Download HOT DOG! We are just past celebrating that uniquely American

Survey
yes no Was this document useful for you?
   Thank you for your participation!

* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project

Document related concepts
no text concepts found
Transcript
HOT DOG!
We are just past celebrating that uniquely American holiday that
is Independence Day and we are entering the heart of baseball season,
so many are enjoying the dietary staple of the summer that is the hot
dog. The hot dog—the centerpiece of the American triumvirate of
“baseball, hot dogs, and apple pie”. It is emblematic of our national
motto: E pluribus unum (“out of many, one”) considering the dog’s
constituent parts—but it is not wise to consider the parts in much
detail. Suffice it to say that the whole is better.
The hot dog is even a part of our competitive spirit. Just this very
4 of July some fellow set an eating contest record by consuming 72
hot dogs in 10 minutes. Burp!
th
It therefore is not surprising that the hot dog has played a role in
the evolving rule of law. Case law and some statutes adopted what is
known as “The Baseball Rule”—basically spectators assume the known
risk of baseballs and bats flying into the stands. But what about flying
hot dogs?
In the Fall of 2009, a fan named Coomer attended a Kansas City
Royals game and found a set a few rows behind the visitors’ dugout.
The Royals’ mascot (Sluggerrr”!) began throwing hot dogs into the
stands from the top of the dugout. Coomer was not looking when
Sluggerrr tossed a hot dog in his direction, striking him in the eye. A
detached retina was the result.
Coomer sued the Royals, alleging negligence and battery. The
Royals assert defenses of assumption of the risk and comparative fault.
Coomer’s arguments against these defenses failed, the court holding
that a jury could determine whether such an injury was a risk of
attending a ballgame. The jury held for the Royals and an appeal
ensued.
The appeals court said the question was “whether the risk which
led to injury involved some feature or aspect of the game which is
inevitable or unavoidable in the actual playing of the game”. . .an
“inherent risk”. The court found that the hot dog toss is not inherently
part of the game because it is only used when the game is not actively
ongoing. A flying ‘dog is not the same as a flying ball or bat.
How appropriate—a case involving cased meat. So, while
devouring that hot dog at the ballpark, keep your eye out for the flying
ball or bat. There is probably no recompense for the injury they might
inflict.
David Pomeroy
July, 2017
487552.1