* Your assessment is very important for improving the work of artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Download Elements of Simulation
Survey
Document related concepts
Transcript
Satellite Communications
Electromagnetic Wave
Propagation
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
Overview
Electromagnetic Waves
Propagation
Polarization
Antennas
Antenna radiation patterns
Propagation Losses
Goldstone antenna at twilight, NASA
LECT 04
© 2012 Raymond P. Jefferis III
1
Reference
Reference is specifically made to the
following highly recommended source:
Kraus, J. D. and Marhefka, R. J., Antennas For All
Applications, Third Edition, McGraw-Hill, 2002
from which the antenna radiation equations
used below were drawn.
LECT 04
© 2012 Raymond P. Jefferis III
2
Overview
• Satellite communication takes place through
the propagation of focused and directed
electromagnetic (EM) waves
• Since both received and transmitted waves
are simultaneously present at very different
power levels, in a satellite, both frequency
separation and EM field polarization are
used to decouple the channels
LECT 04
© 2012 Raymond P. Jefferis III
3
Maxwell’s Equations
Maxwell’s equations in terms of free charge and current, WIKIPEDIA
LECT 04
© 2012 Raymond P. Jefferis III
4
Wave Equation
For scalar variable, u (E & M Fields)
u
2 2
c(u)
u
2
t
2
Solutions are sinusoids in time and space (waves)
LECT 04
© 2012 Raymond P. Jefferis III
5
EM Wave Propagation
Wikipedia
• Electromagnetic (EM) waves propagate energy,
contained in their electric and magnetic fields,
through space with velocity v, which is the speed
of light under the conditions of propagation.
LECT 04
© 2012 Raymond P. Jefferis III
6
Transverse EM (Plane) Wave Properties
• Velocity of propagation (near light speed)
• Electric field is normal to the magnetic field
• Both electric and magnetic fields are normal
to direction of propagation (plane wave)
• The relation of electric to magnetic fields is
a constant for the medium (air, vacuum)
• Waves are polarized, as determined by the
direction of the electric field orientation
LECT 04
© 2012 Raymond P. Jefferis III
7
Impedance
• The electric field strength E and magnetic field
intensity H in a propagating wave are related by,
H
1
E
where,
LECT 04
= magnetic permeability [Henry/meter]
00-7 [Henry/meter] in vacuum
= dielectric constant [Farads/meter]
0 = 1/36*10-8 [Farads/meter] in vacuum
= impedance of the medium
( 0 =376.7 Ohms in free space)
© 2012 Raymond P. Jefferis III
8
Impedance Change At Boundaries
• At a boundary between two media of differing
impedances (air and raindrops for instance), Z1
and Z2 [Ohms]
– Part of the incident wave from Medium1 is reflected
– Part of the incident wave is transmitted into Medium2
Z1
1
1
Z2
2
2
LECT 04
© 2012 Raymond P. Jefferis III
9
Wave Energy
• The electric and
magnetic energy
densities in a
plane wave are
equal. [J/m2]
• The total energy is
the sum of these
energies. [J/m2]
LECT 04
1 2
wE E
2
1
wH H 2
2
wE w H
wT wE wH
wT 12 E 2 12 H 2
© 2012 Raymond P. Jefferis III
10
Wave Energy Density
• The energy density of a plane wave is the
Poynting energy, S [Watts/m2]
SRMS
2
EH E
E
1
2
1
1 2 1 2
SAv EH
E
E
2
2
2
LECT 04
© 2012 Raymond P. Jefferis III
11
Vertical Polarization Behavior
• Radio frequency energy at frequency, f,
propagates
• The wave propagates away from the
observer (into the paper), along the z-axis
• Energy propagates with velocity, v,
• As a function of distance, z, and time, t,
the vertical electric field is described by,
z
E Ey Em cos 2 f t
v
LECT 04
© 2012 Raymond P. Jefferis III
12
Horizontal Polarization
• Radio frequency energy at frequency, f ,
propagates
• The wave propagates away from the
observer, along the z-axis
• Energy propagates with velocity, v,
• As a function of distance, z, and time, t,
the horizontal E-field is described by,
z
E Ex Em cos 2 f t
v
LECT 04
© 2012 Raymond P. Jefferis III
13
Manipulated Variable Example
Run mCos example:
• Vary the frequency and observe the results
• Pick a position (say z = 0.5), and change the
z-variable to see how the wave propagates
past the selected location
LECT 04
© 2012 Raymond P. Jefferis III
Lect 00 - 14
Antennas
• Electromagnetic circuits comparable in size
to the wavelength of an alternating current
• Have alternating electric and magnetic fields
resulting in Electromagnetic (EM) radiation
• Have a polarization specified by the electric field
direction (horizontal or vertical)
• Radiation pattern is affected by the shape of the
current-carrying conductor(s)
• The EM radiation propagates in space
LECT 04
© 2012 Raymond P. Jefferis III
Lect 00 - 15
Vertically Polarized Antenna
• Total antenna length typically /2
• Electric field shown normal to the plane
of the earth (vertical)
• Oscillating electric fields produce
accelerating and decelerating conduction
electrons, with consequent radiation of
EM-energy
• A magnetic field surrounds the currentcarrying wire
• The phases of the electric and magnetic
fields differ by 90 degrees
LECT 04
© 2012 Raymond P. Jefferis III
16
Horizontally Polarized Antenna
• Total antenna length typically /2
where λ = c/f
• Electric field shown parallel to the plane
of the earth (horizontal)
• Oscillating electric fields produce
accelerating and decelerating conduction
electrons, with consequent radiation of
EM-energy
• A magnetic field surrounds the currentcarrying wire
• The phases of the electric and magnetic
fields differ by 90 degrees
LECT 04
© 2012 Raymond P. Jefferis III
17
Polarization Match Angles
• A match angle, M, is defined as the angular
polarization difference between a transmitting and
a receiving antenna
• Smaller match angles result in greater coupling
between transmitting and receiving antennas
• If the antennas are at opposite polarizations
(vertical - horizontal) the received power will be
zero, theoretically.
LECT 04
© 2012 Raymond P. Jefferis III
18
Circular Polarization
• Radio frequency energy at frequency, f,
propagates as an EM wave, away from
the observer, along the z-axis (into the
paper)
• The energy propagates with velocity, v
• The electric and magnetic fields rotate in
time (space) according to,
Ex Em cos 2 f t
z
v
z
Ey Em cos 2 f t
v 2
LECT 04
© 2012 Raymond P. Jefferis III
19
Circularly Polarized Antenna
Circular Polarization, Wikipedia
Note the spiral net electric field resolves into
time-varying Ex and Ey components.
Conductor (black); Ex => Green; Ey => Red
LECT 04
© 2012 Raymond P. Jefferis III
20
The Isotropic (Ideal) Antenna
• The gains of antennas can be stated relative to an
isotropic ideal antenna as G [dBi], where G > 0.
• This antenna is a (theoretical) point source of EM
energy
• It radiates uniformly in all directions
• A sphere centered on this antenna would exhibit
constant energy per unit area over its surface
• The gain of an isotropic antenna is 0 dBi
Lect 05
© 2012 Raymond P. Jefferis III
Lect 00 - 21
Radiation Patterns of Antennas
• Electric field intensity is a function of the radial
distance and the angle from the antenna
• A radiation pattern can be plotted to show field
strength (shown as a radial distance) vs angle
• The angle between half-power points (denoted as
HPBW) is a measure of the focusing (Gain) of the
antenna. [Note: Half-power = 3 dB]
• Note: Antenna Gain is with respect to an ideal
isotropic antenna (Gain = 1.0 or 0.0 dBi)
LECT 04
© 2012 Raymond P. Jefferis III
22
Antenna Gain Calculation
• G = PA/PI
where,
PI is the power per unit area radiated by an
isotropic antenna, and
PA is the antenna power per unit area radiated by a
non-isotropic antenna,
G is the amount by which the isotropic power
would be multiplied to give the same power per
unit area as the gain antenna exhibits in the chosen
direction
LECT 04
© 2012 Raymond P. Jefferis III
23
Antenna Gain Calculation
•
•
•
•
Pr = radiated power per unit area
W = total applied power
Rr = antenna radiation resistance
Im = maximum value of antenna current
4 r 2 Pr
G
W
2
Im
W
Rr
2
LECT 04
© 2012 Raymond P. Jefferis III
24
Antenna Gain and Aperture Calculations
G
4 Ae
Ae A
LECT 04
2
G = antenna gain
Ae = effective aperture area
= carrier wavelength
η = aperture efficiency
A = aperture area (r2)
© 2012 Raymond P. Jefferis III
25
Half-Wave Dipole Power
cos
cos
Im
2
E 60
r
sin
15I m 2
Pr
r2
LECT 04
cos
cos
2
sin
θ is the angle normal
to the antenna
2
© 2012 Raymond P. Jefferis III
26
Dipole Radiation Patterns
• Two dipole lengths shown:
L = /2 (half wave dipole)
HPBW = 78˚
Gain = 2.15 dBi
L = (full wave dipole)
HPBW = 47˚
Gain = 3.8 dBi
• The longer antenna focuses the
energy into a more narrow beam
and thus has higher Gain.
Electric field intensity, half-wave dipole
LECT 04
© 2012 Raymond P. Jefferis III
27
Half-Wave Dipole Radiation
The radiated field and power
of a half-wave dipole
antenna are expressed by:
cos cos
2
E
sin
P : E2
Radiated power pattern, half-wave dipole
LECT 04
© 2012 Raymond P. Jefferis III
28
Half-Wave Dipole Radiation Pattern
zro = 0.000001;
e0 = 1.0;
e1 = Cos[p/2*Cos[theta]]/Sin[theta];
e2 = e1^2;
PolarPlot[{e2}, {theta, zro, Pi}, PlotStyle ->
{Directive[Thick, Black]},
PlotRange -> Automatic]
LECT 04
© 2012 Raymond P. Jefferis III
29
Half-Power Beam Width
• The Half-Power Beam Width (HPBW) is
defined as the included angle between the
half-power points on the radiation pattern.
The power is down by 3 dB at these points.
• For a half-wave dipole antenna this is
calculated as shown on the Mathematica®
notebook output that continues below.
LECT 04
© 2012 Raymond P. Jefferis III
30
Half-Wave Dipole HPBW Calculation
r1 = FindRoot[e1^2 - 0.5 == 0.0, {theta,
60.0 Degree}];
Print[r1]
w1 = theta /. r1
Print[w1/Degree]
r2 = FindRoot[e1^2 - 0.5 == 0.0, {theta,
120.0 Degree}];
Print[r2]
w2 = theta /. R2
Print[w2/Degree]
Print[(w2 - w1)/Degree]
LECT 04
© 2012 Raymond P. Jefferis III
31
HPBW for Half-Wave Dipole
• From the foregoing notebook, the HalfPower Beam Width is found to be:
HPBW = 78.0777 degrees
• At the outer edges of the beam (HPBW), the
power will be 70.7% of the maximum
power value.
LECT 04
© 2012 Raymond P. Jefferis III
32
Full-Wave Dipole Radiation
The radiated field and power
of a full-wave dipole antenna
are expressed, as a function of
angle, by:
cos [ cos 1
E
sin
2
P: E
Power pattern, full-wave dipole
LECT 04
© 2012 Raymond P. Jefferis III
33
Full-Wave Dipole Radiation Pattern
zro = 0.000001;
e0 = 1.0;
en = 2.0;
e1 = (Cos[p*Cos[theta]] + 1)/(Sin[theta]*en);
e2 = e1^2;
PolarPlot[{e2}, {theta, zro, p}, PlotStyle ->
{Directive[Thick, Black]}]
LECT 04
© 2012 Raymond P. Jefferis III
34
Half-Power Beam Width
• The Half-Power Beam Width (HPBW) is
defined as the included angle between halfpower points on the radiation pattern. The
power is down by 3 dB at these points.
• For a full-wave dipole antenna this is
calculated as shown on the Mathematica®
notebook output that continues below.
LECT 04
© 2012 Raymond P. Jefferis III
35
Full-Wave HPBW Calculation
r1 = FindRoot[e1^2 - 0.5 == 0.0, {theta,
60.0 Degree}];
Print[r1]
w1 = theta /. r1
Print[w1/Degree]
r2 = FindRoot[e1^2 - 0.5 == 0.0, {theta,
120.0 Degree}];
Print[r2]
w2 = theta /. r2
Print[w2/Degree]
Print[(w2 - w1)/Degree]
LECT 04
© 2012 Raymond P. Jefferis III
36
HPBW for Full-Wave Dipole
• From the foregoing notebook, the HalfPower Beam Width is found to be:
HPBW = 47.8351 degrees
• At the outer edges of the beam (HPBW), the
power will be 70.7% of the full value.
LECT 04
© 2012 Raymond P. Jefferis III
37
Circular Aperture Antenna
• The electric field of a circular aperture
antenna can be calculated from:
2 J1[( D / )sin ]
E[ ]
D
sin
where, D/ gives the aperture diameter in
wavelengths and ϕ is the angle relative to the
normal to the plane of the aperture.
LECT 04
© 2012 Raymond P. Jefferis III
38
Radiated E-Field of Aperture Antenna
0.03
0.02
0.01
0.00
- 0.01
- 0.02
- 0.03
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1.0
E-field for aperture with D/ = 10
The Mathematica® notebook follows, for D/ = 10:
LECT 04
© 2012 Raymond P. Jefferis III
39
Radiation Pattern of Aperture Antenna
Dlam = 10;
e2 = (2.0/p*Dlam)*(BesselJ[1,
p*Dlam*Sin[theta]])/Sin[theta];
PolarPlot[Abs[e2]/100, {theta, -p/6, p/6},
PlotStyle -> {Directive[Thick, Black]}]
LECT 04
© 2012 Raymond P. Jefferis III
40
Radiated Power from an Aperture
• The normalized radiated power can be
found from E2[] as shown below:
0.04
0.02
0.00
- 0.02
- 0.04
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1.0
Normalized radiated power for aperture with D/ =
10
LECT 04
© 2012 Raymond P. Jefferis III
41
Radiated Power Calculation
Dlam = 10;
e2 = (2.0/p*Dlam)*(BesselJ[1,
p*Dlam*Sin[theta]])/Sin[theta];
PolarPlot[Abs[e2/100], {theta, -p/6, p/6},
PlotStyle -> {Directive[Thick, Black]},
PlotRange -> {{0, 1}, {-0.04, 0.04}}]
LECT 04
© 2012 Raymond P. Jefferis III
42
Half Power Beam Width
• The HPBW of an aperture having D/ = 10
is calculated to be:
5.89831 Degrees
• The Mathematica® notebook for this
calculation follows:
LECT 04
© 2012 Raymond P. Jefferis III
43
Aperture HPBW Calculation
p20 =((2.0/p*Dlam)*
(BesselJ[1,p*Dlam*Sin[0.00001]])/Sin[0.00001])^2
p2 = ((2.0/p*Dlam)*
(BesselJ[1,p*Dlam*Sin[theta]])/Sin[theta])^2/p20;
r1 = FindRoot[p2 - 0.5 == 0.0, {theta,1 Degree}];
w1 = theta /. r1;
Print[w1/Degree]
r2 = FindRoot[p2 - 0.5 == 0.0,{theta,-1 Degree}];
w2 = theta /. r2
Print[w2/Degree]
Print[Abs[(w2 - w1)]/Degree]
LECT 04
© 2012 Raymond P. Jefferis III
44
Workshop 04 - Antenna HPBW
• A circular aperture antenna has D/ = 20.
Plot the radiation pattern of this antenna and
calculate its Half Power Beam Width.
• What can you say about the aiming
requirements for such an antenna mounted
on a satellite?
LECT 04
© 2012 Raymond P. Jefferis III
Lect 00 - 45
Transmission Losses
Transmitted electromagnetic energy from a
satellite is lost on its way to the receiving
station due to a number of factors, including:
– Antenna efficiency
– Antenna aperture gain
– Path loss
LECT 04
– Rain/Cloud loss
– Atmospheric loss
– Diffraction loss
© 2012 Raymond P. Jefferis III
46
Antenna Gain and Link Losses
Pt = transmitted power
Pr = received power
At = transmit antenna aperture
Ar = receive antenna aperture
Lp = path loss
La = atmospheric attenuation loss
Ld = diffraction losses
Antenna Gain (t or r):
Gt/r = 4Ae t/r/ 2
Combined Antenna Gain (t + r):
G = GtGr
LECT 04
© 2012 Raymond P. Jefferis III
47
Antenna Gain
Ae A (d / 2)
4
G 2 Ae
d
G A
LECT 04
2
2
Ae = effective antenna aperture
G = 4Ae/ 2 (Antenna Gain)
d = antenna diameter
λ = wavelength
= aperture efficiency
© 2012 Raymond P. Jefferis III
48
Compensating for Link Losses
• Increase antenna gain
• Increase power input to antenna
• Net effect: increase EIRP (Equivalent
Isotropically Radiated Power)
- Make sure tracking of beam is accurate
(target on beam axis).
LECT 04
© 2012 Raymond P. Jefferis III
Lect 00 - 49
EIRP
• Equivalent Isotropic Radiated Power
• – the equivalent power input that would be
needed for an isotropic antenna to radiate
the same power over the angles of interest
LECT 04
© 2012 Raymond P. Jefferis III
Lect 00 - 50
Path Loss Calculation
• Effective Aperture (transmit or receive):
Ae = A
• Effective Radiated Power:
EIRP = PtGt = Pt tAt
• Path Loss (for path length R):
Lp = (4R/ 2
• Received Power:
Pr = EIRP*Gr/Lp
where,
Gt = 4Aet/ 2
Gr = 4Aer/ 2
LECT 04
© 2012 Raymond P. Jefferis III
51
Decibel (dB) Scale Definition
• PdB = 10 log10 Pt/Pr
• Logarithmic scale changes division and
multiplication into subtraction and addition
• dBW refers to power with respect to 1 Watt.
• Received power (Pratt & Bostian, Eq. 4.11):
• Pr = EIRP + Gr - Lp [dBW]
LECT 04
© 2012 Raymond P. Jefferis III
52
Received Power - dB Model
• (Pratt & Bostian, Eq. 4.11)
Pr = EIRP + Gr - Lp - La - Lt - Lr [dBW]
–
–
–
–
–
–
LECT 04
EIRP => Effective radiated power
Gr => Receiving antenna gain
Lp => Path loss
La => Atmospheric attenuation loss
Lt => Transmitting antenna losses
Lr => Receiving antenna losses
© 2012 Raymond P. Jefferis III
53
End
LECT 04
© 2012 Raymond P. Jefferis III
54