Download Measuring CO2 Emissions

Survey
yes no Was this document useful for you?
   Thank you for your participation!

* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project

Document related concepts

Bernoulli's principle wikipedia , lookup

Reynolds number wikipedia , lookup

Turbulence wikipedia , lookup

Aerodynamics wikipedia , lookup

Compressible flow wikipedia , lookup

Water metering wikipedia , lookup

Rheology wikipedia , lookup

Flow measurement wikipedia , lookup

Fluid dynamics wikipedia , lookup

Computational fluid dynamics wikipedia , lookup

Flow conditioning wikipedia , lookup

Transcript
Measuring CO2 Emissions
Case Study
M easurement Errors in Upstream Oil and Gas Flare Systems
..
NEL was commissioned to model the accuracy of a
ultrasonic flow meter system installed in an offshore
flare stack using Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD).
NEL’s review highlighted metering errors in the
region of 50%. The use of CFD allowed these errors to
be corrected, saving the client significant amounts of
money.
ISSUE
SOLUTIONS
Flares are necessary to quickly dispose of hydrocarbon
gas in emergencies. Flaring gas releases harmful
Carbon Dioxide (CO2) emissions. These emissions are
strictly regulated under the EU Emissions Trading
Scheme (ETS), which places stringent limits on the
amount of CO2 emissions operators can release year on
year. Producers are required to measure the amount of
CO2 released by flares within certain accuracies, and
ensure the amount released stays within their
emissions quotas. Ultrasonic flow meters (USM) are
commonly installed in flare systems to measure the
amount of gas flared. This can then be used to calculate
the release of CO2 emissions. However, flare gas
measurement offshore can be extremely challenging.
This is mainly due to space and load constraints on
platforms that can lead to non-ideal meter installations
and unstable flows.
Modelling the flare and meter installation enabled a
true evaluation of measurement uncertainty in the
field. It was found that the configuration of piping at
the installation produced flow distortions and gas swirl
in the vicinity of the USM transducer path. This was
causing USM errors in the region of 50%.
APPROACH
NEL flow experts modelled the client’s flare stack and
meter installation using Computational Fluid Dynamics
(CFD). This allowed an analysis of the true metering
error under a range of operating conditions. These
included the low-level controlled flaring used to
maintain the flare pilot light, general plant leakage, and
high-level unplanned emergency flaring.
NEL, East Kilbride, GLASGOW G75 0QF
Tel: +44(0) 1355 593700 Email: [email protected] www.tuvnel.com
The use of CFD allowed correction factors to be
established to correct for the installation errors
present. Other options put forward to the client
included the use of CFD to determine the optimum
position for meter relocation and the use of CFD to
model the use of flow conditioners to correct the flow
and remove disturbances.
BENEFITS
Correcting for the meter errors brought measurements
within the EU ETS uncertainty limits. Breaching these
limits could have led to fines of several million pounds
per field. False over-reading of the meter could have
led to costly management decisions, such as shutting
down production to comply with EU ETS emission
allocations and purchasing unnecessary CO2
allowances.
© TUV SUD Ltd 2017 All rights reserved
NEL is a trading name of TUV SUD Ltd