Survey
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Sepsis: A New Look at an Old Problem Nathan Shapiro, MD, MPH Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center Harvard Medical School Sepsis • • • • • • 750,000 cases per year in US Mortality ranges 10-60% 215,000 deaths/year More than 640 deaths/day in US $22,000 per case $16.7 billion per year in US Angus et al. Crit Care Med. 2001;29:7:1303-1309 Severe Sepsis: Comparison With Other Major Diseases Incidence of Severe Sepsis Mortality of Severe Sepsis 300 250,000 200 150 100 50 0 AIDS* Colon Breast CHF† Severe Cancer§ Sepsis‡ †National 200,000 Deaths/Year Cases/100,000 250 150,000 100,000 50,000 0 AIDS* Breast AMI† Cancer§ Severe Sepsis‡ Center for Health Statistics, 2001. §American Cancer Society, 2001. *American Heart Association. 2000. ‡Angus DC et al. Crit Care Med. 2001 (In Press). What is sepsis? Host Infection Systemic Inflammatory Response Pro-inflammatory/Anti Inflammatory Activity Accelerated Inflammatory Cascade Sepsis Syndromes Sepsis Definitions Systemic Inflammatory Response Syndrome: (SIRS): two or more of the following 1. 2. 3. 4. T>38 or <36 HR > 90 beats/min RR>20 beats/min or pCo2<32 torr WBC>12,000 or < 4,000 or >10% bands SEPSIS – SIRS due to an infection ACCM/SCCM Consensus Conference:Chest :1992:20:6 Sepsis Definitions SEVERE SEPSIS - Sepsis + Organ Dysfunction, signs of organ dysfunction in the following systems: – Cardiovascular – Renal – Respiratory – Hepatic – Hemostasis – CNS – Unexplained metabolic acidosis SEPTIC SHOCK – Severe Sepsis + hypotension (despite adequate fluid resuscitation) The Natural History of the Systemic Inflammatory Response Syndrome • 3708 patients, multi-center prospective study in ICU/inpatient population Syndrome SIRS Sepsis Severe Sepsis Septic Shock Mortality 2.2% (2.3-4.1) 2% (1.0-3.5) 9% (7.2-10.7) 15% (9.5-20.3) Rangel-Frausto et. al. JAMA:1995:273:117-123. Sepsis Syndromes in the Emergency Department • 3179 patients, prospective, ED based study Syndrome No SIRS SIRS/Sepsis Severe Sepsis Septic Shock Mortality 3.2% (2.3-4.1%) 8% (1.1-3.5%) 10% (7.4-10.8%) 27% (16.5-41.2%) Shapiro et al. 2001 SCCM Meeting “Patients die of complications of their disease, rather than the disease itself” Sir William Osler Mediators of Sepsis Anti-Inflammatory IL-4 IL-6 (both) IL-10 IL-11 IL-13 LPS TNF IL-1 IL-6/IL-8 NO,PAF, others Local Inflammation (low levels) Sepsis (medium levels) Severe Sepsis (high levels) Approach to Sepsis • Recognition of SIRS/Sepsis • Identify etiology • Early and Aggressive Treatment “Sick, or not sick? That is the question!” (Adapted from) Shakespeare “Hectic Fevers at its inception is difficult to recognize, but easy to treat; Left untended, it becomes easy to recognize, but difficult to treat.” Niccollo Machievielli, in “The Prince”(1513) What are the RED FLAGS in Emergency Department patients with sepsis? Mortality in Emergency Department Sepsis (MEDS) Score • Objective: To identify predictors of death from sepsis present in Emergency Department (ED) patients • Prospective Study of 3179 ED patients admitted to hospital with suspected infection • Logistic regression to identify “predictors of death” Shapiro et al/ Critical Care Medicine. March 2003 Patient Enrollment 3,301 Patient Encounters 122 (4%) missed 3,179 (96%) Enrolled 1/3 2/3 2,070 Derivation Set Regression and Prediction Rule Visits randomly assigned 1,109 Validation Set Independent Predictors Identified by Multivariate Analysis __________________________________________________ Variable Odds Ratio 95% CI Points __________________________________________________ Terminal illness (<30d) Tachypnea or hypoxia Platelets < 150,000 /mm3 Bands > 5% Age > 65 Suspected pneumonia Nursing home resident Septic Shock Altered mental status 6.3 2.6 2.6 2.3 2.3 2.0 1.9 2.6 1.7 (3.7 to 10.4) (1.6 to 4.2) (1.6 to 4.4) (1.4 to 3.5) (1.4 to 3.7) (1.3 to 3.2) (1.2 to 3.1) (1.0 to 3.3) (1.1 to 2.7) Shapiro et al/ Critical Care Medicine. March 2003 6 3 3 3 3 2 2 3 2 **ROC Area = .81 Derivation Validation Mortality by MEDS score 60% 51% 50% Mortality % 39% 40% 30% 18%16% 20% 10% 8% 9.1% 4.7% .6%.7% 2.3% 0% 0-4 5-7 8-12 MEDS score 12-15 >15 ED Predictors of death from Sepsis Host Status • Terminal illness (<30d) • Age > 65 • Nursing home resident Infection Type • Suspected pneumonia Findings: • **Tachypnea or hypoxia • **Septic Shock • Altered mental status Lab Abnormalities • Platelets < 150,000 /mm3 • Bands > 5% Therapy “Over 13,000 patients have been enrolled in 23 multi-center, placebo-controlled, clinical trials……results have been generally disappointing with some spectacular failures” From “Clinical Trials for Severe Sepsis. Past Failures and Future Hopes, 1999 Opal et al. Infectious Disease Clinics of North America. 1999:13:2. Sepsis Systemic Inflammation Coagulation Protein C Infection Sepsis: A Network of Cascading Events PROINFLAMMATORY MEDIATORS INFLAMMATION Activated Protein C ANTI-INFLAMMATORY MEDIATORS T TM Protein C ENDOTHELIAL INJURY Activated Protein C INFECTION COAGULATION TAF-1 T-PA FIBRINOLYSIS TF PAI-1 Endogenous Activated Protein C Modulates Coagulation, Fibrinolysis, and Inflammation in Severe Sepsis Homeostasis Carvalho AC et al. J Crit Illness. 1994;9:51-75; Kidokoro A et al. Shock. 1996;5:223-8; Vervloet MG et al. Semin Thromb Hemost. 1998;24:33-44. Recombinant Human Activated Protein C • 1690 patients, double blind, placebo controlled • Inclusion: – known/suspected sepsis – > 3 SIRS criteria – dysfunction > 1 organ systems Bernard et.al. NEJM. March 8, 2001:344:10:699-709. Results Mortality Control 30.8% VS Protein C Group 24.7% 6.1% absolute reduction in DEATH (Number needed to treat = 17) Bernard et.al. NEJM. March 8, 2001:344:10:699-709. APC “PROS” • Well designed RANDOMIZED, DOUBLE BLIND, MULTICENTER, PLACEBO CONTROLLED study showing benefit in meeting primary objective • Makes good biological sense APC CONS • • • • • Single Study Numerous exclusion criteria Altered exclusion criteria mid-study Very expensive Unclear benefit in patients with lower APACHE Scores FDA mandated follow-up study (lower acuity) starting soon 1Cost-Benefit • All patients: $27,936 per life-year • APACHE II > 25 • APACHE II < 24 $24,484 per life-year $575,054 per life-year 1Manns et al. NEJM:347:13:993-1000