Survey
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
June 2017 Breaking Up Is Hard to Do: Three Market Odd Couples That Won’t Last Forever by Michael Arone, CFA, Chief Investment Strategist, US SPDR Business Lies don’t end relationships, usually the truth does. — Nishan Panwar Relationships are messy. And, sometimes couples just don’t seem to naturally fit together. C’mon, you know what I’m talking about. One is too tall or too short for the other. One of them is way too good-looking to be with the other, or too smart or too ambitious. Their personalities or politics just don’t gel. We all have that odd couple as friends, the couple you and your other friends thought would never last. We’re so fascinated with seemingly inexplicable relationships that fiction is full of romantic mismatches. Catherine and Heathcliff. Benjamin and Mrs. Robinson. Ron and Hermione. And today, the New Abnormal environment offers an interesting breeding ground for puzzling dalliances and potentially fatal attractions. Meet our capital market odd couples: 1. Stock investors and bond investors 2. US economic policy and the US dollar 3. Tight labor market and stagnant wage growth Giddily in the honeymoon stages of their relationships, these couples remain oblivious to the oddness of the attraction that binds them together. Lost in their current love affairs are the underlying contradictions of their affection. However, as temperatures rise this summer, so too may tempers flare regarding all those pesky little things that add up and bother us in any complex relationship. Figure 1: Rising Equities and a Flattening Yield Curve Belie Two Opposing Outlooks S&P Index Level 10Y–2Y Yield Spread 2450 1.3 2425 1.2 2375 1.1 2325 1.0 2275 0.9 2225 Jan 2017 — S&P 500 Index Feb 2017 Apr 2017 Jun 2017 0.8 — US 10Y-2Y Treasury Yield Spread Source: Bloomberg Finance LP as of 06/13/2017. Past performance is not a guarantee of future results. Let’s explore whether our capital market odd couples are built to last like James Carville and Mary Matalin or if they are just another summer fling like Danny Zuko and Sandy Olsson. Stocks and Bonds: Trouble in Paradise When Polar Opposites Attract Stocks and bonds are like that couple that’s always fighting — Mr. & Mrs. Bickerson. They never seem to be on the same page, yet they have an inseparable connection. Stocks have bountiful optimism and want to grow and increase their earnings power. They want to be free from the burden of rules and costs from taxes. On the other hand, bonds are pessimistic and grumpy. They are cynical and question everything. Instead of dreaming big, bonds want cold hard facts. Better yet, they want solid cash flows to make them feel secure. They may not like the rules any more than stocks do, but they welcome strong covenants to ensure they are protected if the relationship turns sour — kind of like a prenup. Lower taxes suit bonds just fine, too, because that means more cash flow for them. Breaking Up Is Hard to Do: Three Market Odd Couples That Won’t Last Forever Old habits die hard, and stocks and bonds are confident in their very different perspectives. Stocks are excited about the potential for better economic growth, improving earnings, lower taxes, less regulation, still low rates and very little inflation. This is the perfect love potion and stocks have become smitten with this story. As a result, US stock indexes are at or near all-time highs. Stock investors are head-over-heels in love! Not surprisingly, the outlook for the more skeptical half of the Bickerson couple is a little less rosy, informed by expectations for sluggish growth and very little inflation. Bond yields are influenced by three factors — growth expectations, inflation expectations and term premium. In regard to growth, the yield curve has been flattening for most of the first half of the year. This signals that bond investors don’t believe growth will be as strong as their optimistic stock partners expect. After a post-US election inflation scare that saw 10-year Treasury yields touch 2.6 percent, inflation expectations have been rolling over alongside diminishing global growth expectations and falling commodity prices. Amid rising global policy uncertainty, Washington DC scandals and growing geopolitical tensions in North Korea and the Middle East, bond investors seeking the security of US Treasuries are demanding less yields (term premium) for the safety of their capital. As a result, bond yields have been falling, which means bond prices have been rising. So, how long before there is trouble in paradise? Can stock and bond investors both be right? Perhaps in the short-term sluggish growth, low rates and benign inflation may keep the peace in the stock and bond household. At some point, however, the natural tension between stocks and bonds will likely flare up and need to be resolved. After all, US monetary policy is gradually tightening, with the Fed raising rates another quarter percentage point on June 14, but fiscal policy is still absent. Unless something changes in this dynamic soon, I’m fearful bond investors will win this couple’s dispute and stock investors may find themselves sleeping on the couch. And, like all couple dust-ups, the hardest part may be admitting that you were wrong. US Economic Policy and the US Dollar: The Ultimate Power Couple When the high school “It Couple” is crowned Prom King and Queen, their power surges. In the same way, sound fiscal policy that complements good monetary policy should result in greater growth and demand for a nation’s currency. In the aftermath of the US election, investors certainly expected a seamless transfer of economic support from accommodative monetary policy to increased fiscal policy spending. Higher expected US economic growth and already greater interest rate differentials compared State Street Global Advisors Figure 2: Stalled Legislation Leads to Dollar Declines DXY Index US 5 Year Breakeven 104 2.10 100 1.80 96 1.50 92 May 2016 — DXY Index July 2016 Sept 2016 Nov 2016 Jan 2017 Mar 2017 May 2017 1.20 — US 5 Year Breakeven Source: Bloomberg Finance LP as of 06/13/2017. Past performance is not a guarantee of future results. to the rest of the developed world (especially German bunds and Japanese government bonds) were expected to further bolster US dollar strength. In fact, the US Dollar Index responded by hitting multi-year highs in early January. However, as so often happens after the last dance ends and the fancy gowns are hung in closets and the powder blue tuxedos are returned to the shop, some of the magic dies. Greater US economic growth and higher interest rate differentials combined with tighter monetary policy should woo US dollar fondness, but the US dollar has continued to play hard to get in 2017 — so much so that the investor crush on the US dollar has faded. In fact, the US Dollar Index has fallen about 5 percent this year. The baton handoff from monetary policy to fiscal policy has been fumbled. US monetary policy is gradually tightening and fiscal policy is stalled. Economic growth in Europe outpaced US growth in the first quarter, a feat not achieved in some time. Investor demand for euros has climbed as a result. Investor skittishness about the current environment has also boosted demand for the perceived safety of Japanese yen. How can the power couple rekindle their flame? Higher relative interest rates supported by gradual monetary policy tightening, increased fiscal spending and better economic growth should result in greater demand for US dollars. Should the dollar rebound, investors should consider value and cyclical sectors of the market. If policy fails and growth disappoints, defensive and growth sectors which have led the way thus far in 2017 are likely to continue their momentum. 2 Breaking Up Is Hard to Do: Three Market Odd Couples That Won’t Last Forever Figure 3: Unemployment Recovers but Wage Pressures Have Yet to Materialize Unemployment Rate (%) Avg Hourly Earnings Yearly Change (%) 10 3.75 3.25 8 2.75 2.25 6 1.75 4 Dec 2008 Sep 2011 Jul 2014 May 2017 1.25 foreign workers have entered the workforce. Lastly, the pent-up potential for productivity gains has allowed companies to adjust their operations rather than increase pay for their staff. Meanwhile, today’s workers are left imploring their employers, “Show me the money!” and wondering just how much lower unemployment can go without a commensurate pick-up in wages. This odd couple relationship should begin to demonstrate some changes soon. After years of falling unemployment during the long business expansion, layoffs could be on the horizon, especially if growth and fiscal policy do not materialize as expected while monetary policy tightens its grip on the economy. Otherwise, I would expect labor to take a greater share of capital through increased wages. Either way, this relationship is headed for Splitsville. — US Unemployment Rate (%) — US Avg. Hourly Earnings All Employees (% Change YoY) Source: Bloomberg Finance LP as of 06/13/2017. Tight Labor Market and Stagnant Wages: It’s All About the Money, Honey! Any couple’s finances are a touchy subject. For many, the bills pile up while the money never seems to stretch as far as it used to. Today, that stress is prevalent across the nation as jobs appear bountiful but pay raises are scarce. The good news is that the US economy is at or near full employment as evidenced by the current 4.3 percent unemployment rate, down from almost 10 percent in 2009.1 The strength of the labor market is a big reason the Fed is gradually raising rates. However, wages have been stuck in neutral, barely growing above inflation. Remarkably, even with the unemployment rate continuing to decline, the change in average hourly earnings recently fell to 2.5 percent.2 Many theories have been put forward to explain the odd dynamics of full employment with little wage acceleration. Aging demographics has resulted in a declining supply of workers rather than a rapid growth in jobs. Companies and small businesses are reluctant to raise wages in a low inflation environment for fear higher wages will eat into already challenged profit margins. The reduction of manufacturing as a percentage of the economy has displaced many factory workers over the last 30 years. This has resulted in a mismatch between the skills employers want and the skills potential employees have. The structural force of labor mobility has put downward pressure on wages as more women and State Street Global Advisors The New Abnormal’s Strange Bedfellows Stocks and bonds, economic policy and the dollar, the labor market and wage growth. We’ve certainly gotten used to seeing them together. Yet, even as we’ve become comfortable with the mismatches, we suspect something has to give over the long term. Sooner or later the Bickersons must reconcile their opposite outlooks or their performance must diverge. As for the power couple of sound economic policy and US dollar strength, they must commit to working together to avoid less than perfect policy and anemic economic growth. Finally, still falling unemployment must be accompanied by an increase in wages to dodge a reversal in the labor market trends that could spark an increase in unemployment. How soon before these relationships hit the rocks? For my part, I expect the Bickersons to live in peace and harmony for a little while longer. Modest growth, better earnings, low rates and low inflation may result in both stock and bond investors celebrating positive returns at year end. If there’s a trigger for change, some revelation or event to hasten a breakup, it will be progress on the fiscal agenda combined with gradual tightening of monetary policy. In that case, look for bonds and bond proxies to fall some while value and cyclical sectors outperform. Under this scenario, the US dollar would rise modestly from current levels and labor would incrementally capture more of the capital pie. That would mean more summer sizzle and less of those awkward “It’s not you, it’s me” conversations. But it’s always difficult to tell with matters of the heart. 1 2 Bloomberg Finance LP as of 06/13/2017. Bloomberg Finance LP as of 06/13/2017. 3 Breaking Up Is Hard to Do: Three Market Odd Couples That Won’t Last Forever Glossary 5-year Break-even Rate The break-even rate is applied to bonds and refers to the difference between the yield on a nominal fixed-rate bond and the real yield on an inflation-linked bond (such as a Treasury inflation-protected security, or Tips) of similar maturity and credit quality. If inflation averages more than the break-even rate, the inflation-linked investment will outperform the fixed-rate bond. If inflation averages below the break-even rate, the fixed-rate bond will outperform the inflation-linked bond. S&P 500® Index A popular benchmark for U.S. large-cap equities that includes 500 companies from leading industries and captures approximately 80% coverage of available market capitalization. US Dollar Index, or DXY A benchmark that measures the performance of the US Dollar against a basket of currencies: the euro (EUR), the Japanese yen (JPY), the British pound sterling (GBP), the Canadian dollar (CAD), the Swiss Franc (CHF) and the Swedish krona (SEK). For reference, the US Dollar Index is structured as follows: 57.6% EUR, 13.6% JPY, 11.9% GBP, 9.1% CAD, 4.2% SEK and 3.6% CHF. Yield The income produced by an investment, typically calculated as the interest received annually divided by the price of the investment. Yield comes from interestbearing securities, such as bonds and dividend-paying stocks. Yield Spread The difference between yields on differing debt instruments of varying maturities, credit ratings and risk, calculated by deducting the yield of one instrument from another. ssga.com | spdrs.com For public use. State Street Global Advisors One Lincoln Street, Boston, MA 02111-2900. T: +1 617 786 3000. The views expressed in this material are the views of Michael Arone through the period ended June 15, 2017 and are subject to change based on market and other conditions. This document contains certain statements that may be deemed forwardlooking statements. Please note that any such statements are not guarantees of any future performance and actual results or developments may differ materially from those projected. Investing involves risk including the risk of loss of principal. Past performance is no guarantee of future results. The information provided does not constitute investment advice and it should not be relied on as such. It should not be considered a solicitation to buy or an offer to sell a security. It does not take into account any investor’s particular investment objectives, strategies, tax status or investment horizon. You should consult your tax and financial advisor. All material has been obtained from sources believed to be reliable. There is State Street Global Advisors no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the information and State Street shall have no liability for decisions based on such information. The whole or any part of this work may not be reproduced, copied or transmitted or any of its contents disclosed to third parties without SSGA’s express written consent. Standard & Poor’s®, S&P® and SPDR® are registered trademarks of Standard & Poor’s Financial Services LLC (S&P); Dow Jones is a registered trademark of Dow Jones Trademark Holdings LLC (Dow Jones); and these trademarks have been licensed for use by S&P Dow Jones Indices LLC (SPDJI) and sublicensed for certain purposes by State Street Corporation. State Street Corporation’s financial products are not sponsored, endorsed, sold or promoted by SPDJI, Dow Jones, S&P, their respective affiliates and third party licensors and none of such parties make any representation regarding the advisability of investing in such product(s) nor do they have any liability in relation thereto, including for any errors, omissions, or interruptions of any index. State Street Global Advisors Funds Distributors, LLC, member FINRA, SIPC, One Lincoln Street, Boston, MA 02111-2900. © 2017 State Street Corporation. All Rights Reserved. ID9850-IBG-24047 0617 Exp. Date: 06/30/2018