* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Download Elements of Simulation
Survey
Document related concepts
Transcript
Satellite Communications Electromagnetic Wave Propagation • • • • • • • Overview Electromagnetic Waves Propagation Polarization Antennas Antenna radiation patterns Propagation Losses Goldstone antenna at twilight, NASA LECT 04 © 2012 Raymond P. Jefferis III 1 Reference Reference is specifically made to the following highly recommended source: Kraus, J. D. and Marhefka, R. J., Antennas For All Applications, Third Edition, McGraw-Hill, 2002 from which the antenna radiation equations used below were drawn. LECT 04 © 2012 Raymond P. Jefferis III 2 Overview • Satellite communication takes place through the propagation of focused and directed electromagnetic (EM) waves • Since both received and transmitted waves are simultaneously present at very different power levels, in a satellite, both frequency separation and EM field polarization are used to decouple the channels LECT 04 © 2012 Raymond P. Jefferis III 3 Maxwell’s Equations Maxwell’s equations in terms of free charge and current, WIKIPEDIA LECT 04 © 2012 Raymond P. Jefferis III 4 Wave Equation For scalar variable, u (E & M Fields) u 2 2 c(u) u 2 t 2 Solutions are sinusoids in time and space (waves) LECT 04 © 2012 Raymond P. Jefferis III 5 EM Wave Propagation Wikipedia • Electromagnetic (EM) waves propagate energy, contained in their electric and magnetic fields, through space with velocity v, which is the speed of light under the conditions of propagation. LECT 04 © 2012 Raymond P. Jefferis III 6 Transverse EM (Plane) Wave Properties • Velocity of propagation (near light speed) • Electric field is normal to the magnetic field • Both electric and magnetic fields are normal to direction of propagation (plane wave) • The relation of electric to magnetic fields is a constant for the medium (air, vacuum) • Waves are polarized, as determined by the direction of the electric field orientation LECT 04 © 2012 Raymond P. Jefferis III 7 Impedance • The electric field strength E and magnetic field intensity H in a propagating wave are related by, H 1 E where, LECT 04 = magnetic permeability [Henry/meter] 00-7 [Henry/meter] in vacuum = dielectric constant [Farads/meter] 0 = 1/36*10-8 [Farads/meter] in vacuum = impedance of the medium ( 0 =376.7 Ohms in free space) © 2012 Raymond P. Jefferis III 8 Impedance Change At Boundaries • At a boundary between two media of differing impedances (air and raindrops for instance), Z1 and Z2 [Ohms] – Part of the incident wave from Medium1 is reflected – Part of the incident wave is transmitted into Medium2 Z1 1 1 Z2 2 2 LECT 04 © 2012 Raymond P. Jefferis III 9 Wave Energy • The electric and magnetic energy densities in a plane wave are equal. [J/m2] • The total energy is the sum of these energies. [J/m2] LECT 04 1 2 wE E 2 1 wH H 2 2 wE w H wT wE wH wT 12 E 2 12 H 2 © 2012 Raymond P. Jefferis III 10 Wave Energy Density • The energy density of a plane wave is the Poynting energy, S [Watts/m2] SRMS 2 EH E E 1 2 1 1 2 1 2 SAv EH E E 2 2 2 LECT 04 © 2012 Raymond P. Jefferis III 11 Vertical Polarization Behavior • Radio frequency energy at frequency, f, propagates • The wave propagates away from the observer (into the paper), along the z-axis • Energy propagates with velocity, v, • As a function of distance, z, and time, t, the vertical electric field is described by, z E Ey Em cos 2 f t v LECT 04 © 2012 Raymond P. Jefferis III 12 Horizontal Polarization • Radio frequency energy at frequency, f , propagates • The wave propagates away from the observer, along the z-axis • Energy propagates with velocity, v, • As a function of distance, z, and time, t, the horizontal E-field is described by, z E Ex Em cos 2 f t v LECT 04 © 2012 Raymond P. Jefferis III 13 Manipulated Variable Example Run mCos example: • Vary the frequency and observe the results • Pick a position (say z = 0.5), and change the z-variable to see how the wave propagates past the selected location LECT 04 © 2012 Raymond P. Jefferis III Lect 00 - 14 Antennas • Electromagnetic circuits comparable in size to the wavelength of an alternating current • Have alternating electric and magnetic fields resulting in Electromagnetic (EM) radiation • Have a polarization specified by the electric field direction (horizontal or vertical) • Radiation pattern is affected by the shape of the current-carrying conductor(s) • The EM radiation propagates in space LECT 04 © 2012 Raymond P. Jefferis III Lect 00 - 15 Vertically Polarized Antenna • Total antenna length typically /2 • Electric field shown normal to the plane of the earth (vertical) • Oscillating electric fields produce accelerating and decelerating conduction electrons, with consequent radiation of EM-energy • A magnetic field surrounds the currentcarrying wire • The phases of the electric and magnetic fields differ by 90 degrees LECT 04 © 2012 Raymond P. Jefferis III 16 Horizontally Polarized Antenna • Total antenna length typically /2 where λ = c/f • Electric field shown parallel to the plane of the earth (horizontal) • Oscillating electric fields produce accelerating and decelerating conduction electrons, with consequent radiation of EM-energy • A magnetic field surrounds the currentcarrying wire • The phases of the electric and magnetic fields differ by 90 degrees LECT 04 © 2012 Raymond P. Jefferis III 17 Polarization Match Angles • A match angle, M, is defined as the angular polarization difference between a transmitting and a receiving antenna • Smaller match angles result in greater coupling between transmitting and receiving antennas • If the antennas are at opposite polarizations (vertical - horizontal) the received power will be zero, theoretically. LECT 04 © 2012 Raymond P. Jefferis III 18 Circular Polarization • Radio frequency energy at frequency, f, propagates as an EM wave, away from the observer, along the z-axis (into the paper) • The energy propagates with velocity, v • The electric and magnetic fields rotate in time (space) according to, Ex Em cos 2 f t z v z Ey Em cos 2 f t v 2 LECT 04 © 2012 Raymond P. Jefferis III 19 Circularly Polarized Antenna Circular Polarization, Wikipedia Note the spiral net electric field resolves into time-varying Ex and Ey components. Conductor (black); Ex => Green; Ey => Red LECT 04 © 2012 Raymond P. Jefferis III 20 The Isotropic (Ideal) Antenna • The gains of antennas can be stated relative to an isotropic ideal antenna as G [dBi], where G > 0. • This antenna is a (theoretical) point source of EM energy • It radiates uniformly in all directions • A sphere centered on this antenna would exhibit constant energy per unit area over its surface • The gain of an isotropic antenna is 0 dBi Lect 05 © 2012 Raymond P. Jefferis III Lect 00 - 21 Radiation Patterns of Antennas • Electric field intensity is a function of the radial distance and the angle from the antenna • A radiation pattern can be plotted to show field strength (shown as a radial distance) vs angle • The angle between half-power points (denoted as HPBW) is a measure of the focusing (Gain) of the antenna. [Note: Half-power = 3 dB] • Note: Antenna Gain is with respect to an ideal isotropic antenna (Gain = 1.0 or 0.0 dBi) LECT 04 © 2012 Raymond P. Jefferis III 22 Antenna Gain Calculation • G = PA/PI where, PI is the power per unit area radiated by an isotropic antenna, and PA is the antenna power per unit area radiated by a non-isotropic antenna, G is the amount by which the isotropic power would be multiplied to give the same power per unit area as the gain antenna exhibits in the chosen direction LECT 04 © 2012 Raymond P. Jefferis III 23 Antenna Gain Calculation • • • • Pr = radiated power per unit area W = total applied power Rr = antenna radiation resistance Im = maximum value of antenna current 4 r 2 Pr G W 2 Im W Rr 2 LECT 04 © 2012 Raymond P. Jefferis III 24 Antenna Gain and Aperture Calculations G 4 Ae Ae A LECT 04 2 G = antenna gain Ae = effective aperture area = carrier wavelength η = aperture efficiency A = aperture area (r2) © 2012 Raymond P. Jefferis III 25 Half-Wave Dipole Power cos cos Im 2 E 60 r sin 15I m 2 Pr r2 LECT 04 cos cos 2 sin θ is the angle normal to the antenna 2 © 2012 Raymond P. Jefferis III 26 Dipole Radiation Patterns • Two dipole lengths shown: L = /2 (half wave dipole) HPBW = 78˚ Gain = 2.15 dBi L = (full wave dipole) HPBW = 47˚ Gain = 3.8 dBi • The longer antenna focuses the energy into a more narrow beam and thus has higher Gain. Electric field intensity, half-wave dipole LECT 04 © 2012 Raymond P. Jefferis III 27 Half-Wave Dipole Radiation The radiated field and power of a half-wave dipole antenna are expressed by: cos cos 2 E sin P : E2 Radiated power pattern, half-wave dipole LECT 04 © 2012 Raymond P. Jefferis III 28 Half-Wave Dipole Radiation Pattern zro = 0.000001; e0 = 1.0; e1 = Cos[p/2*Cos[theta]]/Sin[theta]; e2 = e1^2; PolarPlot[{e2}, {theta, zro, Pi}, PlotStyle -> {Directive[Thick, Black]}, PlotRange -> Automatic] LECT 04 © 2012 Raymond P. Jefferis III 29 Half-Power Beam Width • The Half-Power Beam Width (HPBW) is defined as the included angle between the half-power points on the radiation pattern. The power is down by 3 dB at these points. • For a half-wave dipole antenna this is calculated as shown on the Mathematica® notebook output that continues below. LECT 04 © 2012 Raymond P. Jefferis III 30 Half-Wave Dipole HPBW Calculation r1 = FindRoot[e1^2 - 0.5 == 0.0, {theta, 60.0 Degree}]; Print[r1] w1 = theta /. r1 Print[w1/Degree] r2 = FindRoot[e1^2 - 0.5 == 0.0, {theta, 120.0 Degree}]; Print[r2] w2 = theta /. R2 Print[w2/Degree] Print[(w2 - w1)/Degree] LECT 04 © 2012 Raymond P. Jefferis III 31 HPBW for Half-Wave Dipole • From the foregoing notebook, the HalfPower Beam Width is found to be: HPBW = 78.0777 degrees • At the outer edges of the beam (HPBW), the power will be 70.7% of the maximum power value. LECT 04 © 2012 Raymond P. Jefferis III 32 Full-Wave Dipole Radiation The radiated field and power of a full-wave dipole antenna are expressed, as a function of angle, by: cos [ cos 1 E sin 2 P: E Power pattern, full-wave dipole LECT 04 © 2012 Raymond P. Jefferis III 33 Full-Wave Dipole Radiation Pattern zro = 0.000001; e0 = 1.0; en = 2.0; e1 = (Cos[p*Cos[theta]] + 1)/(Sin[theta]*en); e2 = e1^2; PolarPlot[{e2}, {theta, zro, p}, PlotStyle -> {Directive[Thick, Black]}] LECT 04 © 2012 Raymond P. Jefferis III 34 Half-Power Beam Width • The Half-Power Beam Width (HPBW) is defined as the included angle between halfpower points on the radiation pattern. The power is down by 3 dB at these points. • For a full-wave dipole antenna this is calculated as shown on the Mathematica® notebook output that continues below. LECT 04 © 2012 Raymond P. Jefferis III 35 Full-Wave HPBW Calculation r1 = FindRoot[e1^2 - 0.5 == 0.0, {theta, 60.0 Degree}]; Print[r1] w1 = theta /. r1 Print[w1/Degree] r2 = FindRoot[e1^2 - 0.5 == 0.0, {theta, 120.0 Degree}]; Print[r2] w2 = theta /. r2 Print[w2/Degree] Print[(w2 - w1)/Degree] LECT 04 © 2012 Raymond P. Jefferis III 36 HPBW for Full-Wave Dipole • From the foregoing notebook, the HalfPower Beam Width is found to be: HPBW = 47.8351 degrees • At the outer edges of the beam (HPBW), the power will be 70.7% of the full value. LECT 04 © 2012 Raymond P. Jefferis III 37 Circular Aperture Antenna • The electric field of a circular aperture antenna can be calculated from: 2 J1[( D / )sin ] E[ ] D sin where, D/ gives the aperture diameter in wavelengths and ϕ is the angle relative to the normal to the plane of the aperture. LECT 04 © 2012 Raymond P. Jefferis III 38 Radiated E-Field of Aperture Antenna 0.03 0.02 0.01 0.00 - 0.01 - 0.02 - 0.03 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0 E-field for aperture with D/ = 10 The Mathematica® notebook follows, for D/ = 10: LECT 04 © 2012 Raymond P. Jefferis III 39 Radiation Pattern of Aperture Antenna Dlam = 10; e2 = (2.0/p*Dlam)*(BesselJ[1, p*Dlam*Sin[theta]])/Sin[theta]; PolarPlot[Abs[e2]/100, {theta, -p/6, p/6}, PlotStyle -> {Directive[Thick, Black]}] LECT 04 © 2012 Raymond P. Jefferis III 40 Radiated Power from an Aperture • The normalized radiated power can be found from E2[] as shown below: 0.04 0.02 0.00 - 0.02 - 0.04 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0 Normalized radiated power for aperture with D/ = 10 LECT 04 © 2012 Raymond P. Jefferis III 41 Radiated Power Calculation Dlam = 10; e2 = (2.0/p*Dlam)*(BesselJ[1, p*Dlam*Sin[theta]])/Sin[theta]; PolarPlot[Abs[e2/100], {theta, -p/6, p/6}, PlotStyle -> {Directive[Thick, Black]}, PlotRange -> {{0, 1}, {-0.04, 0.04}}] LECT 04 © 2012 Raymond P. Jefferis III 42 Half Power Beam Width • The HPBW of an aperture having D/ = 10 is calculated to be: 5.89831 Degrees • The Mathematica® notebook for this calculation follows: LECT 04 © 2012 Raymond P. Jefferis III 43 Aperture HPBW Calculation p20 =((2.0/p*Dlam)* (BesselJ[1,p*Dlam*Sin[0.00001]])/Sin[0.00001])^2 p2 = ((2.0/p*Dlam)* (BesselJ[1,p*Dlam*Sin[theta]])/Sin[theta])^2/p20; r1 = FindRoot[p2 - 0.5 == 0.0, {theta,1 Degree}]; w1 = theta /. r1; Print[w1/Degree] r2 = FindRoot[p2 - 0.5 == 0.0,{theta,-1 Degree}]; w2 = theta /. r2 Print[w2/Degree] Print[Abs[(w2 - w1)]/Degree] LECT 04 © 2012 Raymond P. Jefferis III 44 Workshop 04 - Antenna HPBW • A circular aperture antenna has D/ = 20. Plot the radiation pattern of this antenna and calculate its Half Power Beam Width. • What can you say about the aiming requirements for such an antenna mounted on a satellite? LECT 04 © 2012 Raymond P. Jefferis III Lect 00 - 45 Transmission Losses Transmitted electromagnetic energy from a satellite is lost on its way to the receiving station due to a number of factors, including: – Antenna efficiency – Antenna aperture gain – Path loss LECT 04 – Rain/Cloud loss – Atmospheric loss – Diffraction loss © 2012 Raymond P. Jefferis III 46 Antenna Gain and Link Losses Pt = transmitted power Pr = received power At = transmit antenna aperture Ar = receive antenna aperture Lp = path loss La = atmospheric attenuation loss Ld = diffraction losses Antenna Gain (t or r): Gt/r = 4Ae t/r/ 2 Combined Antenna Gain (t + r): G = GtGr LECT 04 © 2012 Raymond P. Jefferis III 47 Antenna Gain Ae A (d / 2) 4 G 2 Ae d G A LECT 04 2 2 Ae = effective antenna aperture G = 4Ae/ 2 (Antenna Gain) d = antenna diameter λ = wavelength = aperture efficiency © 2012 Raymond P. Jefferis III 48 Compensating for Link Losses • Increase antenna gain • Increase power input to antenna • Net effect: increase EIRP (Equivalent Isotropically Radiated Power) - Make sure tracking of beam is accurate (target on beam axis). LECT 04 © 2012 Raymond P. Jefferis III Lect 00 - 49 EIRP • Equivalent Isotropic Radiated Power • – the equivalent power input that would be needed for an isotropic antenna to radiate the same power over the angles of interest LECT 04 © 2012 Raymond P. Jefferis III Lect 00 - 50 Path Loss Calculation • Effective Aperture (transmit or receive): Ae = A • Effective Radiated Power: EIRP = PtGt = Pt tAt • Path Loss (for path length R): Lp = (4R/ 2 • Received Power: Pr = EIRP*Gr/Lp where, Gt = 4Aet/ 2 Gr = 4Aer/ 2 LECT 04 © 2012 Raymond P. Jefferis III 51 Decibel (dB) Scale Definition • PdB = 10 log10 Pt/Pr • Logarithmic scale changes division and multiplication into subtraction and addition • dBW refers to power with respect to 1 Watt. • Received power (Pratt & Bostian, Eq. 4.11): • Pr = EIRP + Gr - Lp [dBW] LECT 04 © 2012 Raymond P. Jefferis III 52 Received Power - dB Model • (Pratt & Bostian, Eq. 4.11) Pr = EIRP + Gr - Lp - La - Lt - Lr [dBW] – – – – – – LECT 04 EIRP => Effective radiated power Gr => Receiving antenna gain Lp => Path loss La => Atmospheric attenuation loss Lt => Transmitting antenna losses Lr => Receiving antenna losses © 2012 Raymond P. Jefferis III 53 End LECT 04 © 2012 Raymond P. Jefferis III 54