Survey
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Neutrino Oscillation Facility Design Study in FP7 14 mars 2007 M. Dracos, Neutrino Design Study 1 Neutrino Oscillation Facility Design Study in FP7 • FP7 call and first discussion with EU officers • DS structure • Future actions 14 mars 2007 M. Dracos, Neutrino Design Study 2 Work Program: Capacities 14 mars 2007 M. Dracos, Neutrino Design Study 3 FP7 Capacities Work Programme: Infrastructures 14 mars 2007 M. Dracos, Neutrino Design Study 4 Design Studies budget 14 mars 2007 M. Dracos, Neutrino Design Study 5 ESFRI and CERN strategy group report 14 mars 2007 M. Dracos, Neutrino Design Study 6 Discussion with EU officers (meeting the 05/01/07 with D. Pasini and C. Kurrer) • • • • • • • • Encouragements for a neutrino DS, not more than 5 M€ by EU, duration: 4 years, possibility to extent the DS using the 2010 call, meanwhile possible to participate to IA proposals, but very difficult to obtain funding for R&D, IA more for improving existing facilities, investigate for ERC grants (young physicists). 14 mars 2007 M. Dracos, Neutrino Design Study 7 Neutrino Oscillation Facility Design Study in FP7 Title: European Design Study of a High Intensity Neutrino Facility Acronym: EURO-n Aim: Study and comparison (physics performances and cost) of the different options in order the neutrino European community to be ready for the particle physics decisions of 2010-2012. Duration: 4 years Cost: <5 M€ (+institutes participation ~50% with a minimum of 25%) Coordinating person: R. Edgecock Host institutes: CCLRC more details in: http://gdrneutrino.in2p3.fr/documents/euro_nu_DS.pdf 14 mars 2007 M. Dracos, Neutrino Design Study 8 Overview q13 technologies CPV SB MSW BB … (non-acc. ?) NF physics facilities p-driver Cerenkov target LAr collector m front-end Emulsions m accel. magnetized stor. ring b beam 14 mars 2007 optional or not baseline M. Dracos, Neutrino Design Study detectors 9 Work Packages in order to underline synergies… technologies p-driver target Super-Beam Beam instr. collector Near det. Detectors m front-end Far det. m accel. Neutrino Factory Perform. stor. ring b beam 14 mars 2007 Beta-Beam Comparison M. Dracos, Neutrino Design Study Physics 10 Work Packages 1. Management (R. Edgecock, M. Lindroos, M. Dracos) 2. Super-Beam (M. Zito, C. Densham) 3. Neutrino Factory (K. Long, J. Pozimski) 4. Beta-Beam (complementarities with EURISOL DS) (A. Fabich, M. Benedikt) 5. Detectors (near, far, beam instrumentation) (P. Soler, xx) 6. Physics (performances, comparisons) (P. Hernandez, A. Donini) 14 mars 2007 M. Dracos, Neutrino Design Study 11 Distribution of resources WP 14 mars 2007 months % Management 48 7.4 Super-Beam 168 25.9 (78 target 36 horn 24 p-driver 30 integration) (12.0 target 5.6 horn 3.7 p-driver 4.6 integration) Neutrino Factory 144 22.2 Beta-Beam 132 20.4 detectors 84 13.0 physics 72 11.1 TOTAL 648 ~13.5 FTE/year M. Dracos, Neutrino Design Study 12 EURO-n and ESGARD • ESGARD supports the DS on neutrinos with all the partners ready to contribute. It is in line with the strategy document and would enhance the EU role in this field. • P-driver is studied elsewhere. Therefore, it should only be in this DS for consistency of the whole project, with a lower priority and without asking for money. • Detectors should not be a large part of the DS and be only included for consistency of the project. Astrophysics community is working on detector proposals. • Caveat: 1. all ingredients must be part of the project so that its success does not depend on institutes external to the collaboration. 2. There must be a unique coordinator who can be helped by additional scientific coordinators if necessary. 14 mars 2007 M. Dracos, Neutrino Design Study 13 Proposal preparation • Proposal preparation: R. Edgecock, M. Lindroos, M. Dracos (under BENE SG supervision). • Identify all interested institutes: under way (summary of the project already prepared: http://bene.web.cern.ch/bene/euro_nu_DS.pdf) • Propose WP coordinators: finished • Proposal presentation: 7 Feb. (BENE SG meeting) and 28th March(?). • Draft to be sent to the participating institutes for approval: end of March • Discussion with Brussels: end of March • Signature by participating institutions: beginning of April • Final proposal agreed: 20 Apr. • Proposal delivery: 2nd May 14 mars 2007 M. Dracos, Neutrino Design Study 14 END 14 mars 2007 M. Dracos, Neutrino Design Study 15 Possible participants Bulgaria: Sofia France: Grenoble, Saclay, Strasbourg Germany: Julich, Rostock Italy: Bari, Genoa, LNF, LNGS, LNL, LNS, Milan Latvia: IPUL Russia: Dubna, ITEP, Novosibirsk Sweden: Uppsala Switzerland: CERN, ETH, Geneva, PSI UK: Brunel, CCLRC, IC, Oxford, Sheffield, Warwick Poland: Cracow 14 mars 2007 M. Dracos, Neutrino Design Study 16 Work Package Proposal 1 • WP1 – Management: Coordinator: Edgecock Lead lab: CCLRC Consortium Board Membership: DS coordinators WP coordinators 1 member/institute Purpose: Oversight of DS Meetings: Twice per year or as required Steering Committee Membership: DS coordinators WP coordinators IDS representatives Others ex-officio as required Purpose: Running the DS Meetings: Every two months 14 mars 2007 M. Dracos, Neutrino Design Study 17