Download Dia 1 - Epomm

Survey
yes no Was this document useful for you?
   Thank you for your participation!

* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project

Document related concepts
no text concepts found
Transcript
The future of rush hour
avoidance measures
Lessons learned from 4 large
projects in the Netherlands
Jorrit Nijhuis (Ministry of Infrastructure
& Environment)
Matthijs Dicke-Ogenia (Goudappel
Coffeng)
Utrecht, ECOMM
22nd May 2015
Rush hour avoidance measures - characteristics
• Encourage drivers to reduce trips in rush hour
• Monetary reward
• Reduced number of trips = trips in reference period
– trips in rewarding period
• GPS or camera as a registration technology
Rijkswaterstaat
Rush hour projects in the Netherlands
• The four largest projects
– Brabant
– Utrecht
– Arnhem-Nijmegen
– Rotterdam
Rijkswaterstaat
A sustainable behaviour change!
Rijkswaterstaat
Be careful with apps
Rijkswaterstaat
Costs of rush hour avoidance measure
• Positive social benefit/costs ratio
however …….
• Significant costs for:
– Monetary reward – €2.000.000 per year
– Registration technology (should a participant be rewarded)
Rijkswaterstaat
Service providers:
reduction in costs
technology
Government:
reduction in costs
reward
Rijkswaterstaat
• Service providers and government aim at cost effective technology
Participants
Costs
Effect
+++
++
++
On board unit (GPS) +
+++
+++
Mobile devices
(GPS)
+
Camera registration
++
Rijkswaterstaat
Alternatives to a monetary reward
•
•
•
•
Lottery
Travel information
Webshop
Use of psychology
Rijkswaterstaat
Use of psychology
• Major rewarding scheme
(money, lottery, webshop, games, travel information)
•
•
•
•
More participants ……
…… that show more of the desired behaviour
…… for a longer period of time
…… resulting in a permanent behaviour change
Rijkswaterstaat
Classical rush hour avoidance elements
• Scale: corridor, region (city), national
• Financial model: B2G, B2C, B2B
• Effect: short (months), medium (years), long term (structural)
• Selection and registration method: camera's, apps, on board unit
(OBU)
• Rewards: financial (money, webshops, lottery), social (feedback
mechanisms, communities), moral (avoidance plans)
Rijkswaterstaat
Criticism on rush hour avoidance projects
• User:
– Privacy (camera surveillance)
– Injustice (non participants)
• Government
– Investment costs
– Financial model (B2G)
– Complex & long time to market
– Limited competition service providers
– Structural effects
• Business
– Difficult B2B/B2C business case
Rijkswaterstaat
IMMA: Integrated Mobility Management Architecture
• Developed within Program Optimizing Use
• IMMA as a new approach:
– Smart use of ITS: mobiles & apps
– Integration of rush hour avoidance with other MM
measures
• How it works:
– Serviceproviders (apps) need to qualify for IMMA
– Apps have (historical) GPS trackings
– Travellers receive an “in app pop up” request for
particition in rewarding scheme
– If accepted the app is used for tracking, rewarding
& user communication
Rijkswaterstaat
IMMA Goals
1. Cost reduction
•
•
•
Less complicated procurement
More market competition
Less structural use of camera’s
2. Shorter time to market
3. Reduction of privacy risks
•
Less structural use of camera’s
4. Realising structural effects
Source: project plan IMMA, 2015
Rijkswaterstaat
IMMA Current proces
• June 2015: product design specifications
Objective baseline
• End 2015: qualification proces serviceproviders
Recruitment
Tracking
• First pilots in 2016 with use of IMMA
Rewarding
• 2016-2017:
Projects
User
Communication
Enforcement
2017
Rijkswaterstaat
New business models for serviceproviders
• B2G:
– Rush hour avoidance projects
 Road construction works
 Programme Optimising Use
– Other MM projects (cycling, public transport use, etc.)
– Research (surveys, GPS data)
• B2B:
– Employers (MM in companies)
– Loyalty programmes (marketing)
– Data (user, travel & traffic info)
Rijkswaterstaat
Questions & remarks?
Rijkswaterstaat