Download Thermodynamics of Activated Phase Transitions of 8CB: DSC

Survey
yes no Was this document useful for you?
   Thank you for your participation!

* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project

Document related concepts

Radiator (engine cooling) wikipedia , lookup

Heat wave wikipedia , lookup

HVAC wikipedia , lookup

Thermal conduction wikipedia , lookup

Solar water heating wikipedia , lookup

Thermoregulation wikipedia , lookup

Cogeneration wikipedia , lookup

Economizer wikipedia , lookup

Solar air conditioning wikipedia , lookup

Hyperthermia wikipedia , lookup

Underfloor heating wikipedia , lookup

Transcript
J. Phys. Chem. B 2006, 110, 16679-16684
16679
Thermodynamics of Activated Phase Transitions of 8CB: DSC and MC Calorimetry
Dipti Sharma,*,† John C. MacDonald,‡ and Germano S. Iannacchione†
Department of Physics and Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry, Worcester Polytechnic Institute,
Worcester, Massachusetts 01609
ReceiVed: May 10, 2006; In Final Form: June 28, 2006
The present paper reports the heating rate effect on the phase transitions of a pure liquid crystal
octylcyanobiphenyl (8CB) with use of Differential Scanning Calorimetry (DSC) and Modulation Calorimetry
(MC) techniques. The DSC runs were taken at various temperature ramp rates from 20 to 0.5 K/min for
heating and cooling scans. Well-defined endothermic/exothermic peaks were found at the melting/crystallization,
smectic-A to nematic (SmA-N), and nematic to isotropic (N-I) transitions on heating/cooling scans,
respectively. All transitions shift in temperature significantly with different ramp rates. The temperature shift
of Cp peaks between heating and cooling scans indicates the order of the transitions. In addition, all transitions
follow an Arrhenius behavior. The activation energy of a transition increases as the total energy involved in
the transition decreases. The respective enthalpy and entropy change of each transition provides information
on the Gibbs free energy. The significance of the results is discussed in terms of the order of transitions. A
comparative analysis of MC and DSC techniques highlights the significance of the two techniques. MC is a
practicable tool for observing the phase dynamics whereas DSC is a good tool for studying the rate kinematics
of the transitions.
I. Introduction
Liquid crystals exhibit unique phase transitions and thermal
properties that make them useful for a number of potential
applications. Liquid crystals commonly are used to manufacture
LCD screens for displays in computers, TVs, and watches.1-8
They are attractive materials for fundamental research because
of their structural, transitional, thermal, orientational, optical,
and photoacoustic properties.9-16
One of the liquid crystals, octylcyanobiphenyl (8CB), has
drawn considerable attention in research regarding its prototypical thermotropic nature in phase transition studies. The properties of 8CB have been widely studied through light scattering,
X-ray, dielectric, and calorimetric spectroscopic analysis by
various authors.15-20 But no study has been found on the heating
rate effect of transitions of bulk 8CB.
The smectic-A to nematic (SmA-N) and nematic to isotropic
(N-I) transitions of 8CB have been studied for decades.14,16,20-23
Only a few reports on the melting and crystallization transitions
can be seen explaining enthalpies etc.,16,24-26 and no detailed
study has been found on the heating rate effects of melting and
crystallization of 8CB liquid crystal. Therefore, We have
undertaken a detailed calorimetric study of a bulk 8CB using
differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) to show rate kinetics
and activated dynamics of the various transitions of 8CB using
Arrhenius theory. We also present a comparative study of DSC
and traditional modulation calorimetry (MC) as a function of
temperature to show the difference between the two techniques.
DSC has been used widely to study various transitions (glass
transitions, crystallization, other first- and second-order transitions) of different research materials (glasses, polymers, liquid
crystals, etc.),16,20,22,24,27-32 whereas alternating current (AC) or
* Address correspondence to this author.
† Department of Physics.
‡ Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry.
MC has been used recently to study phase transitions of the
liquid crystals near equilibrium, using high-precision measurements.17,33-37 The DSC technique is particularly convenient due
to the following facts: (1) it requires little sample preparation,
(2) it is quite sensitive, (3) it is relatively independent of sample
geometry, (4) it takes little time to run samples, (5) it has a
wider temperature range, and (6) it can be operated for various
ramp rates (e.g., from 0.5 to 20 K/min). Whereas the MC
technique is particularly useful due to the following facts: (1)
it uses a modulating heating frequency to heat the sample, (2)
it provides better sensitivity to the results, (3) it provides a direct
measure of heat capacity, (4) it uses lower ramp rates to observe
high-precision results near equilibrium, and (5) it provides phase
dynamics as well as dynamic complex heat capacity results.
Therefore, We have used the DSC technique to study rate
kinetics of various transitions of 8CB and the MC technique to
show phase dynamics of 8CB showing a comparative study of
both techniques in the present work.
Here we report the detailed study of the thermodynamics of
the activated phase transitions of bulk 8CB using DSC and MC
techniques. This study reports the rate kinetics and the activation
energy dynamics of all transitions of bulk 8CB using Arrhenius
theory. The heating rate dependent study of all transitions of
8CB was performed with the DSC technique for heating and
cooling scans at six different ramp rates. A comparison between
DSC and MC was performed to show the significance of the
two techniques. Sample preparation and experimental setup
details of calorimetric spectroscopy are described in Section II.
The results of rate dependent studies are shown in Section III,
with discussion and conclusions drawn in Section IV.
II. Experimental Details
Pure octylcyanobiphenyl (8CB) liquid crystal was used to
study the activated thermodynamics of its phase transitions. A
sample of 8CB, obtained from Frinton Laboratories, having
10.1021/jp062862d CCC: $33.50 © 2006 American Chemical Society
Published on Web 08/01/2006
16680 J. Phys. Chem. B, Vol. 110, No. 33, 2006
molecular weight 291.44, was degassed for about 1 h under a
vacuum unit at room temperature (293 K) and then used in the
study.
For the DSC technique, a MDSC model 2920 (TA instruments) was used to obtain DSC thermograms of the sample at
different heating scan rates of 20, 15, 10, 5, 1, and 0.5 K/min
without using any modulating frequency. The sample of 8CB
(5 mg) was loaded into aluminum pans (dimensions: ∼8 mm
diameter and ∼0.5 mm thick) and placed into a differential
scanning calorimeter (DSC) along with an empty reference pan.
The sample was first annealed at 323 K for 5 min and then
immediately quenched to 243 K and the sample was equilibrated
for 15 min. The sample was heated from 243 to 333 K at 20
K/min ramp rate and then cooled to 243 K with the same ramp
rate. The respective heat flow of the sample was recorded along
with temperature change during heating and cooling scans. The
DSC equipment was well calibrated at each scanning rate. The
DSC thermograms showed well-defined endothermic peaks in
heating scans and well-defined exothermic peaks in cooling
scans. The peak temperature of the transitions was taken as
representative because it shows the maximum change in
enthalpy. Heating and cooling the sample at the same ramp rate
for a second time gave identical results and confirmed that the
phase transitions of the liquid crystal 8CB are reversible. The
same measurements were made for other heating scan rates,
too. All experimental and environmental conditions were kept
identical for all runs so that a comparison of the phase transition
parameters could be made to understand the rate effect on phase
transitions of the sample.
For the last few decades, a high-resolution AC calorimetry
or MC technique has been used to understand the phase
transitions of liquid crystals. Normally, SmA-N and N-I
transitions were studied with it. To compare DSC and MC
techniques, the thermal properties of 8CB were also studied with
the MC technique.
High-resolution MC was performed with a home-built
calorimeter at WPI. This MC is a traditional AC calorimeter
with one cell used for samples, normally run at much slower
ramp rates (10 to 500 mK/h) near equilibrium with use of low
modulating frequencies (15 to 50 mHz). In this range of heating
rate, no temperature shift can be observed because it measures
heat capacity of the sample near equilibrium. But it measures
the phase dynamics in terms of phase shift. The sample cell
consisted of a silver sheet crimp-sealed in an cup shaped
container with a lid (dimensions: ∼12 mm diameter and ∼0.5
mm thick) closely matching the dimensions of the heater sealed
under pressure with the sample after being exposed to the
vacuum for 2 h. After it was sealed, a 120-Ω strain-gauge heater
and a 1-MΩ carbon-flake thermistor were attached to the cell
and then the cell was mounted into the calorimeter, the details
of which have been described elsewhere.38 In the ac-mode,
power is put into the cell as Paceiωt resulting in temperature
oscillations with amplitude Tac and a relative phase shift of φ
≡ Φ + π/2, where Φ is the absolute phase shift between Tac(ω) and the input power. The same sample (25 mg) was studied
with MC. The respective heat capacity of the sample was
measured as a function of temperature for heating and cooling
scans at 6 K/h ramp rate. The temperature of the sample was
varied from 300 to 333 K for the heating scan and then cooled
from 333 to 300 K at a fixed heating frequency of 15 mHz at
the same ramp rate. An empty silver cell was also measured to
obtain the heat capacity of silver keeping all experimental
conditions identical with the previous experiment. To calculate
Sharma et al.
Figure 1. DSC technique: The heat flow (W/g) versus temperature
(K) plot for bulk 8CB liquid crystal shows endothermic and exothermic
transitions on heating and cooling scans at 10 K/min ramp rate. The
forward arrow shows the heating scan and the backward arrow shows
cooling, respectively. The regions K, SmA, N, and I represent
crystallization, smectic-A, nematic, and isotropic states of the 8CB,
respectively. The heating transitions: melting, SmA-N, and N-I, at
10 K/min ramp rate, appear at ∼294.8, ∼306.2, and ∼313.4 K,
respectively. The cooling transitions: I-N, N-SmA, and crystallization, at the same ramp rate, appear at ∼312.2, ∼305.3, and ∼267.0 K,
respectively. The inset figure shows a blowup of SmA-N and N-I
transitions.
the heat capacity of the sample, the heat capacity of the empty
cell was subtracted from the sum of the sample and cell heat
capacities.
III. Results
A. DSC Technique. 1. Heating and Cooling Scans. Figure
1 shows the heating and cooling scans of bulk 8CB liquid crystal
at a 10 K/min heating rate spanning the isotropic and crystal
phases. Well-defined endothermic peaks were found on heating
scan, and exothermic peaks were found on cooling scans at
K-SmA, SmA-N, and N-I transitions. The transitions on
heating scan represent absorption of heat whereas the transition
on cooling scan represents release of heat. The K-SmA has
the largest peak or enthalpy, and SmA-N has the smallest peak
or enthalpy. The positions of the transitions, in the cooling scan,
are found a little lower than those in the heating scan.
2. Rate Effect on Transitions. A heating rate dependent study
of all transitions of 8CB was performed for various heating scan
rates. Significant shifts in temperature were observed in transition temperature for all transitions.
Figure 2 shows that the heating rate effect on various
transitions of bulk 8CB on heating scan at different ramp rates
varies from 20 to 1 K/min. As the ramp rate decreases, all
transitions shift toward lower temperature. The rate of shifting
in the melting transition is more than either of the other SmAN, N-I transitions whereas the rate of shifting is least in the
SmA-N transition. Transitions on cooling scan also show a
rate effect with the change of ramp rates. They shift toward
higher temperature as the ramp rate decreases. Crystallization
shows the maximum enthalpy with highest shifting rate and
SmA-N shows the smallest enthalpy with least shifting rate.
For simplicity, these plots are not shown here but all results
are considered in the data analysis.
To see a clear shift in the peak temperature of each transition
in the heating scan, the excess specific heat capacity versus
temperature graphs are plotted for each transition after subtracting a baseline to the experimental value of the heat capacity of
each transition. The specific heat capacity (J/gK) can be
Thermodynamics of Activated Phase Transitions of 8CB
J. Phys. Chem. B, Vol. 110, No. 33, 2006 16681
Figure 2. DSC technique: Heat flow (Watt/g) versus temperature (K)
plot for heating scan for different ramp rates from 20 to 1 K/min.
Figure 4. Specific heat capacity versus temperature plot for the N-I
transition, using ramp rates from 20 to 0.5 K/min.
Figure 3. Specific heat capacity versus temperature plot for the melting
transition from K to SmA for ramp rates from 20 to 0.5 K/min.
calculated by taking the ratio of heat flow (W/g) and heating
rate (K/s). The blowups of such plots are shown here.
Figure 3 shows the blowup of the melting transition at heating
rates that vary from 20 to 0.5 K/min. It is clear that as the heating
rate decreases, the peak shifts toward lower temperature
significantly. The peak size and shape also changes and becomes
sharper and larger but the area covered by the peak is almost
the same for all ramp rates and found to be independent of
heating rates. Figure 4 shows the blowup of the N-I transition.
The peak becomes sharper and larger and shifts toward lower
temperature as ramp rate decreases but its shifting rate is less
than the melting transition rate. The enthalpy of this transition
is smaller than the melting transition. Figure 5 shows the blowup
of the SmA-N transition. It is clear that the peak is very shallow
for faster rates and changes to a clear peak as rate decreases,
shifting toward lower temperature. In this case, the peak shifting
rate is found to be the lowest and the enthalpy of the transition
is smallest.
Hence all transitions show a clear shift in temperature with
different heating ramp rates and shift toward lower temperature
as ramp rate decreases. The enthalpy of the melting/crystallization is maximum ∼26 kJ/mol, whereas the enthalpy of SmA-N
transition is minimum ∼0.2 kJ/mol and the N-I transition has
an intermediate enthalpy of ∼0.9 kJ/mol. These ∆H values
Figure 5. Specific heat capacity versus temperature plot for the
SmA-N transition, using ramp rates from 20 to 0.5 K/min.
compare favorably to those in the literature.16,20 The enthalpy
is found to be independent of ramp rate and follows the energy
conservation law.
3. EVolution of ActiVation Energy. The significant shift
observed in transitions of 8CB for heating and cooling scans
follow Arrhenius behavior. According to Arrhenius behavior,39-42
the heating rate can be given by
[ (-∆E
RT )]
β ) βo exp
(1)
where β is the effective heating rate (in K/min), βo is a constant
(in K/min), ∆E is the activation energy (in joules/mole), R is
universal gas constant (in J/mol K), and T is the absolute
temperature (in kelvin). This equation can also be shown as:
ln β ) ln βo -
(∆E
RT )
(2)
where ∆E is determined from the slope of the graph, which is
plotted between ln β and 1/T, and ln βo is the intercept on the
y axis.
16682 J. Phys. Chem. B, Vol. 110, No. 33, 2006
Sharma et al.
Figure 6. Comparative semi-ln plot of ramp rate (K/min) versus 1/T
(K) for all transitions following Arrhenius behavior. Solid lines are
fits with eq 2. Top panel: Heating scan represents negative slope due
to the absorption of heat. Bottom panel: Cooling scan represents
positive slope due to release of heat. The errors found in the transition
temperature are much smaller than the symbol size. Errors in TK-SmA
= (0.05 K, TSmA-N = (0.01 K, and TN-I = (0.01 K.
Figure 6 shows a plot between the ln of the heating scan
versus 1/T for all transitions of 8CB for heating and cooling
scans, respectively. All transitions form a straight line following
Arrhenius behavior and indicate the required activation energy
for the transitions in the form of the slope of the lines. The
transitions on heating scan show negative slope due to the
absorption of heat because the endothermic peaks found on the
heating scan shift toward lower temperature with the decrease
of ramp rate. And the transitions on the cooling scan show
positive slope due to the release of heat because the exothermic
peaks found on the cooling scan shift toward higher temperature
with the decrease of ramp rate. The slope of the melting
transition is least and the slope of the SmA-N transition is
maximum whereas the slope of N-I is found to be intermediate.
4. Determination of the Transitional Order. If the peak
temperature of each transition is plotted versus ramp rate, the
intercept found at rate zero ramp rate presents the equilibrium
transition and when compared to heating and cooling scans,
offers evidence of the order of the transitions. Such plots are
plotted as follows:
Figure 7 is plotted as peak temperature of the transition versus
ramp rate for heating and cooling scans where (a) represents
K-SmA, (b) represents N-I, and (c) represents SmA-N
transitions. Both heating and cooling scans follow straight lines
and give an intercept at zero ramp rate for each transition. This
intercept represents a clear indication of the presence of latent
heat of transition at equilibrium. Melting/crystallization has the
largest intercept of 22 K at zero ramp rate and hence represents
a strong first-order transition. The N-I transition shows an
intermediate intercept of 0.5 K and hence represents a weak
first-order transition whereas the SmA-N transition shows no
intercept (0 K) and represents a second-order transition.
B. Comparison with MC Technique. The MC technique
has recently been started to be used to study phase transition
kinetics of liquid crystals. This technique is particularly
Figure 7. Rate effect on heating and cooling scans with ramp rates
from 20 to 0.5 K/min provides the order of transition for the following
transitions: (a) K-SmA, (b) N-I transition, and (c) SmA-N transition.
important due to its dynamic results. We, therefore, present the
MC technique along with the DSC results to compare these two
techniques in the present work.
A heating scan was performed for bulk 8CB in MC at a 0.1
K/min heating rate. A comparative study of MC and DSC results
is shown under Figure 8, which is plotted as specific heat
capacity (J/gK) versus temperature (K) for the heating scan of
SmA-N and N-I transitions of 8CB. The DSC results are
plotted for a 10 K/min heating rate. The DSC results show nicer,
sharper, and bigger peaks than the MC results. The MC
measures the phase dynamics in terms of the complex heat
capacity of the sample, which can be represented as real (Cp′
) Cp cos φ) and imaginary (Cp′′ ) Cp sin φ) parts of the
complex heat capacity (Cp) where φ represents the corresponding
phase shift. The real and imaginary parts represent the storage
and lost heat capacities. The storage heat capacity shows smaller
enthalpy with smaller peaks than the results found in DSC for
SmA-N and N-I transitions whereas the lost part Cp′′ shows
a small dip at both transitions along with negative enthalpies
in MC. But the total enthalpy added by storage and lost parts is
the same as the enthalpy found in the DSC results. This indicates
that the total enthalpy of both transitions (SmA-N, N-I) is
independent of the techniques used. In Figure 8, the storage
and lost heat capacity of 8CB with the MC technique show the
enthalpy of SmA-N as 0.41 and 0.18 J/g, respectively, whereas
the enthalpy of the respective transition found in DSC is 0.59
J/g, which is the sum of the above two. Furthermore, the storage
and the lost part of enthalpies for the N-I transition are 2.36
Thermodynamics of Activated Phase Transitions of 8CB
Figure 8. Comparative specific heat versus temperature plot for DSC
and MC techniques for 8CB liquid crystal at two different heating ramp
rates of 10 and 0.1 K/min rates, respectively, where Cp′, Cp′′, and Cp
represent real (storage), imaginary (lost), and total heat capacities,
respectively.
and 0.57 J/g, respectively, whereas in DSC it is 2.93 J/g, which
is the sum of the above two enthalpies. This indicates that the
MC gives phase dynamics in terms of the complex heat capacity
and phase shift of the transitions. Both techniques provide clear
and sharper peaks for SmA-N, N-I transitions where their
enthalpies are found independent of the techniques used.
IV. Discussion and Conclusions
A. Activated Dynamics of Transitions. The phase transitions
of bulk 8CB show activated rate kinetics which can be studied
by using the rate dependent theory of Arrhenius. By using this
theory, the activation energy of molecular motion and rearrangement of the sample near the transition temperature can be
calculated by the slope obtained from the graph plotted between
ln β versus 1/T as shown in Figure 6.
It is clear from Figure 6 that each transition requires some
activation energy and Figure 1 shows that different transitions
have different enthalpies. The change found in enthalpy and
activation energy indicates a relationship between the enthalpy
and the activation energy of the transitions. Figure 9 shows a
comparative plot for enthalpy and activation energy of each
transition of 8CB for heating scans. It is clear that as the enthalpy
of the transition decreases, the activation energy increases. The
strong first-order transition, melting or crystallization, has
maximum enthalpy of ∼26 ( 1.00 kJ/mol and hence needs the
least activation of ∼1.6 ( 0.10 kJ/mol, whereas the weak firstorder transition, N-I, has less enthalpy of ∼0.9 ( 0.10 kJ/mol
than the melting and needs intermediate activation of ∼3.2 (
0.08 kJ/mol. The second-order SmA-N transition shows the
least enthalpy of ∼0.2 ( 0.04 kJ/mol and hence needs maximum
activation energy of ∼3.4 ( 0.03 kJ/mol. This can be explained
in terms of latent heat present in the transitions. Because of the
presence of latent heat, the first-order transitions show bigger
enthalpy than the second-order transitions and need less
activation energy. The data details for energy dynamics are given
in the Tables 1 and 2 for heating and cooling scans, respectively.
From these tables it is clear that the cooling transitions need
more activation energy than heating transitions because the
cooling transitions show less enthalpy than heating and hence
need more activation as shown in Figure 10.
J. Phys. Chem. B, Vol. 110, No. 33, 2006 16683
Figure 9. Comparative results of enthalpy and activation energy of
each transition of 8CB for heating scans. Vertical lines show the error
bars in the enthalpy and the activation energy, respectively. The size
of the error is smaller than the symbol size.
TABLE 1: Summary of the Rate Effects on Heating Scan of
Bulk 8CBa
∆E
transitions
melting
SmA-N
N-I
∆H
∆S
∆G
1.59((0.10) -26.91((1.00) -91.41 nonspont (-ve)
3.43((0.08) -0.16((0.04) -0.52 nonspont (-ve)
3.27((0.03) -0.91((0.10) -2.91 nonspont (-ve)
a
Shown are the transitions, activation energy of the transition ∆E
(in kJ mol-1), enthalpy of the transition ∆H (in kJ mol-1), the entropy
of the transition ∆S (in J mol-1 K-1), and the Gibbs energy ∆G (in kJ
mol-1) with nonspontaneous changes with negative sign for heating
scans.
TABLE 2: Summary of the Rate Effects on Cooling Scan of
Bulk 8CBa
transitions
∆E
∆H
∆S
∆G
crystallization
N-SmA
I-N
0.27((0.10)
5.96((0.80)
3.56((0.60)
23.38((1.00)
0.14((0.03)
0.90((0.08)
87.21
0.45
2.88
spont (+ve)
spont (+ve)
spont (+ve)
a
Where ∆E and ∆H are in kJ mol-1 and ∆S is in J mol-1 K-1, and
the Gibbs energy ∆G in kJ mol-1 shows spontaneous changes with
positive sign.
B. Discussion of MC vs DSC. Usually MC is used to study
phase dynamics of liquid crystals at much slower heating ramp
rates (50 to 200 mK/h) to obtain more sensitive and dynamic
results near equilibrium with modulated heating frequency. The
MC shows the phase dynamics of the transitions by measuring
complex heat capacity and phase shift of the sample. DSC is
used to study rate kinematics of the samples with a wider range
of heating ramp rates (from 0.5 to 20 K/min), using much higher
scan rates than MC. Here a comparison is shown between two
techniques in Figure 5, and data details are shown in Tables 1
and 2. It is difficult to compare these two techniques at the
same ramp rates because of their own qualities, but both
techniques provide nice and clear peaks for SmA-N and N-I
transitions. The peak height observed in MC is divided into its
storage and lost parts and appears smaller in size than the DSC
results, but the sum of storage and lost peaks is the same as
DSC results. This indicates that total area covered under peaks
found in either transition SmA-N or N-I is independent of
the technique used. Hence the MC technique is found as a
practicable tool for observing dynamics of the transition in terms
of phase shift and complex heat capacity whereas DSC provides
rate kinematics details of the transitions of the system.
16684 J. Phys. Chem. B, Vol. 110, No. 33, 2006
Figure 10. Comparative activation energy of each transition of 8CB
that occurred in heating and cooling scans.
C. Conclusions. The activated dynamics of the phase
transitions of bulk 8CB have been performed with DSC and
MC techniques and reveal interesting results. Well-defined
endothermic and exothermic peaks were found in heating and
cooling scans, respectively. The rate dependent study of each
transition shows significant shift in each transition temperature
with different heating ramp rates. The transition temperature
of various transitions shifts toward lower temperature as ramp
rate decreases in heating scans. This rate shift follows Arrhenius
behavior and provides the activated dynamics of the transitions
of bulk 8CB. As the enthalpy of the transition decreases from
either first-order transitions melting or N-I to the second-order
transition SmA-N, the required activation energy of the
respective transition increases. This can be explained in terms
of the order of transitions. The second-order transition has
smaller enthalpy of the order of ∼0.2 kJ/mol with no latent
heat and hence needs more activation energy (>2 times) than
either of the first-order transitions which contain latent heat and
have bigger enthalpies. The strong first-order transition-melting
or crystallization has maximum enthalpy (∼26 kJ/mol) with
maximum latent heat and hence needs a lower activation energy
(e2 times) than the weaker first-order transition N-I. The
comparative analysis of DSC and MC shows that the enthalpies
found for either first- or second-order transitions SmA-N or N-I
are independent of techniques used as well as independent of
heating ramp rate too. Hence, the MC technique is a practicable
tool for observing dynamics of the transition in terms of phase
shift and complex heat capacity whereas DSC is a good tool
for studying the rate kinematic details of the transitions of the
system where enthalpies are independent of heating ramp rates
and techniques used.
Acknowledgment. This work was supported by the NSFCAREER award DMR-0092786.
References and Notes
(1) Lechner, B.; Marlowe, F.; Nester, E.; Tults, J. Proc. IEEE 1971,
59, 1566.
Sharma et al.
(2) Jacobson, A.; Beard, T.; Bleha, W.; Margerum, J.; Wong S. Pattern
Recognit. 1973, 5, 13.
(3) Shima, T.; Okumura, M.; Higuchi, T. Electron. Commun. Jpn., Part
2 (Electronics) 1996, 79, 73.
(4) Cheng, H.; Gao, H. J. Appl. Phys. 2000, 87, 7476.
(5) Takegoshi, M.; Adachi, K.; Kato, K.; Chen, N. J. Jpn. Soc. Precis.
Eng. 2000, 66, 1875.
(6) Brill, J.; Lueder, E.; Randler, M.; Voegele, S.; Frey, V. J. Soc.
Information Display 2002, 10, 189.
(7) Kawamoto, H. Proc. IEEE 2002, 90, 460.
(8) Yu, C. C.; Carruzzo H. M. Phys. ReV. E 2004, 69 051201.
(9) Cardini, G.; Schettino, V.; Klein, M. J. Chem. Phys. 1989, 90, 4441.
(10) Shin, Y.; Budil, D.; Freed, J. Biophys. J. 1993, 65, 1283.
(11) McQueen, D.; Edgrent, K. A.; Rydmant, S. A. J. Phys. D: Appl.
Phys. 1974, 7, 935.
(12) Mita, S.; Kondo, S. Mol. Cryst. Liq. Cryst. 1986, 140, 153.
(13) Timan, B.; Sitnikov, A.; Gitsenko, N.; Tishchenko, V. SoV. Phys.Technical Phys. 1986, 31, 231.
(14) Scudieri, F.; Marinelli, M.; Zammit, U.; Martellucci, S. J. Phys.
D: Appl. Phys. 1987, 20, 1045.
(15) Leheny, R. L.; Park, S.; Birgeneau, R. J.; Gallani, J. L.; Garland,
C. W.; Iannacchione, G. S. Phys. ReV. E 2003, 67, 011708.
(16) Thoen, J.; Marynissen, H.; Dael, W. V. Phys. ReV. A 1982, 26,
2886.
(17) Iannacchione, G. S.; Garland, C. W.; Mang, J. T.; Rieker, T. P.
Phys. ReV. E 1998, 58, 5966.
(18) Jin, T.; Finotello, D. Phys. ReV. Lett. 2001, 86, 818.
(19) Nozaki, R.; Bose, T. K.; Yagihara, S. Phys. ReV. A 1992, 46, 7733.
(20) Sied, M.; Salud, J.; Lopez, D.; Barrio, M.; Tamarit, J. L.
PhysChemChemPhys 2002, 4, 2587.
(21) Daoudi, A.; Roussel, F.; Buisine, J.; Coqueret, X.; Maschke, U. J.
Polym. Sci., Part B: Polym. Phys. 1999, 37, 1841.
(22) Kosslick, H.; Carius, H.; Frunza, S.; Frunza, L.; Landmesser, H.;
Richter, M.; Schreier, S.; Steinike, U.; Fricke, R. Microporous Mesoporous
Mater. 1998, 21, 467.
(23) Iannacchione, G. S.; Qian, S.; Finotello, D.; Aliev, F. M. Phys.
ReV. E 1997, 56, 554.
(24) Roussel F. J. Therm. Anal. 1996, 47, 715.
(25) Findlay, R.; Windle, A. Mol. Cryst. Liq. Cryst. 1994, 241, 255.
(26) Puetolas, J.; Castro, M.; Fuente, M.; Jubindo, M.; Dreyfus, H.;
Gullivan D.; Gonzales Y. Mol. Cryst. Liq. Cryst. 1996, 287, 69.
(27) Sharma, D.; Shukla, R.; Singh, A.; Nagpal, A.; Kumar, A. AdV.
Mater. Opt. Electron. 2000, 10, 251.
(28) Ernst, C. R.; Schneider, G. M.; Rflinger, A. W.; Weiflog, W. Ber.
Bunsen-Ges. Phys. Chem. 1998, 102, 1870.
(29) Donth, E.; Korus, J.; Hempel, E.; Beiner M. Thermochim. Acta
1997, 304-305, 239.
(30) Schawe, J. E. K. J. Therm. Anal. 1996, 47, 475.
(31) Sharma, D.; Shukla, R.; Kumar, A. Thin Solid Films 1999, 357,
214.
(32) Sharma, D.; Dwivedi, S. K.; Shukla, R. K.; Kumar, A. Mater.
Manuf. Processes 2003, 18, 93.
(33) Gmelin, E. Thermochim. Acta 1997, 304-305, 1.
(34) Kraftmaker, Y. Phys. Rep. 2002, 356, 1.
(35) Sharma, D.; Iannacchione, G. S. Phys. ReV. E. Submitted Apr 2006.
(36) Barjami, S.; Roshi, A.; Sharma, D.; Iannacchione, G. S. ReV. Sci.
Instrum. Submitted June 2006.
(37) Sharma, D.; Mandal, A.; Arguello, J.; Iannacchione G. S. Biophys.
J. Ready to submit.
(38) Yao, H.; Garland, C. W. ReV. Sci. Instrum. 1998, 69, 172.
(39) Vogel, H. Phys. Z. 1921, 22, 645.
(40) Fulcher, G. S. J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 1926, 6, 339.
(41) Maximean, D.; Rosu, C.; Yamamoto, T.; Yokoyama, H. Mol. Cryst.
Liq. Cryst. 2004, 417, 215.
(42) Blum, F.; Padmanabhan, A.; Mohebbi, R. Langmuir 1985, 1,
127.