmental impacts on matters of state
environmental significance by protecting the
matters of state environmental significance
from, or otherwise mitigating, those impacts.
The State mapping (Appendix C) indicates
interests for the following aspects of Biodiversity
in the Project area:
- Regulated Vegetation; and
- Wildlife habitat
The current Project design requires the clearance
of 46.28 ha of Regulated Vegetation.
(1) The Project is located inside areas mapped for
state environmental significance. The Project will
be setting aside an exclusion area, predominately
the Threatened Ecological Community (TEC) along
the dune to the east. The Project will provide some
landscaping with native vegetation around the
administration area and will be seeking to prevent
impacts on the wetland to the west and northwest of the Project.
(2) A comprehensive EIS has been prepared for the
Project. The EIS identifies all potential adverse
Property Vegetation Management Plan
2-4
State Interest Requirement
Response
impacts that may occur to Matters of State
Environmental Significance (MNES). A Construction
Environmental Management Plan (CEMP) has been
prepared which will address any potential
significant impacts, including detailed
management measures.
(3) The CEMP will address potential environmental
impacts on MSES.
1.4.4 State Development Assessment Provisions
The State Development Assessment Provisions (SDAP) set out the matters of interest to the state
for development assessment. The SDAP is prescribed in the SP Regulation, and contains the
matters the chief executive may have regard to when assessing a development application as
either an assessment manager or a referral entity. Accordingly, Module 8 (Native Vegetation
Clearing) of the SDAP has been completed as part of the PVMP and is included as Appendix A of
that document.
Property Vegetation Management Plan
2-5
Section 2
Existing Vegetation Environment
2.1 Ecological Values
2.1.1 Regional and Local Context
The vegetation clearing area is located within the Townsville Plains subregion of the Brigalow Belt
North Bioregion. The Bogie River Hills subregion lies immediately to the south of the Project area
although it is not within the catchment of the Project area. The Townsville Plains subregion covers
an area of approximately 7,600 km2. Vegetation is characterised by open eucalypt woodlands on
duplex clay and loam soils. Low-lying coastal areas support Melaleuca woodlands and saltmarsh
habitats on fine marine deposits. Low rocky hills are scattered throughout the subregion. Rainfall
in the area is typically seasonal with the majority falling in the summer months.
The Project will be located immediately east of the existing Port of Abbot Point T1 coal terminal.
The footprint of the onshore development will be approximately 120.3 hectares (ha) in size,
however, a large portion of this area is already cleared. The proposed rail inloading facilities and
rail corridor will be located concentric with the T1 rail loop. The Project is bounded by the existing
T1 infrastructure to the south-west and Abbot Beach to the east. The site extends approximately
3.6 km south from this point running parallel with Abbot Beach.
2.1.2 Flora Values
The Project area has been subject to vegetation clearing and other disturbances from port
activities and previous cattle grazing activities. Current RE mapping indicates three REs are
located within the Project area and another RE associated with the Caley Valley Wetlands which lie
further to the west (Table 2-1). No community mapped as Essential Habitat for Endangered,
Vulnerable or Near Threatened (EVNT) fauna species is located within the Project area.
On-site investigations identified discrepancies in the current RE mapping for the terminal area. In
particular, site surveys have reduced the extent of RE 11.2.3 (refer following section) and revised
the classification of RE 11.1.2 which has been incorrectly described (Table 2-1). A Property Map of
Assessable Vegetation (PMAV) has been approved with the Department of Environment and
Heritage Protection (EHP) to revise the mapped extent within the Project area (Appendix B).
Only one listed threatened ecological community (TEC), the Semi-evergreen vine thicket (SEVT)
(microphyll/notophyll vine forest and thickets) which is also identified as RE 11.2.3, occurs on
coastal dunes in the area. This community occurs east and south-east of the Project in coastal
dunes. Following on-ground botanical surveys, the mapped extent of the TEC has been determined
not to occur within the Project footprint. As such the Project will not require clearing of this TEC.
As part of this assessment, high-value regrowth is no longer regulated, and hence has been
excluded from this assessment.
The REs located within the Project area are detailed in Table 2-1. A comment has been provided
with a description of the RE and location.
Property Vegetation Management Plan
2-1
2.1.3 Regional Ecosystems
Table 2-1 Regional Ecosystems located within and adjacent to the Project area
VM Act
Status
RE Code/ Description
Biodiversity
Status
Comments
Project Area
11.2.2 - Complex of
Spinifex sericeus, Ipomoea
pescaprae and Casuarina
equisetifolia grassland and
herbland on foredunes
A total of 0.42 ha is
proposed to be cleared for
construction.
11.2.5 - CorymbiaMelaleuca woodland
complex of beach ridges
and swales
A total of 44.75 ha is
proposed to be cleared for
construction.
11.12.4a - SEVT and
microphyll vine forest on
igneous rocks
A total of 1.11 ha is
proposed to be cleared for
construction.
Of Concern
Of concern
Mapped as occurring along the very eastern boundary
of the Project area and immediately landward of the
MOF
Least
concern
No concern at
present
The Project area comprises of remaining remnant
vegetation inland of the beach dune system. Remnant
vegetation, mapped as this community within the
existing rail loop, has been largely cleared at present
Least
concern
No concern at
present
This community is not analogous to the TEC listed
under the EPBC Act. Occurs in the far north of the
Project area
Adjacent to the Project
11.2.3 - Microphyll vine
forest (beach scrub) on
sandy beach ridges
Of concern
Of concern
Least
concern
No concern at
present
No proposed clearing of RE
11.1.2 - Samphire forbland
on marine clay plains
No proposed clearing of RE
11.3.27x1c - Palustrine
Wetland (e.g. vegetated
swamp). Sedgelands to
grasslands on Quaternary
deposits. No proposed
clearing of RE
Least
concern
Of concern
Also listed as a TEC (Semi-evergreen Vine Thicket of the
Brigalow Belt and Nandewar Bioregions (SEVT)) under
the EPBC Act.
Occurs on coastal dunes. Covers sections of the Project
area adjacent to the existing T1 Terminal and a patch
within the southern extension, which is bisected by
Abbot Point Road
Occurs along seaward edge of dune system running
parallel to Abbot Beach
This community has been inspected and is incorrectly
mapped. RE mapping for this area has been changed
under a PMAV (Appendix B) to the Of Concern RE
11.2.2 - Complex of Spinifex sericeus, Ipomoea
pescaprae and Casuarina equisetifolia grassland and
herbland on foredunes
Both communities are associated with the Wetland
and are located directly adjacent to the beach scrub
vegetation bisected by Abbot Point Road in the south
of the Project area
2.1.4 Threatened Ecological Communities
SEVT is floristically diverse and is characterised by trees dominated by species with small
(microphyll) leaves (2.5 - 7.6 cm). Canopy height within RE 11.2.3 is variable (often low) with
multi-storey vegetation and a sparse ground layer. Canopy species found on the Project site are
listed as typical within this community (Queensland Herbarium 2012) including: Tuckeroo
Property Vegetation Management Plan
2-2
(Cupaniopsis anacardioides); Wild Prune (Sersalisia sericea); Queensland Ebony (Diospyros
geminate); and Red Condoo (Memusops elengi). Approximately 28 ha of SEVT (TEC) is located on
the coastal dune ridges in two sections (Figure 2-1) based on current EHP mapping. Targeted field
investigations were conducted within both areas. The presence of SEVT was confirmed in both
locations; however discrepancies in the mapped boundaries of each polygon were identified.
Nevertheless, no clearing is proposed within the currently mapped extent of SEVT TEC.
2.1.5 Declared Weed Species
The following four weeds of national significance species were observed within the Project area
during on-site surveys:

Prickly Acacia was abundant in areas of the southern section of the site that had been subject
to past clearing activities;

Rubber Vine was distributed throughout areas within and adjacent to RE 11.2.3;

Lantana occurred as isolated individuals throughout; and

Parkinsonia occurred in wooded areas adjacent to Saltwater Creek and the wetland.
Property Vegetation Management Plan
2-3
612000
613000
614000
11.12.4a
7801000
7801000
11.2.2
11.12.4a
11.3.27x1c
11.2.5
7800000
7800000
11.2.3
11.1.2b/11.3.27x1c
11.2.5
11.2.5
11.1.2b/11.3.27x1c
11.2.5
11.2.5
7799000
7799000
11.1.2
11.2.5
11.2.5
11.2.5
11.1.2a
7798000
7798000
11.2.5
11.2.5
11.3.27x1c
11.2.5
11.2.3
612000
613000
614000
0
Figure 2-1 Current RE and TEC Mapping
250
Metres
Key
GDA 1994 MGA Zone 55
Rail
Road
Abbot Point SDA
Proposed T0 Project Area
TEC (Microphyll Vine Forest)
Regional Ecosystems V8
Of Concern
Of Least Concern
G:\Projects\BES140088_T0_Approvals\mxd\final\Vegetation\001-R1_re_tec.mxd
500
µ
DISCLAIMER
CDM Smith has endeavoured to ensure accuracy and completeness of the data.
CDM Smith assumes no legal liability or responsibility for any decisions or actions
resulting from the information contained within this map.
Data Source:
Data obtained through Adani,
QLD Government Open
Source & Bing Maps.
2.2 Field Surveys
2.2.1 Overview
This document has obtained field information from previous flora surveys conducted for the T0
EIS and associated works. In the most recent event Biotropica Australia Pty Ltd was engaged to
undertake a flora survey of 71 select sites throughout the current Project area. The data from this
ground survey has been used to clearly identify the extent, location and type of vegetation to be
cleared. A total of 26 locations were ground surveyed in mid-December 2012 and the remaining
45 sites were ground surveyed in late January 2013. At that time the site was very dry and a
number of the grasses contained little vegetative material, however all species at all locations
could be identified to species level.
2.2.2 Findings
As identified in Section 2.1.4 and Figure 2-1, the survey confirmed that to the east of the facility is a
linear patch of SEVT with associated sclerophyllous species on the margin. This community is
mapped as the ‘Of Concern’ regional ecosystem RE 11.2.4 (Microphyll vine-forest [beach scrub] on
sandy beach ridges). The northern extent of the site contains the regional ecosystem RE 11.12.4
(SEVT and microphyll vine forest on igneous rocks). Immediately west of the facility, drainage is
seasonally impeded and plant communities vary from mostly graminoids in very wet sites,
Melaleuca dominated communities in better drained areas, and Eucalyptus tessellaris/Corymbia
dallachiana woodlands as drainage improves. This ecotone contains the mapped regional
ecosystem RE 11.2.5 (Corymbia-Melaleuca woodland complex of beach ridges and swales) and is
mostly concentrated along the western margin of RE 11.2.4. Vegetation in and around the existing
Abbot Point facility is comprised almost exclusively of exotic vegetation, with a minor component
of native species regrowth. This survey indicates that the majority of site supports only exotic
vegetation.
Plate 2-1: View of Beach Scrub from seaward
edge
Property Vegetation Management Plan
Plate 2-2: Non-remnant grassland adjacent to
T1 coal terminal
2-5
612000
613000
614000
11.12.4a
7801000
7801000
11.2.2
11.12.4a
11.3.27x1c
11.2.5
7800000
7800000
11.2.3
11.1.2b/11.3.27x1c
11.2.5
11.2.5
11.1.2b/11.3.27x1c
11.2.5
11.2.5
7799000
7799000
11.1.2
11.2.5
11.2.5
11.2.5
11.1.2a
7798000
7798000
11.2.5
11.2.5
11.3.27x1c
11.2.5
11.2.3
612000
613000
614000
0
Figure 2-2 Field Survey Sites and Transects
Key
250
Metres
Rail
Road
Abbot Point SDA
Proposed T0 Project Area
TEC (Microphyll Vine Forest)
Regional Ecoystems V8
Of Concern
(
! Vegetation Spot Surveys
Access Track Vegetation Survey
SEVT Transect
µ
DISCLAIMER
CDM Smith has endeavoured to ensure accuracy and completeness of the data.
CDM Smith assumes no legal liability or responsibility for any decisions or actions
resulting from the information contained within this map.
Of Least Concern
Data Source:
Data obtained through Adani,
QLD Government Open
Source & Bing Maps.
G:\Projects\BES140088_T0_Approvals\mxd\final\Vegetation\002-R1_survey.mxd
GDA 1994 MGA Zone 55
500
Section 3
Proposed Activities
3.1 Overview
Clearing of vegetation will be required for the construction and operation of the Project. The
proposed infrastructure that will require the clearing of vegetation includes:

Rail Inloading Facility – Earthworks will be required to support the new rail inloading facility;

Road – New roads will be required to facilitate access during construction and operation;

Conveyor – A network of conveyors will transport the coal to a surge bin, ready for subsequent
transport to outloading facilities;

Bund – Minor clearing is required for the coal stockpile for Phase 1 which will comprise of one
bund with two stockpile rows and two stacker/reclaimers; and

MOF – Reinstatement of the existing MOF is required and thus minor clearing will be involved.
Refer to Figure 3-1 to Figure 3-3 for layouts of the abovementioned infrastructure and the RE
mapping.
3.2 Vegetation Clearing
3.2.1 Overview
Adani has undertaken a desktop and field vegetation survey to understand the extent of vegetation
clearing required for the proposed development.
Table 3-1 below identifies the specific infrastructure components of the Project that require
clearing and the type and quantity of the RE to be cleared at each location.
Table 3-1 Area of Mapped Regional Ecosystems to be Impacted1
Infrastructure
Regional Ecosystem
Rail
11.2.5
11.12.4a
Road
11.2.2
11.2.5
Conveyor
11.12.4a
Bund
11.2.5
MOF
11.2.2
Description
Corymbia-Melaleuca woodland complex of beach
ridges and swales
Semi-evergreen vine thicket (SEVT) and microphyll
vine forest on igneous rocks.
Complex of Spinifex sericeus, Ipomoea pescaprae
and Casuarina equisetifolia grassland and herbland
on foredunes
Corymbia-Melaleuca woodland complex of beach
ridges and swales
Semi-evergreen vine thicket (SEVT) and microphyll
vine forest on igneous rocks.
Corymbia-Melaleuca woodland complex of beach
ridges and swales
Complex of Spinifex sericeus, Ipomoea pescaprae
and Casuarina equisetifolia grassland and herbland
on foredunes
Total
Area Impacted (ha)
33.14
0.29
1.00
3.50
0.13
8.11
0.11
46.28
1 - The information in this table relates to the total project area not the clearing area. NB. Some of the project area has already been
cleared.
Property Vegetation Management Plan
3-7
3.2.2 Potential Impacts
The construction of the proposed Project will require the clearing of a maximum of 46.28 ha of
remnant vegetation based on updated mapping. The majority of this area contains REs listed as
‘Least Concern’ under the VM Act except for RE 11.2.2 which is listed as Of Concern. The total
extent of vegetation clearing for each RE within the Project area is presented in Table 3-2. A
number of plant communities will be impacted by clearing for construction. These include the
coastal dune complex, coastal dune grassland, beach scrub and Corymbia-Melaleuca woodland.
Table 3-2 Extent of Vegetation Clearing within the Project Boundary (ha) Based on Current EHP and
Revised Mapping
VM Act status
Comments
Proposed Clearing
Extent
Of Concern
This community is found along the
eastern side of the Project on the
coastal dune system. It covers sections
of the Project area. A small amount of
this will be required for clearing
0.42 ha
RE Code
Description
11.2.2
Complex of Spinifex
sericeus, Ipomoea
pescaprae and
Casuarina equisetifolia
grassland and
herbland on
foredunes
11.2.5
Corymbia-Melaleuca
woodland complex of
beach ridges and
swales
Least Concern
11.12.4a
SEVT and microphyll
vine forest on igneous
rocks
Least Concern
Within Project area comprises
remaining remnant vegetation inland
of beach dune system. Remnant
vegetation mapped as this community
within the existing rail loop has been
largely cleared at present
This community is not analogous to
the Threatened Ecological Community
listed under the EPBC
Occurs to a minor extent in the far
north of the Project area on a low hill
(Abbot Point) and vegetation
extending west
44.75 ha
1.11 ha
The most obvious and direct impact on ecological values is the clearing of native vegetation.
Impacts associated with clearing of vegetation on the Project site may include:

Loss of native vegetation and flora species including REs; and

Direct mortality of fauna during clearing activities.
Careful consideration of these potential direct and impacts has been undertaken in the design
phase, seeking primarily to avoid (preferably) or minimise impacts where possible. For example,
Adani completed on-ground mapping of the extent of significant vegetation and optimised the
facility layout to avoid positioning infrastructure over these features.
3.2.3 Lopping and Trimming
The definition of lopping a tree within the VM Act (Section 5, Dictionary) “means cutting or pruning
its branches, but does not include:
(a) removing its trunk; and
(b) cutting or pruning its branches so severely that it is likely to die.”
Any work areas outside the aforementioned proposed clearing areas will not be impacted
however, minimal trimming or lopping may occur where necessary.
Property Vegetation Management Plan
3-8
3.2.4 Tenure and Lot Description
The tenure of properties directly affected by proposed vegetation clearing has been identified
through desktop mapping and Digital Cadastre Database mapping sourced from the Queensland
Government. Table 3-3 provides a list of the lots impacted by the proposed clearing and the
corresponding tenure.
Table 3-3 Lot and Plans Impacted by Clearing
Lot and Plan
Tenure
3 SP227557
Freehold
48 SP243724
Freehold
51 SP243724
Freehold
54 SP243724
Freehold
58 SP243726
Leasehold
Note – The Project occurs over more lots than are listed above, however, only the lots listed above
have RE mapping overlapping the proposed Project area.
3.2.5 Details of any Commercial Timber Present on State Land
Under the Forestry Act 1959 (Forestry Act), all natural grown forest products are owned by the
state. This includes timbers that may be used for commercial purposes such as hardwood species,
cypress pine (Callitris spp) and sandalwood (Santalum lanceolatum). The area has been subject to
both cattle disturbance and port-related disturbance in the past. Most sites are dominated by low
weeds. The sites are dominated by the following tree species: Melaleuca viridiflora; Terminalia
muelleri; Cupaniopsis anacardioides reflecting the vine-thicket community. No tree taller than 6 m
was recorded and none of these timbers are known to be of commercial value.
Property Vegetation Management Plan
3-9
613000
614000
3SP227557
11.2.5
DSP243724
4SP227557
11.2.3
48SP243724
NSP243724
58SP240224
0102SP256311
102SP256311
58SP243726
50SP243724
7799000
7799000
JSP243724
11.1.2
HSP243724
KSP243724
ESP243724 GSP243724
FSP243724
49SP243724
51SP243724
50SP243724
11.2.5
11.2.5
56SP243724
53SP243724
LSP243724
7798000
7798000
11.2.5
11.2.5
33SP253263
56SP243724
11.3.27x1c
11.2.5
2RP745292
613000
614000
0
Figure 3-1 Location and Extent of Vegetation Clearing - Southern
Key
200
Metres
Rail
Road
Cadastre
Abbot Point SDA
TEC (Microphyll Vine Forest)
Regional Ecosystem V8
Of Concern
GDA 1994 MGA Zone 55
G:\Projects\BES140088_T0_Approvals\mxd\final\Vegetation\003-R1_veg_cl_sth.mxd
µ
DISCLAIMER
CDM Smith has endeavoured to ensure accuracy and completeness of the data.
CDM Smith assumes no legal liability or responsibility for any decisions or actions
resulting from the information contained within this map.
Of Least Concern
Proposed T0 Project Area
400
Data Source:
Data obtained through Adani,
QLD Government Open
Source & Bing Maps.
613000
0102SP256311
102SP256311
3SP227557
7800000
7800000
11.1.2
11.2.3
11.2.5
58SP243726
48SP243724
4SP227557
51SP243724
NSP243724
613000
0
Figure 3-2 Location and Extent of Vegetation Clearing - Central
Key
100
Metres
Rail
Road
Cadastre
Abbot Point SDA
TEC (Microphyll Vine Forest)
Regional Ecosystem V8
Of Concern
GDA 1994 MGA Zone 55
G:\Projects\BES140088_T0_Approvals\mxd\final\Vegetation\004-R1_veg_cl_cnt.mxd
µ
DISCLAIMER
CDM Smith has endeavoured to ensure accuracy and completeness of the data.
CDM Smith assumes no legal liability or responsibility for any decisions or actions
resulting from the information contained within this map.
Of Least Concern
Proposed T0 Project Area
200
Data Source:
Data obtained through Adani,
QLD Government Open
Source & Bing Maps.
613000
49SP185904
101SP256311
11.12.4a
58SP243726
52HR1732
0102SP256311
102SP256311
54SP243724
58SP243726
57SP243726
11.12.4a
58SP243726
11.1.2
58SP243726
48SP243724
11.2.3
11.2.5
3SP227557
613000
0
Figure 3-3 Location and Extent of Vegetation Clearing - Northern
Key
100
Metres
Rail
Road
Cadastre
Abbot Point SDA
TEC (Microphyll Vine Forest)
Regional Ecosystem V8
Of Concern
GDA 1994 MGA Zone 55
G:\Projects\BES140088_T0_Approvals\mxd\final\Vegetation\005-R1_veg_cl_nth.mxd
µ
DISCLAIMER
CDM Smith has endeavoured to ensure accuracy and completeness of the data.
CDM Smith assumes no legal liability or responsibility for any decisions or actions
resulting from the information contained within this map.
Of Least Concern
Proposed T0 Project Area
200
Data Source:
Data obtained through Adani,
QLD Government Open
Source & Bing Maps.
7801000
7801000
11.2.2
Section 4 State Development Assessment
Provisions
4.1 Overview
The proposed clearing area is located within the Townsville Plains subregion of the Brigalow Belt
North Bioregion and therefore the Regional Vegetation Management Code for the Brigalow Belt and
New England Tablelands Bioregions 2012 formerly applied to clearing applications in this
bioregion. Relevant component of the code have been incorporated into the combined State
Development Assessment Provisions (SDAPs) and forms part of Module 8 – Native Vegetation
Clearing. This Property Vegetation Management Plan (PVMP) provides an assessment of how the
proposed clearing intends to achieve best management measures to avoid, minimise, mitigate and
additionally offset the potential effects of native vegetation clearing in accordance with Module 8
of the SDAPs. Module 8 – Native Vegetation Clearing is provided as Appendix A to this document.
Appendix A outlines how Adani intends to undertake the clearing the works in accordance with
the Module. Where the application does not meet the performance outcome or acceptable outcome
a performance solution has been proposed so that the performance requirement is met.
4.2 Relevant Purpose
Module 8 – Native Vegetation Clearing applies to the assessment of properly made applications.
Section 22A of the VM Act must be satisfied for an application to be a properly made application.
Under Section 22A (2)(d) of the VM Act, a vegetation clearing application is for a relevant purpose
if the applicant satisfies the Chief Executive that the development applied for is “for relevant
infrastructure activities and the clearing can not reasonably be avoided or minimised”.
The purpose of this clearing is to establish port infrastructure and to allow construction of the T0
Project which has been assessed by the Department of the Environment and approved by the
Minister for the Environment (EPBC 2011/6194). The T0 Project is considered relevant
infrastructure for the purpose of this application. Adani have undertaken multiple desktop and
field vegetation surveys and located the Project infrastructure where possible in areas of least
vegetation or pre-disturbed areas. Thus the relevant purpose is consistent with Section 22A (2)(d)
of the VM Act.
Property Vegetation Management Plan
4-13
Section 5 Offsets and Environmental
Management
5.1 Offsets
The Vegetation Management Offsets 2009 (Version 2.4) has been superseded and as no
environmental offset component has been imposed, prior to 1 July 2014, on this approval the
PVMP will follow the new framework.
The new framework consists of the Environmental Offsets Act 2014 which coordinates the delivery
of environmental offsets, the Environmental Offsets Regulation 2014 (offset regulation) which
provides details of the prescribed activities regulated under the legislation and the Queensland
Environmental Offset Policy (QEOP) which provides a single, consistent, whole of government
policy for the assessment of offset proposals.
In regards to offsets related to native vegetation clearing an environmental offset is required for
prescribed matters of state environmental significance listed in Schedule 2 of the offset regulation.
These matters include regulated vegetation for REs that are either ‘Endangered’ or are ‘Of
Concern’.
The Project involves the clearing of 0.42 ha of RE11.2.2 which is ‘Of Concern’ and therefore an
offset is required for the Project. Adani proposes to manage the following offset initiatives:

Patches of TEC occur just south of the Project area, near the rail corridor. In the Offsets
Strategy, Adani may investigate a management and monitoring approach for these patches in
an effort which will increase the overall coverage and connectivity of this community in the
immediate vicinity of the Project area, and locally; and

Nest hollows - There is the potential that artificial nest hollows could be installed in
appropriate vegetation and locations to offset any loss of habitat for birds, bats, gliders, and
other species which utilise nest hollows. The planning of nest hollow requirements and best
location for installations could be incorporated in this Offsets Strategy in order to increase the
overall ecological value of the Offset areas.
Property Vegetation Management Plan
5-14
5.2 Environmental Management Measures
5.2.1 Management Measures
The amount of vegetation to be cleared will be reduced through optimising stockyard and
infrastructure layout and avoiding areas of high value. Proposed vegetation management
strategies are seen below in Table 5-1. Strategies include pre-construction and construction
phases to adequately manage vegetation. For detailed information, please refer to the Draft
Construction and Environmental Management Plan (CEMP) prepared for the Project.
Adani’s clearing procedure will be adhered to, to minimise the impacts on the surrounding
environment.
Table 5-1 Vegetation Management Table
Control Strategy
Phase
Vegetation
The Project clearing footprint has been designed to minimise the clearing of remnant
vegetation, where possible avoiding high-value habitat including the TEC located
adjacent to the Project
Pre-construction
The extent of vegetation clearing on construction plans and on-site shall be clearly
identified to ensure the minimum amount of vegetation is removed, particularly where
activities lie adjacent to the beach scrub community
Construction
Clearing of vegetation will be undertaken in a manner allowing more mobile, non-flying
fauna to move away from the disturbance area unhindered
Construction
Vegetation outside of the areas designated for clearing will be protected from heavy
machinery and other disturbances
Construction
Mitigation measures have been developed to ensure that impacts associated with construction and
operation of the Project are minimised. Mitigation strategies have been developed based on the
follow criteria:

Avoid potential impacts where possible;

Minimise the severity and/or duration of the impact; and

Offset unavoidable impacts.
Table 5-2 provides details of objectives, performance criteria and procedures for management of
terrestrial flora and fauna during the proposed clearing.
Property Vegetation Management Plan
5-15
Table 5-2: Flora and Fauna Objectives, Performance Criteria, Control Strategies and Monitoring Plan
Project Objective
- To minimise disturbance and adverse impacts on native fauna and flora
from the proposed clearing
- No injury or death to native fauna
- No vegetation to be disturbed outside of areas designated for clearing
Performance Criteria
- No new weed introductions or spread of existing weeds outside of the
Project area
- Vehicles are certified as ‘clean’ of soil or vegetation from other sites
before entering the clearing areas
Control Strategy
The clearing footprint will be designed to minimise the clearing of remnant vegetation, where possible
avoiding high-value habitat including the TEC located to the east of the clearing locations
The extent of vegetation clearing shall be clearly identified on plans to ensure the minimum amount of
vegetation is removed, particularly where clearing is adjacent to the beach scrub community
Clearing of vegetation will be undertaken in a manner allowing more mobile, non-flying fauna to move
away from the disturbance area unhindered
Vegetation outside of the areas designated for clearing will be protected from heavy machinery and
other disturbances
Fauna Management
No clearing will be undertaken until pre-clearing surveys have been completed and appropriate
management measures have been identified and implemented
Pre-clearing surveys will identify and mark large and small tree hollows that may provide daytime
shelter for fauna species. Hollows will be saved and used for habitat in non-disturbed areas in the
Project surrounds
Any native fauna injured as a result of construction will be transported to a native animal
hospital/refuge
Records of all captures and deaths will be kept by the site Environmental Officer and notification
procedures and field audits will be established
Establish temporary fencing around construction activities to exclude fauna from entering the site
Vehicles associated with the clearing activities shall comply with speed limits within the Strategic Port
Land
Weed Management
A control/eradication plan for pests that may potentially occur on the site
Identifying treatment methods and techniques, chemicals, equipment and sources of assistance
Weed hygiene declaration forms to accompany plant and machinery being brought to site
Property Vegetation Management Plan
5-16
Section 6
References
Biotropica Australia 2013, Ecological Survey Results – Abbot Point Coal Terminal Onshore
Geotechnical Investigations, Prepared for CDM Smith Australia Pty Ltd, January 2013.
Connell Hatch 2009, Geotechnical Investigation Report- Abbot Point Bulk Coal Terminal X80/X110
Expansion, Prepared for Ports Corporation of Queensland, July 2009.
Queensland Government 2014, Environmental Offsets Act¸ Department of Environment and
Heritage Protection.
Queensland Government 2014, Environmental Offsets Regulation¸ Department of Environment and
Heritage Protection.
Queensland Government 2014, Queensland Environmental Offsets Policy¸ Department of
Environment and Heritage Protection.
WBM 2006a, Abbot Point Coal Terminal Stage 3 Expansion Environmental Impact Statement,
Prepared for Port Corporation of Queensland, March 2006.
WBM 2006b, Abbot Point Coal Terminal- X50 Expansion Environmental Impact Statement, Prepared
for Ports Corporation of Queensland
Property Vegetation Management Plan
6-1
Appendix A – SDAP Module 8.1 –
Queensland Vegetation Management
State Code
Response column key:
8.1
 Achieved
P/S Performance solution
N/A Not applicable
Queensland vegetation management state code
Table 8.1.3: General
Performance outcomes
Acceptable outcomes
Response
Comment
Clearing to avoid and minimise impacts
PO1 Clearing only occurs where the
applicant has demonstrated that the
development has first avoided, and then
minimised the impacts of development.
No acceptable outcome is prescribed.

Clearing on land in particular circumstances
PO2 Clearing in an area must not be
inconsistent with or impact on any of the
following unless a better environmental
outcome can be achieved:
A range of vegetation surveys have been undertaken in the
Project area. Data from these surveys was used to design
the facility to avoid important environmental features
including the listed Threatened
Ecological
Community
Response
column
key: (TEC)
to the east of the facility and the Caley Valley Wetland.
Overall the Project has been designed to limit the amount of

Achieved
clearing required.
P/S
Performance
solution
N/A
Not applicable
(1) a declared area, or
(2) an exchange area, or
(3) unlawfully cleared area, or
(4) a restoration notice, or
(5) an enforcement notice under the
Sustainable Planning Act 2009
issued for a vegetation clearing
offence, or
No acceptable outcome is prescribed.
(6) a compliance notice containing
conditions about the restoration of
vegetation, or
N/A
Response
column
key:
Clearing will not be inconsistent
nor impact
on any
of the
areas or notices listed in PO2.

Achieved
P/S
Performance
solution
(7) a Land Act notice, or
(8) a trespass notice if the trespass
related act under the Land Act 1994
for the notice is the clearing of
vegetation on the relevant land, or
N/A
Not applicable
an area on a PMAV shown to be
category A where the chief executive of
the VMA reasonably believes that a
vegetation clearing offence is being, or
State development assessment provisions
10 October 2014 V1.5
Module 8 — Native vegetation clearing
8.1 Queensland
vegetationcolumn
management
Response
key: state code
Page 1 of 9

Achieved
Performance outcomes
Acceptable outcomes
has been, committed in relation to the
area.
Clearing on land that is an environmental offset area
AO3.1 Clearing is consistent with the offset delivery plan
PO3 Clearing on land that contains an
or agreement for the environmental offset area.
existing environmental offset is
OR
consistent with the delivery plan or
AO3.2 An additional environmental offset is provided that
agreement for the environmental offset
is consistent with the relevant Queensland Environmental
area.
Offsets Policy.
No clearing of vegetation as a result of the material change of use or reconfiguration of a lot
PO4 Clearing as a result of the material
change of use or reconfiguration of a lot
will not occur.
No acceptable outcome is prescribed.
Response
Comment
N/A
Clearing is not on land containing an environmental offset
area
N/A
Clearing is not on land containing an environmental offset
area
P/S
The proposed clearing is required for development
associated with a SDA Application for a Material Change of
Use under the APSDA Development Scheme. There is no
feasible alternative to the vegetation clearing as part of this
application. However, the PVMP identifies a number of
management measures to prevent impacts of the clearing
on the surrounding environment and limit overall
disturbance. It is noted that the Project EIS has been
assessed by the Department of the Environment (DotE) and
approved by the Minister for the Environment. It is further
noted that the Project is within an area earmarked for Port
Facilities within the APSDA and a range of Government
Policy Documents. Therefore, the clearing of vegetation in
this location can reasonably be expected to occur.
P/S
The proposed clearing does not come under an exemption
provided within Schedule 24, Parts 1 and 2 of the
Sustainable Planning Regulation 2009. There is no feasible
alternative to the vegetation clearing as part of this
application. However, the PVMP identifies a number of
management measures to prevent impacts of the clearing
on the surrounding environment and limit overall
disturbance. It is noted that the Project EIS has been
assessed by the Department of the Environment (DotE) and
approved by the Minister for the Environment. It is further
noted that the Project is within an area earmarked for Port
Facilities within the APSDA and a range of Government
Policy Documents. Therefore, the clearing of vegetation in
this location can reasonably be expected to occur.
Clearing that could already be done under an exemption
PO5 All clearing is limited to clearing that
could be done under an exemption for
the purpose of the development (as
prescribed under Schedule 24, Parts 1
and 2 of the Sustainable Planning
Regulation 2009) prior to the material
change of use application being
approved.
State development assessment provisions
10 October 2014 V1.5
No acceptable outcome is prescribed.
Module 8 — Native vegetation clearing
8.1 Queensland vegetation management state code
Page 2 of 9
Table 8.1.4: Public safety, relevant infrastructure and coordinated projects
Performance outcomes
Limits to clearing
PO1 Clearing is limited to the extent that
is necessary:
(1) for establishing a necessary fence,
firebreak, road or vehicular track, or
for constructing necessary built
infrastructure, if there is no suitable
alternative site for the fence,
firebreak, road, track or
infrastructure (relevant
infrastructure), or
(2)
Acceptable outcomes
Response
No acceptable outcome is prescribed.
1)
as a natural and ordinary
consequence of other assessable
development for which a
development approval as defined
under the repealed Integrated
Planning Act 1997 was given, or a
development application as defined
under that Act was made, before
16 May 2003, or
(3)
to ensure public safety, or
(4)
for a coordinated project and any
associated ancillary works—other
than a coordinated project that
involves high value agriculture
clearing, or irrigated high value
agriculture clearing.
Wetlands
PO2 Maintain the current extent of
vegetation associated with any natural
wetland to protect:
(1)
water quality by filtering sediments,
nutrients and other pollutants
(2)
aquatic habitat
(3)
terrestrial habitat.
Comment
N/A
AO2.1 Clearing does not occur in or within 100 metres of
any natural wetland.
OR
AO2.2 Clearing only occurs within 100 metres of any
natural wetland where:
(1) the clearing does not occur within 50 metres of the
defining bank of any natural wetland, or the widths
stipulated by Table 1 are not exceeded.
The purpose of this clearing is to establish
port infrastructure and to allow construction of
the T0 Project which has been assessed by
the Department of the Environment (DotE)
and approved by the Minister for the
Environment (EPBC 2011/6190). The T0
Project is considered relevant infrastructure
for the purpose of this application. Adani have
undertaken multiple desktop and field
vegetation surveys and located the Project
infrastructure where possible in areas of least
vegetation or pre-disturbed areas. Thus the
relevant purpose is consistent with Section
22A (2)(d) of the VM Act. All clearing will be
limited to the extent necessary for the Project
and areas approved for clearing by this
application will be appropriately marked.

Clearing does not occur within 100 metres of a natural
wetland. The Caley Valley Wetland is located over 400 m
south-west of the Project area.
N/A
Refer to A.02.1 – The Project is not within 100 metres of a
natural wetland.
OR
State development assessment provisions
10 October 2014 V1.5
Module 8 — Native vegetation clearing
8.1 Queensland vegetation management state code
Page 3 of 9
Performance outcomes
Acceptable outcomes
AO2.3 Where it can be demonstrated that clearing cannot
be avoided, and the extent of clearing has been
minimised, an environmental offset is provided for any
significant residual impacts from clearing of vegetation
associated with a natural wetland.
Editor’s note: Applications for development should identify
whether there is likely to be a significant residual impact and a
need for an environmental offset having regard to the relevant
Queensland Environmental Offsets Policy.
Response
N/A
Comment
Refer to A.02.1 – The Project is not within 100 metres of a
natural wetland.
Watercourses
AO3.1 Clearing does not occur:
(1) in any watercourse, or
(2) within the relevant distance stipulated by Table 2 of
the defining bank of any watercourse.
PO3 Maintain the current extent of
vegetation associated with any
watercourse to protect:
(1) bank stability by protecting against
bank erosion
(2) water quality by filtering sediments,
nutrients and other pollutants
(3) aquatic habitat
(4) terrestrial habitat.
OR
AO3.2 Clearing only occurs within any watercourse or
within the relevant distance stipulated by Table 2 of the
defining bank of any watercourse where:
(1) the clearing does not occur within 5 metres of the
defining bank, or
Clearing does not occur in any watercourse or within the
relevant distance stipulated by Table 2.
N/A
Refer to A03.1
N/A
Refer to A03.1
P/S
The Project will comply with requirements of Table 3 with
the exception of:
(4) The most southern portion of the Project will require
clearing on Lot 51 SP243724 that will reduce the width of
the existing vegetation (between the Project area and Abbot
Point Beach) to less than 100m. Historic clearing has
occurred to the north (existing laydown area) and this has
(2) the widths stipulated by Table 1 is not exceeded OR
AO3.3 Where it can be demonstrated that clearing cannot
be avoided, and the extent of clearing has been
minimised, an environmental offset is provided for any
significant residual impact from clearing of vegetation
associated with any watercourse.
Editor’s note: Applications for development should identify
whether there is likely to be a significant residual impact and a
need for an environmental offset having regard to the relevant
Queensland Environmental Offsets Policy.
Connectivity (public safety and relevant infrastructure)
PO4 In consideration of vegetation on
AO4.1 Clearing occurs in accordance with Table 3.
the subject lot(s) and in the landscape
adjacent to the subject lot(s), vegetation
Table 3 lists the following for Coastal bioregionals and
is retained that:
sub-regions:
(1) is of sufficient size and configured in
Clearing does not:
a way that maintains ecosystem
(1) occur in areas of vegetation that are less than 10
State development assessment provisions
10 October 2014 V1.5

Module 8 — Native vegetation clearing
8.1 Queensland vegetation management state code
Page 4 of 9
Performance outcomes
functioning
(2)
remains in the landscape despite
threatening processes.
Connectivity (coordinated projects)
PO5 In consideration of vegetation on
the subject lot(s) and in the landscape
adjacent to the subject lot(s), vegetation
is retained that:
(1) is of sufficient size and configured in
a way that maintains ecosystem
functioning
(2)
remains in the landscape despite
threatening processes
or where this is not reasonably possible,
maintain the current extent of vegetation.
Soil erosion
PO6 Clearing does not result in:
(1) mass movement, gully erosion, rill
erosion, sheet erosion, tunnel
erosion, stream bank erosion, wind
erosion, or scalding
(2) any associated loss of chemical,
physical or biological fertility—
including, but not limited to water
holding capacity, soil structure,
organic matter, soil biology, and
nutrients
Acceptable outcomes
hectares
(2) reduce the extent of vegetation to less than
10hectares
(3) occur in areas of vegetation less than 100 metres wide
(4) reduce the width of vegetation to less than 100 metres
(5) occur where the extent of vegetation on the subject
lot(s) is reduced to or less than 30 per cent of the total
area of the lot(s)
AO5.1 Clearing occurs in accordance with Table 3.
OR
AO5.2 Where it can be demonstrated that clearing cannot
be avoided, and the extent of clearing has been
minimised, an environmental offset is provided for any
significant residual impact from clearing of vegetation that
forms a connectivity area.
Editor’s note: Applications for development should identify
whether there is likely to be a significant residual impact and a
need for an environmental offset having regard to the relevant
Queensland Environmental Offsets Policy.
AO6.1 Clearing is undertaken in accordance with a
sediment and erosion control plan which avoids and
minimises land degradation.
OR
AO6.2 The application is a development application
where a local government is the assessment manager.
Response
Comment
provided a similar width to the remaining vegetation. It is not
considered that this width reduction will compromise the
foredune vegetation and a range of management measures
will be put in place to ensure the Project operations do not
compromise the integrity of the vegetation communities.
(5) Vegetation on Lot 3 SP227557 will be reduced to less
than 30% of the total area of the lot. This lot will contain the
primary bund and stockyards for the Project. As discussed
above, the area is earmarked for port expansion and there
are no feasible alternatives to the vegetation clearing.
N/A
Project is not a Coordinated Project
N/A
Project is not a Coordinated Project

N/A
A detailed sediment and erosion control plan will be
prepared as referred to in the CEMP. The plan will avoid
and minimise land degradation.
Refer to A06.1
within or outside the lot(s) that are the
subject of the application.
State development assessment provisions
10 October 2014 V1.5
Module 8 — Native vegetation clearing
8.1 Queensland vegetation management state code
Page 5 of 9
Performance outcomes
Salinity
PO7 Clearing does not contribute to land
degradation through:
(1) waterlogging, or
(2) the salinisation of groundwater,
surface water or soil.
Acceptable outcomes
Response
AO7.1 Clearing does not occur in or within 200 metres of
a discharge area or recharge area.
OR
AO7.2 Clearing is less than:
(1) 2 hectares, or
(2) 10 metres wide.

Comment
Clearing does not occur within 200 metres of a discharge
area or recharge area
N/A
Refer to A07.1
N/A
Refer to AO8.3
N/A
Refer to AO8.3
Conserving endangered and of concern regional ecosystems
AO8.1 Clearing does not occur in:
(1) an endangered regional ecosystem, or
(2) an of concern regional ecosystem.
PO8 Maintain the current extent of
endangered regional ecosystems and of
concern regional ecosystems.
OR
AO8.2 Clearing in an endangered regional ecosystem or
an of concern regional ecosystem does not exceed the
width or area prescribed in Table 1.
OR
AO8.3 Where it can be demonstrated that clearing cannot
be avoided, and the extent of clearing has been
minimised, an environmental offset is provided for any
significant residual impact from clearing of endangered
regional ecosystems and of concern regional ecosystems.
Editor’s note: Applications for development should identify
whether there is likely to be a significant residual impact and a
need for an environmental offset having regard to the relevant
Queensland Environmental Offsets Policy.

Clearing of approximately 0.42 ha of RE 11.2.2 – Of
Concern, is required for the Project. RE 11.2.2 is Complex
of Spinifex sericeus, Ipomoea pescaprae and Casuarina
equisetifolia grassland and herbland on foredunes. The
Project design has been optimised to limit the area of
vegetation required to be cleared and avoid important
habitat. The Project area is constrained by the existing T1
facility and the TEC to the east. As such the clearing of RE
11.2.2 cannot be avoided and Adani accepts the
requirement for an environmental offset related to the
clearing of this RE.
Essential habitat
PO9 Maintain the current extent of
essential habitat.
State development assessment provisions
10 October 2014 V1.5
AO9.1 Clearing does not occur in an area of essential
habitat.
OR
P/S
AO9.2 Clearing in essential habitat does not exceed the
widths or areas prescribed in Table 1.
The clearing is proposed to occur in an area mapped as
essential habitat under State vegetation mapping. The
essential habitat shown on the mapping is associated with
an essential habitat species record within the centre of the
existing rail loop. The area of the species record has now
been cleared for the Storm Water Return Dam and therefore
the essential habitat mapping is no longer considered
relevant.
N/A
Refer to A09.1
Module 8 — Native vegetation clearing
8.1 Queensland vegetation management state code
Page 6 of 9
Performance outcomes
Acceptable outcomes
OR
AO9.3 Clearing only occurs where an area of essential
habitat is isolated and small in size and at risk from
threatening processes, for the prescribed species.
OR
AO9.4 Where it can be demonstrated that clearing cannot
be avoided, and the extent of clearing has been
minimised, an environmental offset is provided for any
significant residual impact from clearing of essential
habitat.
Editor’s note: Applications for development should identify
whether there is likely to be a significant residual impact and a
need for an environmental offset having regard to the relevant
Queensland Environmental Offsets Policy.
Response
Comment
N/A
Refer to A09.1
N/A
Refer to A09.1
N/A
Refer to AO10.2
Acid sulfate soils
AO10.1 Clearing does not occur in land zone 1, land zone
2 or land zone 3.
OR
An Acid Sulfate Soil (ASS) Assessment has been
undertaken in general accordance the following guidelines:
PO10 Clearing activities do not result in
disturbance of acid sulfate soils or
changes to the hydrology of the location
that will either:
(1) aerate horizons containing iron
sulfides, or
(2) mobilise acid or metals.
(2) the acid sulfate soils are managed consistent with the
State Planning Policy, Department of State
Development infrastructure and Planning 2013, and
with the Soil Management Guidelines in the
Queensland Acid Sulfate Soil Technical Manual,
Department of Science, Information Technology,
Innovation and the Arts, 2014.
OR
State development assessment provisions
10 October 2014 V1.5
Guidelines for Sampling and Analysis of Lowland Acid
Sulfate Soils (ASS) in Queensland 1998. Queensland’ Acid
Sulfate Soils Investigation Team’s (QASSIT).
AO10.2 Clearing in land zone 1, land zone 2 or land zone
3 in areas below the 5 metre Australian Height Datum only
occurs where:
(1) it does not involve mechanical clearing
Module 8 — Native vegetation clearing
The purpose of the ASS Assessment was to:
Pending

Characterise the site for environmental planning
and design; and

Perform an assessment of the soil at the proposed
Project site to identify presence or potential for acid
sulfate soils.
Observations made during the field sampling and the
preliminary laboratory analysis i.e. Stage 1, ASS screening
testing indicates the T0 ASS Assessment findings will be in
relative consistence with other Abbot Point ASS
Assessments. i.e. There is not a high probability of the
presence of ASS or PASS within the area being disturbed
8.1 Queensland vegetation management state code
Page 7 of 9
Performance outcomes
Acceptable outcomes
Response
Comment
by the T0 Project.
T0 ASS Assessment Stage 2 laboratory analysis is currently
underway and will provide qualitative information with regard
to the presence or absence of ASS or PASS of the samples
being analyzed as part of the Stage 2 assessment.
A full description of both Stage 1 and Stage 2 assessments,
along with commentary on field observations will be
provided in a comprehensive ASS Assessment Report.
The presence and distribution of ASS material will dictate
the requirement for an ASS Management Plan and
associated management actions.
This determination can be made at the finalisation of the
ASS Assessment.
AO10.3 The application is a development application
where a local government is the assessment manager.
N/A
The Office of the Coordinator-General is the assessment
manager
Table 8.1.5: Extractive industry
Table 8.1.5 has been removed - development does not involve and Extractive Industry
Table 8.1.6: High value agriculture clearing and irrigated high value agriculture clearing
Table 8.1.6 has been removed - development does not involve high, value agricultural clearing and irrigated high value agricultural clearing.
Table 8.1.7: Necessary environmental clearing
Table 8.1.7 has been removed – development does not involve necessary environmental cleaning.
Table 8.1.8: Weed or pest management
Table 8.1.8 has been removed – development is not for weed or pest management clearing
State development assessment provisions
10 October 2014 V1.5
Module 8 — Native vegetation clearing
8.1 Queensland vegetation management state code
Page 8 of 9
Table 8.1.9: Thinning
Table 8.1.9 has been removed – development is not for the purpose of clearing for thinning purposes
Table 8.1.10: Encroachment
Table 8.1.10 has been removed – development is not for the purpose of clearing for encroachment.
Table 8.1.11: Fodder
Table 8.1.11 has been removed – development is not for the purpose of fodder harvesting clearing.
State development assessment provisions
10 October 2014 V1.5
Module 8 — Native vegetation clearing
8.1 Queensland vegetation management state code
Page 9 of 9
Appendix B – Certified PMAV
Appendix C – State Vegetation
Mapping
09/12/2014 06:33:36
Lot: '51' Plan: 'SP243724'
Page 1
09/12/2014 06:33:37
Lot: '51' Plan: 'SP243724'
Page 2
09/12/2014 06:33:39
Lot: '51' Plan: 'SP243724'
Vegetation Management Act 1999 - Extract from the essential habitat database
Essential habitat is required for assessment under the:
• State Development Assessment Provisions - Module 8: Native vegetation clearing which sets out the matters of interest to the state for development assessment under the Sustainable Planning
Act 2009; and
• Self-assessable vegetation clearing codes made under the Vegetation Management Act 1999
Essential habitat for one or more of the following species is found on and within 1.1 km of the identified subject lot/s or on and within 2.2 km of an identified coordinate on the accompanying essential habitat
map.
This report identifies essential habitat in Category A, B and Category C areas.
The numeric labels on the essential habitat map can be cross referenced with the database below to determine which essential habitat factors might exist for a particular species.
Essential habitat is compiled from a combination of species habitat models and buffered species records.
The Department of Natural Resources and Mines website (http://www.dnrm.qld.gov.au) has more information on how the layer is applied under the State Development Assessment Provisions - Module 8:
Native vegetation clearing and the Vegetation Management Act 1999.
Regional ecosystem is a mandatory essential habitat factor, unless otherwise stated.
Essential habitat, for protected wildlife, means a category A area, a category B area or category C area shown on the regulated vegetation management map1) (a) that has at least 3 essential habitat factors for the protected wildlife that must include any essential habitat factors that are stated as mandatory for the protected wildlife in the essential habitat
database; or
2) (b) in which the protected wildlife, at any stage of its life cycle, is located.
Essential habitat identifies endangered or vulnerable native wildlife prescribed under the Nature Conservation Act 1994.
Essential habitat in Category A and B (Remnant vegetation species record) areas:1100m Species Information
Label
Scientific Name
Common Name
NCA Status
Vegetation Community
Altitude
Soils
Position in
Landscape
1785
Geophaps scripta
scripta
Squatter Pigeon
(southern subsp.)
V
Dry eucalypt woodland (including poplar box, spotted gum, yellow
box, acacia and callitris), with sparse short grass, often on sandy
areas near to permanent water; grassy eucalypt woodlands. Nest
on ground near or under grass tussock, log or low bush.
None
no soil information
Gravelly ridges,
traprock and river
flats.
Essential habitat in Category A and B (Remnant vegetation species record) areas:1100m Regional Ecosystems Information
Label
Regional Ecosystem (this is a mandatory essential habitat factor, unless otherwise stated)
1785
8.1.5, 8.2.1, 8.2.7, 8.2.8, 8.2.12, 8.3.2, 8.3.3, 8.3.5, 8.3.6, 8.3.13, 8.5.2, 8.5.3, 8.5.5, 8.5.6, 8.9.1, 8.11.1, 8.11.3, 8.11.4, 8.11.5, 8.11.6, 8.11.8, 8.12.6, 8.12.7, 8.12.9, 8.12.12,
8.12.14, 8.12.20, 8.12.22, 8.12.23, 8.12.25, 9.3.1, 9.3.2, 9.3.3, 9.3.4, 9.3.5, 9.3.6, 9.3.7, 9.3.8, 9.3.9, 9.3.11, 9.3.13, 9.3.14, 9.3.15, 9.3.16, 9.3.17, 9.3.18, 9.3.19, 9.3.20, 9.3.21,
9.3.22, 9.3.23, 9.5.3, 9.5.4, 9.5.5, 9.5.6, 9.5.7, 9.5.8, 9.5.9, 9.5.10, 9.5.11, 9.5.12, 9.7.2, 9.7.3, 9.7.5, 9.7.6, 9.8.1, 9.8.2, 9.8.4, 9.8.5, 9.8.6, 9.8.9, 9.8.10, 9.8.11, 9.10.1, 9.10.3,
9.10.6, 9.10.7, 9.10.8, 9.11.1, 9.11.2, 9.11.3, 9.11.4, 9.11.5, 9.11.7, 9.11.10, 9.11.11, 9.11.12, 9.11.13, 9.11.15, 9.11.16, 9.11.17, 9.11.18, 9.11.19, 9.11.23, 9.11.26, 9.11.28,
9.11.29, 9.11.31, 9.11.32, 9.12.1, 9.12.3, 9.12.4, 9.12.5, 9.12.6, 9.12.7, 9.12.10, 9.12.11, 9.12.12, 9.12.13, 9.12.16, 9.12.17, 9.12.18, 9.12.19, 9.12.20, 9.12.21, 9.12.22, 9.12.23,
9.12.24, 9.12.26, 9.12.28, 9.12.30, 9.12.31, 9.12.33, 9.12.35, 9.12.37, 9.12.39, 10.3.1, 10.3.2, 10.3.3, 10.3.4, 10.3.5, 10.3.6, 10.3.9, 10.3.10, 10.3.11, 10.3.12, 10.3.13, 10.3.14,
10.3.15, 10.3.19, 10.3.20, 10.3.27, 10.3.28, 10.3.30, 10.3.31, 10.4.3, 10.5.1, 10.5.2, 10.5.4, 10.5.5, 10.5.7, 10.5.9, 10.5.10, 10.5.11, 10.5.12, 10.7.2, 10.7.3, 10.7.5, 10.7.11,
10.7.12, 10.9.1, 10.9.2, 10.9.3, 10.9.5, 10.10.1, 10.10.3, 10.10.4, 10.10.5, 10.10.7, 11.2.1, 11.2.5, 11.3.1, 11.3.2, 11.3.3, 11.3.4, 11.3.6, 11.3.7, 11.3.8, 11.3.9, 11.3.10, 11.3.12,
11.3.13, 11.3.14, 11.3.15, 11.3.16, 11.3.17, 11.3.18, 11.3.19, 11.3.23, 11.3.25, 11.3.27, 11.3.28, 11.3.29, 11.3.30, 11.3.35, 11.3.36, 11.3.37, 11.3.38, 11.3.39, 11.4.2, 11.4.3,
11.4.5, 11.4.8, 11.4.10, 11.4.12, 11.4.13, 11.5.1, 11.5.2, 11.5.3, 11.5.4, 11.5.5, 11.5.8, 11.5.9, 11.5.12, 11.5.13, 11.5.14, 11.5.17, 11.5.20, 11.5.21, 11.7.1, 11.7.2, 11.7.4, 11.7.6,
11.8.2, 11.8.4, 11.8.5, 11.8.8, 11.8.9, 11.8.11, 11.8.12, 11.8.14, 11.8.15, 11.9.2, 11.9.3, 11.9.7, 11.9.9, 11.9.14, 11.10.1, 11.10.4, 11.10.6, 11.10.7, 11.10.11, 11.10.12, 11.10.13,
11.11.1, 11.11.3, 11.11.4, 11.11.6, 11.11.7, 11.11.8, 11.11.9, 11.11.10, 11.11.11, 11.11.15, 11.11.16, 11.11.19, 11.11.20, 11.12.1, 11.12.2, 11.12.3, 11.12.5, 11.12.6, 11.12.7,
11.12.8, 11.12.9, 11.12.10, 11.12.11, 11.12.12, 11.12.13, 11.12.14, 11.12.17, 11.12.20, 12.2.5, 12.2.6, 12.2.7, 12.2.10, 12.2.11, 12.3.3, 12.3.6, 12.3.10, 12.3.12, 12.3.14, 12.5.2,
12.5.4, 12.5.5, 12.5.7, 12.5.8, 12.5.11, 12.5.12, 12.7.1, 12.7.2, 12.8.14, 12.8.16, 12.8.17, 12.8.19, 12.9-10.7, 12.9-10.8, 12.9-10.12, 12.9-10.13, 12.11.5, 12.11.7, 12.11.8,
12.11.14, 12.11.15, 12.11.20, 12.11.21, 12.11.22, 12.12.7, 12.12.8, 12.12.9, 12.12.12, 12.12.14, 12.12.21, 12.12.22, 12.12.23, 12.12.24, 12.12.25, 12.12.27, 13.3.1, 13.3.4,
13.3.7, 13.11.1, 13.11.3, 13.11.4, 13.11.8, 13.12.2, 13.12.3, 13.12.5, 13.12.8, 13.12.9, 13.12.10
Essential habitat in Category A and B (Remnant vegetation) areas:1100m Species Information
(no results)
Essential habitat in Category A and B (Remnant vegetation) areas:1100m Regional Ecosystems Information
(no results)
Essential habitat in Category C (High value regrowth vegetation) areas:1100m Species Information
(no results)
Essential habitat in Category C (High value regrowth vegetation) areas:1100m Regional Ecosystems Information
(no results)
Page 3