Survey
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Limits to Transparency: Risk, Knowledge and the government of food supply chains in the shadow of Horsegate The European horsemeat scandal of 2013 was widely characterised as a crisis of technologically intensive, opaque, convoluted and poorly governed international food supply chains. In its aftermath, British food businesses were urged to acquire greater knowledge of their suppliers and of the provenance of the food they sold. This, it was argued, would enable them to better anticipate and manage the potential risks lurking within their supply chains, and thus prevent future food fraud scandals. As enhanced supply chain transparency was promoted as the solution to the ‘food fraud crisis,’ purveyors of transparency solutions promised that contemporary data capture and analysis technologies would make centralised oversight and control of food supply chains a reality, and banish ‘bad surprises’ such as meat adulteration to the past. Yet four years on, many food businesses’ knowledge of their supply chains still extends only as far as their immediate suppliers. In this paper I will investigate why the promised technological fix to the problem of supply chain opacity has failed to materialise. I will argue that its continued absence is not simply the result of technical difficulties or corporate intransigence, but instead stems from food businesses’ obligations under consumer protection legislation to take all reasonable precautions to prevent their associates from violating food law. This duty means that it is often safer for food businesses to cultivate a ‘strategic ignorance’ of the identities and activities of those involved in their supply chains, for possession of such knowledge might expose them to prosecution in the event of a breach of food law. In this paper I will examine the legal technologies which generate and maintain this strategic ignorance of food supply chains, and explore their role in forestalling the promised emergence of transparent food production and provisioning systems.